Model reduction for structural health monitoring accounting for soil-structure-interaction

References

• ADINA. (2011). Theory and modeling guide, Volume I: Report ARD 11-8. Watertown, MA: ADINA R & D, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Anand, V., & Kumar, S. R. S. (2018). Seismic soil-structure-interaction: A state-of-the-art review. Structures, 16, 317–326. doi:10.1016/j.struc.2018.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avilés, J., & Suarez, M. (2002). Effective periods and damping of building-foundation systems including seismic wave effects. Engineering Structures, 24(5), 553–562. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00121-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielak, J. (1974). Dynamic behavior of structures with embedded foundations. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 3(3), 259–274. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290030305
   Google Scholar
• Farrar, C. R., & Worden, K. (2012). Structural health monitoring: A machine learning perspective. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gazetas, G. (1983). Analysis of machine foundation vibrations: State of the art. International Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2(1), 2–42. doi:10.1016/0261-7277(83)90025-6
   Google Scholar
• Gazetas, G. (1991). Foundation vibrations. In H. Fang (ed.), Foundation engineering handbook. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Ghahari, S. F., Abazarsa, F., Avci, O., Celebi, M., & Taciroglu, E. (2016). Blind modal identification of the Millikan Library from earthquake data considering soil-structure interaction. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 23(4), 684–706. doi:10.1002/stc.1803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hryniewicz, Z. (1981). Dynamic response of a rigid strip on an elastic half-space. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 25(3), 355–364. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(81)90038-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh, Y. (1986). Die Anwendung der Randelementmethode zur Untersuchung der dynamischen Wechselwirkung zwischen Bauwerl und geschichtetem Baugrund. SFB 1551- Mitteilung, 86, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. J., ed. (1981). Soil-structure interaction: The status of current analysis methods and research (Report NUREG/CR-1780). Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Liguo, J., & Jianwen, L. (2019). Dynamic soil–structure interaction with a flexible foundation embedded in a half-space: Closed-form analytical solution for incident plane SH-waves. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1–25. doi:10.1080/13632469.2019.1586802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luco, J. E. (1982). Linear soil-structure-interaction: A review. In S. K. Datta (Ed.), Earthquake ground motion and its effects on structures (pp. 41–57, AMD-Vol. 53). New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Luco, J. E., & Westmann, R. A. (1972). Dynamic response of a rigid footing bonded to an elastic half-space. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 39(2), 527–534. doi:10.1115/1.34227711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, J. P., & Loh, K. J. (2006). A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring. The Shock and Vibration Digest, 38(2), 91–128. doi:10.1177/0583102406061499
   Google Scholar
• Maravas, A., Mylonakis, G., & Karabalis, D. L. (2014). Simplified discrete systems for dynamic analysis of structures on footings and piles. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 61-62, 29–39. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MATLAB. (2017). MATLAB release. Natick, MA: The MathWorks, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• PEER Ground Motion Database. (2020). Retrieved from https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Shirzad, N., Mahsuli, M., Ghahari, S. F., & Taciroglu, E. (2018). Bayesian identification of soil-foundation stiffness of building structures. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 25(3), e2090. doi:10.1002/stc.2090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieffert, J., & Cevaer, F. (1992). Handbook of impedance functions: Surface foundations. Nantes: Quest Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Smarsly, K., & Law, K. H. (2013). A migration-based approach towards resource-efficient wireless structural health monitoring. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 27(4), 625–635. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sony, S., Laventure, S., & Sadhu, A. (2019). A literature review of next‐generation smart sensing technology in structural health monitoring. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 26(3), e2321. doi:10.1002/stc.2321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, L. M., Tileylioglu, S., Givens, M. J., Mylonakis, G., & Stewart, J. P. (2019). Evaluation of soil-structure interaction effects from system identification of structures subject to forced vibration tests. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 116, 747–760. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taciroglu, E., Celebi, M., Ghahari, S. F., & Abazarsa, F. (2016). An investigation of soil-structure interaction effects observed at the MIT Green building. Earthquake Spectra, 32(4), 2425–2448. doi:10.1193/072215EQS118M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taciroglu, E., Ghahari, S. F., & Abazarsa, F. (2017). Efficient model updating of a multi-story frame and its foundation stiffness from earthquake records using a Timoshenko beam model. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 92, 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzi, V. G. (2019, June). Impedance functions of adjacent strip foundations with different depths of embedment. In M. Papadrakakis, G. Stefanou, & M. Frangiadakis (Eds), Proceedings of the 7th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (pp. 24–26).Crete, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Todorovska, M. I., & Trifunac, M. D. (1992). The system damping, the system frequency and the system response peak amplitudes during in-plane building-soil interaction. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 21(2), 127–144. doi:10.1002/eqe.420210203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veletsos, A. S., & Meek, J. W. (1974). Dynamic behavior of building-foundation systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 3(2), 121–138. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290030203
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Zhou, D., & Liu, W. (2015, May). Simplified model for coupled vibration of adjacent strip footings. In M. Papadrakakis, V. Papadopoulos, & V. Plevris (Eds), Proceedings of the 5th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering (pp. 25–27).Crete, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, J. P. (1985). Dynamic soil-structure interaction. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Zania, V. (2014). Natural vibration frequency and damping of slender structures founded on monopoles. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 59, 8–20. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhenning, B., Jianwen, L., Vincent, W. L., & Liming, H. (2018). IBEM for impedance functions of an embedded strip foundation in a multi-layered transversely isotropic half-space. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 22(8), 1415–1446. doi:10.1080/13632469.2017.1286621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar