Publication Cover
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance
Volume 14, 2018 - Issue 10
1,132
Views
42
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Multi-hazard loss analysis of tall buildings under wind and seismic loads

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 1295-1311 | Received 04 Aug 2017, Accepted 25 Jan 2018, Published online: 27 Feb 2018

References

  • Aly, A., & Abburu, S. (2015). On the design of high-rise buildings for multihazard: Fundamental differences between wind and earthquake demand. Shock and Vibration, 2015. 148681.
  • Aquino, R., & Tamura, Y. (2013). On stick-slip phenomenon as primary mechanism behind structural damping in wind-resistant design applications. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 115, 121–136.
  • Aslani, H., & Miranda, E. (2005). Probabilistic earthquake loss estimation and loss disaggregation in buildings (Technical Report No. 157). Stanford, CA: The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center.
  • Asprone, D., Jalayer, F., Prota, A., & Manfredi, G. (2010). Proposal of a probabilistic model for multi-hazard risk assessment of structures in seismic zones subjected to blast for the limit state of collapse. Structural Safety, 32, 25–34.
  • AZ/NZS 1170.2:2011 (2011). Australian/New Zealand Standard. Structural design actions - Part 2: Wind actions.
  • Barone, G., & Frangopol, D. (2014). Life-cycle maintenance of deteriorating structures by multi-objective optimization involving reliability, risk, availability, hazard and cost. Structural Safety, 48, 40–50.
  • Bjarnadottir, S., Li, Y., & Stewart, M. (2014). Regional loss estimation due to hurricane wind and hurricane-induced surge considering climate variability. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10, 1369–1384.
  • Bradley, B., Dhakal, R., Cubrinovski, M., Mander, J., & MacRae, G. (2007). Improved seismic hazard model with application to probabilistic seismic demand analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36, 2211–2225.
  • Breccolotti, M., Materazzi, A., & Venanzi, I. (2008). Identification of the nonlinear behaviour of a cracked RC beam through the statistical analysis of the dynamic response. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 15, 416–435.
  • Çelebi, M. (1996). Comparison of damping in buildings under low-amplitude and strong motions. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 59, 309–323.
  • Chung, Y., Lin, N., & Vanmarcke, E. (2011). Hurricane damage and loss estimation using an integrated vulnerability model. Natural Hazards Review, 12(4), 184–189.
  • Ciampoli, M., Petrini, F., & Augusti, G. (2011). Performance-based wind engineering: towards a general procedure. Structural Safety, 32, 367–378.
  • Cornell, C. (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58, 1583–1606.
  • Cui, W., & Caracoglia, L. (2015). Simulation and analysis of intervention costs due to wind induced damage on tall buildings. Engineering Structures, 87, 183–197.
  • Di Paola, M. (1998). Digital simulation of wind field velocity. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 74–76, 91–109.
  • EN 1998 - 1:2004 (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.
  • Frangopol, D., & Maute, K. (2003). Life-cycle reliability-based optimization of civil and aerospace structures. Computers and Structures, 81, 397–410.
  • Fukuwa, N., Nishizaka, R., Yagi, S., Tanaka, K., & Tamura, Y. (1996). Field measurement of damping and natural frequency of an actual steel-framed building over a wide range of amplitudes. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 59, 325–347.
  • Gencturk, B., Hossain, K., & Lahourpour, S. (2016). Life cycle sustainability assessment of rc buildings in seismic regions. Engineering Structures, 110, 347–362.
  • Gomes, L., & Vickery, B. (1977). On the prediction of extreme wind speeds from the parent distribution. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2, 21–36.
  • Hart, G., & Jain, A. (2014). Performance-based wind evaluation and strengthening of existing tall concrete buildings in the los angeles region: dampers, nonlinear time history analysis and structural reliability. The structural design of tall and special buildings, 23, 1256–1274.
  • Ierimonti, L., Caracoglia, L., Venanzi, I., & Materazzi, A. (2017). Investigation on life-cycle damage cost of wind-excited tall buildings considering directionality effects. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 171, 207–218.
  • Jalayer, F., Asprone, D., Prota, A., & Manfredi, G. (2011). Multi-hazard upgrade decision making for critical infrastructure based on life-cycle cost criteria. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 40, 1163–1179.
  • Jeary, A. (1986). Damping in tall buildings - a mechanism and a predictor. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 14, 733–750.
  • Kameshwar, S., & Padgett, J. (2014). Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards. Engineering Structures, 78, 154–166.
  • Kanduri, A., & Morrow, G. (1996). Damping in structures: its evaluation and treatment of uncertainty. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 59, 131–157.
  • Kaveh, A., Kalateh-Ahani, M., & Fahimi-Farzam, M. (2014). Life-cycle cost optimization of steel moment-frame structures: Performance-based seismic design approach. Earthquake and Structures, 7, 271–294.
  • Lagaros, N. (2007). Life-cycle cost analysis of design practices for rc framed structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 5, 425–442.
  • Lagomarsino, S. (1993). Forecast models for damping and vibration periods of buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 48, 221–239.
  • Lavan, O., & Avishur, M. (2013). Seismic behavior of viscously damped yielding frames under structural and damping uncertainties. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11, 2309–2332.
  • Li, G., & Hu, H. (2014). Risk design optimization using many-objective evolutionary algorithm with application to performance-based wind engineering of tall buildings. Structural Safety, 48, 1–14.
  • Li, Y., & Van de Lindt, J.W. (2012). Loss-based formulation for multiple hazards with application to residential buildings. Engineering Structures, 38, 123–133.
  • Liu, M., Wen, Y.K., & Burns, S. (2004). Life cycle cost oriented seismic design optimization of steel moment frame structures with risk-taking preference. Engineering Structures, 26(10), 1407–1421.
  • Mahmoud, H., & Cheng, G. (2017). Framework for lifecycle cost assessment of steel buildings under seismic and wind hazards. Journal of Structural Engineering, 143(3), 04016186.
  • Matta, E. (2015). Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass dampers in a life-cycle cost perspective. Earthquake and Structure, 9, 73–91.
  • McGuire, R. (1995). Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85, 1275–1284.
  • Miranda, E., Mosqueda, G., Retamales, R., & Pekcan, G. (2012). Performance of nonstructural components during the 27 February 2010 Chile earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 28, S453–S471.
  • Mitropoulou, C., Lagaros, N., & Papadrakakis, M. (2015). Generation of artificial accelerograms for efficient life-cycle cost analysis of structures. Engineering Structures, 88, 138–153.
  • Mitropoulou, C.C., Lagaros, N., & Papadrakakis, M. (2011). Life-cycle cost assessment of optimally designed reinforced concrete buildings under seismic actions. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 96, 1311–1331.
  • Okasha, N., & Frangopol, D. (2011). Computational platform for the integrated life-cycle management of highway bridges. Engineering Structures, 33, 2145–2153.
  • Padgett, J., Dennemann, K., & Ghosh, J. (2010). Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost-benefit (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retrofit assessment. Structural Safety, 32(3), 165–173.
  • PEER (2010). Tall buildings initiative, guidelines for performance-based seismic design of tall buildings (Technical Report No. 05). Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
  • PEER. (2017). PEER-NISEE on line library. Retrieved from https://nisee.berkeley.edu/elibrary/
  • Priestley, M., Calvi, M., & Kowalsky, M. (2007). Displacement-based seismic design of structures. Pavia: IUSS Press.
  • Pu, W., Kasai, K., & Kashima, T. (2012). Response of conventional seismic-resistant tall buildings in tokyo during 2011 great east japan earthquake. Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering (SFSI 09), Lisbon, Portuga.
  • Puthanpurayil, A., Lavan, O., & Dhakal, R. (2015). Seismic loss optimization of nonlinear moment frames retrofitted with viscous dampers. Proceedings of the 10th Pacific conference on earthquake engineering (10PCEE), Sydney, Australia.
  • Puthanpurayil, A., Lavan, O., & Dhakal, R. (2017). Multi-objective loss optimization of seismic retrofitting of moment resisting frames using viscous dampers. Proceedings of the 16th world conference on earthquake engineering (16WCEE), Santiago, Chile.
  • Ramirez, C., Liel, A., Mitrani-Reiser, J., Haselton, C., Spear, A., Steiner, J., Deierlein, G., & Miranda, E. (2012). Expected earthquake damage and repair costs in reinforced concrete frame buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41, 1455–1475.
  • Ramirez, C., & Miranda, E. (2012). Significance of residual drifts in building earthquake loss estimation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41, 1477–1493.
  • Rutenberg, A. (1981). A direct p-delta analysis using standard plane frame computer programs. Computers and Structures, 14, 97–102.
  • Samali, B., Kwok, K., Wood, G., & Yang, J. (2004). Wind tunnel tests for wind-excited benchmark building. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 130, 447–450.
  • Satake, N., Suda, K., Arakawa, T., Sasaki, A., & Tamura, Y. (2003). Damping evaluation using full-scale data of buildings in Japan. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129, 470–477.
  • Seo, D., & Caracoglia, L. (2013). Estimating life-cycle monetary losses due to wind hazards: Fragility analysis of long-span bridges. Engineering Structures, 56, 1593–1606.
  • Spence, S., & Kareem, A. (2014). Performance-based design and optimization of uncertain wind-excited dynamic building systems. Engineering Structures, 78, 133–144.
  • Stafford Smith, B., & Coull, A. (1991). Tall building structures: Analysis and design. Hoboken: Wiley.
  • Taflanidis, A., & Beck, J. (2009). Life-cycle cost optimal design of passive dissipative devices. Structural Safety, 31, 508–522.
  • Venanzi, I. (2015). Robust optimal design of tuned mass dampers for tall buildings with uncertain parameters. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 51, 239–250.
  • Venanzi, I., & Materazzi, A. (2012). Acrosswind aeroelastic response of square tall buildings: A semi-analytical approach based of wind tunnel tests on rigid models. Wind and Structures, 15, 495–508.
  • Vickery, P., Skerlj, P., Lin, J., Twisdale, L., Jr, Young, M., & Lavelle, F. (2006). HAZUS-MH Hurricane model methodology. II: Damage and loss estimation. Natural Hazards Review, 7, 94–103.
  • Wang, C., Zhai, M., Li, H., Ni, Y., & Guo, T. (2015). Life-cycle cost based maintenance and rehabilitation strategies for cable supported bridges. Advanced Steel Construction, 11, 395–410.
  • Wen, Y. (2001). Minimum lifecycle cost design under multiple hazards. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 73, 223–231.
  • Wen, Y. & Kang, Y. (2001a). Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. I: Methodology. Journal of Structural Engineering, 127, 330–337.
  • Wen, Y., & Kang, Y. (2001b). Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. II: Applications. Journal of Structural Engineering, 127, 338–346.
  • Yang, J., Agrawal, A., Samali, B., & Wu, J. (2004). Bench-mark problem for response control of wind-excited tall building. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 130, 437–446.
  • Zhou, X., & Xu, Y. (2007). Multi-hazard performance assessment of a transfer-plate high-rise building. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 6, 371–382.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.