Policy Puzzle Game: making policy ideas feasible and acceptable in policy co-design

References

• Abelson, J., P.-G. Forest, J. Eyles, P. Smith, E. Martin, and F.-P. Gauvin. 2002. “Obtaining Public Input for Health-systems Decision- Making: Past Experiences and Future Prospects.” Canadian Public Administration 45 (1): 70–97. doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.2002.tb01074.x.
   Google Scholar
• Abelson, J., P.-G. Forest, J. Eyles, P. Smith, E. Martin, and F.-P. Gauvin. 2003. “Deliberations about Deliberative Methods: Issues in the Design and Evaluation of Public Participation Processes.” Social Science & Medicine 57 (2): 239–251. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00343-X.
   Google Scholar
• Ampatzidou, C., and K. Gugerell. 2018. “Participatory Game Prototyping–balancing Domain Content and Playability in a Serious Game Design for the Energy Transi-tion.” CoDesign 15 (4): 345–360. doi:10.1080/15710882.2018.1504084.
   Google Scholar
• Ampatzidou, C., K. Gugerell, T. Constantinescu, O. Devisch, M. T. Jauschneg, and M. Berger. 2018. “All Work and No Play? Facilitating Serious Games and Gamified Applications in Participatory Urban Planning and Governance.” Urban Planning 3 (1): 34–46. doi:10.17645/up.v3i1.1261.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 2013. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baibarac, C., and D. Petrescu. 2017. “Co-design and Urban Resilience: Visioning Tools for Commoning Resilience Practices.” CoDesign 15 (2): 91–109. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1399145.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, K., K. Jalbert, and L. Test. 2021. “Making the Board: Participatory Game Design for Environmental Action.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 11 (1): 12–22. doi:10.1007/s13412-020-00645-2.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, C. 2016. Design for Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bostwick, M. 1999. “Twelve Angry Citizens: Can Citizens’ Juries Improve Local Democ-racy in New Zealand?” Political Science 50 (2): 236–246. doi:10.1177/003231879905000208.
   Google Scholar
• Carpini, M. X., F. Delli, L. Cook, and L. R. Jacobs. 2004. “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 315–344. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630.
   Google Scholar
• Chindarkar, N., M. Howlett, and M. Ramesh. 2017. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Conceptualizing Effective Social Policy Design: Design Spaces and Capacity Challenges.” Public Administration and Development 37 (1): 3–14. doi:10.1002/pad.1789.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, B. 2018. “From Making Things Public to the Design of Creative Democracy: Dewey’s Democratic Vision and Participatory Design.” CoDesign 16 (2): 97–110. doi:10.1080/15710882.2018.1555260.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C., and L. Richardson. 2015. Designing Public Policy for Co-production: Theory, Practice and Change. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, J. 1998. “Deliberation as Discussion.” In Deliberative Democracy. Vol. 1, edited by Elster, Jon, 44–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. Vol. 217. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. 2011. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S., and R. C. Luskin. 2005. “Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion.” Acta politica 40 (3): 284–298. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. 2000. “Is Face-to-face Citizen Deliberation a Luxury or a Necessity?” Political Communication 17 (4): 357–361. doi:10.1080/10584600050178960.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, K. A., and S. D. Phillips. 1998. “Making Public Participation More Effective: Issues for Local Government.” In Citizen Engagement: Lessons in Participation from Local Government, edited by Graham, K. A., and S. D. Phillips, 1–24. Ontario; Toronto: The Institute of Public Administration of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., and D. F. Thompson. 1998. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2015. The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and Systems, a Critique of Functionalist Reason. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, K., E. Miller, and M. Foth. 2014. “Integrating ICT into the Planning Process: Impacts, Opportunities and Challenges.” Australian Planner 51 (1): 24–33. doi:10.1080/07293682.2013.770771.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. 2014. “From the ‘Old’ to the ‘New’ Policy Design: Design Thinking beyond Markets and Collaborative Governance.” Policy Sciences 47 (3): 187–207. doi:10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C., Y. Kwon, and K.-Y. Nam. 2017. “User-Involved Design for Direct Citizen Participation in Policymaking: Adaptive Values, Adaptive Conditions and Common Ground.” In Proceeding of the Design Management Academy Conference (DMA’17), Hong Kong, 613–630. DMA.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C., and K.-Y. Nam. 2017. “Policymaking and the Design Workshop: A New Business Direction.” Design Management Review 28 (4): 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C., E. Woo, and K.-Y. Nam. 2019. “The Paradox of the Excluded Ma- Jority in Youth Policy Design.” Design Management Review 30 (3): 14–21. doi:10.1111/drev.12184.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C., H. Yang, S. Jang, and K.-Y. Nam. 2018. “Grumble to Policy Need: Deriving Public Policy Needs from Daily Life on Social Media Platform.” In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Hong Kong, 971–983. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., and Y. J. Cho. 2020. “The Impacts of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Innovative Work Behavior of Government Officials: Focusing on Moderating Effects of Communication and Reward for Innovation.” Korean Public Personnel Administration Review 19 (4): 303–333.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L. 2017. “Design in the Time of Policy Problems.” Annual Review of Policy Design 5 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• King, S., M. Conley, B. Latimer, and D. Ferrari. 1989. Co-design: A Process of Design Participation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiman, F. 2019. “Engaging Governments in Open Data Policies through Gaming.” In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Melbourne, 461–464.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh Star, S. 2010. “This Is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617. doi:10.1177/0162243910377624.
