Application of sliding seismic isolator to building structures considering cost, performance and inspection: a case study

References

• AngA.H.-S., & TangW.H. (1984). Probability concepts in engineering planning and design (Vol. II). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• AngA.H.-S., & TangW.H. (2007). Probability concepts in engineering: Emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• AshkezariG.D., AghakouchakA.A., & KokabiM. (2008). Design, manufacturing and evaluation of the performance of steel like fiber reinforced elastomeric seismic isolators. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 197, 140–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BiswasS.K., & VijayanK. (1992). Friction and wear of PTFE – A review. Wear, 158, 193–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuckleI.G., ConstantinouM.C., DicleliM., & GhasemiH. (2006). Seismic isolation of highway bridges. Special Report MCEER-06-SP07. The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
   Google Scholar
• BuckleI.G., & MayesR.L. (1990). Seismic isolation: History, application, and performance – A world view. Earthquake Spectra, 6, 161–201.
   Google Scholar
• BurbyR., DeyleR., GodschalkD., & OlshanskyR. (2000). Creating hazard resilient communities through land-use planning. ASCE Natural Hazards Review, 1, 99–106.
   Google Scholar
• ChaeY. (2011). Seismic hazard mitigation of building structures using Magneto-Rheological dampers. (Ph.D Thesis). Lehigh Univeristy, Bethlehem, PA.
   Google Scholar
• ConstantinouM.C., SoongT.T., & DargushG.F. (1998). Passive energy dissipation systems for structural design and retrofit. New York: MCEER.
   Google Scholar
• DolceM., CardoneD., & CroattoF. (2005). Frictional behavior of steel-PTFE interfaces for seismic isolation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 3, 75–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EllingwoodB.R., & WenY.-K. (2005). Risk-benefit-based design decisions for low-probability/high consequence earthquake events in Mid-America. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 7, 56–70.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1337-2 (2004). Structural bearings-Part 2: Sliding elements. Berlin, Germany: The European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC: FEMA-356.
   Google Scholar
• FerrittoJ. (1991). Studies on seismic isolation of buildings. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 117, 3293–3314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FHWA (2010). Earthquake-resistant design concepts – An introduction to the NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. Washington, DC: FEMA P-749.
   Google Scholar
• FrangopolD.M., & KimS. (2011). Service life, reliability and maintenance of civil structures, Chapter 5. In L.S.Lee & V.Karbari (Eds.), Service life estimation and extension of civil engineering structures (pp. 145–178). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• FrangopolD.M., KongJ.S., & GharaibehE.S. (2001). Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges. ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15, 27–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GerhaherU., StraussA., & BergmeisterK. (2009). Effektivität eines Erdbebenisolationssystems für Hochbauten mittels faserbewehrter Elastomerlager. Bautechnik, 86, 14–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GodaK., LeeC.S., & HongH.P. (2010). Lifecycle cost–benefit analysis of isolated buildings. Structural Safety, 32, 52–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HITEC (1998). Evaluation findings for R.J. Watson sliding isolation bearings. Civil Engineering Research Foundation (CERF) Reports 98-08. ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• HuppertH.E., & SparksR.S.J. (2006). Extreme natural hazards: population growth, globalization and environmental change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 364, 1875–1888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IrsyamM., DangkuaD., Hendriyawan, HoedajantoD., HutapeaB., KertapatiE., BoenT., & PetersenM. (2008). Proposed seismic hazard maps of Sumatra and Java islands and microzonation study of Jakarata city, Indonesia. Journal of Earth System Science, 117, 865–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IrsyamM., AsrurifakM., Hendriyawan, BudionoB., TriyosoW., & FirmantiA. (2010). Development of spectral hazard maps for a proposed revision of the Indoensian Seismic Builing Code. Geomechanics and Geoengineering: An Internationl Journal, 5, 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• IslamA., AhmadS., JameelM., & ZaminM. (2012). Seismic base isolation for buildings in regions of low to moderate seismicity: Practical alternative design. ASCE Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 17, 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• KammererA.M., WhittakerA.S., & ConstantinouM.C. (2012). Technical considerations for seismic isolation of nuclear facilities: Draft for comment. Washington, DC: USNRC.
   Google Scholar
• KaniN. (2008). Current state of seismic-isolation design. Journal of Disaster Research, 4, 175–181.
   Google Scholar
• KartoumA., ConstantinouM.C., & ReinhornA.M. (1992). Sliding isolation system for bridges: Analytical study. Earthquake Spectra, 8, 345–372.
   Google Scholar
• KellyJ.M. (1986). Aseismic base isolation: Review and bibliography. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 5, 202–216.
   Google Scholar
• KimS., & FrangopolD.M. (2011). Inspection and monitoring planning for RC structures based on minimization of expected damage detection delay. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 26, 308–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KitamuraH., TamuraK., & TakenakaY. (2008). Seismic performance of seismic-isolated building for long-period ground motion and limited performance of seismic isolator. Proceedings of ASCE Structures Congress: 18th Analysis and Computation Speciality Conference, April 24–26, 2008, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 1–12. Reston, VA: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• KomodromosP. (2000). Seismic isolation for earthquake resistant structures. Southampton: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• KongJ., & FrangopolD.M. (2004). Cost–reliability interaction in life-cycle cost optimization of deteriorating structures. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 130, 1704–1712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LindellM., & PraterC. (2003). Assessing community impacts of natural disasters. ASCE Natural Hazards Review, 4, 176–185.
   Google Scholar
• MatsagarV., & JangidR. (2008). Base isolation for seismic retrofitting of structures. ASCE Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 13, 175–185.
   Google Scholar
• MokhaA., AminN., ConstantinouM., & ZayasV. (1996). Seismic isolation retrofit of large historic building. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 122, 298–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoonB.-Y., KangG.-J., KangB.-S., & KellyJ.M. (2002). Design and manufacturing of fiber reinforced elastomeric isolator for seismic isolation. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 130-131, 145–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MordiniA., & StraussA. (2008). An innovative earthquake isolation system using fibre reinforced rubber bearings. Engineering Structures, 30, 2739–2751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCHRP (1999). High-load multi-rotational bridge bearings. NCHRP Report 432.Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• NoureayanA., MontminyS., & WantsonR. (2005). Seismic design and construction of a hybrid pre-case/cast in place concrete bridge in a cold weather environment. Proceedings of the 2005 PCI National Bridge Conference, October 16–19, 2005, Palm Springs, CA.
   Google Scholar
• PadgettJ.E., DennemannK., & GhoshJ. (2010). Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost–benefit (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retrofit assessment. Structural Safety, 32, 165–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PurtraR.R., KiyonoJ., OnoY., & ParajuliH.R. (2012). Seismic hazard analysis for Indonesia. Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 33, 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• ReitererM., AltayO., WendnerR., HoffmannS., & StraussA. (2008). Adaptive tuned liquid column dampers for structures. Part II. Stahlbau, 77, 205–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StraussA., FrangopolD.M., & KimS. (2008). Statistical, probabilistic and decision analysis aspects related to the efficient use of structural monitoring systems. Beton- und Stahlbetonbau, 103, 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• WarnG.P., & RyanK.L. (2012). A review of seismic isolation for buildings: historical development and research needs. Buildings, 2, 300–325.
   Google Scholar
• WarnG., & WhittakerA. (2008). Vertical earthquake loads on seismic isolation systems in bridges. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 134, 1696–1704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WarnG., WhittakerA., & ConstantinouM. (2007). Vertical stiffness of elastomeric and lead–rubber seismic isolation bearings. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 133, 1227–1236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WatsonR.J. (2006). Short and medium span bridges in Ontario utilizing sliding isolation bearings. Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Short and Medium Span Bridges, August, August 23–25, 2006, Montreal, QC, Canada, 143–151.
   Google Scholar
• WatsonR.J., & DugoJ. (2004). Highload multirotational bearings for concrete bridges. Proceedings of Concrete Bridge Conference, May 17–18, 2004, Charlotte.
   Google Scholar
• WatsonR.J., & LeungH. (2004). The design of steel plate girder bridges using sliding isolation bearings. Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, August 1–6, 2006, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• WhittakerA.S., KennedyR.P., HuangY.-N., & MayesR.L. (2011). Seismic isolation of safety-related nuclear structures. Proceedings of ASCE Structures Congress 2011, Las Vegas, NV, ASCE, 876–885.
   Google Scholar
• WilliamsR.J., GardoniP., & BracciJ.M. (2009). Decision analysis for seismic retrofit of structures. Structural Safety, 31, 188–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar