Optimal sensor placement methods and metrics – comparison and implementation on a timber frame structure

References

• Allemang, R.J., & Brown, D.L. (1982). A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis. In Proceedings of the 1st International Modal Analysis Conference (pp. 110–116). Orlando, FL: SEM.
   Google Scholar
• Barthorpe, R.J., & Worden, K. (2009). Sensor placement optimization. Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring. doi:10.1002/9780470061626.shm086
   Google Scholar
• Breitfeld, T. (1996). A method for identification of a set of optimal measurement points for experimental modal analysis. The International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis, 11, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Brownjohn, J., Rizos, C., Tan, G.-H., & Pan, T.-C. (2004). Real-time long-term monitoring and static and dynamic displacements of an office tower, combining RTK GPS and accelerometer data. First FIG International Symposium of Engineering Surveys for Construction Works and Structural Engineering, Nottingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Carne, T.G., & Dohrmann, C.R. (1995). A modal test design strategy for model correlation. In Proceedings-SPIE The International Society For Optical Engineering (pp. 927–927).
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Triguero, R., Saavedra Flores, E.I., DiazDelaO, F.A., Friswell, M.I., & Gallego, R. (2014). Optimal sensor placement in timber structures by means of a multi-scale approach with material uncertainty. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 21(12), 1437–1452.10.1002/stc.v21.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelebi, M. (2000). GPS in dynamic monitoring of long-period structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 20, 477–483.10.1016/S0267-7261(00)00094-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, M., & Pakzad, S. (2014). Optimal sensor placement for modal identification of bridge systems considering number of sensing nodes. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 19(6), 04014019.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charalampous, E., Psimoulis, P., Guillaume, S., Spiridonakos, M., Klis, R., Bürki, B., … Feltrin, G. (2015). Measuring sub-mm structural displacements using QDaedalus: A digital clip-on measuring system developed for total stations. Applied Geomatics, 7(2), 91–101.10.1007/s12518-014-0150-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzi, E.N., & Fuggini, C. (2015). Online correction of drift in structural identification using artificial white noise observations and an unscented Kalman Filter. Smart Structures and Systems, 16, 295–328.10.12989/sss.2015.16.2.295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzi, E.N., & Smyth, A.W. (2009). The unscented Kalman filter and particle filter methods for nonlinear structural system identification with non-collocated heterogeneous sensing. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 16, 99–123.10.1002/stc.v16:1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dertimanis, V.K. (2013). On the use of dispersion analysis for model assessment in structural identification. Journal of Vibration and Control, 19, 2270–2284.10.1177/1077546313501536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dertimanis, V.K., & Koulocheris, D.V. (2009). On the state-space realization of vector autoregressive structures: An assessment. In ICINCO 2009 – 6th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Proceedings (pp. 20–27).
   Google Scholar
• Dertimanis, V.K., & Koulocheris, D.V. (2011). VAR based state–space structures: Realization, statistics and spectral analysis. In J.A. Cetto, J. Filipe, and J.-L. Ferrier (Eds.), Lecture notes in electrical engineering (Vol. 85, pp. 301–315). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• DIN EN338. (2010). Structural timber-strength classes. Berlin, Germany: German version EN DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung. V.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, E.B., & Todd, M.D. (2010). A Bayesian approach to optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring with application to active sensing. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24, 891–903.10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friswell, M., & Mottershead, J.E. (2013). Finite element model updating in structural dynamics. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Glassburn, R.S., & Smith, S.W. (1994). Evaluation of sensor placement algorithms for on-orbit identification of space platforms. In NASA. Goddard Space Flight Center, Eighteenth Space Simulation Conference: Space Mission Success Through Testing, (United States) (pp. 333–348).
   Google Scholar
• Guo, H.Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, L.L., & Zhou, J.X. (2004). Optimal placement of sensors for structural health monitoring using improved genetic algorithms. Smart Materials and Structures, 13, 528.10.1088/0964-1726/13/3/011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmanci, Y.E., Spiridonakos, M.D., Chatzi, E.N., & Kübler, W. (2016). An autonomous strain-based structural monitoring framework for life-cycle analysis of a novel structure. Frontiers in Built Environment, 2, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Heo, G., Wang, M., & Satpathi, D. (1997). Optimal transducer placement for health monitoring of long span bridge. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 16, 495–502.10.1016/S0267-7261(97)00010-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herranen, H., Kuusik, A., Saar, T., Reidla, M., Land, R., Martens, O., & Majak, J. (2014). Acceleration data acquisition and processing system for structural health monitoring. In Metrology for Aerospace (MetroAeroSpace), 2014 IEEE (pp. 244–248).10.1109/MetroAeroSpace.2014.6865928
   Google Scholar
• Kammer, D.C. (1991). Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 14, 251–259.10.2514/3.20635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammer, D.C. (1996). Optimal sensor placement for modal identification using system-realization methods. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 19, 729–731.10.2514/3.21688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammer, D.C. (2005). Sensor set expansion for modal vibration testing. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 19, 700–713.10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammer, D.C., & Tinker, M.L. (2004). Optimal placement of triaxial accelerometers for modal vibration tests. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 18, 29–41.10.1016/S0888-3270(03)00017-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammer, D.C., & Yao, L. (1994). Enhancement of on-orbit modal identification of large space structures through sensor placement. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 171, 119–139.10.1006/jsvi.1994.1107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, M.P., & Hyzak, M.D. (1994). GPS structural monitoring as applied to cable-stayed suspension bridge. In International Federation of Surveyors (FIG), 20th Congress, Melbourne, Austrialia.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.E., & Fassois, S.D. (1993). On the problem of stochastic experimental modal analysis based on multiple-excitation multiple-response data, part I: Dispersion analysis of continuous-time structural systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 161, 33–56.10.1016/0022-460X(93)90291-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyder, C., Chatzi, E., Frangi, A., & Lombaert, G. (2016). Comparison of optimal sensor placement algorithms via implementation on an innovative timber structure. In Proceedings, International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering (IALCCE 2016) (pp. 260–267). Delft, NL.
   Google Scholar
• Leyder, C., Frangi, A., & Chatzi, E. (2016). Modal vibration testing of an innovative timber structure. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE 2016) (pp. 145–153). Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Leyder, C., Ntertimanis, V.K., Chatzi, E., & Frangi, A. (2015). Optimal sensor placement for the modal identification of an innovative timber structure. In 1st ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Sciences and Engineering, UNCECOMP 2015 (pp. 467–476).10.7712/120215
   Google Scholar
• Leyder, C., Wanninger, F., Frangi, A., & Chatzi, E. (2014). Field testing on innovative timber structures. In Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Timber Engineering WCTE. Quebec City, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Leyder, C., Wanninger, F., Frangi, A., & Chatzi, E. (2015). Dynamic response of an innovative hybrid structure in hardwood. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Construction Materials, 168, 132–143.10.1680/coma.14.00043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. (2011). Sensor placement methods and evaluation criteria in structural health monitoring ( PhD thesis). Universität Siegen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D.S., Li, H.N., & Fritzen, C.P. (2007). The connection between effective independence and modal kinetic energy methods for sensor placement. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 305, 945–955.10.1016/j.jsv.2007.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D.S., Li, H.N., & Fritzen, C.P. (2009). On optimal sensor placement criterion for structural health monitoring with representative least squares method. Key Engineering Materials, 383–391.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.413-414
   Google Scholar
• Maes, K., Lourens, E., Van Nimmen, K., Reynders, E., De Roeck, G., & Lombaert, G. (2015). Design of sensor networks for instantaneous inversion of modally reduced order models in structural dynamics. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 52, 628–644.10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meo, M., & Zumpano, G. (2005). On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure. Engineering Structures, 27, 1488–1497.10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C.D. (2000). Matrix analysis and applied linear algebra. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.10.1137/1.9780898719512
   Google Scholar
• Omenzetter, P., Morris, H., Worth, M., Kohli, V., & Uma, S.R. (2011). Long-term monitoring and field testing of an innovative multi-storey timber building. In Nondestructive Characterization for Composite Materials, Aerospace Engineering, Civil Infrastructure, and Homeland Security (p. 798335). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
   Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, C. (2004). Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 278, 923–947.10.1016/j.jsv.2003.10.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, C. (2005). Pareto optimal sensor locations for structural identification. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 194, 1655–1673.10.1016/j.cma.2004.06.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, C., & Lombaert, G. (2012). The effect of prediction error correlation on optimal sensor placement in structural dynamics. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 28, 105–127.10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, C., Haralampidis, Y., & Sobczyk, K. (2005). Optimal experimental design in stochastic structural dynamics. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 20, 67–78.10.1016/j.probengmech.2004.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, M., & Garcia, E. (1998). Sensor placement methodologies for dynamic testing. AIAA Journal, 36, 256–263.10.2514/2.7509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H.S., Kim, J.M., Choi, S.W., & Kim, Y. (2013). A wireless laser displacement sensor node for structural health monitoring. Sensors, 13, 13204–13216.10.3390/s131013204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickrel, C.R. (1999). A practical approach to modal pretest design. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 13, 271–295.10.1006/mssp.1998.1212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raziq, N., & Collier, P. (2007). GPS deflection monitoring of the West Gate Bridge. Journal of Applied Geodesy Jag, 1, 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, C., Inaudi, D., & Glišić, B. (2013). Long-gauge fibre optic sensors: Performance comparison and applications. International Journal of Lifecycle Performance Engineering, 4(1.3), 209–233.10.1504/IJLCPE.2013.058196
   Google Scholar
• Said, W.M., & Staszewski, W.J. (2001). Optimal sensor location for damage detection using mutual information. Signal Processing and Composites, 428–435.
   Google Scholar
• Salama, M., Rose, T., & Garba, J. (1987). Optimal placement of excitations and sensors for verification of large dynamical systems. In 28th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference (pp. 6–8).
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Z.Y., Law, S.S., & Zhang, L.M. (2000). Optimum sensor placement for structural damage detection. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126, 1173–1179.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:11(1173)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, C. (2012). Sensor placement for modal identification. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 27, 461–470.10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.07.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trendafilova, I., Heylen, W., & Van Brussel, H. (2001). Measurement point selection in damage detection using the mutual information concept. Smart Materials and Structures, 10, 528.10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/315
   Google Scholar
• Wanninger, F. (2015). Post-tensioned timber frame structures. Zürich: ETH Zürich.
   Google Scholar
• Worden, K., Burrows, A.P., & Tomlinson, G.R. (1995). A combined neural and genetic approach to sensor placement. In Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference (p. 1727).
   Google Scholar
• Yao, L., Sethares, W.A., & Kammer, D.C. (1993). Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification via a genetic algorithm. AIAA Journal, 31, 1922–1928.10.2514/3.11868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, T.-H., & Li, H.-N. (2012). Methodology developments in sensor placement for health monitoring of civil infrastructures. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2012, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, T.-H., Li, H.-N., & Gu, M. (2011). A new method for optimal selection of sensor location on a high-rise building using simplified finite element model. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 37, 671–684.10.12989/sem.2011.37.6.671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, T.-H., Li, H.-N., & Zhang, X.-D. (2012). Sensor placement on Canton Tower for health monitoring using asynchronous-climb monkey algorithm. Smart Materials and Structures, 21, 125023.10.1088/0964-1726/21/12/125023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar