Geomorphological and riparian vegetation responses following a low-head dam removal: a study based on literature review

References

• Ahn, H.K., Kim, S.N., and Woo, H.S., 2012. Stream corridor ecological restoration by small dam removal: removals of Gongreung2 & Gotan small dams in Korea. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 21 (1), 171–184.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2005. A summary of existing research on low-head dam removal projects. Standing Committee on the Environment, September.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, J.T.F., et al., 2006. The effects of small dam removal on the distribution of sedimentary contaminants. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 114 (1–3), 287–312. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-4781-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begin, Z.B., Meyer, D.F., and Schumm, S.A., 1981. Development of longitudinal profiles of alluvial channels in response to base-level lowering. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 6 (1), 49–68. doi: 10.1002/esp.3290060106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born, S.M., et al., 1998. Socioeconomic and institutional dimensions of dam removals: the Wisconsin experience. Environmental Management, 22 (3), 359–370. doi: 10.1007/s002679900111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brush, Jr., L.M. and Wolman, M.G., 1960. Knickpoint behavior in noncohesive material – a laboratory study. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 71 (1), 59–73. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1960)71[59:KBINMA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burroughs, B.A., et al., 2009. Effects of Stronach Dam removal on fluvial geomorphology in the pine River, Michigan, United States. Geomorphology, 110 (3), 96–107. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, M., 1995. Geomorphic response to river flow regulation: case studies and time scales. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 11 (1), 3–22. doi: 10.1002/rrr.3450110103
   Google Scholar
• Csiki, S. and Rhoads, B.L., 2010. Hydraulic and geomorphological effects of run-of-river dams. Progress in Physical Geography, 34 (6), 755–780. doi: 10.1177/0309133310369435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, R.T., Keddy, P.A., and McNeill, J., 1988. Fertility and disturbance gradients: a summary model for riverine marsh vegetation. Ecology, 69 (4), 1044–1054. doi: 10.2307/1941260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, M.W., Stanley, E.H., and Harbor, J.M., 2002. Geomorphic analogies for assessing probable channel response to dam removal. Journal of the American Water Resource Association, 38 (6), 1567–1579. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb04365.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, M.W., et al., 2003a. Predicting the depth of erosion following dam removal using a bank stability model. International Journal of Sediment Research, 18 (2), 128–134.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M.W., Stanley, E.H., and Harbor, J.M., 2003b. Channel adjustments following two dam removals in Wisconsin. Water Resources Research, 39 (1), 1011–1025. doi: 10.1029/2002WR001714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, M.W., et al., 2005. Stream ecosystem response to small dam removal: lessons from the Heartland. Geomorphology, 71 (1), 227–244. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, T.W., 1983. Experimental study of knickpoint and longitudinal profile evolution in cohesive, homogeneous material. Geological Society of American Bulletin, 94 (5), 664–672. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1983)94<664:ESOKAL>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, D.D., et al., 2002. Dam removal: challenges and opportunities for ecological research and river restoration. BioScience, 52 (8), 669–682. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0669:DRCAOF]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, D.K., et al., 2011. Changes of river morphology and physical fish habitat following low-head weir removal. Ecological Engineering, 37 (6), 883–892. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, W.B., Sasser, C.E., and Gosselink, J.G., 1985. Succession of vegetation in evolving river delta, Atchafalaya Bay, Louisiana. Journal of Ecology, 73, 973–986. doi: 10.2307/2260162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juracek, K.E., 1999. Geomorphic effects of overflow dams on the Lower Neosho River, Kansas. US Department of interior, US Geological Water Resources Investigations Report 99–4147, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kibler, K., Tullos, D., and Kondolf, M., 2011. Evolving expectations of dam removal outcomes: downstream geomorphic effects following removal of a small, gravel-filled dam. Journal of the American Water Resource Association, 47 (2), 408–423. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00523.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman, L.K., and Sharitz, R.R., 1994. Vegetation disturbance and maintenance of diversity in intermittently flooded Carolina bays in South Carolina. Ecological Applications, 4 (1), 177–188. doi: 10.2307/1942127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondolf, G.M., 1997. Hungry water: effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environmental Management, 21 (4), 533–551. doi: 10.1007/s002679900048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaniz, C.G., 2008. Weir in salmonid streams: implications, challenges and practicalities. Hydrobiologia, 609 (1), 83–96. doi: 10.1007/s10750-008-9397-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclin, E. and Sicchio, M., 1999. Dam removal success stories: restoring rivers through selective removal of dams that don't make sense. American Rivers, Friend of the Earth, Trout Unlimited, 111.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, C.H., 2002. Patterns of removal and ecological response: a study of small dams in Wisconsin. Thesis (MS), University of Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, C.H. and Stanley, E.H., 2006. Vegetation development and restoration potential of drained reservoirs following dam removal in Wisconsin. River Research and Applications, 22 (3), 281–295. doi: 10.1002/rra.891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman, A. and Thorne, C., 1988. Riverbank stability analysis. I: theory. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 114 (2), 134–150. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:2(134)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterkamp, W.R. and Hupp, C.R., 2010. Fluvial process and vegetation – glimpses of the past, the present, and perhaps the future. Geomorphology, 116 (3), 274–285. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzuto, J., 2002. Effects of dam removal on river form and process. BioScience, 52 (8), 683–691. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0683:EODROR]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, N.L., et al., 1997. The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience, 47 (11), 769–784. doi: 10.2307/1313099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, N.L. and Hart, D.D., 2002. How dams vary and why it matters for the emerging science of dam removal. BioScience, 52 (8), 659–668. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0659:HDVAWI]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, K.M., et al., 2000. Processes of headcut growth and migration in rills and gullies. International Journal of Sediment Research, 15 (1), 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Salant, N.L., et al., 2012. Unintended consequences of restoration: loss of riffles and gravel substrates following weir installation. Journal of Environmental Management, 109 (1), 154–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaske, S.R. and Freyberg, D.L., 2012. A comparison of past small dam removals in highly sediment-impacted systems in the US. Geomorphology, 151–152 (1), 50–58. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafroth, P.B., et al., 2002. Potential responses of riparian vegetation to dam removal. BioScience, 52 (8), 703–712. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0703:PRORVT]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R.K. and Simons, D.B., 1991. Sediment problems associated with dam removal – Muskegon River, Michigan. Hydraulic Engineering: Proceedings of the National Conference on Hydraulic Engineering, 680–685.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, A., et al., 2002. Case study: channel stability of the Missouri River, Western Montana. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 128 (10), 880–890. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:10(880)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, E.H. and Doyle, M.W., 2002. A geomorphic perspective on nutrient retention following dam removal. BioScience, 52 (8), 693–701. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0693:AGPONR]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, E.H., et al., 2002. Short-term changes in channel form and macroinvertebrate communities following low-head dam removal. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 21 (1), 172–187. doi: 10.2307/1468307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, O.R. and Julien, P.Y., 1993. Criterion delineating the mode of headcut migration. Journal of hydraulic engineering, 119 (1), 37–50. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:1(37)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromberg, J.C., 2001. Restoration of riparian vegetation in the south-western United States: importance of flow regimes and fluvial dynamism. Journal of Arid Environments, 49 (1), 17–34. doi: 10.1006/jare.2001.0833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschantz, B.A., 2003. Public hazards at low-head dams: can we make them safer. National Dam Safety Conference Proceedings, 2003 Dam safety conference, September, Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), ed., 1987. Design of small dams. Washington DC: A Water Resources Technical Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Vanoni, V.A., ed., 2006. Sedimentation engineering. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Wildman, L.A.S. and MacBroom, J.G., 2005. The evolution of gravel bed channels after dam removal: case study of the Anaconda and Union City Dam removals. Geomorphology, 71 (1), 245–262. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl, E.E. and Cenderelli, D.A., 2000. Sediment deposition and transport patterns following a reservoir sediment release. Water Resources Research, 36 (1), 319–333. doi: 10.1029/1999WR900272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl, E.E. and Ikeda, H., 1997. Experimental simulation of channel incision into a cohesive substrate at varying gradients. Geology, 25 (4), 295–298. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0295:ESOCII>2.3.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar