Value-based conflicts experienced by junior design professionals in collaborative practice

References

• Ahmed, S., K. Wallace, and L. Blessing. 2003. “Understanding the Differences between How Novice and Experienced Designers Approach Design Tasks.” Research in Engineering Design 14 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1007/s00163-002-0023-z.
   Google Scholar
• Badke-Schaub, P., and E. Frankenberger. 1999. “Analysis of Design Projects.” Design Studies 20 (5): 465–480. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00017-4.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. J. 2016. “The Negotiation of Meaning in Epistemic Situations.” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 26 (1): 133–149. doi:10.1007/s40593-015-0050-3.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, L. J., T. C. Ormerod, and N. J. Morley. 2004. “Spontaneous Analogising in Engineering Design: A Comparative Analysis of Experts and Novices.” Design Studies 25 (5): 495–508. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.004.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, M., R. Gill, and S. Taylor. 2013. “Introduction: Cultural Work, Time and Trajectory.” In Theorizing Cultural Work: Labour, Continuity and Change in the Cultural and Creative Industries, edited by M. Banks, R. Gill, and S. Taylor, 1–16. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barki, H., and J. Hartwick. 2004. “Conceptualizing the Construct of Interpersonal Conflict.” International Journal of Conflict Management 15 (3): 216–244. doi:10.1108/eb022913.
   Google Scholar
• Bertaux, D., and M. Kohli. 1984. “The Life Story Approach: A Continental View.” Annual Review of Sociology 10 (1): 215–237. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.10.080184.001243.
   Google Scholar
• Bleek, W. 1987. “Lying Informants: A Fieldwork Experience from Ghana.” Population and Development Review 13 (2): 314. doi:10.2307/1973196.
   Google Scholar
• Bonsiepe, G. 1999. Interface: An Approach to Design.”. Maastricht: Jan van Eyck Akademie.
   Google Scholar
• Boradkar, P. 2010. Designing Things: A Critical Introduction to the Culture of Objects. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, C. L. 1984. “Learning How to Ask: Native Metacommunicative Competence and the Incompetence of Fieldworkers.” Language in Society 13 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1017/S0047404500015876.
   Google Scholar
• Brouillette, S. 2013. “Cultural Work and Antisocial Psychology.” In Theorizing Cultural Work: Labour, Continuity and Change in the Cultural and Creative Industries, edited by M. Banks, R. Gill, and S. Taylor, 30–43. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Casakin, H., and G. Goldschmidt. 1999. “Expertise and the Use of Visual Analogy: Implications for Design Education.” Design Studies 20 (2): 153–175. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00032-5.
   Google Scholar
• Chiaradia, A. J., L. Sieh, and F. Plimmer. 2017. “Values in Urban Design: A Design Studio Teaching Approach.” Design Studies 49: 66–100. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C., and J. Pearce. 2012. Doing Research in Design. London: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• den Ouden, E. 2012. Innovation Design: Creating Value for People, Organizations and Society. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Détienne, F., M. Baker, and J.-M. Burkhardt. 2012. “Quality of Collaboration in Design Meetings: Methodological Reflexions.” CoDesign 8 (4): 247–261. doi:10.1080/15710882.2012.729063.
   Google Scholar
• Feast, L. 2012. “Professional Perspectives on Collaborative Design Work.” CoDesign 8 (4): 215–230. doi:10.1080/15710882.2012.734828.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., P. Kahn, and A. Borning. 2006. “Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems.” Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations 5: 348–372.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and J. Holton. 2004. “Remodelling Grounded Theory.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 5 (2). doi:10.17169/fqs-5.2.607.
   Google Scholar
• Halloran, J., E. Hornecker, M. Stringer, E. Harris, and G. Fitzpatrick. 2009. “The Value of Values: Resourcing Co-design of Ubiquitous Computing.” CoDesign 5 (4): 245–273. doi:10.1080/15710880902920960.
   Google Scholar
• JafariNaimi, N., L. Nathan, and I. Hargraves. 2015. “Values as Hypotheses: Design, Inquiry, and the Service of Values.” Design Issues 31 (4): 91–104. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00354.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., C. J. Thoresen, J. E. Bono, and G. K. Patton. 2001. “The Job Satisfaction– Job Performance Relationship: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review.” Psychological Bulletin 127 (3): 376. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376.
   Google Scholar
• Julier, G. 2017. Economies of Design. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kasser, T., and A. Ahuvia. 2002. “Materialistic Values and Well-Being in Business Students.” European Journal of Social Psychology 32 (1): 137–146. doi:10.1002/ejsp.85.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B., and K. Dorst. 2009. Design Expertise. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Le Bail, C., M. Baker, and F. Détienne. July 2 2020. “Values and Argumentation in Collaborative Design.” CoDesign: 1–21. doi:10.1080/15710882.2020.1782437
   Google Scholar
• Le Dantec, C. A., and E. Y.-L. Do. 2009. “The Mechanisms of Value Transfer in Design Meetings.” Design Studies 30 (2): 119–137. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.12.002.
   Google Scholar
• Lekes, N., N. H. Hope, L. Gouveia, R. Koestner, and F. L. Philippe. 2012. “Influencing Value Priorities and Increasing Well-Being: The Effects of Reflecting on Intrinsic Values.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 7 (3): 249–261. doi:10.1080/17439760.2012.677468.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, P. 2009. “Ethical Imagination and Design.” Design Studies 30 (2): 154–168. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.12.004.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, P., and A. Oak. 2018. “Cracking Open Co-creation: Categories, Stories, and Value Tension in a Collaborative Design Process.” Design Studies 57: 93–111. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2018.02.003.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn Fitzpatrick, R. 2007. “A Literature Review Exploring Values Alignment as A Proactive Approach to Conflict Management.” International Journal of Conflict Management 18 (3): 280–305. doi:10.1108/10444060710826007.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, A. M., and M. Kleinsmann. 2013. “Studying and Supporting Design Communication.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 27 (2): 87–90. doi:10.1017/S0890060413000139.
   Google Scholar
• Manders-Huits, N. 2011. “What Values in Design? The Challenge of Incorporating Moral Values into Design.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2): 271–287. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9198-2.
   Google Scholar
• McCuen, R. H., and K. L. Gilroy. 2011. Ethics and Professionalism in Engineering. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Monnot, M. J., and T. A. Beehr. 2014. “Subjective Well-being at Work: Disentangling Source Effects of Stress and Support on Enthusiasm, Contentment, and Meaningfulness.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 85 (2): 204–218. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2014.07.005.
   Google Scholar
• Muratovski, G. 2016. Research for Designers: A Guide to Methods and Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Oak, A. 2012. “‘You Can Argue It Two Ways’: The Collaborative Management of a Design Dilemma.” Design Studies 33 (6): 630–648. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.006.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, D. H. 2008. A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. 2009. The Coding Manual for Quality Researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., and P. J. Stappers. 2012. Convivial Toolbox: Generative Research for the Front End of Design. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. 2012. “An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values”. Readings in Psychology and Culture 2(1). Online. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., and F. Sortheix. 2018. “Values and Subjective Well-Being.” Handbook of Well-Being. edited by E. Diener, S. Oishi, and L. Tay, 1–25. Salt Lake City, UT: Noba Scholar. http://www.nobascholar.com/chapters/51
   Google Scholar
• van de Poel, I. 2009. “Values in Engineering Design.” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Meijers edited by, Vol. 9, 973–1006. Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• van den Hoven, J., P. Vermaas, and I. van de Poel. 2015. “Design for Values: An Introduction.” In Handbook of Ethics, Values and Technological Design, edited by J. van den Hoven, P. Vermaas, and I. van de Poel, 1–7. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6970-0.
   Google Scholar
• van der Velden, M., and C. Mörtberg. 2015. “Participatory Design and Design for Values.” In Handbook of Ethics, Values and Technological Design, edited by J. van den Hoven, P. Vermaas, and I. van de Poel, 41–66. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6970-0.
   Google Scholar
• van Onselen, L., and R. Valkenburg. 2015. “Personal Values as a Catalyst for Meaningful Innovations: Supporting Young Designers in Collaborative Practice.” In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED15), edited by C. Weber, S. Husung, G. Cascini, M. Cantamessa, D. Marjanovic, and M. Bordegoni, 547–556. Glasgow: Design Society.
   Google Scholar