Model calibration to find leaks in water networks by desensitizing measurements to the model parameters using Artificial Neural Networks

References

• Abdulshaheed, A., F. Mustapha, and A. Ghavamian. 2017. “A Pressure-based Method for Monitoring Leaks in A Pipe Distribution System: A Review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 69: 902–911. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adedeji, K. B., Y. Hamam, and A. M. Abu-Mahfouz. 2017. “Towards Achieving a Reliable Leakage Detection and Localization Algorithm for Application in Water Piping Networks: An Overview.” IEEE Access 5: 20272–20285. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2752802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, Z., J. Muranho, T. Albuquerque, and A. Ferreira. 2014. “Water Distribution Network’s Modeling and Calibration. A Case Study Based on Scare Inventory Data.” Procedia Engineering 70: 31–40. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.005.
   Google Scholar
• Asgari, H. R., and M. F. Maghrebi. 2016. “Application of Nodal Pressure Measurements in Leak Detection.” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 50, June: 128–134. doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2016.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo, A. C., and P. M. Pelagagge. 2003. “Using Neural Networks to Monitor Piping Systems.” Process Safety Progress 22 (2), June: 119–127. doi:10.1002/prs.680220208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles François, P. W. D. 2015.“Keras.” GitHub, GitHub repository. https://github.com/fchollet/keras
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, A. 2016. “Model Calibration with Neural Networks.” IMB Risk Analytics, July 20.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. C. 1998. “Methods and Guidelines for Effective Model Calibration.” U.S. Geological Survey, Water-resources investigation report 98-4005, 1–10. Denver, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Liou, C. P. 1998. “Limitations and Proper Use of the Hazen-Williams Equation.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 124 (9): 951–954. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:9(951).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mareš, T., E. Janouchová, and A. Kučerová 2016. “Artificial Neural Network in Calibration of Non-linear Models.” Advances in Engineering Software 95, January 28: 68–81. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashford, J., D. De Silva, S. Burn, and D. Marney. 2012. “Leak Detection in Simulated Water Pipe Networks Using SVM.” Applied Artificial Intelligence 26, May: 429–444. doi:10.1080/08839514.2012.670974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, G., C. C. Bezuidenhout, and J. J. Bezuidenhout. 2018. “Artificial Neural Networks: Applications in the Drinking Water Sector.” Water Science & Technology: Water Supply 18 (6): 1869–1887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormsbee, L. E., and S. Lingireddy. 1997. “Calibration of Hydraulic Network Models.” Journal of the American Water Works Association 89 (2), February: 42–50. doi:10.1002/j.1551-8833.1997.tb08177.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedregosa, F., G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, et al. 2011. “Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 12: 2825–2830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulakis, Z., D. Valougeorgis, and C. Papadimitriou. 2003. “Leakage Detection in Water Pipe Networks Using a Bayesian Probabilistic Framework.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 18 (4), July: 315–327. doi:10.1016/S0266-8920(03)00045-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roma, J., R. Perez, G. Sanz, and S. Grau. 2015. “Model Calibration and Leakage Assessment Applied to a Real Water Distribution Network.” Procedia Engineering 119: 603–612. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.913.
   Google Scholar
• Seifollahi-Aghmiuni, S., O. Bozorg-Haddad, and M. H. Omid. 2013. “Effect of Pipe Roughness Uncertainty on Water Distribution Network Performance during Its Operational Period.” Water Resource Management 27: 1581–1599. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0259-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabesh, M., M. Jamasb, and R. Moeini. 2011. “Calibration of Water Distribution Hydraulic Models: A Comparison between Pressure Dependent and Demand Driven Analyses.” Urban Water Journal 8 (2), April: 93–102. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2010.548525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Walt, J. C., P. S. Heyns, and D. N. Wilke. 2018. “Pipe Network Leak Detection: Comparison between Statistical and Machine Learning Techniques.” Urban Water Journal 15 (10): 953–960. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2019.1597375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., F. Zheng, H. F. Duan, Y. Jai, T. Zhang, and X. Guo. 2018. “Efficient Numerical Approach for Simultaneous Calibration of Pipe Roughness Coefficients and Nodal Demands for Water Distribution Systems.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 144 (10), October: 04018063-1-12. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar