243
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Use of discrete choice to calibrate a combined distribution and sewer pipe replacement model

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 100-108 | Received 01 Apr 2019, Accepted 07 Mar 2020, Published online: 07 Apr 2020

References

  • Bradley, M., and A. Daly. 1994. “Use of the Logit Scaling Approach to Test for Rank-order and Fatigue Effects in Stated Preference Data.” Transportation 21 (2): 167–184. doi:10.1007/BF01098791.
  • Cardoso, M. A., M. S. Silva, S. T. Coelho, M. C. Almeida, and D. I. C. Covas. 2012. “Urban Water Infrastructure Asset Management–a Structured Approach in Four Water Utilities.” Water Science and Technology 66 (12): 2702–2711. doi:10.2166/wst.2012.509.
  • Carriço, N., D. I. C. Covas, M. Céu Almeida, J. Leitão, and H. Alegre. 2012. “Prioritization of Rehabilitation Interventions for Urban Water Assets Using Multiple Criteria Decision-aid Methods.” Water Science and Technology 66 (5): 1007–1014. doi:10.2166/wst.2012.274.
  • Chandukala, S. R., J. Kim, T. Otter, P. E. Rossi, and G. M. Allenby. 2007. “Choice Models in Marketing: Economic Assumptions, Challenges and Trends.” Foundations and Trends® in Marketing 2 (2): 97–184. doi:10.1561/1700000008.
  • D’Ercole, M., M. Righetti, G. Raspati, P. Bertola, and R. Maria Ugarelli. 2018. “Rehabilitation Planning of Water Distribution Network through a Reliability—Based Risk Assessment.” Water 10 (3): 277. doi:10.3390/w10030277.
  • de Bekker-grob, E. W., M. Ryan, and K. Gerard. 2012. “Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature.” Health Economics 21 (2): 145–172. doi:10.1002/hec.1697.
  • Figueira, J., and B. Roy. 2002. “Determining the Weights of Criteria in the ELECTRE Type Methods with a Revised Simos’ Procedure.” European Journal of Operational Research 139 (2): 317–326. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00370-8.
  • Freitas, R., D. Antunes, and M. Cunha (2012). “Multiple-criteria Decision Analysis for Proactive Management of Risk of Water Distribution Systems.” 14th Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conference, Adelaide, South Australia. 1055–1071.
  • Jones-Lee, M., and T. Aven. 2011. “ALARP—What Does It Really Mean?” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 96 (8): 877–882. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2011.02.006.
  • Kabir, G., R. Sadiq, and S. Tesfamariam. 2014. “A Review of Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods for Infrastructure Management.” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 10 (9): 1176–1210. doi:10.1080/15732479.2013.795978.
  • Kane, G., D. Zhang, D. Lynch, and M. Bendeli. 2014. “Sydney Water´s Critical Water Main Strategy and Implementation - a Quantitative, Triple-bottom Line Approach to Risk Based Asset Management.” Water Asset Management International 10: 19–24.
  • Kilinç, Y., Ö. Özdemir, C. Orhan, and M. Firat. 2018. “Evaluation of Technical Performance of Pipes in Water Distribution Systems by Analytic Hierarchy Process.” Sustainable Cities and Society 42: 13–21. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.06.035.
  • Lanz, B., and A. Provins. 2012. Do Status Quo Choices Reflect Preferences? Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the Context of Water Utilities’ Investment Planning. CEPE Center for Energy Policy and Economics, ETH, Zurich.
  • Leong, W., and D. A. Hensher. 2012. “Embedding Decision Heuristics in Discrete Choice Models: A Review.” Transport Reviews 32 (3): 313–331. doi:10.1080/01441647.2012.671195.
  • Li, S., R. Wang, W. Wu, J. Sun, and Y. Jing. 2015. “Non-hydraulic Factors Analysis of Pipe Burst in Water Distribution Systems. 13th Computer Control for Water Industry Conference, CCWI 2015.” Procedia Engineering 119 (2015): 53–62. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.853.
  • Liang, G.-S. 1999. “Fuzzy MCDM Based on Ideal and Anti-ideal Concepts.” European Journal of Operational Research 112 (3): 682–691. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00410-4.
  • Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher, and J. D. Swait. 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mamo, T. G. 2015. “Risk-based Approach to Manage Aging Urban Water Main Infrastructure.” Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua 64 (3): 260–269. doi:10.2166/aqua.2014.052.
  • Manski, C. F., and D. McFadden, Eds. 1981. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, pp. 2–50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Marques, M. J., A. P. Saramago, M. H. Silva, C. Paiva, S. Coelho, A. Pina, … S. T. Coelho. 2012. “Rehabilitation in Oeiras & Amadora: A Practical Approach.” Water Asset Management International 8 (3): 19–24.
  • Marzouk, M., S. A. Hamid, and M. El-Said. 2015. “A Methodology for Prioritizing Water Mains Rehabilitation in Egypt.” HBRC Journal 11 (1): 114–128. doi:10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.03.002.
  • Monteiro, A. J., A. T. Silva, J. Sereno, L. Marçal, and A. B. Franco. 2008. Scheduling the Renewal of a Water Supply Distribution System - A Case Study in Portugal, 4 (4): 8–13.
  • Saaty, T. L. 1994. “How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process.” Interfaces 24 (6): 19–43. doi:10.1287/inte.24.6.19.
  • Salehi, S., M. Jalili Ghazizadeh, and M. Tabesh. 2018a. “A Comprehensive Criteria-based Multi-attribute Decision-making Model for Rehabilitation of Water Distribution Systems.” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 14 (6): 743–765. doi:10.1080/15732479.2017.1359633.
  • Salehi, S., M. Tabesh, and M. Jalili Ghazizadeh. 2018b. “HRDM Method for Rehabilitation of Pipes in Water Distribution Networks with Inaccurate Operational-failure Data.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 144 (9): 04018053. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000943.
  • Tscheikner-Gratl, F., R. Sitzenfrei, W. Rauch, and M. Kleidorfer. 2016. “Integrated Rehabilitation Planning of Urban Infrastructure Systems Using a Street Section Priority Model.” Urban Water Journal 13 (1): 28–40. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2015.1057174.
  • Willis, K. G., R. Scarpa, and M. Acutt. 2005. “Assessing Water Company Customer Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Service Improvements: A Stated Choice Analysis.” Water Resources Research 41 (2): 2. doi:10.1029/2004WR003277.
  • Yates, J., and D. F. Mackay. 2006. “Discrete Choice Modelling of Urban Housing Markets: A Critical Review and an Application.” Urban Studies 43 (3): 559–581. doi:10.1080/00420980500533695.
  • Zwerina, K. 1997. Discrete Choice Experiments in Marketing: Use of Priors in Efficient Choice Designs and Their Application to Individual Preference Measurement. Heidelberg-New York: Physica-Verlag HD.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.