A computerized hybrid Bayesian-based approach for modelling the deterioration of concrete bridge decks

References

• Agrawal, A. K., Kawaguchi, A., & Chen, Z. (2010). Deterioration rates of typical bridge elements in New York. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 15(4), 419–429. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altaf, S., Aslam, M., & Aslam, M. (2013). Bayesian analysis of the amended Davidson model for paired comparison using noninformative and informative priors. Statistics, 47(5), 1090–1103. doi: 10.1080/02331888.2012.664773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Nawaz, S., Ali, S., & De Silva, S. K. P. (2018). Bayesian estimation of the mixture of exponentiated inverted Weibull distribution using noninformative and informative priors. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, 46(4), 569–586. doi: 10.4038/jnsfsr.v46i4.8632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, L., Liu, P., Li, Z., & Xu, C. (2011). Using multivariate Poisson-lognormal regression method for modeling crash frequency by severity on freeway diverge areas. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Chinese Transportation Professionals, Nanjing, China, 14–17 August.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardo, J. M. (2003). Bayesian statistics. In R. Viertl (Ed.), Probability and statistics- Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS) (pp. 345–407). Oxford: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Bu, G. P., Lee, J. H., Guan, H., Loo, Y. C., & Blumenstein, M. (2015). Prediction of long-term bridge performance: Integrated deterioration approach with case studies. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 29(3), 04014089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champiri, M. D., Mousavizadegan, S. H., & Moodi, F. (2012). A Fuzzy classification system for evaluating the health condition of marine concrete structures. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 10(3), 95–109. doi: 10.3151/jact.10.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, S. (2003). Simulation and solving substitution codes (MSc Thesis). University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, D., & Datta, D. (2013). Comparison of weibull distribution and exponentiated weibull distribution based estimation of mean and variance of wind data. International Journal of Energy, Information and Communications, 4(4), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Transport and Main Roads in State of Queensland. (2016). Structures inspection manual part 2: Deterioration mechanisms. Australia: Department of Transport and Main Roads in State of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Destefano, P. D., & Grivas, D. A. (1998). Method for estimating transition probability in bridge deterioration models. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 4(2), 56–62. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1998)4:2(56)
   Google Scholar
• Dilip, D. M., & Babu, G. L. S. (2013). Methodology for pavement design reliability and back analysis using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 139(1), 65–74. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000455
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Geweke, J. (1992). Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. In J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, & A. F. M. Smith (Eds.), Bayesian Statistics (Vol. 4, pp. 169–193). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilani, G. M., & Abbas, N. (2008). Bayesian analysis for the paired comparison model with order effects (using non-informative priors). Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, 4(2), 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Grussing, M. N., Uzarski, D. R., & Marrano, L. R. (2006). Condition and reliability prediction models using the Weibull Probability distribution. Paper presented at the Ninth International Conference on Applications of Advanced Technology in Transportation (AATT), Chicago, United States of America, 13–16 August.
   Google Scholar
• Hasting, W. K. (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika, 57(1), 97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsein Juang, C., Luo, Z., Atamturktur, S., & Huang, H. (2013). Bayesian updating of soil parameters for braced excavations using field observations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(3), 395–406. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iman, R. L., & Conover, W. J. (1982). A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 11(3), 311–334. doi: 10.1080/03610918208812265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir, G., Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S. (2016). A fuzzy Bayesian belief network for safety assessment of oil and gas pipelines. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12(8), 874–889. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2015.1053093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, D. L., Youngblood, R. W., & Vedros, K. G. (2010). Minimally informative prior distributions for PSA. Seattle: International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management
   Google Scholar
• Le, B., & Andrews, J. (2015). Modelling railway bridge degradation based on historical maintenance data. Safety and Reliability, 35(2), 32–55. doi: 10.1080/09617353.2015.11691040
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Park, W., Ok, S., & Koh, H. (2011). Preference-based maintenance planning for deteriorating bridges under multi-objective optimisation framework. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7(7–8), 633–644. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2010.501565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, C., & Ghazel, M. (2018). A risk assessment study on accidents at French level crossings using Bayesian belief networks. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 25(2), 162–172. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2017.1416480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Li, A., & Feng, M. Q. (2013). Sensitivity and reliability analysis of a self-anchored suspension bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18(8), 703–711. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, P. E. D., Wang, X., Sing, C., & Tiong, R. L. K. (2013). Determining the probability of cost overruns. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(3), 321–330. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mašović, S., & Hajdin, R. (2014). Modelling of bridge elements deterioration for Serbian bridge inventory. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10(8), 976–987. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2013.774426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., & Conover, W. J. (1979). Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 21(2), 239–245. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mircosoft Research. (2017). MSBNx: Bayesian network editor and tool kit. Retrieved from https://msbnx.azurewebsites.net/.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrez, L., Kassem, E., Masad, E., & Little, D. (2015). Stochastic identification of linear-viscoelastic models of aged and unaged asphalt mixtures. Journal of Management in Engineering, 27(4), 04014149.
   Google Scholar
• Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953). Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 21(6), 1087–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micevski, T., Kuczera, G., & Coombes, P. (2002). Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 8(2), 49–56. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:2(49)
   Google Scholar
• M.Abdelkader, E., Marzouk, M., & Zayed, T. (2019). An optimization-based methodology for the definition of amplitude thresholds of the ground penetrating radar. Soft Computing, 3, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Morcous, G., Lounis, Z., & Cho, Y. (2010). An integrated system for bridge management using probabilistic and mechanistic deterioration models: Application to bridge decks. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 14(4), 527–537. doi: 10.1007/s12205-010-0527-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morcous, G., & Lounis, Z. (2007). Probabilistic and mechanistic deterioration models for bridge management. Presented at the Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering, Pittsburgh, United States of America, 24–27 July.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, Y. F., Paz, A., Fuente-Mella, H. D., La, V., Fariña, J., & M.Sales, G. (2016). Estimating bridge deterioration for small data sets using regression and Markov models. International Journal of Urban and Civil Engineering, 10(5), 663–670.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L. D., Tran, D. Q., & Chandrawinata, M. P. (2016). Predicting safety risk of working at heights using Bayesian networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(9), 04016041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. A. (2011). Parameter estimation for the two-parameter weibull distribution (M.Sc. thesis). Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, J. (2005). On filling-in missing conditional probabilities in causal networks. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 13(03), 263–280. doi: 10.1142/S021848850500345X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendharkar, P. (2008). Maximum entropy and last square error minimizing procedures for estimating missing conditional probabilities in Bayesian networks. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52(7), 3583–3602. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2007.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, M. D., Yuan, X.-X., & J. M. Van, N. (2005). Gamma process model for reliability analysis and replacement of aging structural components. Presented at the Ninth International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, Rome, Italy, 19–23 June.
   Google Scholar
• Qu, X., Meng, Q., Yuanita, V., & Wong, Y. H. (2011). Design and implementation of a quantitative risk assessment software tool for Singapore road tunnels. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 13827–13834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjith, S., Setunge, S., Gravina, R., & Venkatesan, S. (2013). Deterioration prediction of timber bridge elements using the Markov chain. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 27(3), 319–325. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravirala, V., & Grivas, D. A. (1995). State increment method of life-cycle cost analysis for highway management. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 1(3), 151–159. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:3(151)
   Google Scholar
• Robert, C. P., & Casella, G. (2010). Introducing Monte Carlo methods with R. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, G., Gelman, A., & Gilks, W. (1997). Weak convergence and optimal scaling of random walk Metropolis algorithms. The Annals of Applied Probability, 7(1), 110–120. doi: 10.1214/aoap/1034625254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudas, T. (2008). Handbook of probability: Theory and applications. California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shim, H. S., & Lee, S. H. (2017). Balanced allocation of bridge deck maintenance budget through multi-objective optimization. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(4), 1039–1046. doi: 10.1007/s12205-016-0591-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohangphurwala, A. (2006). NCHRP Report 558: Manual on service life of corrosion-damaged reinforced concrete bridge superstructure elements. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Siraj, T., Tesfamariam, S., & Dueñas-Osorio, L. (2015). Seismic risk assessment of high-voltage transformers using Bayesian belief networks. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(7), 923–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semaan, N. (2011). Structural performance model for subway networks. Montreal, Canada: Concodia University.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2009). Age of public infrastructure: A provincial perspective. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-621-m/11-621-m2008067-eng.htm (12.20.2016).
   Google Scholar
• Tahir, M., & Hussain, Z. (2008). Comparison of non-informative priors for number of defects (Poisson) model. InterStat: Statistics on the Internet, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Viami International Inc. and The Technology Strategies Group. (2013). Market study for aluminium use in roadway bridges. Montreal, Canada: Viami International Inc. and The Technology Strategies Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Wang, H. (2017). Probabilistic modeling of performance-related pay adjustment for in-place air-void contents of asphalt pavements. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 23(2), 04016033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000330.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, F., & Chen, C. C. (2009). Bayesian updating of parameters for a sediment entrainment model via Markov chain Monte Carlo. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 135(1), 22–37. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2009)135:1(22)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zambon, I., Vidovic, A., Strauss, A., Matos, J., & Amado, J. (2017). Comparison of stochastic prediction models based on visual inspections of bridge decks. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(5), 553–561. doi: 10.3846/13923730.2017.1323795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar