Baseline-free real-time assessment of structural changes

References

• Alvandi, A., & Crémona, C. (2006). Assessment of vibration-based damage identification techniques. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 292, 179–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billard, L., & Diday, E. (2006). Symbolic data analysis. Merrill-Palmer (p. 321). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. In M.Jordan, J.Kleinberg, & B.Scholkopf (Eds.), Pattern recognition (p. 748). Berkeley, CA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Calçada, R., Cunha, A., & Delgado, R. (2005). Analysis of traffic-induced vibrations in a cable-stayed bridge. Part I: Experimental assessment. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10, 370–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cury, A. (2010). Téchniques d'anormalité appliquées a la surveillance de santé structurale. Paris: Université Paris-Est.
   Google Scholar
• Cury, A., & Crémona, C. (2012). Assignment of structural behaviours in long-term monitoring: Application to a strengthened railway bridge. Structural Health Monitoring, 11, 422–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cury, A., Crémona, C., & Diday, E. (2010). Application of symbolic data analysis for structural modification assessment. Engineering Structures, 32, 762–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diday, E., & Noirhomme-Fraiture, M. (2008). Symbolic data analysis and the SODAS software (p. 445). Chicester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Farrar, C. R., & Worden, K. (2007). An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions, Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 365, 303–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, E. (2010). Damage identification in civil engineering infrastructure under operational and environmental conditions. Porto: FEUP – Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, S. D., & Tolman, A. (2008). Sense of sensing: From data to informed decisions for the built environment. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 14, 4–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, T. (2011). The elements of statistical learning, data mining, inference and prediction. In T.Hastie, R.Tibshirani, & J.Friedman (Eds.), (2nd ed., p. 763). Stanford: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ichino, M., & Yaguchi, H. (1994). Generalized Minkowski metrics for mixed feature-type data analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 24, 698–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A. K. (2010). Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31, 651–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, U., & Koh, B.-H. (2009). Structural damage localization using wavelet-based silhouette statistics. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 321, 590–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Chong, J. W., Chon, K. H., & Kim, J. (2013). Wavelet-based AR–SVM for health monitoring of smart structures. Smart Materials and Structures, 22, 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lanata, F., & Grosso, A Del. (2006). Damage detection and localization for continuous static monitoring of structures using a proper orthogonal decomposition of signals. Smart Materials and Structures, 15, 1811–1829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laory, I. (2013). Model-free methodologies for data-interpretation during continuous monitoring of structures. École Polytechnic Fédérale de Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Lautour, O. R., & Omenzetter, P. (2010). Damage classification and estimation in experimental structures using time series analysis and pattern recognition. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24, 1556–1569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C.-H., Chen, C.-H., & Hsu, T.-Y. (2011). Application of advanced statistical methods for extracting long-term trends in static monitoring data from an arch dam. Structural Health Monitoring, 10, 587–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, D., Esposito, F., & Monopoli, M. (2002). Comparing dissimilarity measures for symbolic data analysis. In Data mining III: Series management information systems (pp. 31–40). Southampton: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mata, J. (2011). Interpretation of concrete dam behaviour with artificial neural network and multiple linear regression models. Engineering Structures, 33, 903–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, G., & Cooper, M. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50, 159–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyo, P., & Bronjohn, J. (2002). Application of Box-Jenkins models for assessing the effect of unusual events recorded by structural health monitoring systems. Structural Health Monitoring, 1, 149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Mufti, A. (2001). Guidelines for structural health monitoring, design manual no. 2. Canada: ISIS Canada (Intelligent Sensing for Innovative Structures).
   Google Scholar
• Pestana, D. D., & Velosa, S. F. (2008). Introduçao à probabilidade e estatística (3rd ed., pp. 1164). Lisbon: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Posenato, D. (2009). Model-free data interpretation for continuous monitoring of complex structures. Communications. Lausanne: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Posenato, D., Kripakaran, P., Inaudi, D., & Smith, I. F. C. (2010). Methodologies for model-free data interpretation of civil engineering structures. Computers and Structures, 88, 467–482.
   Google Scholar
• Rendón, E., Abundez, I., Arizmendi, A., & Quiroz, E. M. (2011). Internal versus external cluster validation indices. International Journal of Computers and Communications, 5(1), 158–163.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, C. (2011). Monitorizaçao de estruturas de engenharia civil apoiada em soluções de fibra. Óptica. University of Porto.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, C. (2011). Monitorizaçao de estruturas de engenharia civil apoiada em soluções de fibra.Óptica. University of Porto.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseeuw, P. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseuw, P., & Croux, C. (1993). Alternatives to the median absolute deviaton. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1273–1283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sá, J. (2007). Applied statistics using SPSS, STATISTICA, MATLAB and R. Statistics (2nd ed., p. 505). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, J., Crémona, C., Orcesi, A. D., & Silveira, P. (2013). Multivariate statistical analysis for early damage detection. Engineering Structures, 56, 273–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, J., Orcesi, A. D., Silveira, P., & Guo, W. (2012a). Real time assessment of rehabilitation works under operational loads. In M.Salta, R.Moura, M.Basheer, & A.Gonçalves (Eds.), ICDS12 – International Conference on Durable Structures: From construction to rehabilitation. Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, J., Orcesi, A. D., Silveira, P., & Pina, C. (2012b). Damage detection under environmental and operational loads on large span bridges. V Congresso brasileiro de Pontes e Estruturas – Soluções Inovadores para Projeto, Execuçao e Manutençao. Rio de Janeiro: ABPE – Associação Brasileira de Pontes e Estruturas.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, S., Dias Júnior, M., Lopes Junior, V., & Brennan, M. J. (2008). Structural damage detection by fuzzy clustering. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 22, 1636–1649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, H., Farrar, C., Hemez, F. M., Shunk, D. D., Stinemates, D. W., & Nadler, B. R. (2004). A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001. Structural health monitoring (p. 311). Los Alamos, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, H., & Kim, S. D. (2008). Reference-free damage classification based on cluster analysis. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 23, 324–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., Wendner, R., Frangopol, D. M., & Bergmeister, K. (2012). Influence line- model correction approach for the assessment of engineering structures using novel monitoring techniques. Smart Materials and Structures, 9(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Theodoridis, S., & Koutroumbas, K. (2009). Pattern recognition (4th ed., pp. 961. London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Treacy, M. A., & Brühwiler, E. (2012). A monitoring system for determination of real deck slab behaviour in prestressed box girder bridges. In F.Biondin & D. M.Frangopol (Eds.), IABMAS – Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability (pp. 1495–1501). Stresa, Italy: CRC Press/Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F. L., Chan, T. H. T., Thambiratnam, D. P., Tan, A. C. C., & Cowled, C. J. L. (2012). Correlation-based damage detection for complicated truss bridges using multi-layer genetic algorithm. Advances in Structural Engineering, 15, 693–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worden, K., Staszewski, W. J., & Hensman, J. J. (2011). Natural computing for mechanical systems research: A tutorial overview. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25, 4–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, H. F., Ni, Y. Q., & Ko, J. M. (2011). Structural damage alarming using auto-associative neural network technique: Exploration of environment-tolerant capacity and setup of alarming threshold. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25, 1508–1526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar