Removal efficiency of storm water treatment techniques: standardized full scale laboratory testing

References

• Andral, M.C., et al., 1999. Particle size distribution and hydrodynamic characteristics of solid matter carried by runoff from motorways. Water Environmental Research, 71 (4), 398–407. doi: 10.2175/106143097X122130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boogaard, F.C., et al., (2010). Storm water quality and removal efficiency rates of lamella filters. Lyon: NOVATECH.
   Google Scholar
• Boogaard, F., et al., 2007. Design, implementation and maintenance of sustainable urban drainage systems. Utrecht: STOWA.
   Google Scholar
• Boogaard, F., et al., 2014. Selection of SUDS based on storm water quality characteristics. Challenges, 5 (1), 112–122. doi:10.3390/challe5010112
   Google Scholar
• Bratieres, K., et al., 2008. Nutrient and sediment removal by storm water biofilters: A large-scale design optimisation study. Water Research, 42, 3930–3940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A.P., Shokouhian, M., and Ni, S., 2001. Loading estimates of lead, copper, cadmium, and zinc in urban runoff from specific sources. Chemosphere, 44, 997–1009.
   Google Scholar
• Dierkes, C., Welker, A., and Dierschke, M., 2013. Development of testing procedures for the certification of decentralized stormwater treatment facilities – results of laboratory tests. Lyon: NOVATECH.
   Google Scholar
• Endress+Hauser 2006. Operating instructions proline prosonic flow 91 ultrasonic flow measuring system, BA100D/06/en/04.06 71024989. Reinach: Endress+Hauser. Available from: https://portal.endress.com/wa001/dla/5000300/2064/000/01/TI00105DEN_1311.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, T.D., et al., 2014. SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water Journal, 2014, 3–20. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furumai, H., Balmer, H., and Boller, M., 2002. Dynamic behavior of suspended pollutants and particle size distribution in highway runoff. Water Science Technology, 46 (11–12), 413–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German, J. and Svensson, G., 2002. Metal content and particle size distribution of street sediments and street sweeping waste. Water Science and Technology, 46 (6–7), 191–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hach Company, 2010. HIAC HRLD Series Light Obscuration Liquid Particle Counting Sensors for particle contamination monitoring USA, Loveland.
   Google Scholar
• Hatt, B.E., Fletcher, T.D., and Deletic, A., 2008. Hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of fine media stormwater filtration systems. Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 2535–2541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazen, A., 1904. On sedimentation. Transactions. ASCE, 53, 45–71.
   Google Scholar
• House, M.A., et al., 1993. Urban drainage impacts on receiving water quality. Water Science and Technology, 27 (12), 117–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, A., et al, 2012. Hydraulic analysis of suspended sediment removal from storm water in a standard sump. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 138 (6), 491–502. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, K., et al, 2012. Particle removal properties of stormwater runoff with a lab-scale vortex separator. Desalination and Water Treatment, 38 (1–3), 301–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langeveld, J.G., Liefting, H.J. and Boogaard, F.C., 2012. Uncertainties of stormwater characteristics and removal rates of stormwater treatment facilities: Implications for stormwater handling. Water Research, 46 (20), 6868–6880. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., et al, 2006. Dynamic Characteristics of Particle Size Distribution in Highway Runoff: Implications for Settling Tank Design. Journal of Environmental Engineering., 2006, 852–861. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:8(852)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhani. J. T., Young, J., and Brown, R.J., 2013. Visualising experimental flow fields through a stormwater gross pollutant trap. Visualization Society of Japan, 17 (1), 17–26. doi: 10.1007/s12650-013-0188-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniquiz-Redillas, M.C., Geronimo, F., and Kim, L., 2014. Investigation on the effectiveness of pretreatment in stormwater management technologies. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 26, 1824–1830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maus, C. and Uhl, M., 2010. Tracer studies for the modelling of sedimentation tanks. Lyon: Graie. Available from: http://documents.irevues.inist.fr/handle/2042/35725
   Google Scholar
• Morin, A., et al., 2008. Advanced mechanical stormwater treatment – Numerical simulations of a counter flow particle separator. Paper presented at 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Morquecho, R. and Pitt, R., 2003. Stormwater heavy metal particulate associations. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, WEFTEC 2003: Session 1 through Session 10. Los Angeles, CA, 774–803.
   Google Scholar
• Nederlands Normalisatie-Instituut, NEN-ISO 13320-1 (EN), 1999. Particle size analysis. Laser diffraction methods. Part 1 General principles. Delft: NEN.
   Google Scholar
• Ngu, L., Law, P. L., and Wong, K.K., 2014. Effects of co-current and cross flows on circular enhanced gravity plate separator efficiencie. Environmental Engineering Research, 19 (2), 151–155. doi: 10.4491/eer.2014.19.2.151
   Google Scholar
• Palhegyi, G.E., 2010. Designing storm-water controls to promote sustainable ecosystems: Science and application. Journal of Hydrological Engineering, 15, 504–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, R., 2004. National Stormwater Quality Database (NSQD). Tuscaloosa, AL: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Roger, S., et al, 1998. Mineral, physical and chemical analysis of the solid matter carried by motorway runoff water. Water Research, 32 (4), 1119–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sample, D.J., et al, 2012. Assessing performance of manufactured treatment devices for the removal of phosphorus from urban stormwater. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 279–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansalone, J.J. and Buchberger, S.G., 1997. Characterization of solid and metal element distributions in urban highway storm water. Water Science Technology, 36, 155–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlumberger Water Services, 2014. Diver Manual. Delft: Schlumberger Water Services.
   Google Scholar
• Telstar, 2013. Calibration report. Calibration number SO13-01486-10, 5 November 2013. Woerden: Telstar.
   Google Scholar
• Uhl, M., et al, 2013. Testing the efficiency of decentral devices for stormwater treatment. Lyon: NOVATECH.
   Google Scholar
• Vaze, J. and Chiew, F.H.S., 2004. Nutrient loads associated with different sediment sizes in urban stormwater and surface pollutants. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 130 (4), 391–396. doi: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2004)130:4(391)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viklander, M., 1998. Particle size distribution and metal content in street sediments. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 124, 761–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welker, A., et al., 2013. Entwicklung von Prufverfahren fur Anlagen zur dezentralen Niederschlagswasserbehandlung im Trennverfahren, Hennef: DWA Deutsche Vereinigung fur Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e.V. Available from: https://www.dbu.de/OPAC/ab/DBU-Abschlussbericht-AZ-28940_02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S., Bray, R., and Cooper, P., 2004. Sustainable drainage systems: Hydraulic, structural and water quality advice. London: CIRIA.
   Google Scholar
• Woods-Ballard, B., et al., 2011. The SuDS manual. London: CIRIA.
   Google Scholar