   Google Scholar
• Manin, B. 1987. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 15 (3): 338–368. doi:10.1177/0090591787015003005.
   Google Scholar
• Marier, P. 2017. “Policy Problems.”Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 29 Mar. 2017. Accessed 21 October 2021. https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-130
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M., D. A. Scheufele, P. Moy, E. M. Horowitz, R. Lance Holbert, W. Zhang, S. Zubric, and J. Zubric. 1999. “Understanding Deliberation: The Effects of Discussion Networks on Participation in a Public Forum.” Communication Research 26 (6): 743–774. doi:10.1177/009365099026006005.
   Google Scholar
• McNabola, A., J. Moseley, B. Reed, T. Bisgaard, A. D. Jossiasen, C. Melander, A. Whicher, J. Hytonen, and O. Schultz. 2013. Design for Public Good. London:Design Council.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., and J. Luetjens. 2016. “Design Thinking in Policymaking Processes: Opportunities and Challenges.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 75 (3): 391–402. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12211.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, M. J. 2008. “Participatory Design: The Third Space in Human-Computer Interaction.” In Human-computer Interaction: Development Process, edited by A. Sears and J. A. Jacko, 165–186, Boca Raton; Florida: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olga, D. B., J. Horton, and P. Kraftl. 2008. “Pupil Involvement in School (Re) Design: Participation in Policy and Practice.” Co-Design 4 (4): 197–210.
   Google Scholar
• Ozcelik, D. 2007. “Presenting the Outcomes of a Participatory User Workshop.” Master’s thesis. Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Pratchett, L. 1999. “New Fashions in Public Participation: Towards Greater Democracy?” Parliamentary Affairs 52 (4): 616–633. doi:10.1093/pa/52.4.616.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. 2004. “Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation.” The American Review of Public Administration 34 (4): 315–353. doi:10.1177/0275074004269288.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2000. “Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 25 (1): 3–29. doi:10.1177/016224390002500101.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N. 2002. “From User-centered to Participatory Design Approaches.” In Design and the Social Sciences: Making Connections, edited by Frascara, Jorge, 1–8. Florida: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. 1997. “Why Conversation Is Not the Soul of Democracy.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 14 (4): 297–309.
   Google Scholar
• Sleeswijk Visser, F., R. Van Der Lugt, and P. J. Stappers. 2007. “Sharing User Experiences in the Product Innovation Process: Participatory Design Needs Participatory Communication.” Creativity and Innovation Management 16 (1): 35–45. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00414.x.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. F. 2019. Writing Public Policy: A Practical Guide to Communicating in the Policy Making Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, M., J. Arendsen, A. Cremers, A. De Jong, J. De Jong, and N. De Koning. 2013. “Using Interactive Model Simulations in Co-design: An Experiment in Urban Design.” CoDesign 9 (1): 2–16. doi:10.1080/15710882.2012.755549.
   Google Scholar
• Stickdorn, M., J. Schneider, K. Andrews, and A. Lawrence. 2011. This Is Service Design Thinking: Basics, Tools, Cases. Vol. 1. NJ: Wiley Hoboken.
   Google Scholar
• Teng, D., and L. Ng 2014. “Citizen-Centric Public Policies and Services through Design.” In Proceedings of the 19th DMI: Academic Design Management conference, London, DMI.
   Google Scholar
• Tsekleves, E., A. Darby, A. Whicher, and P. Swiatek. 2017. “Using Design Fictions as a Tool for Engaging Citizens in Debating Future Pervasive Health Systems and Services.” EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology 3 (10): 152888. doi:10.4108/eai.13-7-2017.152888.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, I., M. Basile, L. Ehrenstrasser, V. Maquil, J.-J. Terrin, and M. Wagner. 2009. “Supporting Community Engagement in the City: Urban Planning in the MR-tent.” In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies, University Park, PA, USA, 185–194. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Whicher, A., P. Thurston, and P. Swiatek. 2016. “Trends in Design and Government in Europe.” Design Management Review 27 (1): 44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., and K. Callahan. 2007. “Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Participatory Values, Stakeholder Pressures, and Administrative Practicality.” Public Administration Review 67 (2): 249–264. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00711.x.
   Google Scholar
• Yankelovich, D. 1991. Coming to Public Judgment: Making Democracy Work in a Complex World. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, K., and S. Chung. 2018. Developing an Index for Measuring Government Capacity: Focused on Participation Capacity of the Public and the Government. Seoul; South Korea: Korea Institute of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. 2014. “A Study of Public Service Design Model for Citizen-centered Public Policy.” PhD diss., Ph. D. Thesis, Kookmin University, Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar