Life cycle cost analysis based on the fundamental cost contributors for asphalt pavements

References

• Amini, A.A., Mashayekhi, M., Ziari, H., & Nobakht, S. (2012). Life cycle cost comparison of highways with perpetual and conventional pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 13, 553–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, A., & De Leon, D. (2005). Modeling and analysis of uncertainties for risk-informed decisions in infrastructures engineering. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 1, 19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athena Institute (2006). A life cycle perspective on concrete and asphalt roadways: Embodied primary energy and global warming potential. Ottawa, ON: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A., Keoleian, G., & Gabler, E. (2008). Evaluation of life-cycle cost analysis practices used by the Michigan Department of Transportation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 134, 236–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, P. (2012). Infrastructures and life-cycle cost–benefit analysis. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8, 507–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, I., & Remer, D. (1977). The role of interest and inflation rates in life-cycle cost analysis (NASA Deep Space Network Progress Rep. No. 42–43, pp. 105–109).
   Google Scholar
• Energy Conservation in Road Pavement Design (ECRPD) (2009). Maintenance and utilization WP6 – Life cycle evaluation. Centrum dopravniho vyzkumu, Lisenska, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (2002). Life-cycle cost analysis primer. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (2003). Economic analysis primer. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., & Santos, J. (2012). Life-cycle cost analysis system for pavement management at project level: Sensitivity analysis to the discount rate. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. 10.1080/10298436.2012.719618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D., & Liu, M. (2007). Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 3, 29–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, P., & Irwin, T. (2003). Exchange rate risk (No. 262).The World Bank Group, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gullberg, D., Birgisson, B., & Jelagin, D. (2012). Evaluation of a novel calibrated-mechanistic model to design against fracture under Swedish conditions. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13, 49–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO15686-5 (2008). Building and constructed assets service life planning, Part 5: Life-cycle costing. Stockholm: Swedish Standard Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mandapaka, V., Basheer, I., Sahasi, K., Ullidtz, P., Harvey, J., & Sivaneswaran, N. (2012). Mechanistic-empirical and life cycle cost analysis for optimizing flexible pavement maintenance and rehabilitation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138, 625–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) (2012). Pavement design and selection. Lansing, MI: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2011). U.S. life cycle inventory database. Golden, CO: Author.
   Google Scholar
• New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) (2001). Road user cost manual. Trenton, NJ: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Safi, M., Sundquist, H., Karoumi, R., & Racutanu, G. (2012). Development of the Swedish bridge management system by upgrading and expanding the use of LCC. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, J., & Ferreira, A. (2013). Life-cycle cost analysis system for pavement management at project level. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14, 71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stripple, H. (2001). Life cycle assessment of road, A pilot study for inventory analysis. Goteborg: IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Audit Office (NAO) (2010). Cost analysis in large road investments, RiR 2010:25.Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Transport Administration (STA) (2010). Bitumen bound layers. Publication number: 2010:093.Borlange: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Transport Administration (STA) (2012). Impact analysis of rehabilitation and reconstruction of roads. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories (2011). EcoInvent. Dubendorf: Author.
   Google Scholar
• The University of Chicago Facility Services (2011). Life cycle cost calculations. Chicago, IL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) (2012). Industrial energy prices, quarterly energy prices. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Walls, J., & Smith, M.R. (1998). Life cycle cost analysis in pavement design. Washington, DC: FHWA.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Birgisson, B., & Roque, R. (2007). Development of a windows-based top-down cracking design tool for Florida based on the energy ratio concept. Transportation Research Record, 2037, 86–96.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Tiong, R., Ting, S.K., & Ashley, D. (2000). Evaluation and management of foreign exchange and revenue risks in China's BOT projects. Construction Management and Economics, 18, 197–207.
   Google Scholar
• Weisbrod, G., & Fitzroy, S. (2007). Defining the range of urban congestion impacts on freight and the consequences for business activity. In presentation at the TRB annual conference,Washington, DC, 179: 208–7.
   Google Scholar
• Wennstrom, J. (2010). Estimation of delay costs caused by road works. Department of Science and Technology, University of Linköping, Norrkoping, Sweden. Retrieved from: http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:436257/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, W., & Lo, S. (2007). Time-dependent construction social costs model. Construction Management and Economics, 23, 327–337.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Keoleian, G., & Lepech, M. (2008). An integrated life cycle assessment and life cycle analysis model for pavement overlay systems. Paper presented at the first international symposium on life-cycle civil engineering, Varenna, Italy, 907–912.
   Google Scholar