Incorporating objectives of stakeholders in strategic planning of urban water management

References

• Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K. 2012. “Quantification of Climate Change Effects on Extreme Precipitation Used for High Resolution Hydrologic Design.” Urban Water Journal 9 (2): 57–65. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2011.630091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley, R. M., B. Horton, C. J. Digman, and E. Gill. 2013. Demonstrating the Multiple Benefits of SuDS – A Business Case - Literature Review. London, UK: CIRIA.
   Google Scholar
• Belmeziti, A., F. Cherqui, A. Tourne, D. Granger, C. Werey, P. Le Gauffre, and B. Chocat. 2015. “Transitioning to Sustainable Urban Water Management Systems: How to Define Expected Service Functions?” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 32 (4): 316–334. doi:10.1080/10286608.2015.1047355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, S. D., K. A. Carlson, and R. L. Keeney. 2010. “Improving the Generation of Decision Objectives.” Decision Analysis 7 (3): 238–255. doi:10.1287/deca.1100.0172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casal-Campos, A., G. Fu, D. Butler, and A. Moore. 2015. “An Integrated Environmental Assessment of Green and Gray Infrastructure Strategies for Robust Decision Making.” Environmental Science & Technology 49 (14): 8307–8314. doi:10.1021/es506144f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. M. A., T. Satterfield, and J. Goldstein. 2012. “Rethinking Ecosystem Services to Better Address and Navigate Cultural Values.” Ecological Economics 74: 8–18. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colvin, R. M., G. B. Witt, and J. Lacey. 2016. “Approaches to Identifying Stakeholders in Environmental Management: Insights from Practitioners to Go beyond the ‘Usual Suspects’.” Land Use Policy 52: 266–276. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, USA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dansk Byplanlaboratorium. 2016-2017. ByplanNyt (Danish Journal for Exchange of Experience in City Development). Copenhagen, Denmark: Dansk Byplanlaboratorium.
   Google Scholar
• Dansk Byplanlaboratoium 2018. The Danish Town Planning Institute. Dansk Byplanlaboratorium. Accessed 05 January 2018. https://www.byplanlab.dk/node/68
   Google Scholar
• DANVA. 2016. “Dansk Vand Conference Proceedings.” Copenhagen, Denmark: DANVA (Danish water- and wastewater union).
   Google Scholar
• DANVA 2018a. "Forening" DANVA. Accessed 04 January 2018. https://www.danva.dk/om-danva/forening/
   Google Scholar
• DANVA 2018b. "DANSKVAND - dit og DANVAs magasin!" DANVA. Accessed 04 January 2018. https://www.danva.dk/publikationer/danskvand/danskvand/
   Google Scholar
• de Groot, R. S., R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen. 2010. “Challenges in Integrating the Concept of Ecosystem Services and Values in Landscape Planning, Management and Decision Making.” Ecological Complexity 7 (3): 260–272. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez, D., H. Worch, J. Markard, B. Truffer, and W. Gujer. 2009. “Closing the Capability Gap: Strategic Planning for the Infrastructure Sector.” California Management Review 51: 30–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EVA. 2016-2017. EVA Bladet (Danish Journal for Exchange of Experience Amongst Water Engineers). Copenhagen, Denmark: IDA (Danish Engineering Association).
   Google Scholar
• EVA 2017. "Hvem er vi? - Udvalget for Erfaringsudveksling i VAndmiljøteknikken (EVA)" EVA. Accessed 21 December 2017. http://www.evanet.dk/hvem-er-vi/
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, B. C., N. Frantzeskaki, and R. R. Brown. 2013. “A Strategic Program for Transitioning to A Water Sensitive City.” Landscape and Urban Planning 117: 32–45. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferriman, A. 2007. “BMJ Readers Choose the “Sanitary Revolution” as Greatest Medical Advance since 184.” BMJ 334: 111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39098.461968.DB.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, T. D., W. Shuster, W. F. Hunt, R. Ashley, D. Butler, S. Arthur, S. Trowsdale, et al. 2015. “SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and More – The Evolution and Application of Terminology Surrounding Urban Drainage.” Urban Water Journal 12 (7): 525–542. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratini, C. F., G. D. Geldof, J. Kluck, and P. S. Mikkelsen. 2012b. “Three Points Approach (3PA) for Urban Flood Risk Management: A Tool to Support Climate Change Adaptation through Transdisciplinarity and Multifunctionality.” Urban Water Journal 9 (5): 317–331. doi:10.1080/1573062x.2012.668913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratini, C. F., M. Elle, M. B. Jensen, and P. S. Mikkelsen. 2012a. “A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complexity and Unfolding Transition Dynamics When Developing Sustainable adaption Strategies in Urban Water Management.” Water Science and Technology 66 (11): 2393–2401. doi:10.2166/wst.2012.442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, H., and K. Kumar. 2018. “Distance Measures for Connection Number Sets Based on Set Pair Analysis and Its Applications to Decision-making Process.” Applied Intelligence 48: 3346–3359. doi:10.1007/s10489-018-1152-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geldof, G. D., and P. Stahre. 2004. “The Interaction between Water and Society.” Nato Science Series: Iv: Earth and Environmental Sciences 43: 381–394.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun, E., and D. N. Barton. 2013. “Classifying and Valuing Ecosystem Services for Urban Planning.” Ecological Economics 86: 235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green Infrastructure Valuation Network. 2013. Building Natural Value for Sustainable Economic Development: The Green Infrastructure Valuation Toolkit User Guide. United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R., L. Failing, M. Harstone, G. Long, T. McDaniels, and D. Ohlson. 2012. Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R., and M. Riddle. 2005. “Measures of Similarity and Structural Equivalence, In: Introduction to Social Network Methods.” Riverside, California. 20. http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, R., A. S. Olafsson, A. P. N. van der Jagt, E. Rall, and S. Pauleit. 2019. “Planning Multifunctional Green Infrastructure for Compact Cities: What Is the State of Practice?” Ecological Indicators 96: 99–110. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris-Lovett, S., J. Lienert, and D. Sedlak. 2019. “A Mixed-methods Approach to Strategic Planning for Multi-benefit Regional Water Infrastructure.” Journal of Environmental Management 233: 218–237. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris-Lovett, S., J. Lienert, and D. L. Sedlak. 2018. “Towards a New Paradigm of Urbanwater Infrastructure: Identifying Goals and Strategies to Support Multi-benefit Municipal Wastewater Treatment.” Water (Switzerland) 10. doi:10.3390/w10091127.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, B., C. J. Digman, R. M. Ashley, and J. McMullan. 2019. B£ST Guidance – Guidance to Assess the Benefits of Blue and Green Infrastructure Using B£ST. London: CIRIA.
   Google Scholar
• Huntjens, P., L. Lebel, C. Pahl-Wostl, J. Camkin, R. Schulze, and N. Kranz. 2012. “Institutional Design Propositions for the Governance of Adaptation to Climate Change in the Water Sector.” Global Environmental Change 22 (1): 67–81. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iftekar, S., A. Gunawardena, J. Fogarty, D. Pannel, and A. Rogers. 2019. INFFEWS Value Tool: Guideline (Version 1): IRP2 Comprehensive Economic Evaluation Framework (2017-2019). Melbourne, Australia: Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities.
   Google Scholar
• IWA. n.d.. The IWA Principles for Water Wise Cities. London, United Kingdom: International Water Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kaspersen, P. S., N. H. Ravn, K. Arnbjerg-Nielsen, H. Madsen, and M. Drews. 2017. “Comparison of the Impacts of Urban Development and Climate Change on Exposing European Cities to Pluvial Flooding.” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 21: 4131–4147. doi:10.5194/hess-21-4131-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuller, M., P. M. Bach, D. Ramirez-Lovering, and A. Deletic. 2017. “Framing Water Sensitive Urban Design as Part of the Urban Form: A Critical Review of Tools for Best Planning Practice.” Environmental Modelling & Software 96: 265–282. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, A. N., I. B. Gregersen, O. B. Christensen, J. J. Linde, and P. S. Mikkelsen. 2009. “Potential Future Increase in Extreme One-hour Precipitation Events over Europe Due to Climate Change.” Water Science and Technology 60 (9): 2205–2216. doi:10.2166/wst.2009.650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, T. A., and W. Gujer. 1997. “The Concept of Sustainable Urban Water Management.” Water Science and Technology 35: 3–10. doi:10.2166/wst.1997.0326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., and S. T. Cavusgil. 2006. “Enhancing Alliance Performance: The Effects of Contractual-based versus Relational-based Governance.” Journal of Business Research 59 (8): 896–905. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lienert, J., F. Schnetzer, and K. Ingold. 2013. “Stakeholder Analysis Combined with Social Network Analysis Provides Fine-grained Insights into Water Infrastructure Planning Processes.” Journal of Environmental Management 125: 134–148. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lienert, J., L. Scholten, C. Egger, and M. Maurer. 2015. “Structured Decision-making for Sustainable Water Infrastructure Planning and Four Future Scenarios.” EURO Journal on Decision Processes 3 (1–2): 107–140. doi:10.1007/s40070-014-0030-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, P. E. D., D. Mistry, and P. R. Davis. 2010. “Price Competitive Alliance Projects: Identification of Success Factors for Public Clients.” . Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 136 (9): 947–956. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, H. M., M. M. Andersen, M. Rygaard, and P. S. Mikkelsen. 2018. “Definitions of Event Magnitudes, Spatial Scales, and Goals for Climate Change Adaptation and Their Importance for Innovation and Implementation.” Water Research 144: 192–203. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, H. M., R. Brown, M. Elle, and P. S. Mikkelsen. 2016. “Social Construction of Stormwater Control Measures in Melbourne and Copenhagen: A Discourse Analysis of Technological Change, Embedded Meanings and Potential Mainstreaming.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 115: 198–209. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makropoulos, C. K., K. Natsis, S. Liu, K. Mittas, and D. Butler. 2008. “Decision Support for Sustainable Option Selection in Integrated Urban Water Management.” Environmental Modelling & Software 23 (12): 1448–1460. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meerow, S., and J. P. Newell. 2017. “Spatial Planning for Multifunctional Green Infrastructure: Growing Resilience in Detroit.” Landscape and Urban Planning 159: 62–75. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meurs, H., and R. Haaijer. 2001. “Spatial Structure and Mobility.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 6 (6): 429–446. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00007-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miljøstyrelsen. 2018. “Beregningsværktøj - PLASK.” Version 3.0. Copenhagen, Denmark
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, C. Prell, C. H. Quinn, and L. C. Stringer. 2009. “Who’s in and Why? A Typology of Stakeholder Analysis Methods for Natural Resource Management.” Journal of Environmental Management 90 (5): 1933–1949. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Refsgaard, J. C., K. Arnbjerg-Nielsen, M. Drews, K. Halsnæs, E. Jeppesen, H. Madsen, A. Markandya, J. E. Olesen, J. R. Porter, and J. H. Christensen. 2013. “The Role of Uncertainty in Climate Change Adaptation Strategies - A Danish Water Management Example.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 18 (3): 337–359. doi:10.1007/s11027-012-9366-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrydstrup, J., and H. M. Madsen. 2019. “Final Coding Scheme, Definitions of Objectives and Stakeholders, Workshop Material and Hamming Similarity Results [WWW Document].” data.dtu.dk. https://data.dtu.dk/s/d4ad2a9543756b1d6cd6
   Google Scholar
• Stahre, P. 2006. Sustainability in Urban Storm Drainage. Bromma, Sweden: Svenskt Vatten.
   Google Scholar
• The Danish Nature Agency. 2012. Spatial Planning in Denmark. Copenhagen, Denmark: Ministry of the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, E. L., R. Few, and K. Brown. 2008. “Scenario-based Stakeholder Engagement: Incorporating Stakeholders Preferences into Coastal Planning for Climate Change.” Journal of Environmental Management 88 (4): 1580–1592. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, R. K., and G. C. Daily. 2008. “The Ecosystem Services Framework and Natural Capital Conservation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 39 (1): 25–35. doi:10.1007/s10640-007-9176-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. 2015. “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” Resolution Adopted by The General Assembly on 25 September 2015
   Google Scholar
• US Water Alliance. 2016. One Water Roadmap: The Sustainable Management of Life’s Most Essential Resource. Washington, DC: United States of America: US Water Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• VCS Denmark. 2017. VCS Decision Model. Internal Document. Odense, Denmark: VCS Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Yazdanfar, Z., and A. Sharma. 2015. “Urban Drainage System Planning and Design – Challenges with Climate Change and Urbanization: A Review.” Water Science and Technology 72 (2): 165–179. doi:10.2166/wst.2015.207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar