A flood risk assessment to municipal infrastructure due to changing climate part II: case study

References

• Auld, H. and MacIver, D., 2006. Changing weather patterns, uncertainty and infrastructure risks: emerging adaptation requirements. EIC Climate Change Technology, IEEE, 10–12 May, 2006, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bowering, E., Peck, A., and Simonovic, S.P., 2013. A flood risk assessment to municipal infrastructure due to changing climate part I: methodology. Urban Water Journal, same issue.
   Google Scholar
• City of London, 2003. Bridge Management System. Internal document. London: Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• City of London, 2010. Information about London, [online]. Available from: http://www.london.ca/d.aspx?s = /About_London/colstats.htm [Accessed 7 November 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Community of London Environmental Awareness Reporting (CLEAR) Network, 2006, Sewage Treatment. Available from: www.clear.london.ca [Accessed 4 November 2009].
   Google Scholar
• Cunderlik, J. and Simonovic, S.P., 2005. Hydrologic extremes in south-western Ontario under future climate projections. Journal of Hydrologic Sciences, 50 (4), 631–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunderlik, J. and Simonovic, S.P., 2007. Inverse flood risk modeling under changing climatic conditions. Hydrological Processes Journal, 21 (5), 563–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eum, H., Sredojevic, D., and Simonovic, S.P., 2011. Engineering procedure for the climate change flood risk assessment in the Upper Thames River Basin. ASCE Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 16 (7), 608–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eum, H. and Simonovic, S.P., 2009. City of London: Vulnerability of infrastructure to climate change: background report 1 - climate and hydrologic modeling. Water resources research report no. 68. London, Ontario: Facility for Intelligent Decision Support, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Western Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, P. and Warner, K., 2001. Vulnerability of infrastructure to climate variability: how does this affect infrastructure lending policies? Washington: Report commissioned by the Disaster Management Facility of the World Bank and the ProVention Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Goldt, R., 2006. West London dyke design flood profile. London, Ontario: Upper Thames River Conservation Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J.W., Sayers, P.B., and Dawson, R.J., 2005. National-scale assessment of current and future flood risk in England and Wales. Natural Hazards, 36, 147–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction (ICLR), 2010. Canadians at risk: our exposure to natural hazards. Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Assessment of Natural Hazards Project, ICLR.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2007. Contribution of working groups I, II, and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K. and Reisinger, A., eds.]. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Kundzewicz, Z., 2003. Extreme precipitation and floods in the changing world. In: Water Resources Systems – Hydrological Risk, Management and Development: Proceedings of International Symposium. Sapporo, Japan, 2003. Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, B., 2007. The road well traveled: implications of climate change for pavement infrastructure in Southern Canada. Waterloo, Ontario: Environment Canada, Adaptation & Impacts Research Division.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR), 2007. Flood damage estimation guide. Prepared by W.F. Baird and Associates Coastal Engineers Ltd. and Planning Solutions Inc., Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Prodanovic, P. and Simonovic, S.P., 2007. Development of rainfall intensity duration frequency curves for the City of London under the changing climate. Water resources research report no. 58. London, Ontario: Facility for Intelligent Decision Support, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Western Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Sharif, M. and Burn, D.H., 2006. Simulating climate change scenarios using an improved K-nearest neighbor model. Journal of Hydrology, 325, 179–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada, 2010. The consumer price index, [online]. Ottawa: Government of Canada, 67 pages. Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca [Accessed 12 February 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Simonovic, S.P., 2010. A new methodology for the assessment of climate change impacts on the watershed scale. Current Science, 98 (8), 1047–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonovic, S.P. and Peck, A., 2009. Updated rainfall intensity duration frequency curves for the City of London under the changing climate. Water resources research report no. 065. London, Ontario: Facility for Intelligent Decision Support, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Western Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2006. West London dyke replacement preliminary engineering design. London, Ontario: Upper Thames River Conservation Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Upper Thames River Conservation Authority (UTRCA), 2010. The flood of ‘37, [online]. Available from: http://www.thamesriver.on.ca/Water_Management/flood_history_1937.htm [Accessed 7 November 2010].
   Google Scholar