Evaluation of the laser diffraction method for the measurement of suspended sediment concentration in Mogi-Guaçu reservoir (São Paulo, Brazil)

References

• Agrawal, Y. C. and Pottsmith, H. C., 2000. Instruments for particle size and settling velocity observations in sediment transport. Marine Geology, 168, 89–114. doi: 10.1016/S0025-3227(00)00044-X
   Google Scholar
• Agriculture, Commerce, Defense and Interior Departments, 1978. National handbook of recommended methods for water-data acquisition sediment. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn, J. H., 2012. Size distribuition and settling velocities of suspended particles in a tidal embayment. Water Research, 46, 3219–3228. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.038
   Google Scholar
• Bortoluzzi, E. C. and Poleto, C. 2006. Methodologies for sediment studies: emphasis on the proportion and mineralogical nature of the particles. In: C. Poleto and G. H. Merten, eds. Qualidade dos sedimentos. Chapter 3, Porto Alegre: ABRH, 83–140.
   Google Scholar
• Branco, S. M. and Rocha, A. A., 1977. Pollution, protection and multiple uses of dams. São Paulo: CETESB.
   Google Scholar
• Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency (ANEEL), 2015. Power generating capacity of the state of São Paulo [online]. Available from: http://www.aneel.gov.br/aplicacoes/ResumoEstadual/GeracaoTipoFase.asp?tipo=5&fase=3&UF=SP:S%C3O%20PAULO [Accessed 22 May 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), 2010. Census data 2010 [online]. Available from: http://www.censo2010.ibge.gov.br [Accessed 5 Dec 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Brazilian Technical Standards Association, 1989. ABNT NBR 10,664: water – determination of residues (solids) – gravimetric method.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, N. O., 2008. Hidrosedimentology practice. Rio de Janeiro: Interciência.
   Google Scholar
• Czuba, J. A., et al., 2015. Comparison of fluvial suspended-sediment concentrations and particle-size distributions measured with in stream laser diffraction and in physical samples. Water Resources Research, 51, 320–340.
   Google Scholar
• Daphne, L. H. X., et al., 2011. Correlation between turbidity and total suspended solids in Singapore rivers. The Journal of Water Sustainability, 1 (3), 313–322.
   Google Scholar
• Deines, K. L, 1999. Backscatter estimation using Broadband acoustic Doppler current profilers. Proceedings of IEEE of the 6th CMTC. Working Conference on Current Measurement.
   Google Scholar
• Dinehart, R. L. and Burau, J. R., 2005. Repeated surveys by acoustic Doppler current profiler and sediment dynamics in a tidal river. Journal of Hydrology, 314, 1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.019
   Google Scholar
• Du, Y. and Song, X, 2012. A on-site monitoring system of reservoir sediment for three gorges. Advances in Electronic Engineering, Communication and Management, 1, 29–38. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-27287-5_6
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Company of the State of São Paulo (CETESB), 2014. Internal water quality report of the state of São Paulo: appendix B [online]. Available from: http://www.cetesb.sp.gov.br/agua/aguas-superficiais/35-publicacoes-/-relatorios: CETESB [Accessed 20 May 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Felix, D., et al., 2013. Laboratory investigation on measuring suspended sediment by portable laser diffractometer (LISST) focusing on particle shape. Geo-Marine Letters, 33, 485–498. doi: 10.1007/s00367-013-0343-1
   Google Scholar
• Fillipa, L., et al., 2011. Laboratory evaluation of two LISST-25X using river sediments. Sedimentary Geology, 238, 268–276. doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2011.04.017
   Google Scholar
• Gartner, J. W., et al., 2001. Laboratory and field evaluations of the LISST-100 instrument for suspended particle size determinations. Marine Geology, 175, 199–219. doi: 10.1016/S0025-3227(01)00137-2
   Google Scholar
• Goovaerts, P, 1999. Geostatistics in soil science: state of the art and perspectives. Geoderma, 89, 1–45. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00078-0
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J.R., 2003. Geological survey suspended-sediment surrogate research on optic, acoustic and pressure-difference technologies. In: Suspended-sediment technologies considered at the interagency workshop on turbidity other sediment surrogates. Proceedings …  Reston, USGS.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J.R. and Landers, M.N. 2014. Measuring suspended sediment. In: S. Ahuja, ed. Comprehensive water quality and purification. New York: Elsevier, 1, 157–204.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M., et al., 2017. A combined use of acoustic and optical devices to investigate suspended sediment in rivers. Advances in Warer Resources, 102, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.01.008
   Google Scholar
• Haun, S., et al., 2013. Three-dimensional measurements and numerical modelling of suspended sediments in a hydropower reservoir. Journal of Hydrology, 479, 180–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.060
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization, 2009. ISO 13,320. Particle size analysis: laser diffraction methods. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Karageorgis, A. P., et al., 2012. Spatial and seasonal variability of particulate matter optical and size properties in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Marine Systems, 105–108 (108), 123–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Lengnick, L. L. and Fox, R. H., 1994. Simulation by NCSWAP of seasonal nitrogen dynamics in corn: I. Soil Nitrate. Agronomy Journal, 87 (1), 167–175. doi: 10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600010030x
   Google Scholar
• Lwenya, C. and Yongo, E, 2010. Human aspects of siltation of Lake Baringo: causes, impacts and interventions. Aquatic Ecosystem Heath and Management, 13, 437–441. doi: 10.1080/14634988.2010.524497
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, K., 1987. Reservoir sedimentation: impact, extend and mitigation. World Bank Tech. Paper, 71. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• MALVERN, 2014. Laser diffraction [online]. Available from: http://www.malvern.com/br/products/technology/laser-diffraction/default.aspx [Accessed 28 Aug 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Mccully, P., 2001. Rios silenciados. Ecología y política de las grandes represas. Argentina: Proteger.
   Google Scholar
• Mogi-Guaçu River Basin Committee (RBC Mogi), 2008. Plan of the hydrographical basin 2008–2011. São Paulo: RBC Mogi.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, A. C., 1995. Hydropower, environment and development. São Paulo: Makron Books.
   Google Scholar
• National Water Agency (ANA), 2012. Guidelines for operation of hydrometric stations. Brasília: ANA; Superintendence of Hydrometereological Network Management.
   Google Scholar
• National Water Agency and Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency (ANA-ANEEL), 2010. Joint resolution 003, at 10 August 2010. Brasília, DF: Official Diary of the Union.
   Google Scholar
• Rakhmatullaev, S., et al., 2011. Geostatistical approach for the assessment of the water reservoir capacity in arid regions: a case study of the Akdarya reservoir, Uzbekistan. Environmental Earth Sciences, 63, 447–460. doi: 10.1007/s12665-010-0711-3
   Google Scholar
• Rügner, H., et al., 2013. Turbidity as a proxy for total suspended solids (TSS) and particle facilitated pollutant transport in catchments. Environmental Earth Sciences, 69 (2), 373–380. doi: 10.1007/s12665-013-2307-1
   Google Scholar
• Sassi, M.G., et al., 2012. Impact of sound attenuation by suspended sediment on ADCP backscatter calibrations. Water Resources, 48 Bellevue, Wash.
   Google Scholar
• Scheuerlein, H., 1990. Removal of sediment deposits in reservoirs by means of flushing. ed. In: International Conference on Water Resources in Mountainous Regions, Symposium 3: Impact of artificial reservoirs on hydrological equilibrium, 1990, Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Sentelhas, P. C., et al., 1997. Analysis comparative of meteorological data obtained by conventional and automatic stations. Revista Brasileira Agrometeorológica, 5 (2), 215–221.
   Google Scholar
• SEQUOIA, Scientific Sequoia Inc, 2013. LISST 100X: submersible particle size analyzer [online]. Available from: http://www.sequoiasci.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/LISST-100X.pdf. [Accessed 5 Oct 2014].
   Google Scholar
• SEQUOIA, Scientific Sequoia Inc, 2015. SEQUOIA: Products [online]. Available from: http://www.sequoiasci.com/products/. [Accessed 20 Jun 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Suguio, K. and Bigarella, J. J., 1979. River environment: sedimentation environments, their interpretation and importance. Curitiba: Federal University of Paraná, Environmental Education and Defence Association.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, D. J., et al., 2006. High-resolution monitoring of suspended-sediment concentration and grain size in the Colorado river using laser-diffraction instruments and three-frequency acoustic system. ed. In: 8th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, 2–6 April 2006, Reno, NV, 539–546.
   Google Scholar
• Unverricht, D., et al., 2014. Suspended sediment dynamics during the inter-monsoon season in the subaqueous Mekong delta and adjacent shelf, southern Vietnam. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 79, 509–519. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.10.008
   Google Scholar
• White, R., 2001. Evacuation of sediments from reservoirs. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, N. D., et al., 2007. High temporal resolution in situ measurement of the effective particle size characteristics of fluvial suspended sediment. Water Resources, 41 (5), 1081–1093.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. N. and Crawford, C. G, 2011. Estimation of suspended-sediment concentration from total suspended solids and turbidity data for Kentucky, 1978–1995. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 47, 739–749. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00538.x
   Google Scholar
• Xiau, L., et al., 2014. Laboratory application of laser grain-size analyzer in determining suspended sediment concentration. Journal Ocean University China, 13 (3), 375–380. doi: 10.1007/s11802-014-1973-2
   Google Scholar