Comparing 1-D sediment transport modeling with field observations: Simkins Dam removal case study

References

• AECOM and Stillwater Sciences, 2015. Draft dam removal concepts evaluation report, Matilija Dam removal, sediment transport, and Robles Diversion mitigation project. Prepared for Ventura County Watershed Protection District, August 13. Available from: http://www.matilijadam.org/ [Accessed 15 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Bountry, J., and Randle, T., 2001. Hydraulic and sediment transport analysis and modeling, appendix B in Savage Rapids Dam Sediment Evaluation Study. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Pacific Northwest Region, Lower Columbia Area Office, 825 NE Multnomah Street, Suite 1110, Portland, Oregon 97232-2135.
   Google Scholar
• Bountry, J.A., Lai, Y.G., and Randle, T.J., 2013. Sediment impacts from the savage rapids dam removal, Rogue River, Oregon. Reviews in Engineering Geology, 21, 93–104. doi:10.1130/2013.4121(08).
   Google Scholar
• Brownlie, W.R., 1982. Prediction of flow depth and sediment discharge in open channels. Ph.D. Thesis. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), 1996. Sediment Analysis and Modeling of the River Erosion Alternative. Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Project, Washington, Elwha Technical Series PN-95-9, October.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), 2004. Hydrology, hydraulics and sediment studies of alternatives for the Matilija Dam Ecosystem Restoration Project, Ventura, CA. Final Report, September.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), 2011. Hydrology, hydraulics and sediment transport studies for the Secretary’s determination on Klamath Dam removal and basin restoration. Technical Report No. SRH-2011-02, prepared for Mid-Pacific region, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhry, M.H., 1993. Open channel flow. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cleaves, E.T., Edwards, J., Jr., and Glaser, J.D., 1968. Geologic Map of Maryland: Maryland Geological Survey, Baltimore, Maryland, scale 1:250,000.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, M.J., et al., 2017. Channel response to sediment release: insights from a paired dam-removal analysis. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42 (11), 1636–1651. doi:10.1002/esp.4108.
   Google Scholar
• Conlon, M., 2013. A hindcast comparing the response of the Souhegan River to dam removal with the simulations of the Dam Removal Express Assessment Model-1. thesis. Boston College M.S.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, J.E., 1975. Effects of agriculture on erosion and sedimentation in the Piedmont province, Maryland. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 86, 1281–1286. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1975)86<1281:EOAOEA>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., and Parker, G., 2005. Numerical model of sediment pulses and sediment-sully disturbances in mountain rivers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 131 (8), 646–656. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:8(646).
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., and Wilcox, A., 2008. Development and Application of Numerical Models of Sediment Transport Associated with Dam Removal. Chapter 23 in Sedimentation Engineering: Processes, Measurements, Modeling, and Practice, ASCE Manual 110, Garcia, M.H., ed., 995-1020, ASCE, Reston, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., et al., 2006a. Dam removal express assessment models (DREAM). part 1: model development and validation. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 44 (3), 291–307. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2006.9521683
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., et al., 2006b. Dam removal express assessment models (DREAM). part 2: sensitivity tests/sample runs. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 44 (3), 308–323. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2006.9521684
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., et al., 2008. Simulating sediment transport in a flume with forced pool-riffle morphology: examinations of two one-dimensional numerical models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134 (7), 892–904. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:7(892).
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., et al., 2011. Practical considerations for modeling sediment transport dynamics in rivers. Stream Restoration in Dynamic Fluvial Systems: Scientific Approaches, Analyses, and Tools, Simon, A., Bennett, S.J., and Castro, J. eds., 503-527, American Geophysical Union.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., et al., 2014. Marmot Dam removal project, Sandy River, Oregon: lessons learned from sediment transport model predictions and long-term post-removal monitoring. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 140 (9), 04014044. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000894.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., et al., 2017. Analyses of the erosion of fine sediment deposit for a large dam-removal project: an empirical approach. The International Journal of River Basin Management, 15 (1), 103–114. doi:10.1080/15715124.2016.1247362.
   Google Scholar
• DeTemple, B., and Wilcock, P., 2014. Morphodynamic modeling of dam removal, Patapsco River, Maryland. Technical Report, prepared for American Rivers, 1101 14th St NW, Suite 1400, Washington, D.C., May 28.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, P.W., et al., 2009. Managing reservoir sediment release in dam removal projects: an approach informed by physical and numerical modeling of non-cohesive sediment. International Journal of River Basin Management, 7 (4), 433–452. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2009.9635401
   Google Scholar
• East, A.E., et al., 2015. Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: river channel and floodplain geomorphic change. Geomorphology, 228, 765–786. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.08.028.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R., and Church, M., 2009. A critical perspective on 1-D modeling of river processes: Gravel load and aggradation in lower Fraser River. Water Resources Research, 45, W11424. doi:10.1029/2009WR007740.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Boix, C., Martin-Vide, J.P., and Parker, G., 2014. Channel evolution after dam removal in a poorly sorted sediment mixture: experiments and numerical model. Water Resources Research, 50 (11), 8997–9019. doi:10.1002/2014WR015550.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, M.M., et al., 2017. Dam removal—listening in. Water Resources Research, 53, 5229–5246. doi:10.1002/2017WR020457.
   Google Scholar
• Gartner, J.D., Magilligan, F.J., and Renshaw, C.E., 2015. Predicting the type, location and magnitude of geomorphic response to dam removal: role of hydrologic and geomorphic constraints. Geomorphology, 251, 20–30. doi:10.1016/j.geomorpho.2015.02.013 doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.02.023
   Google Scholar
• Gesch, D.B., 2007. The national elevation dataset. Chapter 4 In: D. Maune, ed. Digital elevation model technologies and applications—the DEM users’ manual. 2nd ed. Bethesda, MA: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 99–118. Available from: http://topotools.cr.usgs.gov/pdfs/Gesch_Chp_4_Nat_Elev_Data_2007.pdf [Accessed 22 August 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Interfluve, 2009a. Simkins Dam removal draft sediment management and water routing plan, Technical Report, prepared for American Rivers, 1101 14th St. NW, Suite 1400, Washington, DC 20005.
   Google Scholar
• Interfluve, 2009b. Simkins Dam removal draft design report, Technical Report, prepared for American Rivers, 1101 14th St. NW, Suite 1400, Washington, DC 20005.
   Google Scholar
• Juez, C., et al., 2016. A model based on Hirano-Exner equations for two-dimensional transport flows over heterogeneous erodible beds. Advances in Water Resources, 87 (1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.advwaters.2015.10.013 doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.10.013
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, C.B., 2009. Simulating the recovery of suspended sediment transport and river-bed stability in response to dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington. Ecological Engineering, 35, 1104–1115. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.03.018.
   Google Scholar
• Langendoen, E.J., 2010. Assessing post-dam removal sediment dynamics using the CONCEPTS computer model. Second joint federal interagency conference, June 27–July 1, Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Langendoen, E.J., Wells, R.R., and Simon, A., 2005. Numerical simulation of post dam removal sediment dynamics along the Kalamazoo River between Otsego and Plainwell, Michigan. In: G.E. Moglen, ed. Watershed management. Williamsburg, VA: ASCE, 476–486.
   Google Scholar
• Magilligan, F.J., et al., 2015. Immediate changes in stream channel geomorphology, aquatic habitat, and fish assemblages following dam removal in a small upland catchment. Geomorphology, 252, 158–170. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.027.
   Google Scholar
• Magirl, C.S., et al., 2015. Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: fluvial sediment load. Geomorphology, 246, 669–686. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.032.
   Google Scholar
• Major, J.J., et al., 2012. “Geomorphic response of the Sandy River, Oregon, to removal of Marmot Dam.” Professional Paper 1792, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Major, J.J., et al., 2017. Geomorphic responses to dam removal in the United States–a two-decade perspective. In: D. Tsutsumi and J. Laronne, eds. Gravel-bed rivers: processes and disasters. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 355–383.
   Google Scholar
• Maryland Department of Natural Resources Watershed Services (MDNRWS), 2005. Characterization Of The Patapsco River Lower North Branch Watershed In Howard County, Maryland, 21 pages+Appendices, February.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A.J., 1990. Flood hydrology and geomorphic effectiveness in the central appalachians. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 15 (2), 119–134. doi: 10.1002/esp.3290150203
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J.R., and Stebenne, D., 2007. New city upon a hill: a history of Columbia, Maryland. Charleston, SC: The History Press. 29403, ISBN 1596290676.
   Google Scholar
• Mussetter Engineering, Inc. (MEI), 2003. San Clemente Reservoir and Carmel River sediment-transport modeling to evaluate potential impacts of dam retrofit options. Prepared for American Water Works Service Company, VooHees, New Jersey, MEI Project No. 01-18.2, April.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J.E., Duda, J.J., and Grant, G.E., 2015. 1000 dams down and counting. Science, 348 (6234), 496–497. doi:10.1126/science.aaa9204.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, A.J., Snyder, N.P., and Collins, M.J., 2011. Rates and processes of channel response to dam removal with a sand-filled impoundment. Water Resources Research, 47, W08504. doi:10.1029/2010WR009733.
   Google Scholar
• Randle, T.J., and Bountry, J.A., 2005. Bridging the gap between numerical sediment modeling and reality for dam removal investigations. In: G.E. Moglen, ed. Watershed management. Williamsburg, VA: ASCE, 23.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J.A., et al., 2010. The hydrology and hydrometeorology of flooding in the Delaware River Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 11, 841–859. doi:10.1175/2010JHM1236.1.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J.A., Villarini, G., and Baeck, M.L., 2011. Mixture distributions and the hydroclimatology of extreme rainfall and flooding in the eastern United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 12, 294–309. doi:10.1175/2010JHM1242.1.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S.M.C., and Wilcock, P.R., 2015. Upland sediment supply and its relation to watershed sediment delivery in the contemporary mid-Atlantic Piedmont (U.S.A.). Geomorphology, 232, 33–46. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.036.
   Google Scholar
• Stillwater Sciences, 2000. Numerical modeling of sediment transport in the Sandy River, OR following removal of Marmot Dam. Technical Report, Prepared for Portland General Electric Company, Portland, Oregon, March, 48p+39 figures.
   Google Scholar
• Stillwater Sciences, 2008. Klamath River dam removal study: sediment transport DREAM-1 simulation. Technical Report, Prepared for California Coastal Conservancy, 1330 Broadway, 13th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612, 73 pages, October.
   Google Scholar
• Stillwater Sciences, 2010. Simulating sediment transport in the Patapsco River following dam removal with Dam Removal Express Assessment Model-1 (DREAM-1). Technical Report, prepared for Interfluve and American Rivers, 32 pages, January.
   Google Scholar
• Stillwater Sciences, 2014. Examining Simkins Dam removal DREAM-1 modeling with field observations. Technical Memorandum, prepared for American Rivers, 1101 14th St. NW, Suite 1400, Washington, DC 20005, April.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W.A., and Chang, H.H., 2008. Computational modeling of sedimentation processes, Chapter 14. In: M.H. Garcia, ed. Sedimentation engineering: Processes, measurements, modeling, and practice. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 649–681.
   Google Scholar
• Tullos, D.D., et al., 2016. Synthesis of common management concerns associated with dam removal. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA), 52 (5), 1179–1206, doi:10.1111/1752-1688.12450.
   Google Scholar
• URS and Stillwater Sciences, 2014. Draft initial options screening report, Matilija Dam Removal, Sediment Transport, and Robles Diversion Mitigation Project. Prepared for Ventura County Watershed Protection District, September. Available from: http://www.matilijadam.org/ [Accessed 14 July 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Warrick, J.A., et al., 2015. Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: source-to-sink sediment budget and synthesis. Geomorphology, 246, 729–750. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.01.010.
   Google Scholar
• Zunka, J., Tullos, D., and Lancaster, S., 2015. Effects of sediment pulses on bed relief in bar-pool channels. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 40, 1017–1028. doi:10.1002/esp.3697.
   Google Scholar