A statistical study on lognormal central tendency estimation in probabilistic seismic assessments

References

• Abyani, M., Asgarian, B., & Zarrin, M. (2018). Statistical assessment of seismic fragility curves for steel jacket platforms considering global dynamic instability. Ships and Offshore Structures, 13(4), 366–374. doi:10.1080/17445302.2017.1386078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abyani, M., Asgarian, B., & Zarrin, M. (2019). Sample geometric mean versus sample median in closed form framework of seismic reliability evaluation: A case study comparison. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 18(1), 187–201. doi:10.1007/s11803-019-0498-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1954). A test of goodness-of-fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49(268), 765–769. doi:10.2307/2281537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE 7-05. (2006). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Asgarian, B., Zarrin, M., & Boroumand, M. (2013). Nonlinear dynamic analysis of pile foundation subjected to strong ground motion using fiber elements. International Journal of Maritime Technology, 1(1), 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Asgarian, B., Zarrin, M., & Sabzeghabaian, M. (2018). Effect of foundation behavior on steel jacket offshore platform failure modes under wave loading. Ships and Offshore Structures, 14(6), 570–581. doi:10.1080/17445302.2018.1526862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W., Shahi, S. K., & Jayaram, N. (2011). New ground motion selection procedures and selected motions for the peer transportation research program. PEER Report, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. (2015). Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra, 31(1), 579–599. doi:10.1193/021113EQS025M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazzurro, P., & Cornell, C. A. (1994). Seismic hazard analysis of nonlinear structures. I: Methodology. Journal of Structural Engineering, 120(11), 3320–3344. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:11(3320)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. R., & Cornell, A. (1970). Probability, statistics and decision for civil engineers. McGraw-Hill: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Boulanger, R. W., Curras, C., Kutter, B. L., Wilson, D. W., & Abghari, A. (1999). Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125(9), 750–759. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:9(750)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R., & Foutch, D. (2002). Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(4), 526–533. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Souza, R. (2000). Forced-based finite element for large displacement inelastic analysis of frames (PhD thesis). University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Dolsek, M. (2009). Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modeling uncertainties. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 38(6), 805–825. doi:10.1002/eqe.869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2000). Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings, Report No. FEMA-350, SAC Joint Venture, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2009). Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. FEMA P695, Prepared by the Applied Technology Council (ATC), Federal Emergency Management Council (FEMA), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Foulad, R., Mofid, M., & Zarrin, M. (2015). On the seismic performance of hat knee bracing system in low-rise multistory steel structures. Advances in Structural Engineering, 18(3), 325–338. doi:10.1260/1369-4332.18.3.325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goutis, C., Casella, G., & Wells, M. T. (1996). Assessing evidence in multiple hypotheses. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(435), 1268–1277. doi:10.2307/2291745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, A. L., Rhodes, R. R., & Clesceri, L. S. (1985). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (16th ed.). Washington, DC: Am. Publ. Health Assoc.
   Google Scholar
• Hirano, S. S., Nordheim, E. V., Amy, D. C., & Upper, C. D. (1985). Lognormal distribution of epiphytic bacterial populations on leaf surfaces. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 44, 695–700.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, L. F., & Krawinkler, H. (2005). Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Rep. No. TB 152, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Jalayer, F. (2003). Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: implementing non-linear dynamic assessments (PhD thesis). Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 773–795. doi:10.2307/2291091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazantzi, A., Vamvatsikos, D., & Lignos, D. (2014). Seismic performance of a steel moment resisting frame subject to strength and ductility uncertainty. Engineering Structures, 78, 69–77. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiani, J., & Khanmohammadi, M. (2015). New approach for selection of real input ground motion records for Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA). Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 19(4), 592–623. doi:10.1080/13632469.2014.997901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lallemant, D., Kiremidjian, A., & Burton, H. (2015). Statistical procedures for developing earthquake damage fragility curves. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 49(9), 1373–1389. doi:10.1002/eqe.2522
   Google Scholar
• Lemaire, M., Chateauneuf, A., & Mitteau, J. (2005). Structural reliability. Wiley Publication, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lignos, D. G., & Krawinkler, H. (2011). Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(11), 1291–1302. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lignos, D. G., & Krawinkler, H. (2012). Sidesway collapse of deteriorating structural systems under seismic excitations. Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center.
   Google Scholar
• Limpert, E., Stahel, W. A., & Abbt, M. (2001). Log-normal distributions across the sciences: Keys and clues. BioScience, 51(5), 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loper, J. E., Suslow, T. V., & Schroth, N. M. (1984). Lognormal distribution of bacterial populations in the rhizosphere. Phytopathology, 74(12), 1454–1460. doi:10.1094/Phyto-74-1454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M., & Fenves, G. (2007). Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSEES), OpenSEES command language manual. University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., & Conover, W. J. (1979). A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 21(2), 239–245. doi:10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menegotto, M., & Pinto, P. (1973). Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frame including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. Proceeding, IABSE symposium on resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well defined repeated loads. International Association of Bridge and Structural Engineering, Libson, Portugal (pp. 15–22).
   Google Scholar
• Moehle, J. P., & Deierlein, G. G. (2004). A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 1–6 August 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, J. E., & DesRoches, R. (2008). Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 37(8), 1157–1174. doi:10.1002/eqe.801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, T. B., & Robinson, J. A. (1993). Statistical evaluation of median estimators for lognormally distributed variables. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57(2), 317–323. doi:10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700020005x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparison of Shapiro-wilk, Kolmogrov Smirnov, Lillefors and Anderson Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, J. W., & Kennedy, R. P. (1994). Methodology for Developing Seismic Fragilities. Final Report, TR-103959, EPRI.
   Google Scholar
• Romao, X., Delgado, R., & Costa, A. (2013). Assessment of the statistical distributions of structural demand under earthquake loading. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 15(5), 724–753. doi:10.1080/13632469.2010.539296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifian, H., Bargi, K., & Zarrin, M. (2015). Ultimate strength of fixed offshore platforms subjected to near-fault earthquake ground vibration. Shock and Vibration, 2015, 1–19. doi:10.1155/2015/841870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shome, N. (1999). Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures (PhD thesis). Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Soong, T. T. (2004). Fundamentals of probability and statistics for engineers: Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Spacone, E., Filippou, F. C., & Taucer, F. F. (1996). Fiber Beam column model for nonlinear analysis of RC frames. I: formulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 25(7), 711–725. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199607)25:7<711::AID-EQE576>3.0.CO;2-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D. (2013). Derivation of new SAC/FEMA performance evaluation solutions with second-order hazard approximation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42(8), 1171–1188. doi:10.1002/eqe.2265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491–514. doi:10.1002/eqe.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorechovsky, M., & Novak, D. (2009). Correlation control in small-sample Monte Carlo type simulations 1: A simulated annealing approach. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 24, 452–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walpole, R. E., Myers, R. H., Myers, S. L., & Ye, K. (2002). Probability and statistics for engineers and scientists (9th ed.). Pearson, Boston: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Elgamal, A., & Parra, E. (2003). Computational model for cyclic mobility and associated shear deformation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129(12), 1119–1127. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1119)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarrin, M., Asgarian, B., & Abyani, M. (2018). Probabilistic seismic collapse analysis of jacket offshore platforms. ASME J Offshore Mechanic and Arctic Engineering, 140(3), 031601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarrin, M., Asgarian, B., & Foulad, R. (2017). A review on factors affecting seismic pile response analysis: a parametric study. Journal of Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering, 2(2), 35–51.
   Google Scholar