Project-based communities: lessons learned from collaborative city-making experiences

References

• Bauman, Z. 2004. Wasted Lives: Modernity and Its Outcasts. UK: Polity press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Blackwell, Cambridge, UK: Polity press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., A. Giddens, and S. Lash. 1994. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. USA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., M. Ritter, and J. Brown. 1993. “Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.” Environmental Values 2 (4): 367–368.
   Google Scholar
• Cologna, D. 2006. “Abitare a ridosso di una storica via d’accesso a Milano.” In Esperienze e paesaggi dell’abitare. Itinerari nella regione urbana milanese, edited by AIM - Associazione Interessi Metropolitani, 24–36. Milano: Abitare Segesta .
   Google Scholar
• Corriere della Sera 2020. La città rinasce al mercato. Corriere della Sera, settembre 30, Cartacea edizione.
   Google Scholar
• Dixson-Declève, S. 2020. Protect, Prepare and Transform Europe. Recovery and Resilience Post COVID-19. 1. ESIR Policy Brief. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fassi, D. 2020b. “Quartieri come incubatori di progettualità di spazi e servizi: Il caso Nolo.” In #regeneration, edited by D. Crippa, 74–81. Sant’Arcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli Editore .
   Google Scholar
• Fassi, D. 2017. “Events and the City: When Arnold Meets NoLo.” In In the Neighbourhood, edited by D. Fassi, and B. Camocini, and Design International, 122–137. Milan: Franco Angeli .
   Google Scholar
• Fassi, D. 2020a. “Le comunità di progetto.” In Vuoto 2/Controverso, edited by Orizzontale, 2. Milano: Orizzontale.
   Google Scholar
• Gerosa, M., and A. Tartari. 2020. “Il quartiere NoLo, un caso di rebranding dal basso: Tra creatività, innovazione sociale e criticità. “ In Costellazione Milano, edited by VV., AA., 253–270 Please edit the last dots and dot after editor name . Milano: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli. . .
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 2007. “The Consequences of Modernity. 1990.” In Contemporary Sociological Theory, edited by C. J. Calhoun, 2–243. UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Iaione, F. C., and G. Arena. 2015. L’età della condivisione: La collaborazione fra cittadini e amministrazione per i beni comuni. Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, I., J. Zimmerman, T. Binder, J. Redstrom, and S. Wensveen. 2011. Design Research through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S., P. Heelas, and P. Morris. 1996. Detraditionalization: Critical Reflections on Authority and Identity. UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarini, E. 2020. “La periferia nella città che cambia. Tra identità in definizione spinte a trasformarsi.” In Periferie del cambiamento. Traiettorie di rigenerazione tra marginalità e innovazione a Milano, edited by F. Cognetti, D. Gambino, and J. L. Faccini, 70–95. Macerata: Quodlibet .
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Tradotto da Rachel Coad. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Mit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2018. Politiche del Quotidiano, Progetti di Vita che Cambiano il Mondo. Roma, Fondazione Adriano Olivetti, Edizioni di Comunitá.
   Google Scholar
• Meroni, A., D. Selloni, and M. Rossi. 2018. Massive Codesign. A Proposal for A Collaborative Design Framework. Milano: FrancoAngeli International.
   Google Scholar
• Meroni, A., and E. Manzini. 2014. “Catalysing Social Resources for Sustainable Changes. Social Innovation and Community Centred Design.” In Product-Service System Design for Sustainability, edited by Vezzoli, C., Kohtala, C., and Srinivasan, A., 362–380. UK: Greenleaf Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Meroni, A. 2007. Creative Communities. People Inventing Sustainable Ways of Living. Milan: Poli.Design.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., S. Tucker, R. Ali, and B. Sanders. 2007. Social Innovation: What It Is, Why It Matters and How It Can Be Accelerated. Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship Working Paper. Basingstoke Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pacchi, C. 2020. Iniziative dal basso e trasformazioni urbane. L’attivismo civico di fronte alle dinamiche di governance locale. Milano: Mondadori Bruno.
   Google Scholar
• Pasqualini, C., and F. Introini. 2020. Per un buon vicinato: La presenza “attiva” e “ri-generativa” delle social street nei quartieri di Milano. In Costellazione Milano 75–92 , edited by VV. AA. Scenari. Fondazione Feltrinelli.
   Google Scholar
• Pasqualini, C. 2018. Vicini e connessi. Rapporto sulle Social Street a Milano. Vol. 61. Milano: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Selloni, D. 2017. CoDesign for Public-Interest Services. Research for Development. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53243-1.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. 2011. Georg Simmel on Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stappers, P. J., and E. Giaccardi. 2017. “Research through Design.” In The Encyclopedia of Human-computer Interaction, edited by Soegaard, M., and Friis-Dam, R , 1–94. Interaction Design Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Verga, P. L. 2016. “Rhetoric in the Representation of a Multi-Ethnic Neighbourhood: The Case of via Padova, Milan.” Antipode 48 (4): 1080–1101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12229.
   Google Scholar
• Volonté, P., L. Rampino, and S. Colombo. 2018. “The Specificity of Design Research: How Practice-Based Design Knowledge Can Enter the Great Archive of Science.” In Advancements in the Philosophy of Design, edited by Vermaas, P.E., and Vial, S , 319–345. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar