Realizing the value of fluvial geomorphology

References

• Acuña, V., et al., 2013. Does it make economic sense to restore rivers for their ecosystem services? Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 988–997. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthington, A., et al., 2010. Preserving the biodiversity and ecological services of rivers: new challenges and research opportunities. Freshwater Biology, 55, 1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02340.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagstad, K., Semmens, D., and Winthrop, R., 2014. Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modelling: a case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona. Ecosystem Services, 5, 40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron, N. and Eyquem, J., 2012. Geomorphology and gravel-bed river ecosystem services: workshop outcomes. In: M. Church, P.M. Biron, A.G. Roy, eds. Gravel-bed rivers: processes, tools, environments. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 242–257. doi:10.1002/9781119952497.ch20.
   Google Scholar
• Bolund, P. and Hunhammar, S., 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, 293–301. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, J. and Banzhaf, S., 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63, 616–626. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauman, K., et al., 2007. The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview of highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 67–98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defra., 2007. An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, P.W. and Gregory, K.J., 2004. River channel management: Towards sustainable catchment hydrosystems. London: Arnold Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dufour, S., et al., 2011. Ecosystem services, an opportunity to improve restoration in river corridors? [online]. Available from: http://hal.univ-nantes.fr/hal-00587959/ [Accessed 18 October 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Elosegi, A. and Sabater, S., 2013. Effects of hydromorphological impacts on river ecosystem functioning: a review and suggestions for assessing ecological impacts. Hydrobiologia, 712, 129–143. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1226-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elosegi, A., Díez, J., and Pozo, J., 2007. Contribution of dead wood to the carbon flux in forested streams. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 32, 1219–1228. doi: 10.1002/esp.1549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elosegi, A., Díez, J., and Mutz, M., 2010. Effects of hydromorphological integrity on biodiversity and functioning of river systems. Hydrobiologia, 657, 199–215. doi: 10.1007/s10750-009-0083-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everard, M., 2011. Why does ‘good ecological status’ matter? Water and Environment Journal, 26 (2), 165–174. doi:10.1111/j.1747–6593.2011.00273.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everard, M., 2012. 25. What have rivers ever done for us? Ecosystem services and river systems. In: P.J. Boon and P.J. Raven, eds. River conservation and management, Chichester: Wiley, 313–324.
   Google Scholar
• Everard, M., 2013. The hydropolitics of dams: engineering or ecosystems? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Everard, M. and McInnes, R.J., 2013. Systemic solutions for multi-benefit water and environmental management. The Science of the Total Environment, 461–462, 170–179. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everard, M. and Waters, R.D., 2013. Ecosystem services assessment: how to do one in practice (Version 1, October 2013). London: Institution of Environmental Sciences [online]. Available from: www.ies-uk.org.uk/resources/ecosystem-services-assessment [Accessed 18 October 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Everard, M., et al., 2009. Integrated catchment value systems. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 3, 174–187. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2009.13022
   Google Scholar
• Everard, M., Harrington, R., and McInnes, R.J., 2012. Facilitating implementation of landscape-scale integrated water management: the integrated constructed wetland concept. Ecosystem Services, 2, 27–37. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everard, M., et al., 2014. Improving coherence of ecosystem service provision between scales. Ecosystem Services. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilvear, D.J., Spray, C.S., and Casas-Mulet, R., 2013. River rehabilitation for the delivery of multiple ecosystem services at the river network scale. Journal of Environmental Management, 126, 30–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J.E. and Barron, J.E., 2013. The role of geodiversity in delivering ecosystem services and benefits in Scotland. Scottish Journal of Geology, 49, 41–58. doi: 10.1144/sjg2011-465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government, H.M. 2011. The natural choice: securing the value of nature. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, M., 2011. Other nature: geodiversity and geosystem services. Environmental Conservation, 38, 271–274. doi: 10.1017/S0376892911000117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M., Gordon, J.E., and Brown, E.J., 2013. geodiversity and the ecosystem approach: the contribution of geoscience in delivering integrated environmental management. Proceedings of the Geologist's Association, 124, 659–673. doi: 10.1016/j.pgeola.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, K.J., et al., 2014. Communicating geomorphology: global challenges for the twenty-first century. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 39, 476–486. doi: 10.1002/esp.3461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurnell, A., Lee, M., and Souch, C., 2007. Urban rivers: hydrology, geomorphology, ecology and opportunities for change. Geography Compass, 1 (5), 1118–1137. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00058.x
   Google Scholar
• Haines-Young, R.H. and Potschin, M.P., 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In: D. Raffaelli and C. Frid, eds. Ecosystem ecology: a new synthesis. Cambridge: CUP; BES Ecological Reviews Series, 110–139.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, B., et al., 2014. A synoptic survey of ecosystem services from headwater catchments in the United States. Ecosystem Services, 7, 106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. and Hering, D., 2000. Wood-associated macroinvertebrate fauna in central European streams. International Review of Hydrobiology, 85, 25–48. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2632(200003)85:1<25::AID-IROH25>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2013. Contribution of working group to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: T.F. Stocker et al., eds. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 867–952.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, I., 2013. The impact of extreme events of freshwater ecosystems. Ecological issues 2013. London: British Ecological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kaime, T., 2013. Symposium foreward: framing the law and policy for ecosystem services. Transnational Environmental Law, 2, 211–216. doi: 10.1017/S2047102513000198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendon, E.J., et al., 2014. Heavier summer downpours with climate change revealed by weather forecast resolution model. Nature Climate Change, 4, 570–576. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE2258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Large, A.R.G. and Gilvear, D.J., 2014. Using Google Earth, a virtual-globe imaging platform, for ecosystem services-based river assessment. River Research and Applications, 31 (4), 406–421. doi:10.1002/rra.2798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. and McTernan, J., 2014. Economic value of instream flow for non-commercial whitewater boating using recreation demand and contingent valuation methods. Environmental Management, 53, 510–519. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0232-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Harms, M. and Balvanera, P., 2012. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 8, 17–25. doi: 10.1080/21513732.2012.663792
   Google Scholar
• May, R.W.P., Ackers, J.C., and Kirby, A.M., 2002. Manual on scour of bridges and other hydraulic structures. CIRIA Manual C551. London: Construction Industry Research and Information Association.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, S., James, D., and Davidson, A., 2010. The development of an ecosystem services framework for South East Queensland. Environmental Management, 45, 881–895. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9428-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, S., James, D., and Davidson, A., 2012. An adaptive participatory approach for developing an ecosystem services framework for South East Queensland, Australia. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 7 (3), 182–189. doi: 10.1080/21513732.2011.652176
   Google Scholar
• Milhous, R.T. and Waddle, T.J., 2012. Physical Habitat Simulation (PHABSIM) Software for Windows (v.1.5.1). Fort Collins, CO: USGS Fort Collins Science Center.
   Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems & human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J., et al., 2008. The economic dimension of integrating flood management and agri-environment through washland creation. A case study from Somerset, England. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 372–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naiman, R.J., Decamps, H., and McClain, M., 2005. Riparia, ecology, conservation and management of streamside communities. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Rivers Authority, 1992. River corridor surveys. Conservation technical handbook number 1. Bristol: National Rivers Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Natural England, 2008. Geomorphological assessment of riverine SSSIs for the strategic planning of river restoration. Natural England Research Report NERR013 [online]. Available from: www.publications.naturalengland.org.uk/file/50038 [Accessed 18 October 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Newson, M.D. and Large, A.R.G., 2006. ‘Natural' rivers, ‘hydromorphological quality' and river restoration: a challenging new agenda for applied fluvial geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 31, 1606–1624.
   Google Scholar
• Pagella, F. and Sinclair, F., 2014. Development and use of a typology of mapping tools to assess their fitness for supporting management of ecosystem service provision. Landscape Ecology, 29, 383–399. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9983-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, R. and Prior, T., 2014. An ecosystem services framework to support statutory water allocation planning in Australia. International Journal of River Basin Management. doi:10.1080/15715124.2013.865635.
   Google Scholar
• Plant, R. and Ryan, P., 2013. Ecosystem services as a practicable concept for natural resources management: some lessons from Australia. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystems Services and Management, 9 (1), 44–53. doi: 10.1080/21513732.2012.737372
   Google Scholar
• Postel, S., 2002. Rivers of life the challenge of restoring health to freshwater ecosystems. Water Science and Technology, 45 (11), 3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postel, S., 2003. Securing water for people, crops and ecosystems: new mindset and new priorities. Natural Resources Forum, 27 (2), 89–98. doi: 10.1111/1477-8947.00044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posthumus, H., et al., 2010. A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England. Ecological Economics, 69, 1510–1523. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhl, J.B., 1999. The (political) science of watershed management in the ecosystem age. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35 (3), 520–526. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03608.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhl, J.B. and Salzman, J., 2007. The law and policy beginnings of ecosystem services. Journal of Land Use, 22 (2), 157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Seppelt, R., et al., 2011. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48 (3), 630–636. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffel, M. and Wilford, D.J., 2012. Hydrogeomorphic processes and vegetation: disturbance, process histories, dependencies and interactions. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37, 9–22. doi: 10.1002/esp.2163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürk, J., Poortinga, A., and Verburg, P. H., 2014. Mapping ecosystem services: the supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe. Ecological Indicators, 38, 198–211. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndycroft, V.R., Benito, G., and Gregory, K.J., 2008. Fluvial geomorphology: a perspective on current status and methods. Geomorphology, 98, 2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorp, J. H., et al., 2010. Linking ecosystem services, rehabilitation and river hydrogeomorphology. BioScience, 60, 67–74. doi: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.1.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinch, R. and Provins, A., 2007. Policy appraisal and the enviornment: Wareham managed realignment case study. London: Eftec report to Defra. Eftec.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R.K., Georgiou, S., and Fisher, B., 2008. Valuing ecosystem services: the case of multi-functional Wetlands. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• UK National Ecosystem Assessment, 2011. The UK national ecosystem assessment: synthesis of the key findings. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.
   Google Scholar
• UK National Ecosystem Assessment, 2014. The UK national ecosystem assessment: synthesis of the key findings. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC, LWEC.
   Google Scholar
• Water Framework Directive UK TAG, 2014. River hydromorphology assessment technique (RHAT) [online]. Available from: http://www.wfduk.org/resources/river-hydromorphology-assessment-technique-rhat [Accessed 18 October 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Wohl, E. 2014. Time and the rivers flowing: fluvial geomorphology since 1960. Geomorphology, 216, 263–282. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Commission on Dams, 2000. Dams and development: a new framework for better decision-making. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar