Effectiveness of motion scaling procedures for the seismic assessment of concrete gravity dams for near field motions

References

• Abrahamson, N.A. (1992). Non-stationary spectral matching. Seismological Research Letters, 63(1), 30–40.
   Google Scholar
• Akkar, S. (2010). Determination of the design spectrum of the Andiraz dam based on probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (in Turkish) ( Report No. 2010-03-03-1-01-11). Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Al Atik, L., & Abrahamson, N. (2010). An improved method for nonstationary spectral matching. Earthquake Spectra, 26(3), 601–617.10.1193/1.3459159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi, B., & Krawinkler, H. (2004). Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 33(6), 687–706.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE. (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures ( Report No. ASCE/SEI-7-10) (p. 608). Reston, VA: Structural Engineering İnstitute of the American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J.W. (2007). Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(5), 1486–1501.10.1785/0120060255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J.W. (2010). Conditional mean spectrum: Tool for ground-motion selection. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(3), 322–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielak, J., Loukakis, K., Hisada, Y., & Yoshimura, C. (2003). Domain reduction method for three-dimensional earthquake modeling in localized regions, Part I: Theory. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(2), 817–824.10.1785/0120010251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybordiani, M., & Arıcı, Y. (2017). The use of 3D modeling for the prediction of the seismic demands on the gravity dams. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 46(11), 1769–1789.10.1002/eqe.v46.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, A.K. (2012). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering (4th ed., p. 944). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• COSMOS. (2016). Strong motion database ( Report No.). Consortium of Strong Motion Observation Systems. Retrieved from http://www.strongmotioncenter.org/vdc/scripts/default.plx
   Google Scholar
• FEMA450-1. (2003). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, Part 1: Provisions ( Report No.). Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Fenves, G., & Chopra, A.K. (1984). Earthquake analysis of concrete gravity dams including reservoir bottom absorption and dam-water-foundation rock interaction. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 12(5), 663–680.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fok, K., Hall, J.F., & Chopra, A.K. (1986). EACD-3D: A computer program for three-dimensional earthquake analysis of concrete dams ( Report No. EERC-86/09) (p. 160). Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved from https://nisee.berkeley.edu/elibrary/Text/12690
   Google Scholar
• Fu, Q., & Menun, C. (2004). Seismic-environment-based simulation of near-fault ground motions. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/13_322.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ghanaat, Y. (2004). Failure modes approach to safety evaluation of dams. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/13_1115.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kalkan, E., & Chopra, A.K. (2010). Practical guidelines to select and scale earthquake records for nonlinear response history analysis of structures ( Report No. 1068(2010)) (p. 113). US Geological Survey. Retrieved from https://www.eeri.org/~eeriorg/site/images/awards/reports/ekalkan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kurama, Y.C., & Farrow, K.T. (2003). Ground motion scaling methods for different site conditions and structure characteristics. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 32(15), 2425–2450.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilhanand, K., & Tseng, W.S. (1988). Development and application of realistic earthquake time histories compatible with multiple-damping design spectra. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Japan. Retrieved from http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/9_vol2_819.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Medina, F., Dominguez, J., & Tassoulas, J.L. (1990). Response of dams to earthquakes ıncluding effects of sediments. Journal of Structural Engineering, 116(11), 3108–3121.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:11(3108)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, A.P., Kurama, Y.C., Kalkan, E., & Taflanidis, A.A. (2013). Experimental evaluation of ground motion scaling methods for nonlinear analysis of structural systems. Proceedings of the Structures Congress 2013, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• PEER. (2016). Strong motion database ( Report No.). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Retrieved from http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, J.M. (1984). Tensile strength of concrete. ACI Journal Proceedings, 81(2), 158–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes, J.C., & Kalkan, E. (2012). How many records should be used in an ASCE/SEI-7 ground motion scaling procedure? Earthquake Spectra, 28(3), 1223–1242.10.1193/1.4000066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes, J.C., Riaño, A.C., Kalkan, E., Quintero, O.A., & Arango, C.M. (2014). Assessment of spectrum matching procedure for nonlinear analysis of symmetric- and asymmetric-plan buildings. Engineering Structures, 72, 171–181.10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somerville, P.G. (2002). Characterizing near fault ground motion for the design and evaluation of bridges. Proceedings of the 3rd National Conference and Workshop on Bridges and Highways, Portland, OR. Retrieved from http://peer.berkeley.edu/research/peertestbeds/Hbt/PaperonNearFaultGroundMotion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J.P., Chiou, S.-J., Bray, J.D., Graves, R.W., Somerville, P.G., & Abrahamson, N.A. (2002). Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(9), 765–772.10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00097-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, H., & Chopra, A.K. (1996). EACD-3D-96: A computer program for three-dimensional earthquake analysis of concrete dams ( Report No. SEMM-1996/06) (p. 131). Structural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials, University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved from https://nisee.berkeley.edu/elibrary/Text/300564
   Google Scholar
• United States Army Corps of Engineers. (2003). Time-history dynamic analysis of hydraulic concrete structures ( Report No. EP-1110-2-6051) (p. 401). Washington, DC: Department of the Army. Retrieved from http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-6051.pdf?ver=2013-09-04-102314-930
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Chopra, A.K. (2008). EACD-3D-2008: A computer program for three dimensional earthquake analysis of concrete dams considering spatially-varying ground motion ( Report No. EERC-2008/04) (p. 146). Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved from https://nisee.berkeley.edu/elibrary/Text/200901062
   Google Scholar
• Yilmazturk, S.M., Arici, Y., & Binici, B. (2015). Seismic assessment of a monolithic RCC gravity dam including three dimensional dam–foundation–reservoir interaction. Engineering Structures, 100, 137–148.10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar