Ten reasons to set up sediment budgets for river management

References

• Anon., 2013. Large-scale sediment budget of the Western Scheldt [text in Dutch]. Arnhem: Arcadis, I/RA/11387/13.080/GVH.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M.S., et al., 2005. Suspended matter in the Scheldt estuary. Hydrobiologia, 40, 79–104. doi: 10.1007/s10750-004-7122-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vriend, H.J., 2015. The long-term response of rivers to engineering works and climate change. Civil Engineering, 168 (3), 139–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council establishing a framework for the community action in the field of water policy. Brussels: European Parliament and Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Frings, R.M., et al., 2014a. Fluvial sediment budget of a modern, restrained river: the lower reach of the Rhine in Germany. Catena, 122, 91–102. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, R.M., et al., 2014b. Today’s sediment budget of the Rhine River channel, focusing on the Upper Rhine Graben and Rhenish Massif. Geomorphology, 204, 573–587. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.08.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, R.M., et al., 2017. From source to mouth: basin-scale morphodynamics of the Rhine River. Earth Science Reviews. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Frings, R.M., Schüttrumpf, H., and Vollmer, S., 2011. Verification of porosity predictors for fluvial sand-gravel deposits. Water Resources Research, 47 (7), 1–15. doi: 10.1029/2010WR009690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gölz, E., 1994. Bed degradation – nature, causes, countermeasures. Water Science and Technology, 3, 325–333.
   Google Scholar
• Hillebrand, G. and Frings, R.M., in press. Sediment budget of the Rhine River 1991–2010 (Report No. CHR-22). Lelystad: CHR/International Commission for the Hydrology of the Rhine Basin. doi: 10.5675/KHR_22.2017
   Google Scholar
• Kondolf, G.M. and Matthews, W.V.G., 1991. Unmeasured residuals in sediment budgets: a cautionary note. Water Resources Research, 27, doi: 10.1029/91WR01625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment and Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2014. Delta Programme 2015. Working on the delta. The decisions to keep the Netherlands safe and liveable [text in Dutch]. The Hague: Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment / Ministry of Economic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, A.J., 2011. How useful are sediment budgets? Progress in Physical Geography, 36 (1), 60–71. doi: 10.1177/0309133311424591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, L.M. and Dunne, T., 1996. Rapid evaluation of sediment budgets. Reiskirchen: Catena.
   Google Scholar
• Rijkswaterstaat, 2014. The national flood risk analysis for the Netherlands. VNK Project Office, Final report.
   Google Scholar
• Schielen, R.M.J. and Havinga, H., 2010. Long-term claims in the Dutch river area: handling climate change, safety, navigation and nature. Proceedings River Flow, 2010, 1429–1436.
   Google Scholar
• Sieben, J., 2008. Sediment dynamics in the Dutch Rhine branches. International Journal of River Basin Management, 6 (4), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Slaymaker, O., 2003. The sediment budget as conceptual framework and management tool. Hydrobiologia, 494, 71–82. doi: 10.1023/A:1025437509525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temmerman, S. and Kirwan, M.L., 2015. Building land with a rising sea. Science, 6248, 588–589. doi: 10.1126/science.aac8312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temmerman, S., et al., 2013. Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change. Nature, 504, 79–83. doi: 10.1038/nature12859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Brinke, W.B.M., 1998. The importance of large-magnitude floods for long-term sediment transport and morphodynamics in the Dutch Rhine river system. In: A. Kroon and G. Ruessink, eds. Geographical developments in coastal morphodynamics, 59–81. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Brinke, W.B.M., 2005. The Dutch Rhine – a restrained river. Diemen: Veen Magazines.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Brinke, W.B.M., et al., 2001. Sediment budget Rhine branches 2000 [text in Dutch]. Arnhem: Rijkswaterstaat/RIZA.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Brinke, W.B.M., Schulze, F.H., and Van der Veer, P., 2004. Sand exchange between groyne field beaches along the Rhine and the main channel: the impact of navigation traffic versus river flow. River Research and Applications, 20, 899–928. doi: 10.1002/rra.809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Slobbe, E., et al., 2013. Building with nature: in search of resilient storm surge protection strategies. Natural Hazards, 66, 1461–1480. doi: 10.1007/s11069-013-0612-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vuren, S., Paarlberg, A., and Havinga, H.J. 2015. The aftermath of “Room for the River” and restoration works: Coping with excessive maintenance dredging. Journal of Hydro-environment Research, 9 (2), 172–186. doi: 10.1016/j.jher.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wesenbeeck, B.K., et al., 2014. Rejuvenation of half-natural salt marshes [text in Dutch]. Driebergen: VBNE Vereniging van Bos- en Natuurterreineigenaren, 2014/OBN-196-DK.
   Google Scholar
• Walling, D.E. and Collins, A., 2008. The catchment sediment budget as a management tool. Environmental Science and Policy, 11, 136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar