Publication Cover
CoDesign
International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts
Volume 19, 2023 - Issue 4
2,162
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Participatory design meets gender equality at European higher education institutions

, , &
Pages 304-326 | Received 01 Jul 2022, Accepted 12 May 2023, Published online: 08 Jun 2023

References

  • Acker, J. 2006. “Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations.” Gender & Society 20 (4): 441–464. doi:10.1177/0891243206289499.
  • Agid, S. 2016. “‘…it’s Your Project, but It’s Not Necessarily Your Work…’” Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2940299.2940317.
  • Ahmed, S. 2009. “Embodying Diversity: Problems and Paradoxes for Black Feminists.” Race, Ethnicity & Education 12 (1): 41–52. doi:10.1080/13613320802650931.
  • Balka, E., D. Peddie, S. Small, C. Ackerley, J. Trimble, and C. Hohl. 2018. “Barriers to Scaling Up Participatory Design Interventions in Health IT.” Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3210604.3210612.
  • Bell, E., S. Meriläinen, S. Taylor, and J. Tienari. 2019. “Time’s Up! Feminist Theory and Activism Meets Organization Studies.” Human Relations 72 (1): 4–22. doi:10.1177/0018726718790067.
  • Benschop, Y. 2021. “Grand Challenges, Feminist Answers.” Organization Theory 2 (3): 1–19. doi:10.1177/26317877211020323.
  • Benschop, Y., and L. Husu. 2021. “Close Encounters of the Feminist Kind with Research and Innovation.” Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics 5 (2): 1–6. doi:10.20897/femenc/11155.
  • Benschop, Y., and M. Verloo. 2015. “Feminist Organization Theories: Islands of Treasure.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy in Organization Studies, edited by R. Mir, H. Willmott, and M. Greenwood, 100–113. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203795248.
  • Bjerknes, G., and T. Bratteteig. 1995. “User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 7 (1): 73–98.
  • Björgvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P.-A. Hillgren. 2010. “Participatory Design and ‘Democratizing Innovation’.” In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference on - PDC ’10, 41–50. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1900441.1900448.
  • Bødker, S., C. Dindler, and O. Iversen. 2017. “Tying Knots: Participatory Infrastructuring at Work.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26 (1–2): 245–273. doi:10.1007/s10606-017-9268-y.
  • Bredies, K., S. Buchmüller, and G. Joost. 2008. “The Gender Perspective in Cultural Probes.” In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, 146–149. PDC ’08. USA: Indiana University.
  • Bustelo, M., L. Ferguson, and M. Forest, eds. 2019. The Politics of Feminist Knowledge Transfer: Gender Training and Gender Expertise. In Gender and Politics. Hampshire, UK: Springer.
  • Calderon Salazar, P., and L. Huybrechts. 2020. “PD Otherwise Will Be Pluriversal (Or It Won’t Be).” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1, 107–115. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3385010.3385027.
  • Cozza, M., L. Tonolli, and V. D’Andrea. 2016. “Subversive Participatory Design: Reflections on a Case Study.” In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops - Volume 2, 53–56. PDC ’16. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2948076.2948085.
  • Cullen, P., M. Ferree, and M. Verloo. 2019. “Introduction to Special Issue: Gender, Knowledge Production and Knowledge Work.” Gender, Work, & Organization 26 (6): 765–771. doi:10.1111/gwao.12329.
  • Deetz, S. 2 1996. “Crossroads—Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and Their Legacy.” Organization Science 7 (2): 191–207. doi:10.1287/orsc.7.2.191.
  • DiSalvo, C. 2012. Adversarial Design. Cambridge: MIT. doi:10.7551/mitpress/8732.001.0001.
  • EC. 2019. She Figures 2018. Luxembourg: Publications Office. doi:10.2777/936.
  • EC. 2020. Gendered Innovations 2: How Inclusive Analysis Contributes to Research and Innovation - Policy Review. Luxembourg: Publications Office. doi:10.2777/316197.
  • EC. 2021a. Horizon Europe Guidance on Gender Equality Plans. Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2777/876509.
  • EC. 2021b. Horizon Europe, Gender Equality. Luxembourg: Publications Office. doi:10.2777/97891.
  • EC. 2021c. “Gender Equality in Research and Innovation.” 15 October 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/strategy-2020-2024/democracy-and-rights/gender-equality-research-and-innovation_en
  • Eleutério, R., and F. van Amstel. 2020. “Matters of Care in Designing a Feminist Coalition.” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 2, 17–20. PDC ’20. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3384772.3385157.
  • Elovaara, P., and C. Mörtberg. 2010. “Carthographic Mappings: Participative Methods.” In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference on - PDC ’10, 171–174. New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1900441.1900469.
  • Finken, S., and C. Mörtberg. 2014. “Performing Elderliness – Intra-Actions with Digital Domestic Care Technologies.” In HCC 2014: ICT and Society, edited by K. Kimppa, D. Whitehouse, T. Kuusela, and J. Phahlamohlaka, 307–319. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44208-1_25.
  • Finken, S., C. Mörtberg, and P. Elovaara. 2018. “Becoming-With in Participatory Design.” In HCC13 2018: This Changes Everything – ICT and Climate Change: What Can We Do? edited by D. Kreps, C. Ess, L. Leenen, and K. Kimppa, 258–268. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99605-9_19.
  • Forlano, L., and A. Mathew. 2014. “From Design Fiction to Design Friction: Speculative and Participatory Design of Values-Embedded Urban Technology.” Journal of Urban Technology 21 (4). doi:10.1080/10630732.2014.971525.
  • Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Frauenberger, C., K. Spiel, L. Scheepmaker, and I. Posch. 2019. “Nurturing Constructive Disagreement - Agonistic Design with Neurodiverse Children.” In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3290605.3300501.
  • Frid-Jimenez, A., J. Carson, A. Scott, P. Khantidhara, and D. Elza. 2020. “Designing Participedia: A Collaborative Research Platform.” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 2. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3384772.3385125.
  • Gatehouse, C. 2020. “A Hauntology of Participatory Speculation.” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1, 116–125. PDC ’20. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3385010.3385024.
  • Gidlund, K. 2012. “Designing for All and No One - Practitioners Understandings of Citizen Driven Development of Public E-Services.” In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers: Volume 1 - PDC ’12, 11–19. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2347635.2347638.
  • Greenbaum, J., and M. Kyng, eds. 1991. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Greenbaum, J., and D. Loi. 2012. “Participation, the Camel and the Elephant of Design: An Introduction.” CoDesign 8 (2–3): 81–85. doi:10.1080/15710882.2012.690232.
  • Grünberg, L. 1999. “Access to Gender-Sensitive Higher Education in Eastern and Central Europe: Reflections from the CEPES Project on ‘Good Practice in Promoting Gender Equality in Higher Education’.” Higher Education in Europe 24 (3): 395–404. doi:10.1080/0379772990240307.
  • Hall, S., and A. O’Shea. 2013. “Common-Sense Neoliberalism.” Soundings 55 (55): 9–25. doi:10.3898/136266213809450194.
  • Heikkinen, M., S. Pihkala, L. Pääsky, and H. Sari. 2020. “Intersectional Gender-Responsibility in STEM: Co-Creating Sustainable Arctic Knowledge Production.” In Arctic Yearbook 2020, edited by L. Heininen, H. Exner-Pirot, and J. Barnes, 175–188. Akureyri: Arctic Portal. https://arcticyearbook.com/images/yearbook/2020/Scholarly-Papers/9_Heikkinen_et_al.pdf
  • Iivari, N. 2018. “Using Member Checking in Interpretive Research Practice.” Information Technology & People 31 (1): 111–133. doi:10.1108/ITP-07-2016-0168.
  • Jackson, S. J., S. B. Steinhardt, and A. Buyuktur. 2013. “Why CSCW Needs Science Policy (And Vice Versa).” In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW ’13, 1113–1124. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2441776.2441902.
  • Jagtap, S. February 2021. “Co-Design with Marginalised People: Designers’ Perceptions of Barriers and Enablers.” CoDesign 18 (3): 279–302. doi:10.1080/15710882.2021.1883065.
  • Karasti, H. 2014. “Infrastructuring in Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers - PDC ’14. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2661435.2661450.
  • Karasti, H., K. S. Baker, and F. Millerand. 2010. “Infrastructure Time: Long-Term Matters in Collaborative Development.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 19 (3–4): 377–415. doi:10.1007/s10606-010-9113-z.
  • Korsmeyer, H., A. Light, and L. Grocott. 2022. “Understanding Feminist Anticipation Through ‘Back-Talk’: 3 Narratives of Willful, Deviant, and Care-Full Co-Design Practices.” Futures 136 (February): 102874. doi:10.1016/J.FUTURES.2021.102874.
  • Kuhar, R., and D. Paternotte. 2017. Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing Against Equality. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Kwok, J. 2004. “The Weight of Space: Participatory Design Research for Configuring Habitable Space for New Arrival Women in Hong Kong.” In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices - Volume 1, 183–192. PDC 04. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1011870.1011892.
  • LeDantec, C., and C. DiSalvo. 2 2013. “Infrastructuring and the Formation of Publics in Participatory Design.” Social Studies of Science 43 (2): 241–264. doi:10.1177/0306312712471581.
  • Light, A., and Y. Akama. 2014. “Structuring Future Social Relations: The Politics of Care in Participatory Practice.” In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers - PDC ’14, 151–160. New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2661435.2661438.
  • Lombardo, E., P. Meier, and M. Verloo. 2010. “Discursive Dynamics in Gender Equality Politics: What About ‘Feminist Taboos’?” European Journal of Women’s Studies 17 (2): 105–123. doi:10.1177/1350506809359562.
  • Luck, R. 2018. “What is It That Makes Participation in Design Participatory Design?” Design Studies 59 (November): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.002.
  • Manne, K. 2018. Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mauro-Flude, N., and Y. Akama. 2022. “A Feminist Server Stack: Co-Designing Feminist Web Servers to Reimagine Internet Futures.” CoDesign 18 (1): 48–62. doi:10.1080/15710882.2021.2021243.
  • Mills, A. J., and P. Tancred. 1992. Gendering Organisational Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
  • Morley, L. 2 2000. “The Micropolitics of Gender in the Learning Society.” Higher Education in Europe 25 (2): 229–235. doi:10.1080/713669263.
  • Myers, M., and M. Newman. 2007. “The Qualitative Interview in is Research: Examining the Craft.” Information and Organization 17 (1): 2–26. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001.
  • Nielsen, M., C. Bloch, and L. Schiebinger. 2018. “Making Gender Diversity Work for Scientific Discovery and Innovation.” Nature Human Behaviour 2 (10): 726–734. doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0433-1.
  • O’Connor, P. 2 2020. “Why is It so Difficult to Reduce Gender Inequality in Male-Dominated Higher Educational Organizations? A Feminist Institutional Perspective.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 45 (2): 207–228. doi:10.1080/03080188.2020.1737903.
  • Pihkala, S., and H. Karasti. 2016. “Reflexive Engagement: Enacting Reflexivity in Design and for ‘Participation in Plural’.” In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1, 21–30. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2940299.2940302.
  • Pihkala, S., and H. Karasti. 2022. “Towards Response-Able PD: Putting Feminist New Materialisms to Work in the Practices of Participatory Design.” In Participatory Design Conference 2022: Volume 1, 98–108. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3536169.3537784.
  • Poderi, G., and Y. Dittrich. 2018. “Participatory Design and Sustainability.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3210604.3210624.
  • Ramírez Galleguillos, M., and A. Coşkun. 2020. “How Do I Matter? A Review of the Participatory Design Practice with Less Privileged Participants.” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1, 137–147. PDC ’20. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3385010.3385018.
  • Rodil, K., H. Winschiers-Theophilus, and K. Jensen. 2012. “Enhancing Cross-Cultural Participation Through Creative Visual Exploration.” In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1, 81–90. PDC ’12. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2347635.2347647.
  • Sabiescu, A., S. David, I. van Zyl, and L. Cantoni. 2014. “Emerging Spaces in Community-Based Participatory Design: Reflections from Two Case Studies.” In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1, 1–10. PDC ’14. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2661435.2661446.
  • Schiebinger, L., I. Klinge, I. S. de Madariaga, H. Paik, M. Schraudner, and M. Stefanick. 2020. “Gendered Innovations in Science, Health & Medicine, Engineering, and Environment.” http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/
  • Schuler, D., and A. Namioka, eds. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Schultz, E., L. Garcia, L. Fernandes, M. Paixão, F. Kawasaki, and R. Pereira. 2020. “Cultivating Creative Coexistence(s): Towards a Critical Education for Creativity Praxis to Construct Fairer Human Coexistences.” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1, 33–43. PDC ’20. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3385010.3385019.
  • Scollon, R., and S. Scollon. 2004. Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203694343.
  • Sefyrin, J. 2010. “Entanglements of Participation, Gender, Power and Knowledge in IT Design.” In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, 111–120. PDC ’10. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1900441.1900457.
  • Sefyrin, J., P. Elovaara, and C. Mörtberg. 2018. “Feminist Technoscience as a Resource for Working with Science Practices, a Critical Approach, and Gender Equality in Swedish Higher IT Educations.” In HCC13 2018: This Changes Everything – ICT and Climate Change: What Can We Do? edited by D. Kreps, C. Ess, L. Leenen, and K. Kimppa, 221–231. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99605-9_16.
  • Sefyrin, J., and C. Mortberg. 2009. “We Do Not Talk About This: Problematical Silences in EGovernment.” Electronic Journal of E-Government 7 (3): 259–270.
  • Sefyrin, J., and C. Mörtberg. 2010. “‘But That is a Systems Solution to Me’ – Negotiations in IT Design.” CoDesign 6 (1): 25–41. doi:10.1080/15710881003671882.
  • Serpa, B., I. Portela, M. Costard, and S. Silva. 2020. “Political-Pedagogical Contributions to Participatory Design from Paulo Freire.” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 2, 170–174. PDC ’20. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3384772.3385149.
  • Shah, A., M. Gonçalves, and I. Mulder. 2020. “Design Research for Participatory Policies: Paradoxes, Themes, Futures.” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 2. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3384772.3385144.
  • Smith, R., C. Bossen, C. Dindler, and O. Iversen. 2020. “When Participatory Design Becomes Policy: Technology Comprehension in Danish Education.” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3385010.3385011.
  • Smith, R., and O. Iversen. 2018. “Participatory Design for Sustainable Social Change.” Design Studies 59 (November): 9–36. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2018.05.005.
  • Spiel, K., E. Brulé, C. Frauenberger, G. Bailly, and G. Fitzpatrick. 2018. “Micro-Ethics for Participatory Design with Marginalised Children.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1. PDC ’18. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3210586.3210603.
  • Suchman, L. 2002. “Located Accountabilities in Technology Production.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14 (2): 99–105.
  • Thorpe, A., A. Prendiville, S. Rhodes, and L. Salinas. 2016. “Public Collaboration Lab.” In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops - Volume 2. NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2948076.2948121.
  • Verloo, M. 2018. Varieties of Opposition to Gender Equality in Europe. London, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315625744.
  • Walby, S. 2011. “Is the Knowledge Society Gendered?” Gender, Work, & Organization 18 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00532.x.
  • Walby, S. 2020. “Varieties of Gender Regimes.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 27 (3): 414–431. doi:10.1093/sp/jxaa018.
  • Weedon, C. 1987. Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.