87
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Risk management and components’ coordination assessment in the design of a composite riverine flood defence system

&
Received 12 Dec 2022, Accepted 15 Aug 2023, Published online: 08 Sep 2023

References

  • Afshar, A., Barkhordary, L., and Mariño, M.A., 1994. Optimizing river diversion under hydraulic and hydrologic uncertainties. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 120 (1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1994)120:1(36).
  • Alimohammadi, S. and Behrouz, M., 2021. Stochastic design of flood control systems; Uncertainty propagation and results representation. Water Resources Management, 35 (13), 4457–4476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02960-x.
  • Apel, H., Merz, B., and Thieken, A.H., 2008. Quantification of uncertainties in flood risk assessments. International Journal of River Basin Management, 6 (2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2008.9635344.
  • Behrouz, M. and Alimohammadi, S., 2018. Uncertainty analysis of flood control measures including epistemic and aleatory uncertainties: Probability theory and evidence theory. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 23 (8). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001675.
  • Carter, N.T., 2016. Discount rates in the economic evaluation of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Projects. Congressional Research Service.
  • Celorrio, L. and Patelli, E., 2021. Reliability-based design optimization under mixed aleatory/epistemic uncertainties: Theory and applications. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 7 (3). https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001147.
  • Corry, M.L. and Jones, J.S., 1981. Design of encroachments on flood plains using risk analysis. Appendix A, risk analysis sample problem-U.S.11 Crossing Leaf River at Hattiesburg, MS.
  • Dai, L., et al., 2018. Flood-risk analysis based on a stochastic differential equation method. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 12 (2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12515.
  • Das, B.M., 2008. Advanced soil mechanics. Taylor & Francis e-Library.
  • De Moel, H., et al., 2015. Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20 (6), 865–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9654-z.
  • De Moel, H., Asselman, N.E.M., and Aerts, J.C.J.H., 2012. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of coastal flood damage estimates in the west of The Netherlands. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12 (4), 1045–1058. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1045-2012.
  • Fenton, G.A. and Griffiths, D.V., 2008. Risk assessment in geotechnical engineering. Wiley.
  • Flood Insurance Study, Forrest Country Mississippi and Incorporated Area, 2015. U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
  • Grigg, N.S., 2020. Uncertainty and legal foreseeability in flood risk management. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, 6 (3), 06020001.
  • Hall, J. and Solomatine, D., 2010. A framework for uncertainty analysis in flood risk management decisions. International Journal of River Basin Management, 6 (2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2008.9635339.
  • Helton, J.C., 1993. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 42 (2-3), 327–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(93)90097-I.
  • Helton, J.C., et al.,1997. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for gas and brine migration at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: Permeable shaft without panel seals. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 57 (3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00035-5.
  • Huang, K.D., et al., 2018. Risk analysis of flood control reservoir operation considering multiple uncertainties. Journal of Hydrology, 565, 672–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.040.
  • Karamouz, M., et al., 2011). Evaluation of floodplain variability considering impacts of climate change. Hydrological Processes, 25 (1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7822.
  • Kottegoda, N.T. and Rosso, R., 2009. Applied statistics for civil and environmental engineers. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill.
  • Kundzewicz, Z.W., et al., 2019. Flood risk and its reduction in China. Advances in Water Resources, 130, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.05.020.
  • Oladyshkin, S., de Barros, F.P.J., and Nowak, W., 2012. Global sensitivity analysis: A flexible and efficient framework with an example from stochastic hydrogeology. Advances in Water Resources, 37, 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.11.001.
  • Pappenberger, F., et al., 2005. Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations. Journal of Hydrology, 302 (1-4), 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.036.
  • Qi, W., et al., 2016. Imprecise probabilistic estimation of design floods with epistemic uncertainties. Water Resources Research, 52 (6), 4823–4844. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017663.
  • Scopetani, L., et al., 2022. Decision support system for managing flooding risk induced by levee breaches. International Journal of River Basin Management, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2022.2114482.
  • Song, C.G., et al., 2018. Stability analysis of riverfront facility on inundated floodplain based on flow characteristic. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11, S455–S467. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12233.
  • Storm, J.B., 2012. Flood-inundation maps for the Leaf River at Hattiesburg, Mississippi. U.S. Geological Survey.
  • Su, H.T. and Tung, Y.K., 2018. Effects of statistical sampling errors on flood-damage-reduction project evaluation. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11, S1015–S1023. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12275.
  • Torres, M.A., et al., 2014. Event-based approach for probabilistic flood risk assessment. International Journal of River Basin Management, 12 (4), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2013.847844.
  • Tung, Y.K., 1999. Risk/reliability-based hydraulic engineering design. In: L.W. Mays, ed., Hydraulic design handbook. Mc Graw-Hill, 7-1–7-56.
  • Tung, Y.K. and Bao, Y., 1990. On the optimal risk-based design of highway drainage structures. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, 4 (4), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544083.
  • Tung, Y.K. and Mays, L.W., 1981. Optimal risk-based design of flood levee systems. Water Resources Research, 17 (4), 843–852. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR017i004p00843.
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1983. Leaf and Bouie rivers Hattiesburg and Petal. Detailed project report and environmental impact statement, Mississippi. Discount Rate in the Economic Evaluation of U.S. Army Corps of Engineering Projects (2016) U.S. Congressional Research Service.
  • U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1996. Risk-based analysis for flood damage reduction studies (EM1110-2-1619).
  • Van Steenbergen, N., Ronsyn, J., and Willems, P., 2012. A non-parametric data-based approach for probabilistic flood forecasting in support of uncertainty communication. Environmental Modelling & Software, 33, 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.013.
  • Westerhof, S.G., et al., 2023. Uncertainty analysis of risk-based flood safety standards in The Netherlands through a scenario-based approach. International Journal of River Basin Management, 21 (3), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2022.2060243.
  • Wilson, K.V., 1964. Floods of 1961 in Mississippi. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 93, 64–4.
  • Zhang, P., et al., 2011. Diffuse response surface model based on moving Latin hypercube patterns for reliability-based design optimization of ultrahigh strength steel NC milling parameters. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 44 (5), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0672-5.
  • Zhang, S. and Tan, Y., 2014. Risk assessment of earth dam overtopping and its application research. Natural Hazards, 74 (2), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1207-3.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.