Post-quake urban road network functionality assessment for seismic emergency management in historical centres

References

• Argyroudis, S., Monge, O., Finazzi, D., & Pessina, V. (2003). Vulnerability assessment of lifelines and essential facilities (WP06): Methodological handbook – Appendix 1: Roadway Transportation System, Risk-UE Final Report, Report n. GTR-RSK 0101-152av7.
   Google Scholar
• Argyroudis, S., Selva, J., Gehl, P., & Pitilakis, K. (2015). Systemic seismic risk assessment of road networks considering interactions with the built environment. Computer-Aided and Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 30, 524–540.10.1111/mice.2015.30.issue-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetti, L., Tapponnier, P., King, G.C.P., Meyer, B., & Manighetti, I. (2000). Growth folding and active thrusting in the Montello region, Veneto, northern Italy. Journal of Geophysics Research, 105, 739–766.10.1029/1999JB900222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardini, A., Gori, R., Muneratti, E., Paggiarin, C., Parisi, O., & Zuccaro, G. (2000). Vulnerability and probability of collapse for classes of masonry buildings. In E. Faccioli e V. Pessina (Eds.), The Catania project: earthquake damage scenarios for high risk area in the Mediterranean,. CNR-GNDT (pp. 146–158). Roma: Esagrafica Editors.
   Google Scholar
• Biondini, F., & Frangopol, D.M. (2015). Design, assessment, monitoring and maintenance of bridges and infrastructure networks. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11, 413–414.10.1080/15732479.2014.951868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga, F., Dolce, M., & Liberatore, D. (1982). Southern Italy November 23, 1980 earthquake: A statistical study on damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the M.S.K.-76 scale (Progetto Finalizzato Geodinamica, Report n. 503). Roma: CNR Editor.
   Google Scholar
• Breymann, G.A. (1885). General treaty on civil constructions with insights on huge structures. ASIN B0087R93RO. Vallardi Editor ( in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Calderoni, B., Cordasco, E.A., Giubileo C., & Migliaccio, L. (2009). Preliminary report on damages suffered by masonry buildings in consequence of the L’Aquila earthquake of 6th April 2009. Retrieved April 10, 2014, from http://www.reluis.it
   Google Scholar
• Carocci, C.F. (2012). Small centers damaged by 2009 L’Aquila earthquake: On site analyses of historical masonry aggregates. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 10, 45–71.10.1007/s10518-011-9284-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalieri, F., Franchin, P., Buriticà Cortés, J.A., & Tesfamariam, S. (2014). Models for seismic vulnerability analysis of power networks: Comparative assessment. Computer-Aided and Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 29, 590–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DISS Working Group. (2010). Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS), Version 3.1.1: A compilation of potential sources for earthquakes larger than M 5.5 in Italy and surrounding areas. http://diss.rm.ingv.it/diss/, © INGV 2010 – Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia – All rights reserved; doi:10.6092/INGV.IT-DISS3.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Dolce, M. (2012). The Italian National Seismic Prevention Program. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering WCEE, September 24–28, 2012, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Dolce, M., Goretti, A., & Masi, A. (1999). Analisi dei danni causati dal sisma del settembre 1998 nel Pollino. Ingegneria Sismica, n. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Dolce, M., Masi, A., & Zuccaro, G. (2003). Rilievo ed analisi sistematica del danneggiamento di S. Giuliano di Puglia ( GNDT Technical Report). Rome: Esagrafica.
   Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P. (1999). Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28, 979–993.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchin, P., Lupoi, A., & Pinto, P.E. (2006). On the role of road network in reducing human losses after earthquakes. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 10, 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goretti, A., & Sarli, V. (2006). Road network and damaged buildings in urban areas: Short and long-term interaction. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 4, 159–175.10.1007/s10518-006-9004-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goretti, A. (2004). Interaction between urban system components: Road network, buildings, emergency system. XI National Congress on Seismic Engineering, Italy, January 25–29, 2004, Genoa, ( in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Goretti, A. (2005). A probabilistic model able to handle interaction among road network, buildings and emergency services in urban areas. Proceedings of the IX International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, ICOSSAR’05, June 19–23, 2005, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Guillaume, S., & Magdalena, L. (2006). Expert guided integration of induced knowledge into a fuzzy knowledge base. Soft Computing, 10, 773–784.10.1007/s00500-005-0007-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillaume, S., & Charnomordic, B. (2012). Fuzzy inference systems: An integrated modeling environment for collaboration between expert knowledge and data using FisPro. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 8744–8755.10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Jernigan, J.B., & Lin, Y.W. (2000). Evaluation of seismic damage to Memphis bridges and highway systems. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 5, 322–330.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:4(322)
   Google Scholar
• Italian Building Code. (2008). DM 14.01.2008: Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni. Rome: Italian Ministry of Infrastructures and Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Italian Parliament. (2009). Law n°77/2009 art. 11 National Plan for the mitigation of the seismic risk. Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Jenelius, E., & Mattsson, L.G. (2012). Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: A grid-based approach with case study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46, 746–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanafany, A. (1983). Transportation Demand Analysis. New York, NY: Mc Graw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Klir, G.J., & Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic. Theory and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.J., Song, J., Gardoni, P., & Lim, H.W. (2011). Post-hazard flow capacity of bridge transportation network considering structural deterioration of bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7, 509–521.10.1080/15732479.2010.493338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. (2002). Computations on historic masonry structures. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 4, 301–319.10.1002/pse.v4:3
   Google Scholar
• Lupoi, G., Franchin, P., Lupoi, A., & Pinto, P.E. (2006). Seismic fragility analysis of structural systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE, 132, 385–395.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:4(385)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magenes, G. (2006). Masonry building design in seismic areas: Recent experiences and prospects from a european standpoint. International European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Mamdani, E.H. (1977). Application of fuzzy logic to approximate reasoning using linguistic synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 26, 1182–1191.10.1109/TC.1977.1674779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamdani, E.H., & Assilian, S. (1975). An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7, 1–13.10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2
   Google Scholar
• Menoni, S., Pergalani, F., Boni, M.P., & Petrini, V. (2002). Lifelines earthquake vulnerability assessment: A systemic approach. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, 22, 1199–1208.10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00148-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morbin, R., Zanini, M. A., Pellegrino, C., Zhang, H., & Modena, C. (2015). A probabilistic strategy for seismic assessment and FRP retrofitting of existing bridges. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13, 2411–2428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (U.S.) (2010). HCM2010: Highway capacity manual. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Ordinance of the President of the Ministry Council. (2012). OPMC n°4007 Contributions for the seismic risk prevention interventions for the Year 2011. Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Papa, F., & Zuccaro, G. (2004). Medea: A multimedia and didactic handbook for seismic damage evaluation. Postdam: XXIX General Assembly of the European Seismological Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Parisi, F., De Luca, F., Petruzzelli, F., De Risi, R., Chioccarelli, E., & Iervolino, I. (2012). Field inspection after the May 20th and 29th 2012 Emilia-Romagna earthquakes. Retrieved April 10, 2014 from, http://www.reluis.it
   Google Scholar
• Pitilakis, K., Franchin, P., Khazai, B., & Wenzel, H. (eds.). (2014). SYNER-G: Systemic seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of complex urban, utility, lifeline systems and critical facilities: Methodology and applications. Series: Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, 31. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media. ISBN 978-94-017-8834-2.
   Google Scholar
• Poli, M.E., Burrato, P., Galadini, F., & Zanferrari, A. (2008). Seismogenic sources responsible for destructive earthquakes in north-eastern Italy. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata, 49, 301–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2004). Caltrans structural control for bridges in high-seismic zones. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34, 449–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondelet, J.B. (1802). Traitè theorique et pratique de l’Art de Batir. Paris: Ecole d’Architecture ( in French).
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, R., Gastaldi, M., Carturan, F., Pellegrino, C., & Modena, C. (2012). Planning and management of actions on transportation system to address extraordinary events in post-emergency situations. A multidisciplinary approach. European Transport, 51, Paper n.2. ISSN 1825-3997.
   Google Scholar
• SERGISAI. (2001). Seismic risk evaluation through integrated use of geographical information systems and artificial intelligence techniques, Project ENV4-0279, Final report. DGXII, EC.
   Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M., Murachi, Y., Dong, X., Zhou, Y., & Orlikowsky, M. (2003). Effect of seismic retrofit of bridges on transportation networks. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibrations, 2, 169–179.10.1007/s11803-003-0001-0
   Google Scholar
• Titi, A., Biondini, F., Frangopol, D.M. (2014). Lifetime resilience of aging concrete bridges under corrosion. Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life Extension - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, IABMAS 2014, pp. 1691–1698.
   Google Scholar
• Veneto Region. (2010). Regional Technical Map. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from http://www.regione.veneto.it/web/ambiente-e-territorio/carta-tecnica-regionale
   Google Scholar
• Wald, D.J., & Allen, T.I. (2007). Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97, 1379–1395.10.1785/0120060267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampieri, P., Zanini, M. A., & Faleschini, F. (2016). Influence of damage on the seismic failure analysis of masonry arches. Construction and Building Materials, 199, 343–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanini, M.A., Pellegrino, C., Morbin, R., & Modena, C. (2013). Seismic vulnerability of bridges in transport networks subjected to environmental deterioration. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11, 561–579.10.1007/s10518-012-9400-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar