Strategic flood risk management over time. Applying a temporal lens to see how flood risk management measures are (or are not) implemented

References

• Adam, B., 2004. Time. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., 2004. Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., 2006. Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Some evidence from Europe and Australia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38, 1149–1170. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., et al., 2017. Longitudinal assessment of climate vulnerability: a case study from the Canadian Arctic. Sustainability Science, 12, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0401-5.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, S.D., et al., 2009. Policy learning for flood mitigation: a longitudinal assessment of the community rating system in Florida. Risk Analysis, 29, 912–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01210.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Lagendijk, A., and Jacobs, W., 2007. A theory of institutional change: illustrated by Dutch City-Provinces and dutch land policy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 39, 891–908. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collentine, D., and Futter, N.N., 2018. Realising the potential of natural water retention measures in catchment flood management: trade-offs and matching interests. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadson, S.J., et al., 2017. A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK. Proceedings of the Royal Society A – Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 473, 20160706. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, M., et al., 2022. RegioFEM — applying a floodplain evaluation method to support a future-oriented flood risk management (Part II). Journal of Flood Risk Management, 15, e12758. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12758.
   Google Scholar
• EU, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2000/60/oj [Accessed 15 September 2023].
   Google Scholar
• EU, 2007. Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32007L0060&qid=1694786938445 [Accessed 15 September 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Fioretos, O., Falleti, T. G., and Sheingate, A. 2016. Historical institutionalism in political science. In: O. Fioretos, T.G. Falleti, and A. Sheingate, eds. Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Flaherty, M.G., 2011. The textures of time. Agency and temporal experience. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., and Schot, J., 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J., 2017. Case study research. Principles and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granqvist, K., and Mäntysalo, R. 2020. Strategic turn in planning and the role of institutional innovation. In: A. Hagen, and U. Higdem, eds. Innovation in public planning. Calculate, communicate and innovate. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Gryzmala-Busse, A., 2011. Time will tell? Temporality and the analysis of causal mechanisms and processes. Comparative Political Studies, 44, 1267–1297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010390653.
   Google Scholar
• Habersack, H., Kristelly, C., and Hauer, C., 2012. Analyse von geplanten Hochwasserschutzmaßnahmen an der Aist in Oberösterreich. Gutau: Hochwasserschutzverband Aist. http://www.hws-aist.at/media/dokumente/121203_GutachtenHabersack.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., Slavikova, L., and Wilkinson, M., eds. 2022. Spatial flood risk management. Implementing catchment-based retention and resilience on private land. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1997. The revival of strategic spatial planning in Europe. In: P. Healey et al., eds. Making strategic spatial plans. Innovation in Europe. London: UCL Press, 3-19.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., 2009. In search of the “strategic” in spatial strategy making. Planning Theory & Practice, 10, 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903417191.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G.M., 2006. What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, G., 2007. Strategic planning for long-term flood risk management: some suggestions for learning how to make strategy at regional and local level. International Planning Studies, 12, 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470701640168.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, G., and Joshi, N., 2024. Duration and speed of change – applying a temporal lens to just transitions of urban energy systems. Dresden: IOER (Paper under review).
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, G., and Wiechmann, T., 2022. Time, temporality, and planning – comments on the state of art in strategic spatial planning research. Planning Theory & Practice, 23, 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.2008172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, G., Wiechmann, T., and Krüger, T. 2019. Strategische Planung. In: T. Wiechmann, ed. ARL reader Planungstheorie. Band 2: Strategische Planung – Planungskultur. Berlin: Springer, 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Immergut, E.M. 2006. Historical-institutionalism in political science and the problem of change. In: A. Wimmer, and R. Kössler, eds. Understanding change. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 237–259.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., and Priest, S.J., 2008. Flood risk management in England: a changing landscape of risk responsibility? International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24, 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620801923146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundzewicz, Z.W., 2002. Non-structural flood protection and sustainability. Water International, 27, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060208686972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, S.N., 2017. Natural flood management. WIREs Water, 4, e1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1211.
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, J., 2003. Institutional stability and change: two sides of the same coin. Journal of European Public Policy, 10, 912–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000148360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löschner, L., et al., 2022. RegioFEM – informing future-oriented flood risk management at the regional scale (Part I). Journal of Flood Risk Management, 15, e12754. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12754.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., 2021. The logic of social science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., Mohamedali, K., and Nguyen, C. 2016. Causality and time in historical institutionalism. In: O. Fioretos, T.G. Falleti, and A. Sheingate, eds. Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 71–88.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and Hupe, P., 2011. Talking about government: the role of magic concepts. Public Management Review, 13, 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.532963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, M.S. 2004. Central issues in the study of change and innovation. In: M.S. Poole, and A.H. Van de Ven, eds. Handbook of organizational change and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Puchinger, F., and Henle, A., 2007. Regionalplanungen—ein Instrument zur Umsetzung nachhaltiger Schutzkonzepte. Wildbach- und Lawinenverbauu, 71, 90–99.
   Google Scholar
• Raffaelli, R., and Glynn, M.A. 2015. Institutional innovation: novel, useful and legitimate. In: C.E. Shalley, M.A. Hitt, and J. Zhou, eds. The Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 407–420.
   Google Scholar
• Rauter, M., et al., 2020. Flood risk management in Austria: analysing the shift in responsibility-sharing between public and private actors from a public stakeholder's perspective. Land Use Policy, 99, 105017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105017.
   Google Scholar
• Redmond, W.H., 2003. Innovation, diffusion, and institutional change. Journal of Economic Issues, 37, 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2003.11506608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seebauer, S., et al., 2023. How path dependency manifests in flood risk management: observations from four decades in the Ennstal and Aist catchments in Austria. Regional Environmental Change, 23, 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02029-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seebauer, S., and Babcicky, P., 2021. (Almost) all quiet over one and a half years: a longitudinal study on causality between key determinants of private flood mitigation. Risk Analysis, 41, 958–975. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13598.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thaler, T., et al., 2019. Drivers and barriers of adaptation initiatives – how societal transformation affects natural hazard management and risk mitigation in Europe. Science of the Total Environment, 650, 1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, T., et al., 2023. Natural flood management: opportunities to implement nature-based solutions on privately owned land. WIREs Water, 10, e1637. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1637.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, T., and Penning-Rowsell, E.C., 2023. Policy experimentation within flood risk management: transition pathways in Austria. The Geographical Journal, https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thaler, T., Priest, S.J., and Fuchs, S., 2016. Evolving inter-regional cooperation in flood risk management: distances and types of partnership approaches in Austria. Regional Environmental Change, 16, 841–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0796-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, T., Seebauer, S., and Schindelegger, A., 2020. Patience, persistence and pre-signals: policy dynamics of planned relocation in Austria. Global Environmental Change, 63, 102122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K.E., 1993. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations. The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton, G., and Gilvear, D.J., 2007. River restoration in the UK: meeting the dual needs of the European union water framework directive and flood defence? International Journal of River Basin Management, 5, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2007.9635314.
   Google Scholar
• Wiering, M.A., et al., 2017. Varieties of flood risk governance in Europe: How do countries respond to driving forces and what explains institutional change? Global Environmental Change, 44, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiering, M., Liefferink, D., and Crabbé, A., 2018. Stability and change in flood risk governance: on path dependencies and change agents. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11, 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar