Towards a radically inclusive design – indigenous story-telling as codesign methodology

References

• Archibald, J.-A. 2008. Indigenous storywork: educating the heart, mind, body, and spirit. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archibald, J.-A., et al. 2019. Decolonizing Research : Indigenous Storywork as Methodology. London: ZED Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, R. 1999. “Collaborative Storytelling : Meeting Indigenous People’s Desires for Self-determination“. In World Indigenous People’s conference. Albuquerque, New Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Blaser, M. 2014. “Ontology and Indigeneity: On the Political Ontology of Heterogeneous Assemblages.” Cultural Geographies 21 (1): 49–58. doi:10.1177/1474474012462534.
   Google Scholar
• Durie, M. 2011. “Indigenous Mental Health 2035: Future Takers, Future Makers and Transformational Potential.” Australasian Psychiatry 19 (1_suppl): S8–S11. London, England: SAGE Publications. doi:10.3109/10398562.2011.583058.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2015. “Transiciones : A Space for Research and Design for Transitions to the Pluriverse.” Design Philosophy Papers 13 (1): 13–23. doi:10.1080/14487136.2015.1085690.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, T. 2017. Remaking Cities : An Introduction to Urban Metrofitting, Re-making Cities. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Graveline, F. J. 2000. “Circle as Methodology: Enacting an Aboriginal Paradigm.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 13 (4): 361–370. doi:10.1080/095183900413304.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (Fall 88): 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. 1912. Essays in Radical Empiricism. New York: Longmans, Green.
   Google Scholar
• Janzer, C. L., and L. S. Weinstein. 2014. “Social Design and Neocolonialism.” Design and Culture 6 (3): 327–343. doi:10.2752/175613114X14105155617429.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach, M. 2010. “Conversational Method in Indigenous Research.” First Peoples Child & Family Review 5 (1): 40–48. doi:10.7202/1069060ar.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs : An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maturana, H. R., and F. J. Varela. 1987. The Tree of Knowledge : The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. 1st ed. Boston: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M., F. Cram, and B. Chilisa. 2013. Indigenous Pathways into Social Research : Voices of a New Generation. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mwewa, L., and N. Bidwell. 2015. “African Narratives in Technology Research & Design.” In At the Intersection of Indigenous and Traditional Knowledge and Technology Design, edited by N. Bidwell and H. Winschiers-Theophilus. Santa Rosa: Informing Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, B. 2010. “Is Humanitarian Design the New Imperialism? Does Our Desire to Help Do More Harm than Good?” Fast Company (online blog). http://www.fastcodesign.com/1661859/is-humanitarian-design-the-new-imperialism
   Google Scholar
• Paris, D., and H. S. Alim, Eds. 2017. Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies: Teaching and Learning for Justice in a Changing World. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pihkala, S., and H. Karasti, 2016. “Reflexive Engagement: Enacting Reflexivity in Design and for ‘Participation in Plural’.” In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference, Vol. 1, 21–30. Aarhus, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Rodil, K., and H. Winschiers-Theophilus. 2015. “Indigenous Storytelling in Namibia: Sketching Concepts for Digitization.” In 2015 International Conference on Culture and Computing (Culture Computing), 80–86. Kyoto, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., and P. J. Stappers. 2014. “From Designing to Co-designing to Collective Dreaming: Three Slices in Time.” Interactions 21 (6): 24–33. doi:10.1145/2670616.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, T., D. Abdulla, A. Ansari, E. Canlı, M. Keshavarz, M. Kiem, L. P. D. O. Martins, et al. 2018. “What Is at Stake with Decolonizing Design? A Roundtable.” Design and Culture 10 (1): 81–101. DOI:10.1080/17547075.2018.1434368.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, N. W. 2011. “Indigenous Knowledge and Respectful Design: An Evidence-Based Approach.” Design Issues 27 (4): 68–80. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00106.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies : Research and Indigenous Peoples, Research and Indigenous Methodologies. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, S. L. 2009. “One Indigenous Academic’s Evolution : A Personal Narrative of Native Health Research and Competing Ways of Knowing.” First Peoples Child & Family Review 4 (1): 57–65. doi:10.7202/1069350ar.
   Google Scholar
• Tlostanova, M. 2017. ““On Decolonizing Design”.” Design Philosophy Papers 15 (1): .51–61. doi:10.1080/14487136.2017.1301017.
   Google Scholar
• Verran, H. 2002. “A Postcolonial Moment in Science Studies.” Social Studies of Science 32 (5–6): 729–762. doi:10.1177/030631270203200506.
   Google Scholar
• Winschiers, H. January 2006, . “The Challenges of Participatory Design in a Intercultural Context: Designing for Usability in Namibia.” In Proceedings PDC, 73–76. Trento, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Winschiers-Theophilus, H., C. Stanley, and T. Zaman. 2019. “A Classification of Cultural Engagements in Community Technology Design: Introducing A Transcultural Approach”. AI and Society 34 (3): 419–435. doi:10.1007/s00146-017-0739-y.
   Google Scholar