Performance-based prioritisation for seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete bridge bent

References

• Abrahamson, N.A. (1992). Non-stationary spectral matching, Seismological Research Letters, 63(1), 30.
   Google Scholar
• Annan, C.D., Youssef, M.A., & El Naggar, M.H. (2009). Seismic vulnerability of assessment of modular steel buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 13, 1065–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam, M.S., Youssef, M.A., & Nehdi, M. (2008). Analytical prediction of the seismic behaviour of superelastic shape memory alloy reinforced concrete elements. Engineering Structures, 30(12), 3399–3411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam, M.S., Youssef, M.A., & Nehdi, M. (2009). Seismic performance of concrete frame structures reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloys. Smart Structures and Systems, 5(5), 565–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi, B., & Krawinkler, H. (2001). Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structures. Stanford, CA: The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, G., & Sharma, A.K. (1988). Repaired reinforced concrete beams. Concrete International, 10, 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S.S., & Goyal, S.K. (2011). A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 53, 98–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billah, A.H.M.M., & Alam, M.S. (2012). Seismic performance of SMA-FRP RC hybrid column with adequate ductility and energy dissipation capacity. Construction and Building Materials, 28(1), 730–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard, K.M. (2007). A performance based approach to retrofitting unreinforced masonry structures for seismic loads. Cambridge, MA: Master of Engineering Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Caterino, N., Iervolino, I., Manfredi, G., & Cosenza, E. (2008). Multi-criteria decision making for seismic retrofitting of RC structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12, 555–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., & KilInç, N. (2009). Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8143–8151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhakal, R.P., & Maekawa, K. (2001). Post-peak cyclic response analysis and energy dissipation capacity of RC columns. Journal of Materials, Concrete Structures and Pavements, JSCE, 51, 117–133.
   Google Scholar
• Dugdale, J.S. (1996). Entropy and its physical meaning. New York: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• ElGawady, M., Endeshaw, M., McLean, D., & Sack, R. (2010). Retrofitting of rectangular columns with deficient lap splices. Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, 14(1), 22–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA P695 (2009). Quantification of building seismic performance factors (ATC-63 Project Report). Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council (ATC).
   Google Scholar
• Ferracuti, B., & Savoia, M. (2005). Cyclic behaviour of FRP-wrapped columns under axial and flexural loadings. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Fracture (pp. 1–6), Turin, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• FHWA-HRT-06-032 (2006). Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 – Bridges, Research, Development, and Technology, Turner-Fairbank, Highway Research Center 6300, Georgetown Pike McLean, VA22101–2296.
   Google Scholar
• Filippou, F.C., Popov, E.P., & Bertero, V.V. (1983). Modelling of R/C joints under cyclic excitations. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 109(11), 2666–2684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, G., & Li, V.C. (2002). Effect of matrix ductility on deformation behavior of steel-reinforced ECCs flexural members under reversed cyclic loading conditions. ACI Structural Journal, 99(6), 781–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, G., & Li, V.C. (2003). Intrinsic response control of moment-resisting frames utilizing advanced composite materials and structural elements. ACI Structural Journal, 100(2), 166–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridley, K.J., & Ma, Z. (2007). Reliability-based design of seismic retrofit for bridges (Report No. WA-RD 664.1). Olympia, WA: The Washington State Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Gencturk, B., & Elnashai, A.S. (2011). Multi-objective optimal seismic design of buildings using advanced engineering materials (MAE Center Report No. 11-01). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R. (2008). Normalization of quantities of various dimensions. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 9(1), 79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovinazzi, S., & Pampanin, S. (2008). Multi-criteria approaches for regional earthquake retrofit strategies. In Proceedings of 8th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering (8PCEE) (pp. 1–11), 5–7 Dec 2008, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Grosan, C., & Abraham, A. (2007). Intelligent data analysis using multiple criteria decision making. In Proceedings of IADIS European Conference Data Mining (pp. 89–94), 3–8 July, 2007, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Han, T.S., Feenstar, P.S., & Billington, S.L. (2003). Simulation of highly ductile fiber-reinforced cement-based composite components under cyclic loading. ACI Structural Journal, 100(6), 749–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, W.J., & Wiggins, J.H. (2000). Acceptable risk: A need for periodic review. Natural Hazards Review, 1(3), 180–187.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, J., Watson-Lamprey, J., Abrahamson, N.A., Bommer, J.J., Markatis, A., McCoy, E., & Mendis, R. (2006). An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 10, 67–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houška, M., & Dömeová, L. (2003). Cost and benefit criteria in methods based on distances from ideal and negative ideal variants. Proceedings of Mathematical and Computer Modelling in Science and Engineering ( pp. 150–154). Prague. ISBN 80-7015-912-X CVUT.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C.L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision makingLecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kettani, O., Aouni, B., & Martel, J.M. (2004). The double role of the weight factor in the goal-programming model. Computers and Operations Research, 31(11), 1833–1845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P.R., Oshima, T., Mikami, S., & Yamazaki, T. (2005). Seismic retrofit of square reinforced concrete piers by ferrocement jacketing. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 1(4), 253–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, D.E., Sharon, E.G., Adrian, M.N., & Jack, P.M. (2001). Repair of earthquake-damaged bridge columns. ACI Structural Journal, 98, 233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, V.C. (2008). Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECCs) – Material, Structural, and Durability Performance. In E. Nawy (Ed.), Concrete Construction Engineering Handbook, Chapter 24, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Li, V., Horii, H., Kabele, P., Kanda, P., & Lim, Y.M. (2000). Repair and retrofit with engineered cementitious composites. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 65, 317–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madas, P., & Elnashai, A.S. (1992). A new passive confinement model for transient analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21, 409–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makowski, M. (2008). Multi-objective decision support including sensitivity analysis (pp. 21–22). Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 114(8), 1804–1826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinola, G., Meda, A., Plizzari, G.A., & Zila, R. (2010). Strengthening and repair of RC beams with fiber reinforced concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 32, 731–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masukawa, J., Akiyama, H., & Saito, H. (1997). Retrofitting of existing reinforced concrete piers by using carbon fiber sheet and aramid fiber sheet. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Non-metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (pp. 411–418). Sapporo, Japan: Japan Concrete Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, T., & Mihashi, H. (2002). JCI-DFRCC summary report on DFRCC terminologies and application concepts. JCI International Workshop on Ductile Fiber Reinforced Cementitious (DFRCC) – Application and Evaluation (pp. 59–66), 21–22 October 2002, Takayama, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Menegotto, M., & Pinto, P.E. (1973). Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R.C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending. Symposium on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads (pp. 15–22), Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Milani, A.S., Shanian, A., Madoliat, R., & Nemes, J.A. (2005). The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making (MADM) models: A case study in gear material selection. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 29(4), 312–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okeil, A.M., El-Tawil, S., & Shahawy, M. (2002). Flexural reliability of RC bridge girders strengthened with CFRPs laminates. Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 7(5), 290–299.
   Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantelides, C.P., & Gergely, J. (2002). Carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer seismic retrofit of RC bridge bent: Design and in situ validation. Journal of Composites for Construction, 6(1), 52–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peldschus, F. (2009). The analysis of the quality of the results obtained with the methods of multi-criteria decisions. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(4), 580–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettinga, D., Pampanin, S., Christopoulos, C., & Priestley, N. (2006). Accounting for residual deformations and simple approaches to their mitigation. In Proceedings of First European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology (pp. 1–10), 3–6 September, 2006, Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Pinho, R., Casarotti, C., & Antoniou, S. (2007). A comparison of single-run pushover analysis techniques for seismic assessment of bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36, 1347–1362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F., & Calvi, G.M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriquez, M., & Park, R. (1994). Seismic load test on reinforced concrete columns strengthened by jacketing. ACI Structural Journal, 91, 150–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadatmanesh, H., Ehsani, M.R., & Li, M.W. (1994). Strength and ductility of concrete columns externally reinforced with fiber composite strap. ACI Structural Journal, 91, 434–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L. (2006). Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(2), 557–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seismosoft (2010). SeismoMatch – a computer program for spectrum matching of earthquake records. Retrieved from http://www.seismosoft.com.
   Google Scholar
• Seismostruct (2011). V5.2.5. Retrieved from http://www.seismosoft.com.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, J., & Medina, M. (2010). Integrated multiple-criteria decision-making method to prioritize transportation projects. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2174, 51–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simanaviciene, R., & Ustinovichius, L. (2010). Sensitivity analysis for quantitative decision making methods: TOPSIS and SAW. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(6), 7743–7744.
   Google Scholar
• Spoelstra, M., & Monti, G. (1999). FRP-confined concrete model. Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, 3, 143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Stang, H., & Li, V.C. (2004). Classification of fibre reinforced cementitious materials for structural applications. In Proceedings of 6th RILEM Symposium on Fiber-Reinforced Concretes (FRC) – BEFIB (pp. 197–218), Varenna, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Triantaphyllou, E. (2002). Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Applied Optimization, 44, 320. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tsonos, A.G. (2009). Ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete: an innovative solution for strengthening old R/C structures and for improving the FRP strengthening method. Materials Characterisation Computational Methods and Experiments IV. WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences, 64, 10.2495/MC090261.
   Google Scholar
• USGS & Geological Hazards Science Center (2012). Hazard curve application. Retrieved from http://geohazards.usgs.gov/hazardtool/application.php (accessed January 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Vandoros, K.G., & Dritsos, S.E. (2008). Concrete jacket construction detail effectiveness when strengthening RC columns. Construction and Building Materials, 22, 264–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. (2004). A study of RC columns with shape memory alloy and engineered cementitious composites (MSc Thesis), Department of Civil Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T.C., & Chang, T.H. (2007). Application of TOPSIS in evaluation initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 33, 870–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston, L.W. (1991). Operations research (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: PWS-Kent Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Yankelevsky, D.Z., & Reinhardt, H.W. (1989). Uniaxial behavior of concrete in cyclic tension. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 115(1), 166–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZEUS NL (2011). A system for inelastic analysis of structure, V-1.9.0. Mid America Earthquake Centre. Retrieved from http://mae.cee.uiuc.edu/software_and_tools/zeus_nl.html.
   Google Scholar