Seismic performance evaluation of an airport traffic control tower through linear and nonlinear analysis

References

• ASCE (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 7-10. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• ATC (1995). Structural response modification factors (ATC-19). Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• ATC (1996). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (ATC-40). Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, J.E. (1996). Foundation analysis and design (5th ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Li, J., & Cheang, J. (2010). Seismic performance analysis of Wenchuan hospital structure with viscous dampers. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 19(4), 397–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Computers and Structures, Inc. (2006). Perform 3D-Version 4: Nonlinear analysis and performance assessment for 3d structures, User Guide. Berkeley, CA: Computer and Structures, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Computers and Structures, Inc. (2007). ETABS-Version 9.1.6: Extended 3D nonlinear analysis of building systems software. Berkeley, CA: Computer and Structures, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBBUH) (2008). Recommendation for seismic design of high-rise buildings. Chicago, IL: A Consensus Document-CTBUH Seismic Working Group.
   Google Scholar
• Dicleli, M., & Bruneau, M. (1995). An energy approach to sliding of single-span simply supported slab-on-girder steel highway bridges with damaged bearings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24(3), 395–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, S.C., & Roy, R. (2002). A critical review on idealization and modelling for interaction among soil-foundation-structure system. Computers and Structures, 80(20), 1579–1594.
   Google Scholar
• Eshghi, S., & Farrokhi, H. (2003). Seismic vulnerability of airport traffic control towers. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 5(1), 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Eurocode 8 (2004). Design provision for earthquake resistance of structure, part 1: General rule. EN 1998-1:2004. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee de Normalization.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA (2000). Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 356). Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Goyal, A., & Maiti, M.K. (1997). Inelastic seismic resistance of reinforced concrete stack-like structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26(5), 501–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, J., Bommer, J.J., & Stafford, P.J. (2008). Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37(14), 1585–1607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, K., & Kuang, J.S. (2010). On the applicability of pushover analysis for seismic evaluation of medium-rise and high-rise buildings. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 19(5), 573–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsanos, E.I., Sextos, A.G., & Manolis, G.D. (2010). Selection of earthquake ground motion records: A state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, 30(4), 157–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunnath, S.K. (2004). Identification of modal combinations for nonlinear static analysis of building structures. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 19(4), 246–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiti, M.K., & Goyal, A. (1996). Non-linear seismic response of reinforced concrete stack like structures. Bulletin of the Indian Society of Earthquake Technology, 33(2), 195–214.
   Google Scholar
• Nove, N. (2007). Representative ensembles of strong earthquake records. Ottawa, Ontario: The Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering. University of Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, PEER (2009). NGA database. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Pierepiekarz, M.R., Ballantyne, D.B., & Hamburger, R.O. (2001). Damage report from Seattle. Civil Engineering ASCE, 71(6), 78–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyke, R., & Beikae, M. (1983). “A new solution for the resistance of single piles to lateral loading,” Laterally loaded deep foundations: Analysis and performance. ASTM STP 835. In J.A.Langer, E.T.Mosley, & C.D.Thompson (Eds.), American Society for Testing and Materials (pp. 3–20). Pennsylvania, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Roark, M., Turner, K.Z., & Gould, P. (2000). Seismic vulnerability of airport facilities, 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Oakland, New Zealand. 30 January-4 February, 2000, paper No. 3.
   Google Scholar
• SEAOC Vision 2000 Committee (1995). Performance-based seismic engineering., Report prepared by Structural Engineering Association of California, Sacramento, CA.
   Google Scholar
• SEAOC (1999). Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary (7th ed.). Sacramento, CA: Seismology Committee Structural Engineers Association of California.
   Google Scholar
• Tso, W.K., Zhu, T.J., & Heidebrecht, A.C. (1992). Engineering application of ground motion a/v ratio. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, 11(3), 133–144.
   Google Scholar
• Vafaei, M., & Adnan, A. (2012). Seismic damage detection of tall airport traffic control towers using wavelet analysis. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10.1080/15732479.2012.704051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villaverde, R. (2009). Fundamental concept of earthquake engineering. New York: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcoski, J., & Heymsfield, E. (2001). Performance and rehabilitation of type L FAA airport traffic control tower at San Carlos, California, for seismic loading. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 16(2), 85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J.L. (2003). Earthquake response of tall reinforced concrete chimneys. Engineering Structures, 25(1), 11–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousuf, M.D., & Bagchi, A. (2010). Seismic performance of 20-story steel-frame building in Canada. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 19(8), 901–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekioglu, A., Willford, M., Jin, L., & Melek, M. (2007). Case study using the Los Angeles Tall Buildings Structural Design Council Guidlines: 40-story concrete core wall building. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 16(5), 583–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar