Assessing the quality of riparian areas: the case of River Ecosystem Quality Index applied to the Marecchia river (Italy)

References

• Allan, J.D., 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 35 (1), 257–284. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, J.D. and Flecker, S.A., 1993. Biodiversity conservation in running waters. BioScience, 43, 432–443. doi: 10.2307/1312104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, J.D., Erickson, D.L., and Fay, J., 1997. The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology, 37 (1), 149–161. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.d01-546.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbumozhi, V., Radhakrishnan, J., and Yamaji, E., 2005. Impact of riparian buffer zones on water quality and associated management considerations. Ecological Engineering, 24 (5), 517–523. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armsworth, P.R., et al., 2007. Ecosystem-service science and the way forward for conservation. Conservation Biology, 21 (6), 1383–1384. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00821.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondel, J., 1975. L'analyse des peuplements d'oiseaux, elements d'un diagnostic écologique I. La methode des echantillonages frequentiels progressifs (E.F.P.). Terre et Vie, 29, 533–589.
   Google Scholar
• Blondel, J., Ferry, C., and Frochot, B., 1973. Avifauna et végétation, essai d'analyse de la diversité. Alauda, 41, 63–84.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch, J.M. and Hewlett, J.D., 1982. A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology, 55 (1–4), 3–23. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(82)90117-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton, A.J., 1999. An overview of river health assessment: philosophies, practice, problems and prognosis. Freshwater Biology, 41 (2), 469–479. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00443.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauman, K.A., et al., 2007. The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 67–98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhard, B., et al., 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21 (2012), 17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvario, E. and Sarrocco, S., 1997. Italian red list of vertebrates. Rome: WWF Italia.
   Google Scholar
• Campiani, E., et al., 2006. 2003 Land use vector coverage 1:25 000. Bologna: Emilia Romagna Region.
   Google Scholar
• Castelletti, A. and Soncini-Sessa, R., 2006. A procedural approach to strengthening integration and participation in water resource planning. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21 (10), 1455–1470. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K.M.A., et al., 2006. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biology, 4 (11), 2138–2152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, Bern, 19.IX.1979.
   Google Scholar
• Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals, Bonn 1979
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R. et al., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, G.C., et al., 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7 (1), 21–28. doi: 10.1890/080025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dente, B. and Goria, A., 2002. Case study 2: Marecchia-Conca water basin. Euwareness Italy. Milano: Institute for Social Research (IRS).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora.
   Google Scholar
• European Community, Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of the 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.
   Google Scholar
• European Council Directive 409/79/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds.
   Google Scholar
• Fausch, K.D., et al., 2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. BioScience, 52 (6), 483–498. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0483:LTRBTG]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, C., 2001. Biodiversity. Bologna: Zanichelli.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, C., et al., 2008. Evaluating landscape quality with vegetation naturalness maps. An index and some inferences. Applied Vegetation Science, 11, 243–250. doi: 10.3170/2008-7-18400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figini, P. and Vici, L., 2012. Off-season tourists and the cultural offer of a mass-tourism destination: the case of Rimini. Tourism Management, 33 (4), 825–839. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2011.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, B., Polasky, S., and Sterner, T., (2011). Conservation and human welfare: economic analysis of ecosystem services. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48 (2), 151–159.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, R.T.T., 1995. Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghetti, P.F., 1997. Extended biotic index (E.B.I.). The macroinvertebrates in controlling the quality of the environment of running waters. Application manual. Regional Agency for Environmental Protection, TRENTO pp. 222.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez del Tanago, M. and Garca de Jalon, D., 2011. Riparian quality index (RQI): a methodology for characterizing and assessing the environmental conditions of riparian zones. Limnetica, 30 (2), 235–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R.D. and van Strien, A., 2010. Wild bird indicators: using composite population trends of birds as measures of environmental health. Ornithological Science, 9 (1), 3–22. doi: 10.2326/osj.9.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R.D. et al., 2003. Using birds as indicators of biodiversity. Ornis Hungarica, 12–13, 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R.D., et al., 2005. Developing indicators for European birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360, 269–288. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, C., et al., 2012. U.S. environmental protection agency valuation of surface water quality improvements. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6 (1), 130–146. doi: 10.1093/reep/rer025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, R., Wilson, M., and Boumans, R., 2002. Special issue: the dynamics and value of ecosystem services: integrating economic and ecological perspectives. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41 (2002), 393–408. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Italian Law No 157/92 of 11 February 1992 on standards for the protection of homeothermic wildlife and for the hunting.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgo, J.C., et al., 1998. Effect of stand width and adjacent habitat on breeding bird communities in bottomland hardwoods. Journal of Wildlife Management, 62 (1), 72–83. doi: 10.2307/3802265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S., Sorace, A., and Mancini, L., 2010. Riparian bird communities as indicators of human impacts along Mediterranean streams. Environmental Management, 45 (2), 261–273. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9419-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layke, C., 2009. Measuring nature's benefits: a preliminary roadmap for improving ecosystem service indicators. WRI Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available from: http://pdf.wri.org/measuring_natures_benefits.pdf [Accessed 18 December 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Margules, C. and Usher, M.B., 1981. Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biology Conservation, 21, 79–109. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(81)90073-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEA., 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Available from: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/ [Accessed 20 January 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Mingozzi, T. and Brandmayr, P., 1991. L’évaluation cartographique des ressources faunistiques: un exemple appliqué aux ornithocénoses d'une vallée alpestre. Revue d’écologie alpine, 1, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Morri, E., et al., 2014. A forest ecosystem services evaluation at the river basin scale: supply and demand between coastal areas and upstream lands (Italy). Ecological Indicators, 37 (part A), 210–219. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, F. and Burkhard, B., 2012. The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 1 (1), 26–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naiman, R.J. and Decamps, H., eds., 1990. The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones. Man and the Biosphere series, 4. Carnforth: The Parthenon Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Negri, P., et al., 2004. The use of the fluvial functioning index for river management. wetHYDRO Workshop, 4, 107–115. Available from: http://levis.sggw.waw.pl/wethydro/contents/monografie/ws4/107-115_PaoloNegri_e.pdf [Accessed 20 March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, L.L. and Kovacic, D.A., 1993. Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management. Freshwater Biology, 29 (2), 243–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00761.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, M.A. et al., 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42 (2), 208–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01004.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, M.A., Menninger, H.L., and Bernhardt, E., 2009. River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshwater Biology, 55 (supplement S1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, M.J. and Meyer, J.L., 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 32, 333–365. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, R.C., 1992. The RCE: a riparian, channel and environmental inventory for small streams in the agricultural landscape. Freshwater Biology, 27 (2), 295–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1992.tb00541.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzolotto, R. and Brandmayr, P., 1996. An index to evaluate landscape conservation state based on land-use pattern analysis and geographic information system techniques. Coenoses, 11, 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, P.J., et al., 1998. River habitat quality: the physical character of rivers and streams in the UK and the Isle of Man. Bristol: Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, M., et al., 2013. A method for the assessment and analysis of the hydromorphological condition of Italian streams: the morphological quality index (MQI). Geomorphology, 180–181, 96–108. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roni, P., Hanson, K., and Beechie, T., 2008. Global review of the physical and biological effectiveness of stream habitat rehabilitation techniques. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 28 (3), 856–890. doi: 10.1577/M06-169.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Santolini, R., ed., 1988. The valley of Marecchia. Bologna: Emilia Romagna Region.
   Google Scholar
• Santolini, R. and Pasini, G., 2007. Applying a geostatistical model for the evaluation of the environmental system. In: C. Battisti and B. e Romano, eds. Fragmentation and connectivity: ecological analysis of environmental planning. Turin: De Agostini-Città Studi, 257–261.
   Google Scholar
• Schiemer, F., Zalewski, M., and Thorpe, J.E., eds., 1995. The importance of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones for freshwater fish. Developments in Hydrobiology, 105, 278–219.
   Google Scholar
• Scolozzi, R., Morri, E., and Santolini, R., 2012. Delphi-based change assessment in ecosystem services values to support strategic spatial planning in Italian landscapes. Ecological Indicator, 21, 134–144. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severi, P., 2001. The fan of the Marecchia river: reconstruction of geological subsurface and investigation for the proper management of water resources. In: Hydrogeological risk in Rimini. Bologna: Ind. Grafiche Labanti & Nanni, 35–37.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C.E., 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423 and 623–656. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   Google Scholar
• Siligardi., ed., 2007. I.F.F. river functionality index. Roma: ANPA-APPA.
   Google Scholar
• Timm, R.K., et al., 2004. A screening procedure for prioritizing riparian management. Environmental Management, 33 (1), 151–161. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-2980-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, G.M. and Heath, M.F., 1994. Birds in Europe: their conservation status. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 3. Cambridge: BirdLife International.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J.V., 1998. Riverine landscapes: biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation. Biological Conservation, 83 (3), 269–278. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00083-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, T., Wu, J., and Shaolin Peng, S., 2012. Assessing the effects of landscape pattern on river water quality at multiple scales: a case study of the Dongjiang River watershed, China. Ecological Indicators, 23, 166–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar