Risk-based maintenance strategy for deteriorating bridges using a hybrid computational intelligence technique: a case study

References

• Barone, G., & Frangopol, D. M. (2014). Life-cycle maintenance of deteriorating structures by multi-objective optimization involving reliability, risk, availability, hazard and cost. Structural Safety, 48, 40–50. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaurepaire, P., Jensen, H. A., Schuëller, G. I., & Valdebenito, M. A. (2013). Reliability-based optimization using bridge importance sampling. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 34, 48–57. doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2013.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beconcini, M. L., Croce, P., Marsili, F., Muzzi, M., & Rosso, E. (2016). Probabilistic reliability assessment of a heritage structure under horizontal loads. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 45, 198–211. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2016.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, C., & Frangopol, D. M. (2006). Optimization of lifetime maintenance strategies for deteriorating structures considering probabilities of violating safety, condition, and cost thresholds. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 21(1), 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2005.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011). LIBSVM. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2(3), 1–27. doi: 10.1145/1961189.1961199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.-Y., Chiu, C.-K., Chiu, Y.-F., Wu, Y.-W., Syu, Z.-L., Prayogo, D., & Lin, C.-H. (2014). SOS optimization model for bridge life cycle risk evaluation and maintenance strategies. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, 26(4), 293–308.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.-Y., & Prayogo, D. (2014). Symbiotic organisms search: A new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Computers & Structures, 139, 98–112. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.-Y., Prayogo, D., Ju, Y.-H., Wu, Y.-W., & Sutanto, S. (2016). Optimizing mixture properties of biodiesel production using genetic algorithm-based evolutionary support vector machine. International Journal of Green Energy, 13(15), 1599–1607. doi: 10.1080/15435075.2016.1206549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.-Y., Prayogo, D., & Wu, Y.-W. (2014). Novel genetic algorithm-based evolutionary support vector machine for optimizing high-performance concrete mixture. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 28(4), 06014003. doi: 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.-Y., Wibowo, D. K., Prayogo, D., & Roy, A. F. V. (2015). Predicting productivity loss caused by change orders using the evolutionary fuzzy support vector machine inference model. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(7), 881–892. doi: 10.3846/13923730.2014.893922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.-Y., & Wu, Y.-W. (2009). Evolutionary support vector machine inference system for construction management. Automation in Construction, 18(5), 597–604. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2008.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C.-K., Lyu, Y.-C., & Jean, W.-Y. (2014). Probability-based damage assessment for reinforced concrete bridge columns considering the corrosive and seismic hazards in Taiwan. Natural Hazards, 71(3), 2143–2164. doi: 10.1007/s11069-013-1002-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, S., Gupta, V. K., & Srimahavishnu, V. (2007). Damage-based design with no repairs for multiple events and its sensitivity to seismicity model. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36(3), 307–325. doi: 10.1002/eqe.632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D. M., & Bocchini, P. (2012). Bridge network performance, maintenance and optimisation under uncertainty: Accomplishments and challenges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8(4), 341–356. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2011.563089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D. M., Kong, J. S., & Gharaibeh, E. S. (2001). Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15(1), 27–34. doi:doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2001)15:1(27).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furuta, H., Kameda, T., Nakahara, K., Takahashi, Y., & Frangopol, D. M. (2006). Optimal bridge maintenance planning using improved multi-objective genetic algorithm. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2(1), 33–41. doi: 10.1080/15732470500031040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., & Rosowsky, D. (2011). Seismic fragility increment functions for deteriorating reinforced concrete bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7(11), 869–879. doi: 10.1080/15732470903071338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D., Deb, K., Kargupta, H., & Harik, G. (1993). Rapid, accurate optimization of difficult problems using fast messy genetic algorithms. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, San Fransisco, CA, USA, pp. 56–64.
   Google Scholar
• Goyal, R., Whelan, M. J., & Cavalline, T. L. (2017). Characterising the effect of external factors on deterioration rates of bridge components using multivariate proportional hazards regression. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(7), 894–905. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2016.1217888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Daganzo, C., & Madanat, S. (2015). A reliability-based optimization scheme for maintenance management in large-scale bridge networks. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 55, 166–178. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2015.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, R.-Y., & Mao, I.-S. (2010). Estimation of bridge life cycle maintenance costs using reliability-based model. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining, Bratislava, Slovakia.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.-H. (2003). Modeling deterioration of concrete bridge decks using neural networks (Ph.D. Thesis). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kamankesh, H., Agelidis, V. G., & Kavousi-Fard, A. (2016). Optimal scheduling of renewable micro-grids considering plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging demand. Energy, 100, 285–297. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., & Gardoni, P. (2014). Effect of seismic degradation on the fragility of reinforced concrete bridges. Engineering Structures, 79, 267–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H.-K., & Yau, N.-J. (2011). Development of various bridge condition indices for Taiwan bridge management system. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining, Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Panda, A., & Pani, S. (2016). A symbiotic organisms search algorithm with adaptive penalty function to solve multi-objective constrained optimization problems. Applied Soft Computing, 46, 344–360. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk, L., Matos, J., Murphy, J., & Pakrashi, V. (2017). Visual inspection and bridge management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 14, 320–332. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2017.1352000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J., & Shepard, R. (2001). Bridge management for the 21st Century. Proceedings of SPIE, 1696(1), 197–203. doi: 10.3141/1696-63
   Google Scholar
• Secui, D. C. (2016). A modified symbiotic organisms search algorithm for large scale economic dispatch problem with valve-point effects. Energy, 113, 366–384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J., Bracci, J. M., & Gardoni, P. (2010). Seismic response and fragility of deteriorated reinforced concrete bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, 136(10), 1273–1281. doi:doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, D.-H., Cheng, M.-Y., & Prayogo, D. (2016). A novel multiple objective symbiotic organisms search (MOSOS) for time–cost–labor utilization tradeoff problem. Knowledge-Based Systems, 94, 132–145. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tserng, H. P., & Chung, C.-L. (2007). Health assessment and maintenance strategy for bridge management systems: Lessons learned in Taiwan. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 13(3), 235–246. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:3(235).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vapnik, V. N. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, F. Y., Redi, A. A. N. P., Yang, C.-L., Ruskartina, E., & Santosa, B. (2017). Symbiotic organisms search and two solution representations for solving the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Applied Soft Computing, 52, 657–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadollahi, M., Abd Majid, M., & Mohamad Zin, R. (2015). Post-Pareto optimality approach to enhance budget allocation process for bridge rehabilitation management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(12), 1565–1582. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2014.980833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeum, C. M., & Dyke, S. J. (2015). Vision-based automated crack detection for bridge inspection. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 30(10), 759–770. doi: 10.1111/mice.12141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampieri, P., Zanini, M. A., Faleschini, F., Hofer, L., & Pellegrino, C. (2017). Failure analysis of masonry arch bridges subject to local pier scour. Engineering Failure Analysis, 79, 371–384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.05.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanini, M. A., Faleschini, F., & Pellegrino, C. (2016). Cost analysis for maintenance and seismic retrofit of existing bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12(11), 1411–1427. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2015.1133661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanini, M. A., Pellegrino, C., Morbin, R., & Modena, C. (2013). Seismic vulnerability of bridges in transport networks subjected to environmental deterioration. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11(2), 561–579. doi: 10.1007/s10518-012-9400-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, B., & Frangopol, D. M. (2012). Reliability, redundancy and risk as performance indicators of structural systems during their life-cycle. Engineering Structures, 41, 34–49. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar