A review of frontier approaches to efficiency and productivity measurement in urban water utilities

REFERENCES

• Abbott, M. and Cohen, B., 2009. Productivity and efficiency in the water industry. Utilities Policy, 17 (3–4), 233–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonioli, B. and Filippini, M., 2001. The use of variable cost function in the regulation of the Italian water industry. Utilities Policy, 10 (3–4), 181–187.
   Google Scholar
• Anwandter, L. and Ozuna, T., 2002. Can public sector reforms improve the efficiency of public water utilities. Environment and Development Economics, 7 (4), 687–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubert, C. and Reynaud, A., 2005. The impact of regulation on cost efficiency: An empirical analysis of Wisconsin water utilities. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23 (3), 383–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, K.J., 2010. Privatizing water: Governance failure and the world's urban water crisis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, A., Harris, T., Narayanan, R., and Raffiee, K., 1995. Specification and estimation of the effect of ownership on the economic efficiency of the water utilities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25 (6), 759–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, A., Parker, E., and Raffie, K., 1994. An examination of the effect of ownership on the relative efficiency of public and private water utilities. Land Economics, 70 (2), 197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottasso, A. and Conti, M., 2003. Cost inefficiency in the English and Welsh water industry: An heteroskedastic stochastic cost frontier approach, Department of Economics Discussion Paper No. 575, University of Essex. Available from: http://www.essex.ac.uk/economics/discussion-papers/papers-text/dp573.pdf [Accessed 15 September 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Bottasso, A. and Conti, M., 2009. Scale economies, technology, and technical change in the water industry: Evidence from the English water only sector. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39 (2), 138–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J., Crase, L., Dollery, B., and Villano, R., 2009. An analysis of the relative efficiency of wastewater utilities in non-metropolitan New South Wales and Victoria. Australian Journal of Regional Studies, 15 (2), 153–169.
   Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J., Crase, L., Dollery, B.E., and Villano, R., 2010. The relative economic efficiency of urban water utilities in regional New South Wales and Victoria. Resource and Energy Economics, 32 (3), 439–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelli, T. and Walding, S., 2006. Performance measurement in the Australian water supply industry: A preliminary analysis. In: T.Coelli and D.Lawrence, eds. Performance measurement and regulation of network utilities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 29–62.
   Google Scholar
• Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., O'Donnell, C.J., and Battese, G.E., 2005. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. 2nd ed.New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., and Tone, K., 2006. Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: With DEA-Solver software and references. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, W.W., Huang, Z.M., Lelas, V., Li, S.X., and Olesen, O.B., 1998. Chance constrained programming formulations for stochastic characterizations of efficiency and dominance in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9 (1), 53–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSIRO, 2012. Urban water research theme, Available from: http://www.csiro.au/Organisation-Structure/Flagships/Water-for-a-Healthy-Country-Flagship/Urban-Water/Urban-Water-overview.aspx [Accessed 8 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Cubbin, J., 2004. Assessing Ofwat's efficiency econometrics: A report for Water UK, Available from: http://www.staff.city.ac.uk/∼sm340/Consulting&Policy/Water%20UK%20Assessing%20Ofwat%20Final140404.pdf [Accessed 12 May 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Cubbin, J., 2005. Efficiency in the water industry. Utilities Policy, 13 (4), 289–293.
   Google Scholar
• Cubbin, J. and Tzanidakis, G., 1998. Regression versus data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement: An application to the England and Wales regulated water industry. Utilities Policy, 7 (2), 75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva e Souza, G., Coelho de Faria, R., Belchiar, S., and Moreira, T., 2007. Estimating the relative efficiency of Brazilian publicly and privately owned water utilities: A stochastic cost frontier approach. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43 (5), 1237–1244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva e Souza, G., Coelho de Faria, R., Belchior, T., and Moreira, S., 2008. Efficiency of Brazilian public and private water utilities. Estudos Economicos, 38 (4), 905–917.
   Google Scholar
• Erbetta, F. and Cave, M., 2006. Regulation and efficiency incentives: Evidence from the England and Wales water and sewerage industry. Review of Network Economics, 6 (2), 425–452.
   Google Scholar
• Estache, A. and Rossi, M., 2002. How different is the efficiency of public and private water companies in Asia?World Bank Economic Review, 16 (1), 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estache, A. and Trujillo, L., 2003. Efficiency effects of ‘privatization’ in Argentina's water and sanitation services. Water Policy, 5 (4), 369–380.
   Google Scholar
• Fabbri, P. and Fraquelli, G., 2000. Costs and structure of technology in the Italian water industry. Empirica, 27 (1), 65–82.
   Google Scholar
• Faria, C.R., Souza, G., and Moreira, T., 2005. Public versus private water utilities: Empirical evidence for Brazilian companies. Economics Bulletin, 8 (2), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Filippini, M., Hrovatin, N., and Zorić, J., 2008. Cost efficiency of Slovenian water distribution utilities: An application of stochastic frontier methods. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 29 (2), 169–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraquelli, G. and Moiso, V., 2005. Cost efficiency and economies of scale in the Italian water industry, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica (SIEP). Dipartimento di Economia Pubblica e Territoriale – Università di Pavia. Available from: http://www-3.unipv.it/websiep/wp/420.pdf [Accessed 7 May 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Fraquelli, G., Piacenza, M., and Vannoni, D., 2004. Scope and scale economies in multiutilities: Evidence from gas, water and electricity combinations. Applied Economics, 36 (18), 2045–2057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frontier Economics, 2008. Urban water markets: A final report prepared for the joint steering committee for water sensitive cities (JSCWSC). Melbourne: Frontier Economics Pty. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, S., Moreaux, M., and Reynaud, A., 2007. Measuring economies of vertical integration in network industries: An application to the water sector. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25, 791–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Sánchez, I.M., 2006. Efficiency measurement in Spanish local government: The case of municipal water services. Review of Policy Research, 23 (2), 355–371.
   Google Scholar
• García-Valinas, M.A. and Muniz, M.A., 2007. Is DEA useful in the regulation of water utilities? A dynamic efficiency evaluation. Applied Economics, 39 (2), 245–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guder, J., Kittlau, B., Moll, R., Walter, M., and Zschille, M., 2009. The performance of German water utilities: A first non-parametric analysis, DIW Berlin (German Institute for Economic Research) and Dresden University of Technology Efficiency Analysis Working Papers. WP-EA-20. Available from: http://www.webmeets.com/files/papers/EARIE/2009/199/water_structural_benchmarking_germany.pdf [Accessed 9 May 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Z. and Li, S.X., 2001. Stochastic DEA models with different types of input–output disturbances. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 15 (2), 95–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, C., Parker, D., and Zhang, Y.F., 2006. State versus private sector provision of water services in Africa: An empirical analysis. World Bank Economic Review, 20 (1), 143–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, D., Dichev, D., and Raffiee, K., 1993. Ownership and sources of inefficiency in the provision of water services. Water Resources Research, 29 (6), 1573–1578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S.X., 1998. Stochastic models and variable returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 104 (3), 532–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynk, E.L., 1993. Privatisation, joint production and the comparative efficiencies of private and public ownership: The UK water industry case. Fiscal Studies, 14 (2), 98–116.
   Google Scholar
• Mosheim, R., 2006. A shadow cost function model of the US water industry incorporating water quality and ownership effects. In: T.Coelli and D.Lawrence, eds. Performance Measurement and Regulation of Network Utilities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 243–267.
   Google Scholar
• Munisamy, S., 2010. Efficiency and ownership in water supply: evidence from Malaysia. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Business Research Conference. 8–9 April. Dubai: United Arab Emirates. Available from: www.wbiconpro.com/3.Susila.pdf [Accessed 10 May 2010]
   Google Scholar
• National Water Commission, 2012. Urban water, Available from: http://nwc.gov.au/urban [Accessed 8 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Nauges, C. and van den Berg, C., 2008. Economies of density, scale and scope in the water supply and sewerage sector: A study of four developing and transition economies. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 34 (2), 144–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, M. and Stoker, B., 1991. Data envelopment analysis: The assessment of performance. Chichester, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ofwat, 2010a. Relative efficiency assessment 2007–08 — supporting information. Available from: http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/regulating/reporting/ltr_rd0209_supportinginfo.pdf [Accessed 5 May 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Ofwat, 2010b. Relative efficiency assessment 2007–08 — water operating expenditure model data. Available from: http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/publications/pricereviewletters/ltr_pr0939_appendix2.pdf [Accessed 5 May 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Ofwat, 2010c. Water and sewerage relative efficiency assessments. Available from: http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/regulating/reporting/ltr_rd0209_releffassess07-08 [Accessed 5 May 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Ofwat, 2012. Future challenges. Available from: http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/future [Accessed 8 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Picazo-Tadeo, A.J., Sáez-Fernández, F.J., and González-Gómez, F., 2008. Does service quality matter in measuring the performance of water utilities?Utilities Policy, 16 (1), 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission, 2011. Australia's urban water sector, Report No. 55, Final inquiry report, Canberra. Available from: http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/113192/urban-water-volume1.pdf [Accessed 8 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, R., 2003. An introduction to data envelopment analysis: A tool for performance measurement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, S.C., 2004. Data envelopment analysis: Theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzetti, S. and Dupont, D.P., 2009. Measuring the technical efficiency of municipal water suppliers: The role of environmental factors. Land Economics, 85 (4), 627–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saal, D.S. and Parker, D., 2000. The impact of privatization and regulation on the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: A translog cost function model. Managerial and Decision Economics, 21 (6), 253–268.
   Google Scholar
• Saal, D.S. and Parker, D., 2001. Productivity and price performance in the privatized water and sewerage companies of England and Wales. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 20 (1), 61–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saal, D.S. and Parker, D., 2006. Assessing the performance of water operations in the English and Welsh water industry: A lesson in the implications of inappropriately assuming a common frontier. In: T.Coelli and D.Lawrence, eds. Performance measurement and regulation of network utilities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 297–328.
   Google Scholar
• Saal, D.S., Parker, D., and Weyman-Jones, T., 2007. Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985–2000. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28 (1), 127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E., 2001. Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis: A foundation text with integrated software. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E., 2000. The use of data envelopment analysis in the regulation of UK water utilities: Water distribution. European Journal of Operational Research, 126 (2), 436–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E., 2002. Comparative performance measurement in regulation: The case of English and Welsh sewerage services. Journal of Operational Research Society, 53 (3), 292–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, M. and Morrison Paul, C.J., 2006. Driving forces for consolidation or fragmentation of the US water utility industry: A cost function approach with endogenous output. Journal of Urban Economics, 59 (1), 104–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tupper, H.C. and Resende, M., 2004. Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: An empirical study. Utilities Policy, 12 (1), 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Uitto, J.I. and Biswas, A.K., eds., 2000. Water for urban areas: Challenges and perspectives. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, 2012. Responding to the urban water challenge. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/sustainable/water-challenge.html [Accessed 8 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Walter, M., Cullmann, A., von Hirschhausen, C., Wand, R., and Zschille, M., 2009. Quo vadis efficiency analysis of water distribution? A comparative literature review. Utilities Policy, 17 (3–4), 225–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodbury, K. and Dollery, B.E., 2004. Efficiency measurement in Australian local government: The case of New South Wales municipal water services. Review of Policy Research, 21 (5), 615–636.
   Google Scholar
• Worthington, A.C., 2010. A review of frontier approaches to efficiency and productivity measurement in urban water utilities, Griffith Business School Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 2010-10. Available from: http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/261153/2010-10-review-of-frontier-approaches-to-efficiency-and-productivity-measurement-in-urban-water-utilities.pdf [Accessed 11 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Worthington, A.C., 2011. Productivity, efficiency, and technological progress in Australia's urban water utilities. Waterlines Report No. 62. Canberra, Australia: National Water Commission.
   Google Scholar