Dissonance and diplomacy: coordination of conflicting values in urban co-design

References

• Agid, S., and E. Chin. 2019. “Making and Negotiating Value: Design and Collaboration with Community Led Groups.” CoDesign 15 (1): 75–89. doi:10.1080/15710882.2018.1563191.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M., M. Callon, and B. Latour. 2002. “The Key to Success in Innovation, Part I: ‘The Art of Interessement’ and Part II: ‘The Art of Choosing Good Spokespersons’.” International Journal of Innovation Management 6 (2): 187–206. doi:10.1142/S1363919602000550.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, L. B., P. Danholt, K. Halskov, N. Brodersen Hansen, and P. Lauritsen. 2015. “Participation as a Matter of Concern in Participatory Design.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 250–261. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081246.
   Google Scholar
• Aspers, P. 2004. “Empirical Phenomenology: An Approach for Qualitative Research.” Papers in Social Research Methods, Methodology Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. A. 2015. Planning Matter. Acting with Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, T., and E. Brandt. 2008. “The Design: Labas Platform in Participatory Design Research.” CoDesign 4 (2): 115–129. doi:10.1080/15710880802117113.
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P.-A. Hillgren. 2012. “Agonistic Participatory Design: Working with Marginalised Social Movements.” CoDesign 8 (2–3): 127–144. doi:10.1080/15710882.2012.672577.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., and J. Law. 1982. “On Interests and Their Transformation: Enrolment and Counter-Enrolment.” Social Studies of Science 12 (4): 615–625.
   Google Scholar
• Di Salvo, C. 2012. Adversarial Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farías, I. 2015. “Epistemic Dissonance: Reconfiguring Valuation in Architectural Practice.” In Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance, edited by A. A. Berthoin, M. Hutter, and D. Stark, 271–289. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernström, N. 2015. “Effekter Av Innovationslabbet: En Entreprenöriellt Orienterad Idégenereringsprocess För Stadsutveckling.” Mistra Urban Futures Report. 2015: 11.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2002. “Bringing Power to Planning Research: One Researcher’s Praxis Story.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 21 (4): 353–366. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202100401.
   Google Scholar
• FOG Innovation. 2021. “Innovativt angreppssätt tidigt i processen vänder utmaning till möjlighet.” Accessed 21 June 2021. http://foginnovation.se/levande-bottenvaningar-i-masthuggskajen/
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., and D. G. Henry. 2019. Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Girard, M., and D. Stark. 2002. “Distributing Intelligence and Organizing Diversity in New-Media Projects.” Environment and Planning A 34 (11): 1927–1949. doi:10.1068/a34197.
   Google Scholar
• Halloran, J., E. Hornecker, M. Stringer, E. Harris, and G. Fitzpatrick. 2009. “The Value of Values: Resourcing Co-design of Ubiquitous Computing.” CoDesign 5 (4): 245–273. doi:10.1080/15710880902920960.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, E., T. Heffernan, and W. Pan. 2014. “The Relationship between the Quality of Active Frontages and Public Perceptions of Public Spaces.” Urban Design International 19 (1): 92–102. doi:10.1057/udi.2013.16.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, M., and I. Farías. 2017. “Sourcing Newness: Ways of Inducing Indeterminacy.” Journal of Cultural Economy 10 (5): 434–449. doi:10.1080/17530350.2017.1326969.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, C. C. 2016. “Active Centers - Interactive Edges: The Rise and Fall of Ground Floor Frontages.” Urban Design International 21 (1): 55–77. doi:10.1057/udi.2015.27.
   Google Scholar
• Kiem, M. 2013. “If Political Design Changed Anything They’d Make It Illegal: Review Essay on Carl DiSalvo’s Adversarial Design.” Design Philosophy Papers 11 (1): 31–38. doi:10.2752/089279313X13968799816038.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L., and G. Julier. 2019. “Confronting Bureaucracies and Assessing Value in the Co-production of Social Design Research.” CoDesign 15 (1): 8–23. doi:10.1080/15710882.2018.1563190.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1988. “The Prince for Machines as Well as Machinations.” In Technology and Social Change, edited by B. Elliott, 20–43. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1999. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Bail, C., M. Baker, and F. Détienne. 2020. “Values and Argumentation in Collaborative Design.” CoDesign 1–21. doi:10.1080/15710882.2020.1782437.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2005. No Issue, No Public. Doctoral dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N., and D. Stark. 2020. “Put to the Test: For a New Sociology of Testing.” The British Journal of Sociology 71 (3): 423–443. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12746.
   Google Scholar
• Molnar, S. Forthcoming. “The Framing of Urban Values and Qualities in Interorganizational Settings: The Case of Ground Floor Planning in Gothenburg, Sweden.” ( Under review).
   Google Scholar
• Mose Biskjaer, M., A. Kamari, S. Rask Jensen, and P. H. Kirkegaard. 2019. “Exploring Blind Spots in Collaborative Value Creation in Building Design: A Creativity Perspective.” CoDesign. doi:10.1080/15710882.2019.1654521.
   Google Scholar
• Palmås, K., and O. von Busch. 2015. “Quasi-Quisling: Co-design and the Assembly of Collaborateurs.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 236–249. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081247.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, J. 2016. “War and Peace in Codesign.” CoDesign 12 (3): 171–184. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1112813.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, J. 1975. The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, L. 2018. “Nonhumans in Participatory Design.” CoDesign 14 (3): 238–257. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1316409.
   Google Scholar
• Rørbæk Olesen, A., N. Holdgaard, and D. Laursen. 2020. “Challenges of Practicing Digital Imaginaries in Collaborative Museum Design.” CoDesign 16 (3): 189–201. doi:10.1080/15710882.2018.1539109.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1984. “Problems, Frames and Perspectives on Designing.” Design Studies 5 (3): 132–136.
   Google Scholar
• Sejer Iversen, O., K. Halskov, and T. W. Leong. 2012. “Values-led Participatory Design.” CoDesign 8 (2–3): 87–103. doi:10.1080/15710882.2012.672575.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, D. 2009. The Sense of Dissonance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storni, C., T. Binder, P. Linde, and D. Stuedahl. 2015. “Designing Things Together: Intersections of Co-design and Actor–network Theory.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 149–151. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081442.
   Google Scholar
• Stuedahl, D., and O. Smørdal. 2015. “Matters of Becoming, Experimental Zones for Making Museums Public with Social Media.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 193–207. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081245.
   Google Scholar
• Sweden Green Building Council. 2019. “Citylab Guide.” Accessed 21 June 2021. https://www.sgbc.se/certifiering/citylab/det-har-ar-citylab/citylab-guide/
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2005. “Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 1991–2006. doi:10.1080/00420980500279869.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. 2014. “Voicing Concern and Difference: From Public Spaces to Common-places.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 1 (1): 7–34. doi:10.1080/23254823.2014.905749.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkiss, F. 2013. Cities by Design – The Social Life of Urban Form. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vatin, F. 2013. “Valuation as Evaluating and Valorizing.” Valuation Studies 1 (1): 31–50. doi:10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131131.
   Google Scholar
• von Busch, O., and K. Palmås. 2016a. “Social Means Do Not Justify Corruptible Ends: A Realist Perspective of Social Innovation and Design.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 2 (4): 275–278.
   Google Scholar
• von Busch, O., and K. Palmås. 2016b. “Designing Consent: Can Design Thinking Manufacture Democratic Capitalism?” Organizational Aesthetics 5 (2): 10–24.
   Google Scholar
• Whitham, R., S. Moreton, S. Bowen, C. Speed, and A. Durrant. 2019. “Understanding, Capturing, and Assessing Value in Collaborative Design Research.” CoDesign 15 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1080/15710882.2018.1563194.
   Google Scholar