Statistical analysis of public perceptions of water infrastructure sustainability in shrinking cities

References

• BeazleyM., WilkowskiK., EckertJ., and WuestS., 2011. A state of inequity in Ohio: Funding and service disparities between municipalities and townships in Montgomery County, Ohio. Toledo, OH: University of Toledo Urban Affairs Center for the Greater Dayton Mayors and Managers Association.
   Google Scholar
• BhatC., 2003. Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences. Transportation Research Part B, 37 (1), 837–855.
   Google Scholar
• BontjeM., 2004. Facing the challenge of shrinking cities in East Germany: The case of Leipzig. GeoJournal, 61, 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• BrightE., 2000. Reviving America's forgotten neighborhoods: An investigation of inner city revitalization efforts. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc..
   Google Scholar
• ButtsR. and GasteyerS., 2011. More cost per drop: Water rates, structural inequality, and race in the United States - the case of Michigan. Environmental Reviews and Case Studies, Environmental Practice, 13 (4), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• FaustK., AbrahamD., and DeLaurentisD., 2013. Assessment of stakeholder perceptions in water infrastructure projects using system-of-systems and binary probit analyses: A case study. Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 866–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GerasidiA., ApostolakiS., ManoliE., AssimacopoulosD., and VlachosE., 2009. Towards the formulation of a new strategy of water resource management for urban areas achieved through participatory processes. Urban Water Journal, 6 (3), 209–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Water Partnership Technical Advisory Committee, 2000. Integrated water resource management. TA Background Paper Number 4. Denmark: GWPTAC.
   Google Scholar
• GreenbergM. and SchneiderD., 1996. Environmentally devastated neighborhoods: Perceptions, realities and policies. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HerzR., 2006. Buried infrastructure in shrinking cities. International Symposium: Coping with City Shrinkage and Demographic Change-Lessons from around the Globe, 03-2006. Retrieved from www.schader-stiftung.de/docs/herzpresentation.pdf [Accessed 17 June 2011].
   Google Scholar
• HollanderJ., 2010. Moving toward a shrinking cities metric: Analyzing land use changes associated with depopulation in Flint, Michigan. Cityscape, 12 (1), 133–151.
   Google Scholar
• HollanderJ., 2011. Can a city successfully shrink? Evidence from survey data on neighborhood quality. Urban Affairs Review, 47 (1), 129–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoornbeekJ. and SchwarzT., 2009. Sustainable infrastructure in shrinking cities: Options for the future. Kent, OH: Kent State University Center for Public Administration and Public Policy, in association with the Cleveland Urban Design Collaborative.
   Google Scholar
• HummelD. and LuxA., 2007. Population decline and infrastructure: The case of the German water supply system. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 2007, 167–191.
   Google Scholar
• KiparskyM., SedlakD., ThompsonJr, B., and TrufferB., 2013. The innovation deficit in urban water: The need for an integrated perspective on institutions, organizations, and technology. Environmental Engineering Science, 30 (8), 395–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFaddenD., 1981. Econometric models for probabilistic choice. Structural analysis of discrete data using econometric applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFaddenD. and TrainK., 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15 (5), 447–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NancarrowB., PorterB., and LevistonZ., 2010. Predicting community acceptability of alternative urban water supply systems: A decision making model. Urban Water Journal, 7 (3), 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RobersonA., 2011. What's next after 40 years of drinking water regulations?Environmental Science and Technology, 45 (1), 154–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RybczynskiW. and LinnemanP., 1999. How to save our shrinking cities. Public Interest, 135, 30–44.
   Google Scholar
• SchlörH., HakeJ.-H., and KuckshinrichsW., 2009. Demographics as a new challenge for sustainable development in the German wastewater sector. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 10 (3/4), 327–352.
   Google Scholar
• SusskindL. and CruikshankJ., 1987. Breaking the impasse – consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• TrainK., 2009. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WangW., ParkerK., and TaylorP., 2013. Breadwinner moms: Mothers are the sole are primary provider in four-in-ten households with children; public conflicted about the growing trend. Washington, DC: Pew Research: Social and Demographic Trends.
   Google Scholar
• WashingtonS., KarlaftisM., and ManneringF., 2011. Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis. 2nd ed.Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• WesterhoffN., 2008. Set in our ways: Why change is so hard. Scientific American Mind, 19 (6), 44–46.
   Google Scholar