Codesign principles for the effective development of digital heritage extended reality systems for health interventions in rural communities

References

• Asthana, S., and A. Gibson. 2021. “Averting a Public Health Crisis in England’s Coastal Communities: A Call for Public Health Research and Policy.” Journal of Public Health 44 (3): 642–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asthana, S., R. Jones, and R. Sheaff. 2019. “Why Does the NHS Struggle to Adopt eHealth Innovations? A Review of Macro, Meso and Micro Factors.” BMC Health Services Research 19 (Article number 984). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4790-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker, S., J. Waycott, E. Robertson, R. Carrasco, B. Barbosa Neves, R. Hampson, and F. Vetere. 2020. “Evaluating the Use of Interactive Virtual Reality Technology with Older Adults Living in Residential Aged Care”. Information Processing & Management 57(3). Special Section on Marginalised Communities, Emerging Technologies, and Social Innovation in the Digital Age): Article 102105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, J., R. Hine, and J. Pretty. 2009. “The Health Benefits of Walking in Greenspaces of High Natural and Heritage Value.” Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 6 (4): 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/19438150903378425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blockley, M., and A. Hems. 2005. Heritage Interpretation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bradwell, H., L. Cooper, K. Edwards, R. Baxter, S. Tomaz, J. Ritchie, S. Gaudl, et al. 2023. “Staff Perceptions Towards Virtual Reality-Motivated Treadmill Exercise for Care Home Residents: A Qualitative Feedback Study with Key Stakeholders and Follow-Up Interview with Technology Developer.” BMJ Open 13:e073307. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradwell, H., K. Jane Edwards, R. Winnington, S. Thill, V. Allgar, and R. B. Jones. 2022. “Implementing Affordable Socially Assistive Pet Robots in Care Homes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stratified Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial and Mixed Methods Study.” JMIR Aging 5 (3): e38864. https://doi.org/10.2196/38864.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradwell, H. L., K. Jane Edwards, R. Winnington, S. Thill, and R. B. Jones. 2019. “Companion Robots for Older People: Importance of User-Centred Design Demonstrated Through Observations and Focus Groups Comparing Preferences of Older People and Roboticists in South West England.” BMJ Open 9:e032468. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. 1992. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8 (2): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, R. and A. Veliz Reyes. 2021. “Socio-Spatial Relationships in Design of Residential Care Homes for People Living with Dementia Diagnoses: A Grounded Theory Approach.” Architectural Science Review 66 ( 5: Design for Dementia): 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2021.1941749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyüksalih, G., T. Kan, G. Enç Özkan, M. Meriç, L. Isın, and T. P. Kersten. 2020. “Preserving the Knowledge of the Past Through Virtual Visits: From 3D Laser Scanning to Virtual Reality Visualisation at the Istanbul Çatalca İnceğiz Caves.” PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science 88:133–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-020-00091-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champion, E. 2021. “Preserving Authenticity in Virtual Heritage.” In Virtual Heritage: A Guide, edited by E. Champion, 129–137. London: Ubiquity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coyne, R. 2005. “Wicked Problems Revisited.” Design Studies 26 (1): 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enrico, B., S. Teasdale, O. Biosca, and D. A. Skelton. 2022. “The Health Impacts of Place-Based Creative Programmes on Older adults’ Health: A Critical Realist Review.” Health & Place 76:102839. July 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallou, E. 2022. “Heritage and Pathways to Wellbeing: From Personal to Social Benefits, Between Experience Identity and Capability Shaping.” Wellbeing, Space and Society 3:100084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2022.100084.
   Google Scholar
• Georgios, C., and H. Barraí. 2021. “Social Innovation in Rural Governance: A Comparative Case Study Across the Marginalised Rural EU.” Journal of Rural Studies 99:193–203. April 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gougeh, R. A., B. J. De Jesus, M. K. S. Lopes, M.-A. Moinnereau, W. Schubert, and T. H. Falk. 2022. “Quantifying User Behaviour in Multisensory Immersive Experiences.” IEEE International Conference on Metrology for Extended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (MetroXRAINE), Rome, Italy, 26-28 October 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Gradinger, F., J. Elston, S. Asthana, S. Martin, and R. Byng. 2019. “Reflections on the Researcher-In-Residence Model Co-Producing Knowledge for Action in an Integrated Care Organisation: A Mixed Methods Case Study Using an Impact Survey and Field Notes.” Evidence & Policy 15 (2): 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426419X15538508969850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., and C. Papoutsi. 2018. “Studying Complexity in Health Services Research: Desperately Seeking an Overdue Paradigm Shift.” BMC Medicine 16 (95). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1089-4.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, S., C. McLeod, M. Clifford, S. Jewitt, and C. Ray. 2019. “A Retrospective Analysis of Responsible Innovation for Low-Technology Innovation in the Global South.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (2): 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1575682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, J., M. Balaam, S. Hastings, and K. Morrissey. 2018. “Exploring the Design of Tailored Virtual Reality Experiences for People with Dementia.” CHI ’18: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., J. Milde, and R. Schwartz Cowan. 2016. “Symbiont Practices in Boundary Spanning: Bridging the Cognitive and Political Divides in Interdisciplinary Research.” Academy of Management Journal 60 (4): 1387–1414. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. Y. 2013. “Efficacy versus Effectiveness.” Korean Journal of Family Medicine 34 (4): 227. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.4.227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lucy, J., H. Koikkalainen, L. Anderson, P. Lapok, A. Lawson, and S. D. Shenkin. 2022. “Foundation Level Barriers to the Widespread Adoption of Digital Solutions by Care Homes: Insights from Three Scottish Studies.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 (12): 7407. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madgin, R., and E. Robson. 2023. Developing a People-Centred, Place-Led Approach: The Value of the Arts and Humanities. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Marasco, A., and B. Balbi. 2019. “Designing Accessible Experiences for Heritage Visitors Through Virtual Reality.” E-Review of Tourism Research 17 (3): 426–443.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. 2014. “Researchers-In-Residence: A Solution to the Challenge of Evidence-Informed Improvement?” Primary Health Care Research & Development 15 (4): 337–338. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423614000310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejía, M., D. Henriksen, Y. Xie, A. García-Topete, R. F. Malina, and K. Jung. 2022. “From Researching to Making Futures: A Design Mindset for Transdisciplinary Collaboration.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 48 (1): 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2131086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moinnereau, M.-A., A. A. de Oliveira Jr, and T. H. Falk. 2022. “Immersive Media Experience: A Survey of Existing Methods and Tools for Human Influential Factors Assessment.” Quality and User Experience 7. Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41233-022-00052-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy, P., D. Thackray, and E. Wilson. 2009. “Coastal Heritage and Climate Change in England: Assessing Threats and Priorities.” Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 11 (1): 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A., and V. L. O’Day. 1999. Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart. London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Day, V. 2000. “Information ecologies.” The Serials Librarian 38 (1–2): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v38n01_05.
   Google Scholar
• Paladini, A., A. Dhanda, M. Reina Ortiz, A. Weigert, A. M. Eslam Nofal, M. Gyi, S. Su, K. Van Balen, and M. Santana Quintero. 2019. “Impact of Virtual Reality Experience on Accessibility of Cultural Heritage.” 2nd International Conference of Geomatics and Restoration (GEORES 2019), Milan, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Pershina, R., B. Soppe, and T. Mari Thune. 2019. “Bridging Analog and Digital Expertise: Cross-Domain Collaboration and Boundary-Spanning Tools in the Creation of Digital Innovation.” Research Policy 48 (9): 103819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. 2021. “The Academisation of Creativity and the Morphogenesis of the Practice-Based Researcher.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Practice-Based Research, edited by C. Vear, L. Candy, and E. Edmonds, 60–74. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Power, A., and K. Smyth. 2016. “Heritage, Health and Place: The Legacies of Local Community-Based Heritage Conservation on Social Wellbeing.” Health & Place 39:160–167. May 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., S. Keynes, and G. Woodhouse. 2020. Heritage, Health and Wellbeing. UK: The Heritage Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, S., C. Nolan, and L. Monckton. 2018. Wellbeing and the Historic Environment: Threats, Issues and Opportunities for the Historic Environment. London: Historic England.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., and P. Jan Stappers. 2014. “Probes, Toolkits and Prototypes: Three Approaches to Making in Codesigning.” CoDesign 10 (1): 5–14. ( CoDesigning through making). https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayma, M., R. Tuijt, C. Cooper, and K. Walters. 2020. “Are We There Yet? Immersive Virtual Reality to Improve Cognitive Function in Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment.” The Gerontologist 60 (7): e502–e512. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. 2009. “Place Illusion and Plausibility Can Lead to Realistic Behaviour in Immersive Virtual Environments.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364:3549–3557. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N., A.-M. Towers, S. Palmer, J. Beecham, and E. Welch. 2018. “Being Occupied: Supporting ‘Meaningful Activity’ in Care Homes for Older People in England.” Ageing and Society 38 (11): 2218–2240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X17000678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snoswell, A. J., and C. L. Snoswell. 2019. “Immersive Virtual Reality in Health Care: Systematic Review of Technology and Disease States.” JMIR Biomedical Engineering 4 (1): e15025. https://doi.org/10.2196/15025.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. C., and K. K. Choo. 1996. “Spatial Acuity of the Body Surface Over the Life Span.” Somatosensory & Motor Research 13 (2): 153–166. https://doi.org/10.3109/08990229609051403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockton, J., and O. Duke-Williams. 2016. Geographical Maps Showing Characteristics Associated with the Ageing of the UK Population: A Report for the Government Office for Science Foresight ‘Future of an Ageing Population Project. Future of Ageing Collection. London: UK Government Office for Science.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, E. 2009. “Consuming Nature-Producing Heritage: Aspects on Conservation, Economical Growth and Community Participation in a Forested, Sparsely Populated Area in Sweden.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 15 (6): 540–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903210837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. 2021. “The Geographies of Digital Health - Digital Therapeutic Landscapes and Mobilities.” Health & Place 70:102610. July 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoresen, L., and J. Öhlén. 2015. “Lived Observations: Linking the researcher’s Personal Experiences to Knowledge Development.” Qualitative Health Research 25 (11): 1589–1598. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315573011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomisch, M., and M. Borthwick. 2021. Design.Think. Make. Break. Repeat. The Netherlands: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, L. 2017. Practice-Based Design Research. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Veliz Reyes, A., M. Varga, H. Bradwell, and R. Baxter. 2023. “Unlocking Social Innovation in XR for Healthcare in Coastal Communities.” 30th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops, Shanghai, 25-29 March.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, P. 2021. “Connecting the Parts with the Whole: Toward an Information Ecology Theory of Digital Innovation Ecosystems.” MIS Quarterly 45 (1): 397–422. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15864. ( Special Issue ‘Next Generation IS Theories’)).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, C. 1967. “Wicked Problems.” Management Science 14 (4): B141–B142.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, K. S. 2019. “Making a ‘Place’ for ICTs in Rural Communities: The Role of Village Halls in Digital Inclusion.” C&T ’19: 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities. Vienna, Austria. June 3–7, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, R., W. Zhang, R. Evans, G. Cao, T. Rui, and L. Shen. 2022. “Inequities in Health Care Services Caused by the Adoption of Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 24 (3): e34144. https://doi.org/10.2196/34144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar