Performance and damage evolution of plain and fibre-reinforced segmental concrete pipelines subjected to transverse permanent ground displacement

References

• Arsénio, A. M., Vreeburg, J. H. G. H. G., Bouma, F., Rietveld, J. C., & Rietveld, L. C. (2013). Characterization of PVC joints’ behaviour during variable loading laboratory tests. Urban Water Journal, 12(7), 1–9. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2014.923475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D2216 (2010). Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D2922 (2005). Standard test methods for density of soil and soil-aggregate in place by nuclear methods (shallow depth). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTMC655. (2009). Standard specification for reinforced concrete D-load culvert, storm drain, and sewer pipe. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTMC76. (2010). Standard specification for reinforced concrete culvert, storm drain, and sewer pipe. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• AWWA C300, (2004). Standard for reinforced concrete pressure pipe, steel cylinder type, for water and other liquids. Denver CO: American Water Works Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ayala, G., & O’Rourke, M. (1989). Effects of the 1985 Michoacan earthquake on water systems and other buried lifelines in Mexico. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, D. (1995), Water system performance in the Great Hanshin (Kobe) earthquake. In 1995 American Water Works Association Annual Conference. Anaheim, CA: American Water Works Association,Denver,.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, D., Chung, R., O’Rourke, T., & Schiff, A. (1996), Performance of lifeline systems, the January 17, 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake, performance of structures, lifelines and fire protection systems. NIST Special Publication 901, Washington, DC: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, A. S., daSilva, G., McCue, M. T., Kim, J., Nadukuru, S. S., Lynch, J., Michalowski, R. L., Pour-Ghaz, M., Weiss, J., Green, R. A. (2009), Damage detection and health monitoring of buried concrete pipelines. In International Symposium on Prediction and Simulation Methods for Geohazard Mitigation. Kyoto, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, A. S., Green, R. A., Lynch, J. P., Michalowski, R. L., Kim, J., O’Connor, S., Pour-Ghaz, M., Nadukuru, S., & Weiss, W. J. (2011), A simple soil-structure interaction model for indirect damage assessment of segmented concrete pipelines during PGD (pp. 766–776). Seattle, Washington: ASCE Pipelines Conference 2011.10.1061/9780784411872
   Google Scholar
• Buco, J., Emeriault, F., & Kastner, R. (2008). Full-scale experimental determination of concrete pipe joint behavior and its modeling. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 14, 230–240.10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:3(230)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. E., Seligson, H. A., & Eguchi, R. T. (1996). Estimation of the economic impact of multiple lifeline disruption: Memphis light, gas and water case study. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research: Buffalo, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W.-F., & Scawthorn, C. (2002). Earthquake Engineering Handbook. New York, NY: New Directions in Civil Engineering. CRC Press.10.1201/CRCNEDICIENG
   Google Scholar
• Cubrinovski, M., Bradley, B., Wotherspoon, L., Green, R. A., Bray, J., Wood, C., Pender, M., Allen, J., Bradshaw, A., Rix, G., Taylor, M. Robinson, K., Henderson, D. Giorgini, S. Ma, K. Winkley, A., Zupan, J. O’Rourke, T. DePascale, G., Wells, D. (2011). Geotechnical aspects of the 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 44, 205–226.
   Google Scholar
• Eguchi, R. T. (1995), Mitigating risks to infrastructure systems through natural hazard reduction and design. In International Symposium on Public Infrastructure Systems Research. Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• El Hmadi, K., & O’Rourke, M. J. (1989). Seismic wave effects on straight jointed buried pipeline. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
   Google Scholar
• Erami, M. H., Miyajima, M., & Kaneko, S. (2012). Soil-pipe interaction of fault crossing segmented buried ductile iron pipelines subjected to dip faultings. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. A1 (Structural Engineering & Earthquake Engineering (SE/EE)), 68, I_781–I_789.
   Google Scholar
• Erami, M. H., Miyajima, M., Kaneko, S., Toshima, T., & Kishi, S. (2015). Pipe–soil interaction for segmented buried pipelines subjected to dip faults. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 44, 403–417.10.1002/eqe.v44.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glisic, B., & Yao, Y. (2012). Fiber optic method for health assessment of pipelines subjected to earthquake-induced ground movement. Structural Health Monitoring, 11, 696–711.10.1177/1475921712455683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Lynch, J. P., Michalowski, R. L., Green, R. A., Pour-Ghaz, M., Weiss,W. J., & Bradshaw, A. (2009). Experimental study on the behavior of segmented buried concrete pipelines subject to ground movements. In Proceedings of SPIE Nondestructive Characterization for Composite Materials, Aerospace Engineering, Civil Infrastructure, and Homeland Security (pp. 729419–10).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., O’Connor, S., Nadukuru, S., Lynch, J. P., Michalowski, R., Green, R. A., Pour-Ghaz, M. Weiss, W. J., Bradshaw, A. (2010). Behavior of full-scale concrete segmented pipelines under permanent ground displacements. In Proceedings of SPIE Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems (p. 76500U).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Nadukuru, S. S., Pour-Ghaz, M., Lynch, J. P., Michalowski, R. L., Bradshaw, A. S., Green, R. A., Weiss, J. (2011). Assessment of the behavior of buried concrete pipelines subjected to ground rupture: Experimental study. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2011, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klar, A., Marshall, A. M., Soga, K., & Mair, R. J. (2008). Tunneling effects on jointed pipelines. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45, 131–139.10.1139/T07-068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krathy, R. G., & Salvadori, M. G. (1978). Strength and dynamic characteristics of gasket-jointed concrete water pipelines. New York, NY: Weidlinger Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, E. N., & Baillon, L. (2002). Experiments to relate acoustic emission energy to fracture energy of concrete. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128, 698–702.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:6(698)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. M., Klar, A., & Mair, R. J. (2010). Tunneling beneath buried pipes: View of soil strain and its effect on pipeline behavior. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136, 1664–1672.10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, S. M., Lynch, J. P., Pour-Ghaz, M., Nadukuru, S. S., Michalowski, R. L., Green, R. A., Bradshaw A. S., & Weiss W. J. (2017). Underground sensing strategies for the health assessment of buried pipelines. In S. Pamukcu, & L. Cheng (Eds.), Underground sensing: Monitoring and hazard detection for environment and infrastructure. Netherlands: Elsevier, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, T. D., Jeon, S.-S., Toprak, S., Cubrinovski, M., & Jung, J. K. (2012). Underground lifeline system performance during the Canterbury earthquake sequence. In Proceedings of 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE) (p. 24). Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, T., Jezerski, J., Olson, N., Bonneau, A., Palmer, M., Stewart, H. O’Rourke, M., & Abdoun, T. (2008), Geotechnics of pipeline system response to earthquakes. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, T. D., & Bonneau, A. (2007), Lifeline performance under extreme loading during earthquakes. in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, M., & Deyoe, E. (2004). Seismic damage to segmented buried pipe. Earthquake Spectra, 20, 1167–1183.10.1193/1.1808143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, T. D., Gowdy, T. E., Stewart, H. E., & Pease, J. W. (1991), Lifeline performance and ground deformation in the Marina during 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. Third Japan–U.S. Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures for Soil Liquefaction, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, T. D., Grigoriu, M. D., & Khater, M. M. (1985). A state of the art review: Seismic response of buried pipelines. In C. Sundararajan (Ed.), Pressure Vessel and Piping Technology 1985 – A Decade of progress (pp. 281–323). New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Ohtsu, M. (1999). Estimation of crack and damage progression in concrete by quantitative acoustic emission analysis. Materials Evaluation, 57, 521–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohtsu, M., Shigeishi, M., & Sakata, Y. (1998). Nondestructive evaluation of defects in concrete by quantitative acoustic emission and ultrasonics. Ultrasonics, 36, 187–195.10.1016/S0041-624X(97)00091-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, C. S., Landis, E., & Shah, S. P. (1991). Damage assessment in concrete using quantitative acoustic emission. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 117, 2681–2698.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:11(2681)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, M. C., O’Rourke T. D., Stewart H. E., O’Rourke M. J., & Symans M. (2006), Large displacement soil-structure interaction test facility for lifelines. Eighth US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Pour-Ghaz, M. (2011), Detecting damage in concrete using electrical methods and assessing moisture movement in cracked concrete. PhD Thesis, Purdue University: West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Pour-Ghaz, M., & Weiss J. (2010), Quantifying damage due to aggregate expansion in cement matrix. In J. H. Ideker (Ed.), Advances in the material science of concrete (pp. 101–114). American Concrete Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pour-Ghaz, M., & Weiss, J. (2011a). Detecting the time and location of cracks using electrically conductive surfaces. Cement and Concrete Composites, 33, 116–123.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pour-Ghaz, M., & Weiss, J. (2011b). Application of frequency selective circuits for crack detection in concrete elements. ASTM International, 8, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Pour-Ghaz, M., Poursaee, A., Spragg, R., & Weiss, J. (2010). Experimental methods to detect and quantify damage in restrained ring specimens. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 9, 251–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajani, B., & Tesfamariam, S. (2004). Uncoupled axial, flexural, and circumferential pipe-soil interaction analyses of partially supported jointed water mains. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 41, 997–1010.10.1139/t04-048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajani, B., & Abdel-Akher, A. (2013). Performance of cast-iron-pipe bell-spigot joints subjected to overburden pressure and ground movement. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 4, 98–114.10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, J. C. (1935). Investigation of bell and spigot joints in cast iron water pipes. Ohio: Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Puri, S., & Weiss, J. (2003). Assessment of localized damage in concrete under compression using acoustic emission. SCE Journal of Civil Engineering Materials, 18, 325–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiyar, M., Ni, P., Take, W. A., & Moore, I. D. (2016). Response of pipelines of differing flexural stiffness to normal faulting. Géotechnique, 66, 275–286.10.1680/jgeot.14.P.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiyar, M., Moore, I. D., & Take, W. A. (2015). Kinematics of jointed pipes and design estimates of joint rotation under differential ground movements. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 52, 1714–1724.10.1139/cgj-2014-0347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiyar, M., Take, W. A., & Moore, I. D. (2015). Post-failure fracture angle of brittle pipes subjected to differential ground movements. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 49, 114–120.10.1016/j.tust.2015.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, I. G. (1991). Nondestructive testing monographs and tracts. In W. J. McGonnagle (Ed.), Basic acoustic emission (Vol. 6). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Services, T. A. M. C. (2010), Chile earthquake and tsunami update. Hawaii: Center For Excellence In Disasater Management and humanitarian Assiatance Tripler Army Medical Center.
   Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M., Rose, A., & Eguchi, R. (1998). Engineering and socioeconomic impacts of earthquakes. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, S., & Shien, S. (1983). Analysis of seismic damage to buried pipelines in Tangshan earthquake. Earthquake Behavior and Safety of Oil and Gas Storage Facilities, Buried Pipelines and Equipment, PVP-77 (pp. 365–367). New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-C., Meymand, P., Dawson, E., & Wong, S. A. (2014). Behaviour of segmental pipeline protective vaults subjected to fault offset. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11, 1369–1382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wham, B. P., & O’Rourke, T. D. (2016). Jointed pipeline response to large ground deformation. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 7, 04015009.10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar