On the use of under sleeper pads in transition zones at railway underpasses: experimental field testing

References

• AFNOR NF P 94-117-1 (2000). Soils: Investigation and testing. Formation level bearing capacity. Part I. Plate test static deformation module (EV2). Paris: Association Française de Normalisation.
   Google Scholar
• Alves Ribeiro, C. (2012). Transições aterro-estrutura em linhas ferroviárias de alta velocidade: Análise experimental e numérica [Embankment-structure transitions in high-speed railway lines: Experimental and numerical analysis] (Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (FEUP), Portugal).
   Google Scholar
• Brough, M., Stirling, A., Ghataora, G., & Madelin, K. (2003). Evaluation of railway trackbed and formation: A case study. NDT & E International, 36(3), 145–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrow, M. P. N., Chan, A. H. C., & Shein, A. (2007). Deflectometer-based analysis of ballasted railway tracks. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Geotechnical Engineering, 160(3), 169–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, B., Hölscher, P., Priest, J., Powrie, W., & Barends, F. (2011). An assessment of transition zone performance. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 225(2), 129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuéllar, V., Valerio, J., Rivas, J. A., & Rodríguez, M. (2009). Improvement of transition zones for an old embankment. Paper presented at the 17th international conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Alexandria, Egypt.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, T. (2010). Railway track stiffness variations – Consequences and countermeasures. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 8(1), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Man, A. P. (2002). DYNATRACK: A survey of dynamic railway track properties and their quality, (Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands).
   Google Scholar
• ERRI-D214 Committee (1999). Ponts rails pour vitesses sur 200 km/h. Rapport final [Rail bridges for speeds >200 km/h. Final report]Utrecht: European Rail Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• ERRI-D230.1 Committee (1999). Bridge ends – Embankment structure transition, state of art report. Utrecht: European Rail Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hruzíková, M., Plášek, O., Smutný, J., Svoboda, R., & Salajka, V. (2009). Test track section with under sleeper pads in the Czech Republic. Paper presented at the XII international scientific conference, Transport Structures, Brno, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Insa, R., Salvador, P., Inarejos, J., & Medina, L. (2013). Analysis of the performance of under-sleeper pads in high-speed line transition zones. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport, 1–15. doi:10.1680/tran.11.00033.
   Google Scholar
• Insa, R., Salvador, P., Inarejos, J., & Roda, A. (2011). Analysis of the influence of under sleeper pads on the railway vehicle/track dynamic interaction in transition zones. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit. 10.1177/0954409711430174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, A., Nielsen, J. C. O., Bolmsvik, R., Karlström, A., & Lundén, R. (2008). Under sleeper pads – Influence on dynamic train–track interaction. Wear, 265(9–10), 1479–1487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaynia, A. M., Schmitt, L., Lozano del Moral, A., Pecker, A., Cuéllar, V., Clouteau, D., & Berggren, E. (2005). SUPERTRACK project, sustained performance of railway tracks: Final report.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., & Davis, D. (2005). Transition of railroad bridge approaches. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(11), 1392–1398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López Pita, A., Teixeira, P. F., Casas-Esplugas, C., & Ubalde, L. (2006). Deterioration in geometric track quality on high speed lines: The experience of the Madrid-Seville high speed line (1992–2002). Paper presented at the TRB 85th annual meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Lozano del Moral, A., & Cuéllar, V. (2009). Track stiffness variations observed in transition zones of Spanish railways. Paper presented at the 3as Jornadas Hispano Portuguesas sobre Geotecnia en las Infraestructuras Ferroviarias, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, A., Larsson, R., & Dahlberg, T. (2006). Influence of railway track stiffness variations on wheel/rail contact force. Paper presented at the Track for High-Speed Railways, Porto, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Luomala, H., & Nurmikolu, A. (2012). Railway track stiffness measurements at bridge transition zones. Paper presented at the Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II, Hokkaido University, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Namura, A., & Suzuki, T. (2007). Evaluation of countermeasures against differential settlement at track transitions. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 48(3), 176–182.
   Google Scholar
• Nicks, J. E. (2009). The bump at the end of the railway bridge (Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M University).
   Google Scholar
• Paixão, A., Fortunato, E., & Calçada, R. (2013). Design and construction of backfills for railway track transition zones. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, doi:10.1177/0954409713499016.
   Google Scholar
• Plotkin, D., & Davis, D. (2008). Bridge approaches and track stiffness (p. 41). U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Quibel, A. (1999). New in situ devices to evaluate bearing capacity and compaction of unbound granular materials. In A.Gomes Correia (Ed.), Unbound granular materials – Laboratory testing, in-situ testing and modelling (pp. 141–151). Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Read, D., & Li, D. (2006). Design of track transitions, research results digest (Vol. 79, pp. 38). Washington: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, P., Bolmsvik, R., & Nielsen, J. C. O. (2011). In situ performance of a ballasted railway track with under sleeper pads. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 225(3), 299–309.
   Google Scholar
• Selig, E. T., & Waters, J. M. (1994). Track geotechnology and substructure management. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, J., Burrow, M. P. N., Chan, A. H., & Wang, Y. J. (2013). Measurements and simulation of the dynamic responses of a bridge-embankment transition zone below a heavy haul railway line. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 227(3), 254–268.
   Google Scholar
• UIC (2008). CODE 719 R, Earthworks and track bed for railway lines (3rd ed., pp. 117). Paris: Union Internationale des Chemins de Fer.
   Google Scholar
• UIC (2009). Under sleeper pads – Summarising report (4th ed.). Vienna: Union Internationale des Chemins de Fer.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, S. (2008). The influence of under sleeper pads on railway track dynamics (M.Sc. thesis, Linköping University, Sweden).
   Google Scholar
• Wu, T. X., & Thompson, D. J. (1999). Effects of local preload on the foundation stiffness and vertical vibration of railway track. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 219(5), 881–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakeri, J. -A., & Ghorbani, V. (2011). Investigation on dynamic behavior of railway track in transition zone. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 25(2), 287–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar