Publication Cover
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance
Volume 11, 2015 - Issue 2
756
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Research orientations towards the ‘management’ of infrastructure assets: an intellectual structure approach

, &
Pages 73-96 | Received 14 May 2013, Accepted 22 Aug 2013, Published online: 30 Oct 2013

REFERENCES

  • Abaza, K.A., & Ashur, S.A. (1999). An optimum decision policy for management of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation. Transportation Research Record, 1655, 8–15.
  • Abaza, K.A., Ashur, S.A., Abu-Eisheh, S.A., & Rabay'a, A. (2001). Macroscopic optimum system for management of pavement rehabilitation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 127, 493–500.
  • Abaza, K.A., Ashur, S.A., & Al-Khatib, I.A. (2004). Integrated pavement management system with a Markovian prediction model. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 130, 24–33.
  • Ahonen, T., Reunanen, M., & Ojanen, V. (2010). Customer value driven service business development outcomes from the fleet asset management project (Vol. 749, pp. 1–29). Finland: VTT Publications.
  • Akgul, F., & Frangopol, D.M. (2003). Rating reliability existing bridges network. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 8, 383–392.
  • Aktan, A.E., Farhey, D.N., Brown, D.L., Dalal, V., Helmicki, A.J., Hunt, V.J., & Shelley, S.J. (1996). Condition assessment bridge management. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2, 108–117.
  • Alegre, H. (2010). Is strategic asset management applicable to small and medium utilities?Water Science and Technology, 62, 2051–2058.
  • American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO) (1962). The AASHO road test report 5, pavement research. Washington, DC: Highway Research Board, AASHTO, National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council.
  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (1986). Guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (1990). Guidelines for pavement management systems. Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (1993a). AASTHO guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (1993b). Guidelines for bridge management systems. Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (1994). Manual for condition evaluation of bridges (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (1997). Guide for commonly recognized (CoRe) structural elements. Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2001a). Pavement measurement guide. Washington, DC: AASTHO Joint Task Force on Pavement.
  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2001b). Pontis bridge management, release 4, technical manual. Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2002). Transportation asset management guide. Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2005). Report card America's infrastructure. Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2009). Report card for America's infrastructure. Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Water Works Association (AWWA) (2001). Reinvesting in drinking water infrastructure. Dawn of the replacement era. Denver, CO: Author.
  • Amit, R., & Schoemaker, H. (1993). Strategic assets organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33–46.
  • Ana, E.V., & Bauwens, W. (2010). Modeling the structural deterioration of urban drainage pipes: The state-of-the-art in statistical methods. Urban Water Journal, 7, 47–59.
  • Anastasopoulos, P.C., Labi, S., Karlaftis, M.G., & Mannering, F.L. (2012). Exploratory state-level empirical assessment of pavement performance. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 17, 200–215.
  • Ang, A.H.-S., & Tang, W.H. (1984). Probability concept in engineering planning and design. Vol. II – Decision, risk, and reliability. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Ariaratnam, S.T., El-Assaly, A., & Yang, Y. (2001). Assessment infrastructure inspection needs using logistic models. Journal Infrastructure Systems, 7, 160–165.
  • Baik, H.S., Jeong, H.S., & Abraham, D.M. (2006). Estimating transition probabilities in Markov chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems. Journal of Water Resource Planning, 132, 15–24.
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 9–120.
  • Bartlett, M.S. (1937). Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proceedings of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 160, 268–282.
  • Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2003). Pajek – analysis and visualization of large networks [Graph Drawing Software].
  • Batty, D. (2001). NCHRP Report 450 Transportation Research Thesaurus and user's guide. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. Website consulted on 20th of March 2013.
  • Baur, R., & Herz, R. (2002). Selective inspection planning with ageing forecast for sewer types. Water Science and Technology, 46, 389–396.
  • Ben-Akiva, M., & Gopinath, D. (1995). Modeling infrastructure performance and user costs. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 1, 33–43.
  • Bertling, L. (2002). Reliability centered maintenance electric power distribution systems (Ph.D. dissertation). Department of Electrical Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Bertling, L. (2005). A reliability-centered asset maintenance method assessing impact maintenance power distribution systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 20, 75–82.
  • Bian, J.-M., Zhu, F.-S., Chen, G.-Y., & Bai, Q. (2008). Maintenance optimization of concrete bridge deck using the niched Pareto genetic algorithm. Dongbei Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northeastern University, 29, 125–129.
  • Bian, J., Zhu, F., Cui, K., Li, C., & Kan, L. (2009). Long-term maintenance optimization of concrete bridge deck and interactive genetic algorithm. Shenyang Jianzhu Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University (Natural Science), 25, 511–516.
  • Billinton, R., & Allan, R. (1996). Reliability evaluation power systems (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637–654.
  • Bricker, R.J. (1989). An empirical investigation of the structure of accounting research. Journal of Accounting Research, 27, 246–262.
  • Brint, A., Bridgeman, J., & Black, M. (2009). The rise, current position and future direction of asset management in utility industries. Journal of Operating Research Society, 60, S106–S113.
  • British Standards Institution (BSI) (2004). BSI specification: BSI-PAS 55 optimised management physical infrastructure assets, publicly acceptable standard. Milton Keynes: Author.
  • British Standards Institution (BSI) (2008a). Asset management part 1: Specifications for the optimised management of physical infrastructure assets. Milton Keynes: Author, PAS-55.
  • British Standards Institution (BSI) (2008b). Asset management part 2: Guidelines for the application of PAS-55-1. Milton Keynes: Author, PAS 55-2.
  • Brown, R.E. (2002). Electric power distribution reliability. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
  • Brown, R.E., & Humphrey, B.G. (2005). Asset management transmission distribution. IEEE Power Energy Magazine, 3, 39–45.
  • Brundtland, G.H. (1987). Our common future: By World Commission Environment Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Burn, S., Marlow, D., & Tran, D. (2010). Modelling asset lifetimes and their role in asset management. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology – AQUA, 59, 362–377.
  • Butt, A.A., Shahin, M.Y., Feighan, K.J., & Carpenter, S.H. (1987). Pavement performance prediction model using the Markov process. Transportation Research Record, 1123, 12–19.
  • Campbell, J.D., & Reyes-Picknell, J. (1995). Uptime: Strategies for excellence in maintenance management (1st ed.). New York, NY: Productivity Press.
  • Carnahan, J.V., Davis, W.J., Shahin, M.Y., Keane, P.L., & Wu, M.I. (1987). Optimal maintenance decisions for pavement management. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 113, 554–572.
  • Cavallini, A., Conti, M., Contin, A., & Montanari, G.C. (2003). Advanced PD inference on-field measurements, Part. 2: Defect identification. IEEE Transactions on Dielectric and Electrical Insulation, 10, 528–538.
  • Cesare, M., Santamarina, C., Turkstra, C., & VanMarcke, E.H. (1992). Modeling bridge deterioration Markov chains. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 118, 820–833.
  • Chan, W., Fwa, T., & Tan, C. (1994). Road-maintenance planning using genetic algorithms. I: Formulation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 120, 693–709.
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operations Research, 2, 429–444.
  • Chevalier, J., & Ellison, G. (1997). Risk taking mutual funds response incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 1167–1200.
  • Chua, A.Y.K., & Goh, D.H. (2008). Untying the knot of knowledge management measurement: A study of six public service agencies in Singapore. Journal of Information Science, 34, 259–274.
  • CIGRE (2000). Ageing system impact planning, Electra, 193, 42–49. CIGRE Working Group 37.27, Brochure 176, Paris.
  • Czepiel, E. (1995). Bridge management systems literature review search (Technical Report No. 11). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Infrastructure Technology Institute, BIRL Industrial Research Laboratory.
  • Darden, L., & Maull, N. (1977). Interfield theories. Philosophy of Science, 44, 43–64.
  • Davenport, T.H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Davies, J.P., Clarke, B.A., Whiter, J.T., & Cunningham, R.J. (2001). Factors influencing the structural deterioration and collapse of rigid sewer pipes. Urban Water, 3, 73–89.
  • Dearholt, D.W., & Schwaneveldt, R.W. (1990). Properties of pathfinder networks. In R.W.Schwaneveldt (Ed.), Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization (pp. 89–99). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp. ISBN: 0-89391-624-2.
  • Deb, K. (2001). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm. IEEE Transactions Evolutionary Computations, 6, 182–197.
  • Dekker, R. (1996). Applications maintenance optimization models: A review analysis. Reliability Engineering System Safety, 51, 229–240.
  • De La Garza, J.M., Akyildiz, S., Bish, D.R., & Krueger, D.A. (2011). Network-level optimization of pavement maintenance renewal strategies. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25, 699–712.
  • DeStefano, P.D., & Grivas, D.A. (1998). Method for estimating transition probability in bridge deterioration models. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 4, 56–62.
  • Dierickx, I., Cool, K., & Barney, J.B. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35, 1504–1511.
  • Dissanayake, P.B.R., & Karunananda, P.A.K. (2008). Reliability index for structural health monitoring of aging bridges. Structural Health Monitoring, 7, 175–183.
  • Dresner, K., & Stone, P. (2008). A multiagent approach autonomous intersection management. Journal Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 31, 591–656.
  • Durisin, B., & Puzone, F. (2009). Maturation of corporate governance research, 1993–2007: An assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 266–291.
  • Dziuban, C.D., & Shirkey, E.C. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 358–361.
  • Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M.S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
  • Eerens, E. (2003). Business driven asset management for industrial infrastructure assets. Australia: Le Clochard.
  • Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
  • Endrenyi, J., Aboresheid, S., Allan, R.N., Anders, G.J., Billinton, R., & Singh, C.H. (2001). The present status maintenance strategies impact maintenance reliability. A report of the IEEE/PES task force impact maintenance reliability, risk probability applications. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 16, 638–646.
  • Endrenyi, J., Anders, G.J., & da Silva, A.M. L. (1998). Probabilistic evaluation effect maintenance reliability: An application. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 13, 576–583.
  • English, L. (1999). Improving data warehouse business information quality: Methods reducing costs increasing profits. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Enright, M.P., & Frangopol, D.M. (1999). Condition prediction of deteriorating concrete bridges using Bayesian updating. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125, 1118–1125.
  • Eom, S.B. (2001). Decision support systems implementation research: Review of the current state and future directions. In M.K.Sein, B.E.Munkvold, T.U.Ørvik, W.Wojtkowski, W.G.Wojtkowski, J.Zupančič, & S.Wrycza (Eds.), Contemporary trends in systems development (pp. 315–329). Springer.
  • Estes, A.C., & Frangopol, D.M. (1999). Repair optimization of highway bridges using system reliability approach. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125, 766–775.
  • Farran, M., & Zayed, T. (2012). New life-cycle costing approach for infrastructure rehabilitation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19, 40–60.
  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (1988). Recording coding guide for structure inventory appraisal of nation's bridges. Washington, DC: FHWA, US Department Transportation, Office Engineering, Bridge Division.
  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (1995). Recording coding guide structure inventory appraisal nation's bridges. Washington, DC: FHWA, US Department Transportation, Office Engineering, Bridge Division.
  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (1996). Asset management, advancing the state of the art into the 21st century through public-private dialogue (Report FHWA-RD-97-046). Washington, DC: FHWA, US Department of Transportation.
  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (1999). Asset management primer. Washington, DC: FHWA, Office of Asset Management, DOT.
  • Feighan, K.J., Shahin, M.Y., & Sinha, K.C. (1987). A dynamic programming approach optimization pavement management systems. Proceeding of the 2nd North American Conference of Managing Pavements, Road Transportation Association, Toronto, Canada.
  • Ferreira, A., Antunes, A., & Picado-Santos, L. (2002). Probabilistic segment-linked pavement management optimization model. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, 128, 568–577.
  • Flintsch, G.W., & Chen, C. (2004). Soft computing applications in infrastructure management. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 10, 157–166.
  • Frangopol, D., & Das, P. (1999). Management bridge stocks based future reliability maintenance cost. In Current future trends bridge design, construction management (pp. 45–58). Proceedings of the International Conference Organized by the Institution of Civil Engineers and Held in Singapore on 4–5 October 1999, Thomas Telford, 1999.
  • Frangopol, D.M., Kong, J.S., & Gharaibeh, E.S. (2001). Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15, 27–34.
  • Frangopol, D.M., Lin, K.Y., & Estes, A.C. (1997). Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123, 1390–1401.
  • Frangopol, D.M., & Liu, M. (2006). Multiobjective optimization for risk-based maintenance and life-cycle cost of civil infrastructure systems. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 199, 123–137.
  • Frangopol, D.M., Saydam, D., & Kim, S. (2012). Maintenance, management, life-cycle design and performance of structures and infrastructures: A brief review. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8(1), 1–25.
  • Frenette, R., Bernard, O., Putallaz, Y., & Gérard, B. (2010). Connaissance et incertitudes en gestion des infrastructures civiles: Un point de vue décisionnel. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 37, 1024–1033.
  • Friesz, T., & Fernandez, E. (1979). A model optimal transport maintenance demand responsiveness. Transportation Research Part B, 13, 317–339.
  • Fwa, T.F., Chan, W.T., & Hoque, K.Z. (2000). Multiobjective optimization pavement maintenance programming. Journal Transportation Engineering, 126, 367–374.
  • Fwa, T.F., Chan, W.T., & Tan, C.Y. (1996). Genetic algorithm programming of road maintenance and rehabilitation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 122, 246–253.
  • Gao, L., Guo, R., & Zhang, Z. (2013). An augmented Lagrangian decomposition approach for infrastructure maintenance and rehabilitation decisions under budget uncertainty. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9, 448–457.
  • Garfield, E. (1977). Citation indexing – Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Scientific Information, ISI Press.
  • Geoffroy, D.N. (1996). NCHRP synthesis of highway practice 223: Cost-effective preventive pavement maintenance. Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council.
  • Gibbons, P.M., Kennedy, C., Burgess, S.C., & Godfrey, P. (2012). Developing an asset management value improvement model (a-VIM) approach for an airport operational engineering environment. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 29, 819–841.
  • Golabi, K., Kulkarni, R., & Way, G. (1982). A statewide pavement management system. Interfaces, 12, 5–21.
  • Golabi, K., & Shepard, R. (1997). Pontis: A system for maintenance optimization and improvement of US bridge network. Interfaces, 27, 71–78.
  • Golabi, K., Thompson, P.D., & Hyman, W.A. (1993). Pontis version 2.0 technical manual (Report FHWA-SA-94-031). Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
  • Goldberg, D. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Golroo, A., & Tighe, S.L. (2012). Optimum genetic algorithm structure selection in pavement management. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 5, 327–341.
  • Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) (1999). Statement No. 34 of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, No. 171-A, June. Government Accounting Standards Series (GASS).Washington, DC: Author.
  • Grivas, D.A., Ravirala, V., & Schultz, B.C. (1993). State increment optimization methodology for network-level pavement management. Transportation Research Record, 1397, 25–33.
  • Haas, R., & Hudson, W.R. (1978). Pavement management systems. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Haas, R., Hudson, W.R., & Zaniewski, J.P. (1994). Modern pavement management. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing.
  • Haider, A. (2013). Information systems implementation for asset management: A theoretical perspective. Engineering Asset Management Review, 19–69.
  • Halfawy, M.M. R., Newton, L.A., & Vanier, D.J. (2006). Review of commercial municipal infrastructure asset management systems. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 11, 211–224.
  • Hampapur, A., Cao, H., Davenport, A., Dong, W.S., Fenhagen, D., Feris, R.S., Goldszmidt, G., Jiang, Z.B., Kalagnanam, J., Kumar, T., Li, H., Liu, X., Mahatma, S., Pankanti, S., Pelleg, D., Sun, W., Taylor, M., Tian, C.H., Wasserkrug, S., Xie, L., Lodhi, M., Kiely, C., Butturff, K., & Desjardins, L. (2011). Analytics-driven asset management. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 55(1–2), 1–9.
  • Hawk, H., & Small, E.P. (1998). The BRIDGIT bridge management system. Structural Engineering International, 8, 309–314.
  • Hegazy, T., Ali, A., & Abdel-Monem, M. (2011). Prospects of mind maps for better visualization of infrastructure literature. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 137, 239–247.
  • Hegazy, T., Elbeltagi, E., & El-Behairy, H. (2004). Bridge deck management system integrated life cycle cost optimization. Transportation Research Board (TRB) 83rd annual meeting, Washington, DC.
  • Holland, J.H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Hong, F., & Prozzi, J.A. (2010). Roughness model accounting for heterogeneity based on in-service pavement performance data. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136, 205–213.
  • Huang, Y.H. (1993). Pavement analysis and design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hudson, S.W., Carmichael III, R.F., Moser, L.O., & Hudson, W.R. (1987). Bridge management systems. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 300Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
  • Hudson, W.R., Haas, R., & Uddin, W. (1997). Infrastructure management, integrating design, construction, maintenance, rehabilitation, and renovation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia (IPWEA) (2002). International infrastructure management manual. Thames: Author.
  • Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia (IPWEA) (2006). International infrastructure management manual, version 3.0. Wellington: Author.
  • Irfan, M., Khurshid, M.B., Bai, Q., Labi, S., & Morin, T.L. (2012). Establishing optimal project-level strategies for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation – A framework and case study. Engineering Optimization, 44, 565–589.
  • Jacobs, T.L. (1992). Optimal long-term scheduling of bridge deck replacement and rehabilitation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 118, 312–322.
  • Jardine, A., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review machinery diagnostics prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems Signal Processing, 20, 1483–1510.
  • Jelinek, V. (1981). Characterization of the magnetic fabric of rocks. Tectonophysics, 79, 63–67.
  • Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, ownership structure. Journal Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
  • Jiang, Y., Saito, M., & Sinha, K.C. (1987). Bridge performance prediction model using the Markov chain. Transportation Research Record, 1180, 25–30.
  • Jorge, D., & Ferreira, A. (2012). Road network pavement maintenance optimisation using the HDM-4 pavement performance prediction models. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 13, 39–51.
  • Kahn, B.K., Strong, D.M., & Wang, R.Y. (2002). Information quality benchmarks: Product services performance. Communications of the ACM, 45, 184–192.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
  • Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31, 7–15.
  • Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70, 71–79.
  • Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1996). Balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard: Harvard Business Books.
  • Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decision multiple objectives-preferences value tradeoffs. New York, NY: Wiley Sons.
  • Keeney, R.L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decision with multiple objectives: Preferences value tradeoffs. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Kerali, H.G.R. (2000). Highway Development and Management (HDM-4) volume 1: Overview of HDM-4, 1. Paris: World Road Association (PIARC); Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Khurshid, M.B., Irfan, M., & Labi, S. (2010). Optimal performance threshold determination for highway asset interventions: Analytical framework and application. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137, 128–139.
  • Kim, S., Damnjanovic, I., & Gunby, M. (2010). Effects of pavement spatial variability on contractor's management strategies. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 16, 231–240.
  • Kleiner, Y. (2001). Scheduling inspection and renewal of large infrastructure assets. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 7, 136–143.
  • Kleiner, Y., & Rajani, B. (1999). Using limited data to assess future needs. Journal of American Water Works Association, 91, 47–61.
  • Kleiner, Y., & Rajani, B. (2001). Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: Statistical models. Urban Water Journal, 3, 131–150.
  • Kobayashi, K., Ejiri, R., & Do, M. (2008). Pavement management accounting system. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 14(2), 159–168.
  • Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
  • Kong, J.S., & Frangopol, D.M. (2003). Life-cycle reliability-based maintenance cost optimization of deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129, 818–828.
  • Kostic, T. (2003). Asset management electrical utilities: How many facets it actually has. In IEEE Power Engineering Society general meeting (pp. 275–281). Toronto, Canada, 13–17 July, IEEE.
  • Lee, J. (2006). Intelligent prognostics tools e-maintenance. Computers Industry, 57, 476–489.
  • Lee, J., Blumenstein, M., Guan, H., & Loo, Y.-C. (2013). Minimising uncertainty in long-term prediction of bridge element. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 20, 127–142.
  • Lee, J., Guan, H., Loo, Y.-C., & Blumenstein, M. (2012). Refinement of backward prediction method for reliable artificial intelligence-based bridge deterioration modelling. Advances in Structural Engineering, 15, 825–836.
  • Lee, M.R., & Chen, T.T. (2012). Revealing research themes and trends in knowledge management: From 1995–2010. Knowledge-Based Systems, 28, 47–58.
  • Leiringer, R., Green, S.D., & Raja, J.Z. (2009). Living up to the value agenda: The empirical realities of through-life value creation in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 27, 271–285.
  • Levitan, A.V., & Redman, T.C. (1998). Data resource: Properties, implications prescriptions. Sloan Management Review, 40, 89–101.
  • Leydesdorff, L., & Vaughan, L. (2006). Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the web environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1616–1628.
  • Li, J., Sheng, Y., Li, Z., & Zhou, B. (2010). A disaggregated approach for the computation of network-level highway user costs. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 3, 24–33.
  • Li, N., & Haas, R. (1996). Reliability-based processing Markov chains modeling pavement network deterioration. Transportation Research Record, 1524, 203–213.
  • Li, Y., & Madanat, S. (2002). A steady-state solution for the optimal pavement resurfacing problem. Transportation Research Part A, 36, 525–535.
  • Lin, S., Gao, J., Koronios, A., & Chanana, V. (2007). Developing a data quality framework for asset management in engineering organisations. International Journal of Information Quality, 1, 100–124.
  • Liu, M., & Frangopol, D.M. (2004). Optimal bridge maintenance planning based on probabilistic performance prediction. Engineering Structures, 26, 991–1002.
  • Liu, M., & Frangopol, D. M. (2005). Multiobjective maintenance planning optimization deteriorating bridges considering condition, safety life-cycle cost. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131, 833–842.
  • Liu, C., Hammad, A., & Itoh, Y. (1997a). Multi-objective optimization bridge deck rehabilitation using genetic algorithm. Microcomputers in Civil Engineering, 12, 431–443.
  • Liu, C., Hammad, A., & Itoh, Y. (1997b). Maintenance strategy optimization of bridge decks using genetic algorithm. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 123, 91–100.
  • Locke, J., & Perera, H. (2001). The intellectual structure of international accounting in the early 1990s. The International Journal of Accounting, 36, 223–249.
  • Lounis, Z. (2003). Identification environmental categories Markovian deterioration models bridge decks. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 8, 353–361.
  • Lynch, J.P. (2007). An overview of wireless structural health monitoring for civil structures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 365, 345–372.
  • Lytton, R.L. (1987). Concepts of pavement performance prediction and modeling. In Proceedings second North American conference on managing pavements (Vol. 2) (pp. 25–212), Toronto, Canada, November.
  • Madanat, S. (1993). Optimal infrastructure management decisions under uncertainty. Transportation Research Part C, 1, 77–88.
  • Madanat, S., & Ben-Akiva, M. (1994). Optimal inspections and repair policies for infrastructure facilities. Transportation Science, 28, 55–62.
  • Madanat, S., Mishalani, R., & Ibrahim, W.H.W. (1995). Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 1, 120–125.
  • Madanat, S., Park, S., & Kuhn, K. (2006). Adaptive optimization systematic probing infrastructure system maintenance policies under model uncertainty. Journal Infrastructure Systems, 12, 192–198.
  • Madanat, S., & Wan Ibrahim, W.H. (1995). Poisson regression models of infrastructure transition probabilities. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 21, 267–272.
  • Madanat, S.M., Karlaftis, M.G., & McCarthy, P.S. (1997). Probabilistic infrastructure deterioration models with panel data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 3, 4–9.
  • Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91.
  • Markowitz, H. (1959). Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Marsilio, M., Cappellaro, G., & Cuccurullo, C. (2011). The intellectual structure of research into PPPs. Public Management Review, 13, 763–782.
  • Massa, S., & Testa, S. (2009). How do Miles and Snow's strategic types differ in their knowledge assets evidence from Italian SMEs. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 7, 377–386.
  • Mauch, M., & Madanat, S. (2001). Semiparametric hazard rate models reinforced concrete bridge deck deterioration. Journal Infrastructure Systems, 7, 49–57.
  • Mbwana, J.R., & Turnquist, M.A. (1996). Optimization modeling for enhanced network-level pavement management system. Transportation Research Record, 1524, 76–85.
  • McCain, K.W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 433–443.
  • McGhee, K.H. (2004). NCHRP synthesis of highway practice 334: Automated pavement distress collection techniques. Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council.
  • McKay, D.T., Rens, K.L., Greimann, L.F., & Stecker, J.H. (1999). Condition index assessment of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 5, 52–60.
  • Micevski, T., Kuczera, G., & Coombes, P. (2002). Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 8, 49–56.
  • Miller, J.S., & Bellinger, W.Y. (2003). Distress identification manual for the long-term pavement performance program (Report FHWA-RD-03-031 (4th revised ed.). Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT).
  • Mishalani, R.G., & Madanat, S.M. (2002). Computation of infrastructure transition probabilities using stochastic duration models. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 8, 139–148.
  • Miyamoto, A., Kawamura, K., & Nakamura, H. (2000). Bridge management system and maintenance optimization for existing bridges. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 15, 45–55.
  • Miyamoto, A., Kawamura, K., & Nakamura, N. (2001). Development bridge management system existing bridges. Advances Engineering Software, 32, 821–833.
  • Molina, R., Unsworth, K., Hodkiewicz, M., & Adriasola, E. (2013). Are managerial pressure, technological control and intrinsic motivation effective in improving data quality?Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 119, 26–34.
  • Moon, F., Aktan, E.A., Furuta, H., & Dogaki, M. (2009). Governing issues and alternate resolutions for a highway transportation agency's transition to asset management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 5, 25–39.
  • Morcous, G., Rivard, H., & Hanna, A.M. (2002). Modeling bridge deterioration using case-based reasoning. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 8, 86–95.
  • Moubray, J. (1997). Reliability-centered maintenance (2nd ed.). London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) (2004). Guide mechanistic-empirical design new rehabilitated pavement structures (Final Report 1-37A Project). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
  • Neves, L.A.C., & Frangopol, D.M. (2005). Condition, safety cost profiles deteriorating structures emphasis bridges. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 89, 185–198.
  • Ng, M.W., Zhang, Z., & Waller, T. (2011). The price of uncertainty in pavement infrastructure management planning: An integer programming approach. Transportation Research Part C, 19, 1326–1338.
  • Nonaka, I.J., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York and London: Oxford University Press.
  • NWB Team (2006). Network workbench tool. Indiana University, Northeastern University, University of Michigan.
  • Nyström, B., & Söderholm, P. (2010). Selection of maintenance actions using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): Decision-making in railway infrastructure. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 6, 467–479.
  • Okamoto, T., & Takahashi, T. (2007). Development of asset management decision support tools for power equipment. IEEE Journal of Transactions on Power and Energy, 127, 555–558.
  • Osman, H., Atef, A., & Moselhi, O. (2012). Optimizing inspection policies for buried municipal pipe infrastructure. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 26, 345–352.
  • Ouyang, Y., & Madanat, S. (2004). Optimal scheduling rehabilitation activities multiple pavement facilities: Exact approximate solutions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38, 347–365.
  • Ouyang, Y., & Madanat, S. (2006). An analytical solution finite-horizon pavement resurfacing planning problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 40, 767–778.
  • Pantelias, A., Flintsch, G.W., Bryant, J.W.Jr, & Chen, C. (2009). Asset management data practices for supporting project selection decisions. Public Works Management and Policy, 13, 239–252.
  • Paterson, W.D.D. (1986). Prediction road deterioration maintenance effects: Theory quantification (Vol. 2), 471 ppWashington, DC: World Bank.
  • Paterson, W.D.O. (1987). Road deterioration and maintenance effects: Models for planning and management. Highway design and maintenance series. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Patidar, V., Labi, S., & Sinha, C. (2007). Multi-objective optimization bridge management systems. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
  • Peshkin, D.G., Hoerner, T.E., & Zimmerman, K.A. (2004). NCHRP report no. 523: Optimal timing of pavement preventive maintenance treatment applications. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
  • Peterson, D.E. (1985). NCHRP synthesis highway practice 122: Life-cycle cost analysis pavements. Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council.
  • Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009). The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management – 1980–2006: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 27, 185–202.
  • Pilson, C., Hudson, R.W., & Anderson, V. (1999). Multi-objective optimization pavement management using genetic algorithms efficient surfaces. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 79th annual meeting, Washington, DC, Vol. 1655, pp. 42–48.
  • Poff, N.L., Allan, J.D., Bain, M.B., Karr, J.R., Prestegaard, K.L., Richter, B.D., Sparks, R.E., & Stromberg, J.C. (1997). The natural flow regime: A paradigm river conservation restoration. BioScience, 47, 769–784.
  • Porter, A.I., Roessner, D.J., Cohen, A.S., & Perreault, M. (2006). Interdisciplinary research: Meaning, metrics and nurture. Research Evaluation, 15, 187–195.
  • Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques analyzing industries competitors. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79–90.
  • Prozzi, J., & Madanat, S. (2000). Analysis of experimental pavement failure data using stochastic duration models. Transportation Research Record, 1699, 87–94.
  • Prozzi, J.A., & Madanat, S.M. (2003). Incremental nonlinear model predicting pavement serviceability. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 129, 635–641.
  • Rajani, B., & Kleiner, Y. (2001). Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: Physically based models. Urban Water, 3, 177–190.
  • Rajani, B., & Makar, J. (2000). A methodology estimate remaining service life grey cast iron water mains. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 27, 1259–1272.
  • Ramos-Rodríguez, A.-R., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of Strategic management research: A bilbiometric study of the Strategic Management Journal. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 981–1004.
  • Robinson, R. (1998). Road management: Concepts systems. London: Macmillan.
  • Rouse, P., & Chiu, T. (2009). Towards optimal life cycle management in a road maintenance setting using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196, 672–681.
  • Saaty, T.L. (1977). A scaling method priorities hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281.
  • Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Saegrov, S. (2006). CARE-S: Computer aided rehabilitation of sewer and storm water networks. London: IWA Publishing.
  • Salman, B., & Salem, O. (2012). Modeling failure of wastewater collection lines using various section-level regression models. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 18, 146–154.
  • Sasmal, S., & Ramanjaneyulu, K. (2008). Condition evaluation of existing reinforced concrete bridges using fuzzy based analytic hierarchy approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35, 1430–1443.
  • Sathaye, N., & Madanat, S. (2011). A bottom-up solution for the multi-facility optimal pavement resurfacing problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45, 1004–1017.
  • Sayers, M., Gillespie, T.D., & Paterson, W.D.O. (1986a). Guidelines conducting calibrating road roughness measurements. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Sayers, M.W., Gillespie, T.D., & Queiros, C.A. (1986b). The international road roughness experiment: A basis for establishing a standard scale for road roughness measurements. Transportation Research Record, 1084, 76–85.
  • Scherer, W.T., & Glagola, D.M. (1994). Markovian models for bridge maintenance management. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 120, 37–51.
  • Schwaneveldt, R.W., Durso, F.T., & Dearholt, D.W. (1990). Network structures in proximity data. In G.Bower (Ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 24, pp. 249–284). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Shahin, M.Y. (1994). Pavement management for airports, roads, and parking lots. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
  • Shahin, M.Y., Nunez, M.M., Broten, M.R., Carpenter, S.H., & Sameh, A. (1987). New techniques for modeling pavement deterioration. Transportation Research Record, 1123, 40–46.
  • Shamir, U., & Howard, C.D.D. (1979). An analytic approach to scheduling pipeline replacement. Journal of American Water Works Association, 71, 248–258.
  • Shanks, G., & Darke, P. (1998). Understanding data quality data warehouse. Australian Computer Journal, 30(4), 122–128.
  • Sharpe, W.F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19, 425–442
  • Shepard, R., & Johnson, M. (2001). California bridge health index. TRNews, 215, 6–11.
  • SHRP (1993). LTPP distress identification manual long-term pavement performance project, SHRP-P-338. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
  • Sinha, K.C., & Labi, S. (2007). Transportation decision making – Principles project evaluation programming. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265–269.
  • Small, H.G., & Griffith, B.C. (1974). The structure of scientific. Literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4, 17–40.
  • Smilowitz, K., & Madanat, S. (2000). Optimal inspection and maintenance policies for infrastructure networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 15, 5–13.
  • Smith, L.C. (1981). Citation analysis. In W.G.Potter (Ed.), Library trends (Vol. 30), No. 1 (summer 1981).
  • Smith, R., Freeman, T., & Pendleton, O. (1993). Pavement maintenance effectiveness. Strategic Highway Research Program. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
  • Spatari, S., & Aktan, A.E. (2013). Guest editorial: Asset management in civil engineering. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9, 295–296.
  • Stapelberg, R.F. (2006). Professional skills training in integrated asset management: How to develop and implement the essential organizational asset management functions. In Proceedings in World Conference of Engineering Asset Management, Paper 326 (pp. 1–9)
  • St Clair, A.M., & Sinha, S. (2012). State-of-the-technology review on water pipe condition, deterioration and failure rate prediction models!Urban Water Journal, 9, 85–112.
  • Strong, D.M. (1997). IT process designs improving information quality reducing exception handling: A simulation experiment. Information Management, 31, 251–263.
  • Sveiby, K.E. (1997). The intangible asset monitor. Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting, 2, 73–97.
  • Takahashi, H. (2010a). An analysis of the influence of fundamental values' estimation accuracy on financial markets. Journal of Probability and Statistics, art. no. 543065, 1–17.
  • Takahashi, H. (2010b). Clarification of the price fluctuation mechanism in financial markets: Disparity in forecast accuracy among investors and asset price fluctuations. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 38, 250–258.
  • Teece, D.J. (2011). Achieving integration of the business school curriculum using the dynamic capabilities framework. Journal of Management Development, 30, 499–518.
  • Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.
  • Thoft-Christensen, P. (1995). Advanced bridge management systems. Structural Engineering Review, 7, 151–163.
  • Thompson, P., Small, E., Johnson, M., & Marshall, A. (1998). The Pontis bridge management system. Structural Engineering International, 8, 303–308.
  • Thompson, P.D., & Shepard, R.W. (1994). Pontis. Transportation Research Record, 324, 35–42.
  • Too, E. (2012). Infrastructure asset: Developing maintenance management capability. Facilities, 30, 234–253.
  • Transportation Association Canada (1997). Pavement design management guide. Ottawa: Author.
  • Tsai, Y.J., Li, F., Purcell, R.C., & Rabun, J.T. (2012). Reliable statewide pavement-performance study using a confidence evaluation system. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138, 339–347.
  • Tsunokawa, K., & Schofer, J.L. (1994). Trend curve optimal control model highway pavement maintenance: Case study evaluation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 28, 151–166.
  • Ugarelli, R., & Di Federico, V. (2010). Optimal scheduling of replacement and rehabilitation in wastewater pipeline networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 136, 348–356.
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2002). The clean water and drinking water infrastructure gap analysis. Washington DC: USEPA, Office of Water.
  • Unsworth, K., Adriasola, E., Johnston-Billings, A., Dmitrieva, A., & Hodkiewicz, M. (2011). Goal hierarchy: Improving asset data quality by improving motivation. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 96, 1474–1481.
  • Vanier, D.J. (2001). Why industry needs asset management tools. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15, 35–43.
  • Wagner, C.S., Roessner, J.D., Bobb, K., Klein, J.T., Boyack, K.W., Keyton, J., Rafols, I., & Börner, K. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 165, 14–26.
  • Wakchaure, S.S., & Jha, K.N. (2012). Review of inspection practices, health indices, and condition states for concrete bridges. Indian Concrete Journal, 86, 13–26.
  • Walls III, J., & Smith, M.R. (1998). Life cycle cost analysis in pavement design. Search of better investment decisions. Publication FHWASA-98-1079.Washington, DC: FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation.
  • Wand, Y., & Wang, R.Y. (1996). Anchoring data quality dimensions ontological foundations. Communications of the ACM, 39, 86–95.
  • Wang, C.P. (2000). Designs implementations automated systems pavement distress survey. Journal Infrastructure Systems, 6, 24–32.
  • Wang, F., Zhang, Z., & Machemehl, R.B. (2003). Decision-making problem for managing pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects. Transportation Research Record, 1853, 21–28.
  • Wang, K.C. P., Zaniewski, J., & Way, G. (1994). Probabilistic behavior of pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 120, 358–375.
  • Wang, R. (1998). A product perspective data quality management. Communications of the ACM, 41, 58–65.
  • Wang, R., & Strong, D. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 5–34.
  • Watanatada, T., Harral, C.G., Paterson, W., Dhareshwar, A.M., Bhandari, A., & Tsunokawa, K. (1987). The highway design and maintenance model, 1. Description of the HDM-III model. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Water Research Centre (WRc) (2001). Sewerage rehabilitation manual. Swindon: Author.
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.
  • White, H., & Griffith, B.C. (1981). Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 163–171.
  • White, H.D. (2003). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 423–434.
  • White, H.D., & Griffith, B.C. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In C.J.Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bilbiometrics (pp. 84–106). Newsbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • White, H.D., & McCain, K. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author cocitation analysis of information science 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327–355.
  • Wirahadikusumah, R., Abraham, D., & Iseley, T. (2001). Challenging issues in modeling deterioration of combined sewers. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 7, 77–84.
  • Wood, A., & Lence, B.J. (2006). Assessment of water main break data for asset management. Journal of American Water Works Association, 98, 76–86.
  • Woodhouse, J. (2001). Asset management decision making. Newbury: The Woodhouse Partnership Ltd.
  • Wooldridge, M. (2002). An introduction multi agent systems. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. (1995). Intelligent agents: Theory practice. Knowledge Engineering Review, 10, 115–152.
  • Yehia, S., Abdelfatah, A., & Abu Dabous, S. (2012). A conceptual framework for a bridge management system for the United Arab Emirates. Bridge Structures, 8, 67–79.
  • Yeo, H., Yoon, Y., & Madanat, S. (2013). Algorithms for bottom-up maintenance optimisation for heterogeneous infrastructure systems. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9, 317–328.
  • Yin, R.K. (2003). Applications case study research. Applied social research methods series (Vol. 34), (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Yoder, E.J., & Witzak, M.W. (1975). Principle of pavement design. 2nd edn. New York, NY: John Wiley Sons.
  • Younis, R., & Knight, M.A. (2010). Continuation ratio model for the performance behavior of wastewater collection networks. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 25, 660–669.
  • Zadeh, L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information Control, 8, 338–353.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.