Community-based design through the enactive concept of participatory sense-making: the case of water care in the Moravia neighbourhood of Medellín, Colombia

References

• Aldridge, J. 2016. Participatory Research: Working with Vulnerable Groups in Research and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bilda, Z., L. Candy, and E. Edmonds. 2007. “An Embodied Cognition Framework for Interactive Experience.” CoDesign 3 (2): 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701251443.
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, E. B. 2008. “Open-Ended Participatory Design As Prototypical Practice.” CoDesign 4 (2): 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880802095400.
   Google Scholar
• Bolvig Poulsen, S., and U. Thøgersen. 2011. “Embodied Design Thinking: A Phenomenological Perspective.” CoDesign 7 (1): 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.563313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broncano, F. 2008. “In media res: cultura material y artefactos.” ArtefaCToS. Revista De Estudios Sobre La Ciencia Y La tecnología. 1. https://revistas.usal.es/cinco/index.php/artefactos/article/view/13.
   Google Scholar
• Cuffari, E. C., E. Di Paolo, and H. De Jaegher. 2015. “From Participatory Sense-Making to Language: There and Back Again.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (4): 1089–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9404-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jaegher, H., and E. Di Paolo. 2007. “Participatory Sense-Making: An Enactive Approach to Social Cognition.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (4): 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9.
   Google Scholar
• Devisch, O., L. Huybrechts, and R. De Ridder. 2019. Participatory Design Theory. Media to Foster Civic Engagement Using Technology and Social. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Di Paolo, E., T. Buhrmann, and X. Barandiaran. 2017. Sensorimotor Life: An Enactive Proposal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Paolo, E., E. C. Cuffari, and H. De Jaegher. 2018. Linguistic Bodies: The Continuity Between Life and Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. https://lccn.loc.gov/2018001231.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C., A. Clement, and V. Pipek. 2013. “Participatory Design For, with and by Communities.” In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by J. A. Somonsen, 182–209. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez Rendón, R. A., and A. D. Monterroza Ríos. 2020. “La perspectiva humanista como base para una evaluación crítica y pluralista de la tecnología y el diseño.” Revista Institucional | UPB 58 (158): 71–98. https://revistas.upb.edu.co/index.php/revista-institucional/article/view/358.
   Google Scholar
• Durt, C., T. Fuchs, and C. Tewes. 2017. Embodiment, Enaction, and Culture. Investigating the Constitution of the Shared World. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P. 2008. “Participation in Design Things.” Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design, New York. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse. Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822371816.
   Google Scholar
• Fals-Borda, O., and M. A. Rahman. 1991. Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research. Michigan: Apex Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heras-Escribano, M. 2019. The Philosophy of Affordances. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. 2019. “Towards Ethical Principles for Participatory Design Practice.” CoDesign 15 (4): 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1502324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2006. The Semantic Turn. A New Foundation for Design. ed. Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. 2017. Research Design. Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. New York, NY: The Guilfors Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgaard, K., and H. Wesselius. 2017. “Once More, with Feeling: Design Thinking and Embodied Cognition.” She Ji the Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 3 (2): 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.05.004.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E., and F. Rizzo. 2011. “Small Projects/Large Changes: Participatory Design As an Open Participated Process.” CoDesign 7 (3–4): 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monterroza-Ríos, A. D. 2023. “Una concepción enactiva de cultura: Enculturación como acople dinámico entre agentes humanos y sus entornos de cultura material.” Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 27 (2): 215–234. https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e85209.
   Google Scholar
• Monterroza-Rios, A. D., and C. M. Gutierrez-Aguilar. 2022. “Enactivism and Material Culture: How Enactivism Could Redefine Enculturation Processes.” Philosophies 7 (4): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7040075.
   Google Scholar
• Palleroni, S. 2004. Studio-At-Large. Architecture in Service of Global Communities. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prada Molina, M. S. 2013. Diseño sensorial y emocional. Medellín: Ed. UPB.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, L. 2018. “Nonhumans in Participatory Design.” CoDesign 14 (3): 238–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1316409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, E., and P. Stappers. 2014. “From Designing to Co-Designing to Collective Dreaming: Three Slices in Time.” Interactions 21 (6): 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2670616.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Sanoff, H. 1999. Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shuler, D., and A. Namioka. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Boca Raton: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203744338.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, J., and T. Y. Robertson. 2013. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. 2005. “The Methodology of Participatory Design.” Technical Communication 52 (2): 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, R., D. Snelders, M. Kleinsmann, and J. Buur. 2022. “Participation in Design Research.” Design Studies 78:101073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela, F. J., E. Rosch, and E. Thompson. 1991. The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, A.-M. 2006. “Ontological Designing.” Design Philosophy Papers 4 (2): 69–92. https://doi.org/10.2752/144871306X13966268131514.
   Google Scholar
• World Design Organization. 2023. Definition of Industrial Design. World Design Organization, February. https://wdo.org/.
   Google Scholar