Radical design praxis and the problematics of intent

References

• Abdulla, D., A. Ansari, E. Canli, M. Keshavarz, M. Kiem, P. Oliveira, and T. Schultz. 2019. “A Manifesto for Decolonising Design.” Journal of Future Studies 23 (3): 129–132. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201903_23(3).0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari, A. 2019. “Decolonizing Design Through the Perspectives of Cosmological Others: Arguing for an Ontological Turn in Design Research and Practice.” XRDS: Crossroads, the ACM Magazine for Students 26 (2): 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368048.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, E. E. 2002. “P for Political: Participation is Not Enough.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14 (1): 77–92. https://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol14/iss1/1.
   Google Scholar
• Benston, M. (1969) 2019. “The Political Economy of Women’s Liberation.” Monthly Review 41 (7): 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, E., and M. Keshavarz. 2020. “Partitioning Vulnerabilities: On the Paradoxes of Participatory Design in the City of Malmö.” In Vulnerability in Scandinavian Art and Culture, edited by A. M. Dancus, M, Hyvönen, and M. Karlsson, 247–266. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. 2010. Materialisms: The Stuff of Things is Many. Ian Bogost, blog. http://bogost.com/blog/materialisms/.
   Google Scholar
• Bonhomme, E. 2022. “Black Radical Design: Bringing a Vital Legacy of Visual Culture to Technology Worlds.” Interactions 29 (1): 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Borrelli, L., P. Pinkerton, H. Safouane, A. Jünemann, S. Göttsche, S. Scheel, and C. Oelgemöller. 2022. “Agency within Mobility: Conceptualising the Geopolitics of Migration Management.” Geopolitics 27 (4): 1140–1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1973733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, L. R. 2011. The Democracy of Objects. London: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, J., and J. Singh. 2011. “Radical Democracy in Global Perspective: Notes from the Pluriverse.” Third World Quarterly 32 (4): 689–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.570029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. 1988. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by Steven Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, I. 2015. The Practice Turn in Architecture: Brussels After 1968. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970) 2005. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Reprint, London, England: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, T. 2017. “Designs For/By the Global South.” Design Philosophy Papers 15 (1): 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2017.1303242.
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. 2001. All About Love. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., H. Benesch, and J. Geib. 2017. “Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the Public Realm.” CoDesign 13 (3): 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961) 1992. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. NewYork: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L. 2009. “Design Practices in Design Thinking.” European Academy of Management, Liverpool, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kjærsgaard, M. G., H. Joachim, C. S. Rachel, T. V. Kasper, B. Thomas, and O. Ton. 2016. “Introduction: Design Anthropological Futures.” In Design Anthropological Futures, edited by V. K. T. Rachel Charlotte Smith, M. G. Kjærsgaard, T. Otto, J. Halse, and T. Binder, 1–16. London: Bloomsbury Academic .
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, P., and D. Machin. 2019. “Doing Critical Discourse Studies with Multimodality: From Metafunctions to Materiality.” Critical Discourse Studies 6 (5): 514–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1556173.
   Google Scholar
• Lugones, M. 2010. “Toward a Decolonial Feminism.” Hypatia 25 (4): 742–759. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40928654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mareis, C., and N. Paim. 2021. Design Struggles: Intersecting Histories, Pedagogies, Perspectives. Amsterdam: Valiz.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. (1848) 1967. “The Communist Manifesto.” Trans. Samuel Moore. London: Penguin 15 (10): 9780822392583–049. 1215.
   Google Scholar
• Matrix. (1984) 2022. Making Space: Women and the Man-Made Environment. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. M. 2016. “The Aesthetics of Governance: Thoughts on Designing (And) Politics.” Journal of Design Strategies 8 (1): 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1955. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Jutus Buchler.
   Google Scholar
• Petcoff, A. n.d. “The Problem with Saul Alinsky.” Jacobin. Accessed May, 2017. https://jacobin.com/2017/05/saul-alinsky-alinskyism-organizing-methods-cesar-chavez-ufw.
   Google Scholar
• Prendeville, S., A. Carlton-Parada, V. Gerrard, and P. Syperek. 2022. “From Publics to Counter-Publics- Design Politics of Participation.” In Participatory Design Conference 2022, Vol. 1, pp. 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1145/3536169.3537795.
   Google Scholar
• Prendeville, S., P. Syperek, and L. Santamaria. 2022. “On the Politics of Design Framing Practices.” Design Issues 38 (3): 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Querejazu, A. 2021. “Cosmopraxis: Relational Methods for a Pluriversal IR.” Review of International Studies 48 (5): 875–890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. 2007. “Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality.” Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 168–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, A. S. 2019. Jugaad Time: Ecologies of Everyday Hacking in India. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Red Wing, S. 2018. “Keynote Debate 3: Whose Design?” Design Research Society Conference, 25-28 June. [video recording]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wuf91I247b8.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera Cusicanqui, S. 2012. “Ch’ixinakax Utxiwa: A Reflection on the Practices and Discourses of Decolonization.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 111 (1): 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-1472612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., and Y.-J. Lee. 2007. “Vygotsky’s Neglected legacy”: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory.” Review of Educational Research 77 (2): 186–232. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306298273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runnels, D. 2019. “Cholo Aesthetics and Mestizaje: Architecture in El Alto, Bolivia.” Latin American & Caribbean Ethnic Studies 14 (2): 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442222.2019.1630059.
   Google Scholar
• Saussure, F. M. (1959) 2011. Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Wade Baskin. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wainwright, J. 2022. “Praxis.” Rethinking Marxism 34 (1): 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2026749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winschiers-Theophilus, H., T. Zaman, and C. Stanley. 2019. “A Classification of Cultural Engagements in Community Technology Design: Introducing a Transcultural Approach.” AI & SOCIETY 34:419–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0739-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar