The institutionalization of the Kura-Aras River Basin for effective management of water resources

References

• Abbasov, R., and Flores, M., 2023. Assessment of the contribution of freshwater ecosystem services to the hydropower sector in the Kura–Araz Basin. In: S. Dhyani, etal, ed. Ecosystem and species habitat modeling for conservation and restoration. Singapore: Springer, 519–539.
   Google Scholar
• Abbasov, R., Karimov, R., and Jafarova, N., 2022. Ecosystem and socioeconomic values of clean water. In: R. Abbasov, R. Karimov, and N. Jafarova, eds. Ecosystem services in Azerbaijan. Cham: Springer, 71–121.
   Google Scholar
• Abdi, B., Bozorg-Haddad, O., and Loáiciga, H.A., 2023. International water comprehensive organization (IWCO): creating alliances for improved water management and solving water conflicts. AQUA Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society, 72 (4), 465–478. doi:10.2166/aqua.2023.181.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, S.A., et al., 2023. The hydropolitics of Upper Karabakh, with emphasis on the border conflicts and wars between Azerbaijan and Armenia. GeoJournal, 88, 1873–1888. doi:10.1007/s10708-022-10714-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alipour, F.M., 2023. Hybrid diplomacy in a nexus approach; managing shared water resources in Kura-Aras River Basin. Journal of Iran and Central Eurasia Studies, 6 (1), 87–98. doi:10.22059/JICES.2023.95143.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, M., 2006. Transboundary river floods: vulnerability of continents, international river basins and countries. Thesis (Ph.D.). Oregon State University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304036973_Transboundary_River_Floods_Vulnerability_of_Continents_International_River_Basins_and_Countries_PhD_dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, A.K., 2011. Cooperation or conflict in transboundary water management: case study of South Asia. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56 (4), 662–670. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.572886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, D., and Payton, A., 2009. Decision making in international organizations: an interest-based approach to voting rule selection. In: Paper prepared for the research in international politics workshop, 16 January 2008, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, M., and Molden, D., 2005. Making sound decisions: information needs for basin water management. In: M. Svendsen, ed. Irrigation and river basin management: options for governance and institutions. Wallingford, UK: CABI, 51–74.
   Google Scholar
• Campana, M., and Vener, B., 2013. Conflict and cooperation in the South Caucasus: the Kura-Araks Basin of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. In: M. Arsel and M. Spoor, eds. Water, environmental security and sustainable rural development: conflict and cooperation in Central Eurasia. Routledge, p. 304.
   Google Scholar
• Campana, M.E., Vener, B.B., and Lee, B.S., 2012. Hydrostrategy, hydropolitics, and security in the Kura-Araks Basin of the South Caucasus. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 149 (1), 22–32. doi:10.1111/j.1936-704X.2012.03124.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cantor, A., et al., 2018. Data for water decision making: informing the implementation of California’s open and transparent water data act through research and engagement. Berkeley, CA: Wheeler Water Institute Center for Law, Energy & the Environment University of California, Berkeley, School of Law.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Priscoli, J., 2009. River basin organizations (appendix B). In: J. Delli Priscoli and A. Wolf, eds. Managing and transforming water conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135–168.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Priscoli, J., and Wolf, A.T., 2009. Managing and transforming water conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Stefano, L., et al., 2012. Climate change and the institutional resilience of international river basins. Journal of Peace Research, 49, 193–209. doi:10.1177/00223433114274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinar, S., 2008. International water treaties. Negotiation and cooperation along transboundary rivers. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Espíndola, I.B., and Ribeiro, W.C., 2020. Transboundary waters, conflicts and international cooperation – examples of the La Plata basin. Water International, 45 (4), 329–346. doi:10.1080/02508060.2020.1734756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhendler, I., 2008. Ambiguity in transboundary environmental dispute resolution: The Israeli-Jordanian water agreement. Journal of Peace Research, 45 (1), 91–109. doi:10.1177/0022343307084925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A., and Grant, K., 2009. The emergence of cooperative institutions around transboundary waters. In: T. Volgy, Z. Sabic, P. Roter and A. Gerlak, eds. Mapping the new world order. Chichester: Wiley, 114–147.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., Lautze, J., and Giordano, M., 2011. Water resources data and information exchange in transboundary water treaties. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11 (2), 179–199. doi:10.1007/s10784-010-9144-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, E., 2007. Developing the Mekong: regionalism and regional security in China–southeast Asian relations. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies. Adelphi-Paper No. 387.
   Google Scholar
• Hajihoseini, M., et al., 2023. Conflict and cooperation in Aras International Rivers Basin: status, trend, and future. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 9, 28. doi:10.1007/s40899-022-00799-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, R., Scholes, R., and Ash, N., eds., 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: current states and trends. Findings of the condition and trends working group, 1, 893-900. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, B., 2005. Integrated river basin governance. Learning from international experience. London, UK: IWA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, B., 2006. Key performance indicators of river basin organizations. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Water Resources, US Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, B.P., and Kranz, N., 2009. Handbook for the use of IWRM key performance indicators in African transboundary basins. Paris, France: International Network of Basin Organizations (INBO); International Office for Water (IOW).
   Google Scholar
• Houdret, A., Dombrowsky, I., and Horlemann, L., 2014. The institutionalization of river basin management as politics of scale – insights from Mongolia. Journal of Hydrology, 519 (C), 2392–2404. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspers, F., and Gupta, J., 2014. Global water governance and river basin organizations. In: Huitema, D. and Meijerink, S. (eds) The politics of river basin organizations: coalitions, institutional design choices and consequences. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 38–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kallioras, A., et al., 2010. SWOT analysis in groundwater resources management of coastal aquifers: a case study from Greece. Water International, 35 (4), 425–441. doi:10.1080/02508060.2010.508929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R.O., Moravcsik, A., and Slauther, A.-M., 2000. Legalized dispute-resolution: interstate and transnational. International Organization, 54 (3), 457–488. doi:10.1162/002081800551299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaphake, A., and Kramer, A., 2011. Kura-Aras River Basin: burgeoning transboundary water issues. In: A. Kramer, A. Kibaroglu, W. Scheumann, eds. Turkey’s water policy. Berlin: Springer, 263–275.
   Google Scholar
• Kliot, N., Shmueli, D.F., and Shamir, U., 2001. Institutions for management of transboundary water resources: their nature, characteristics and shortcomings. Water Policy, 3 (3), 229–255. doi:10.1016/S1366-7017(01)00008-3.
   Google Scholar
• Koremenos, B., 2008. When, what and why do states choose to delegate. Law and Contemporary Problems, 71 (151), 151–192.
   Google Scholar
• Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., and Snidal, D., 2001. The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55 (4), 761–799. doi:10.1162/002081801317193592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lautze, J., et al., 2013. International river basin organizations: variation, options and insights. Water International, 38 (1), 30–42. doi:10.1080/02508060.2013.747418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makin, I., Parks, Y.P., and Arriens, W.L., 2004. Supporting the development of effective and efficient river basin organizations in Asia: a discussion of the applications of organizational benchmarking approaches. In: Paper prepared for the NARBO consultation workshop. Batu-Malang. Indonesia, Manila: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Meijerink, S., and Huitema, D., 2017. The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations. Ecology and Society, 22 (2), 41. doi:10.5751/ES-09388-220241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millington, P., Olsen, D., and McMillan, S., 2006. Integrated river basin management: from concepts to practice. Washington DC: World Bank. Briefing Note No. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Milman, A., and Gerlak, A.K., 2020. International river basin organizations, science, and hydrodiplomacy. Environmental Science & Policy, 107, 137–149. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S.M., and Hensel, P.R., 2007. International institutions and compliance with agreements. American Journal of Political Science, 51 (4), 721–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R., and Keilbach, P., 2001. Situation structure and institutional design: reciprocity, coercion, and exchange. International Organization, 55 (4), 891–917. doi:10.1162/002081801317193637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostert, E., 2003. Conflict and co-operation in international freshwater management: A global review. International Journal of River Basin Management, 1 (3), 1–12. doi:10.1080/15715124.2003.9635212.
   Google Scholar
• Ochoa-Ruiz, N., 2005. Dispute-settlement over non-navigational uses of international watercourses: theory and practice. In: L. Boisson de Chazournes and S. Salman Les ressources en eau et le droit international. Leiden: Brill, 343–387.
   Google Scholar
• Offutt, A., 2022. Mixing waters: stakeholder influence in transboundary water conflict and cooperation. Water International, 47 (4), 583–609. doi:10.1080/02508060.2022.2059322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangeley, R., 1994. International river basin organizations in sub-Saharan Africa. Washington DC: World Bank. Technical Paper No. 250.
   Google Scholar
• Rieu-Clarke, A., 2020. The duty to take appropriate measures to prevent significant transboundary harm and private companies: insights from transboundary hydropower projects. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 20, 667–682. doi:10.1007/s10784-020-09504-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakal, H. B., 2022. The risks of hydro-hegemony: Turkey’s environmental policies and shared water resources in the south Caucasus. Caucasus Survey, 10 (3), 294–323. doi:10.30965/23761202-20220016.
   Google Scholar
• Sant’Anna, F. M., and Ribeiro, W. C., 2014. Water security and interstate conflict and cooperation. Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 60, 573–596. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/DocumentsAnalisi/article/download/291319/379753/0.
   Google Scholar
• Schmeier, S., 2013. Governing international watercourses: river basin organizations and the sustainable governance of internationally shared rivers and lakes. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmeier, S., 2024. The role of institutionalized cooperation in transboundary basins in mitigating conflict potential over hydropower dams. Frontiers in Climate, 5, doi:10.3389/fclim.2023.1283612.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, S., and Schmeier, S., 2012. Governing environmental change in international river basins: the role of river basin organizations. International Journal of River Basin Management, 10 (3), 229–244. doi:10.1080/15715124.2012.664820.
   Google Scholar
• Sendzimir, J., Magnuszewski, P., and Gunderson, L., 2018. Adaptive management of riverine socio-ecological systems. In: S. Schmutz, J. Sendzimir, eds. Riverine ecosystem management. Aquatic Ecology Series, 8. Cham: Springer, 301–324.
   Google Scholar
• Sharipova, B., 2023. Trust in transboundary water cooperation: A social constructivist approach. In: K. Szálkai, M. Szalai, eds. Theorizing transboundary waters in international relations. Cham: Springer Water. Springer, 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Sokhem, P., Sunada, K., and Oishi, S., 2011. Managing transboundary rivers: The case of the Mekong river basin. Water International, 32 (4), 503–523. doi:10.1080/02508060.2007.9709685.
   Google Scholar
• Stoa, R.B., 2015. Shared waters of the south Caucasus: lessons for treaty formation and development. In: S. Setegn, M. Donoso, eds. Sustainability of integrated water resources management. Cham: Springer, 335–344.
   Google Scholar
• Underdal, A., 2008. The organizational infrastructure of international environmental regimes. In: U. Sverdrup and J. Trondal, eds. The organizational dimension of politics. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget, 186–205.
   Google Scholar
• UNECA, 2000. Transboundary river/lake basin water development in Africa: prospects, problems, and achievements. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: UNECA.
   Google Scholar
• Vener, B.B., and Campana, M.E., 2010. Conflict and cooperation in the South Caucasus: the Kura-Araks Basin of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. In: M. Arsel, and M. Spoor, eds. Water, environmental security and sustainable rural development: conflict and cooperation in Central Eurasia. Oxford, UK: Routledge, 144–174.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A.T., 2007. Shared waters: conflict and cooperation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 241–269. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.32.041006.101434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, A.T., Yoffe, S.B., and Giordano, M., 2003. International waters: identifying basins at risk. Water Policy, 5 (1), 29–60. doi:10.2166/wp.2003.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, P., and Muller, M., 2017. Water governance—An historical perspective on current debates. World Development, 92, 225–241. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanatta, L., and Alvi, M., 2024. Assessing water (Ir)rationality in Nagorno-Karabakh. In: A. Mihr, C. Pierobon, eds. Polarization, shifting borders and liquid governance. Cham: Springer, 79–97.
   Google Scholar
• Zawahri, N.A., 2008. Designing river commissions to implement treaties and manage water disputes. Water International, 33 (4), 464–474. doi:10.1080/02508060802474566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeeb, S., 2010. Adaptation to climate change in the Kura-Aras River Basin. Azerbaijan: River Basin Snapshot Draft for Discussion, Competence Center Water and Waste Management, 1−46. https://iwlearn.net/resolveuid/166c61b7bbfc4def7dffa12d5102d4b3.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., and Mirumachi, N., 2008. Transboundary water interaction I: reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements: Political Law Economy, 8, 297–316. doi:10.1007/s10784-008-9083-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar