Aggregating spatially explicit criteria: avoiding spatial compensation

References

• Black, A.R., 1995. Major flooding and increased flood frequency in Scotland since 1988. Physics and Chemistry of The Earth, 20 (5–6), 463–468. doi: 10.1016/S0079-1946(96)00007-9
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, H., Pinter, N., and Elfert, S., 2011. Hydrological signatures of flood trends on German rivers: flood frequencies, flood heights and specific stages. Journal of Hydrology, 404 (1–2), 50–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunderlik, J.M. and Ouarda, T.B.M.J., 2009. Trends in the timing and magnitude of floods in Canada. Journal of Hydrology, 375 (3–4), 471–480. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckstein, L. and Opricovic, S., 1980. Multiobjective optimisation in river basin development. Water Resources Research, 16 (1), 14–20. doi: 10.1029/WR016i001p00014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, D., Herath, D., and Musiakec, K., 2003. A mathematical model for flood loss estimation. Journal of Hydrology, 277 (1–2), 24–49. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00084-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliot, M., 2012. Sea level variability influencing coastal flooding in the Swan River region, Western Australia. Continental Shelf Research, 33, 14–28. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02784343/33 [Accessed 17 March 2014]. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2011.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers, M., et al., 2012. Collaborative modelling for active involvement of stakeholders in urban flood risk management. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12 (9), 2821–2842. doi: 10.5194/nhess-12-2821-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, D.S. and Lutz, M.A., 2010. Urban flood hazard zoning in Tucumán Province, Argentina, using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Engineering Geology, 111 (1–4), 90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira, J., Greco, S., and Ehrogott, M., 2005. Multiple criteria decision analysis – state of the art surveys. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hajkowicz, S. and Collins, K., 2007. A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resources Management, 21 (9), 1553–1566. doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-9112-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundecha, Y., et al., 2008. Development and test of a stochastic rainfall generator for the generation of hydrologic load scenarios (in German). Forum für Hydrologie und Wasserwirtschaft, Heft 23.06, Beiträge zum Tag der Hydrologie 27 March 2008, Hannover.
   Google Scholar
• Hundecha, Y., Pahlow, M., and Schumann, A., 2009. Modeling of daily precipitation at multiple locations using a mixture of distributions to characterize the extremes. Water Resources Research, 45 (12), Art. no. W12412. doi: 10.1029/2008WR007453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K.S., 1981. Multiple attribute decision-making, methods and applications. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkman, S.N., et al., 2008. Integrated hydrodynamic and economic modelling of flood damage in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 66 (1), 77–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamrath, P., et al., 2006. Assessment of discharge through a dike breach and simulation of flood wave propagation. Natural Hazards, 38 (1–2), 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, I. and Spence, R., 2004. An overview of flood actions on buildings. Engineering Geology, 73 (3–4), 297–309. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., et al., 2006. Catchment-wide wetland assessment and prioritization using the multi-criteria decision-making method TOPSIS. Environmental Management, 38 (2), 316–326. doi: 10.1007/s00267-005-0151-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Loë, R. and Wojtanowski, D., 2001. Associated benefits and costs of the Canadian flood damage reduction program. Applied Geography, 21 (1), 1–21. doi: 10.1016/S0143-6228(00)00013-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostert, E. and Junier, S.J., 2009. The European flood risk directive: challenges for research. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussion, 6 (4), 4961–4988. doi: 10.5194/hessd-6-4961-2009
   Google Scholar
• Nijssen, D., et al., 2009. Planning of technical flood retention measures in large river basins under consideration of imprecise probabilities of multivariate hydrological loads. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9 (4), 1349–1363. doi: 10.5194/nhess-9-1349-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveri, E. and Santoro, M., 2000. Estimation of urban structural flood damages: the case study of Palermo. Urban Water, 2 (3), 223–234. doi: 10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00062-5
   Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., 2009. A compromise solution in water resources planning. Water Resources Management, 23 (8), 1549–1561. doi: 10.1007/s11269-008-9340-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrow, T. and Merz, B., 2009. Trends in flood magnitude, frequency and seasonality in Germany in the period 1951–2002. Journal of Hydrology, 371 (1–4), 129–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Sande, C.J., de Jong, S.M., and de Roo, A.P.J., 2003. A segmentation and classification approach of IKONOS-2 imagery for land cover mapping to assist flood risk and flood damage assessment. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 4 (3), 217–229. doi: 10.1016/S0303-2434(03)00003-5
   Google Scholar
• Schmocker-Fackel, P. and Naef, F., 2010. More frequent flooding? Changes in flood frequency in Switzerland since 1850. Journal of Hydrology, 381 (1–2), 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, E.M. and Gemmell Campbell, J., 2012. Spatial statistics – a watery business. Spatial Statistics, 1 (May), 121–132. doi: 10.1016/j.spasta.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonovic, S.P. and Verma, R., 2008. A new methodology for water resources multicriteria decision making under uncertainty. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 33 (5), 322–329. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2008.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srdjevic, B., Medeiros, Y.D.P., and Faria, A.S., 2004. An objective multi-criteria evaluation of water management scenarios. Water Resources Management, 18 (1), 35–54. doi: 10.1023/B:WARM.0000015348.88832.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinet, F., 2008. Geographical analysis of damage due to flash floods in southern France: the cases of 12&13 November 1999 and 8&9 September 2002. Applied Geography, 28 (4), 323–336. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeleny, M., 1973. Compromise programming. In: J. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds. Multiple criteria desicion making. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 262–301.
   Google Scholar