Bayesian network-based vulnerability assessment of a large-scale bridge network using improved ORDER-II-Dijkstra algorithm

References

• Berdica, K. (2002). An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done. Transport Policy, 9(2), 117–127. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00011-2
   Google Scholar
• Bocchini, P., & Frangopol, D. M. (2011a). Generalized bridge network performance analysis with correlation and time-variant reliability. Structural Safety, 33(2), 155–164. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocchini, P., & Frangopol, D. M. (2011b). A probabilistic computational framework for bridge network optimal maintenance scheduling. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(2), 332–349. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocchini, P., Frangopol, D. M., & Deodatis, G. (2011). A random field based technique for the efficiency enhancement of bridge network life-cycle analysis under uncertainty. Engineering Structures, 33(12), 3208–3217. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, B., Kong, X., Liu, Y., Lin, J., Yuan, X., Xu, H., & Ji, R. (2019). Application of Bayesian networks in reliability evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), 2146–2157. doi:10.1109/TII.2018.2858281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cats, O., Koppenol, G.-J., & Warnier, M. S. S. (2017). Robustness assessment of link capacity reduction for complex networks: Application for public transport systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 167, 544–553. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2017.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Chen, X., Zheng, H., & Chen, C. (2017). Understanding network travel time reliability with on-demand ride service data. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 4(4), 388. doi:10.15302/J-FEM-2017046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupeté, E., Moutarde, F., & Manitsaris, S. (2019). Multi-users online recognition of technical gestures for natural human–robot collaboration in manufacturing. Autonomous Robots, 43(6), 1309–1317. doi:10.1007/s10514-018-9704-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1(1), 269–271. doi:10.1007/BF01386390
   Google Scholar
• Edrissi, A., Nourinejad, M., & Roorda, M. J. (2015). Transportation network reliability in emergency response. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 80, 56–73. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2015.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estes, A. C. (1997). A system reliability approach to the lifetime optimization of inspection and repair of highway bridges (doctoral dissertation) Colorado University, Boulder, US
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D. M., & Bocchini, P. (2012). Bridge network performance, maintenance and optimisation under uncertainty: accomplishments and challenges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8(4), 341–356. doi:10.1080/15732479.2011.563089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D. M., Dong, Y., & Sabatino, S. (2017). Bridge life-cycle performance and cost: analysis, prediction, optimisation and decision-making. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(10), 1239–1219. doi:10.1080/15732479.2016.1267772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D. M., & Liu, M. (2007). Bridge network maintenance optimization using stochastic dynamic programming. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(12), 1772–1782. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:12(1772)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl, P., & D’Ayala, D. (2016). Development of Bayesian Networks for the multi-hazard fragility assessment of bridge systems. Structural Safety, 60, 37–46. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosn, M., & Moses, F. (2000). Effect of Changing Truck Weight Regulations on U.S. Bridge Network. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 5(4), 304–310. 300. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:4(304)
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, R. L., Bittencourt, L. F., & Madeira, E. R. (2014). A bandwidth-feasibility algorithm for reliable virtual network allocation. In 2014 IEEE 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (pp. 504–511). Victoria, BC, Canada: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, R. L., Bittencourt, L. F., & Madeira, E. R. M. (2019). FUZA: An Algorithm for Definition of Reliable Virtual Networks to the Edge as a Service Paradigm. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 27(2), 388–321. doi:10.1007/s10922-018-9470-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidotti, R., Gardoni, P., & Chen, Y. (2017). Network reliability analysis with link and nodal weights and auxiliary nodes. Structural Safety, 65, 12–26. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackl, J., & Adey, B. T. (2016). Generation of spatially embedded random networks to model complex transportation networks. Paper presented at the 14th International Probabilistic Workshop, Ghent, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Hackl, J., Heitzler, M., Lam, J. C., Adey, B. T., & Hurni, L. (2017). Development of flood and mudflow events for the spatio-temporal risk assessment of networks. European Water, 57, 197–203.
   Google Scholar
• Hackl, J., Lam, J. C., Heitzler, M., Adey, B. T., & Hurni, L. (2018). Estimating network related risks: A methodology and an application in the transport sector. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 18(8), 2273–2293. doi:10.5194/nhess-18-2273-2018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenelius, E., & Mattsson, L. G. (2008). The vulnerability of road networks under area-covering disruptions. Paper presented at the Informs Annual Meeting, Washington D.C., USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kosgodagan-Dalla Torre, A., Yeung, T. G., Morales-Nápoles, O., Castanier, B., Maljaars, J., & Courage, W. (2017). A Two-dimension dynamic Bayesian network for large-scale degradation modeling with an application to a bridges network. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 32(8), 641–656. doi:10.1111/mice.12286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, Y., & Li, V. (1986). An improved algorithm for performance analysis of networks with unreliable components. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 34(5), 496–497. doi:10.1109/TCOM.1986.1096560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B. H., & Jung, W. S. (2018). Analysis on the urban street network of Korea: Connections between topology and meta-information. Physica A Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 497, 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, V., & Silvester, J. (1984). Performance analysis of networks with unreliable components. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 32(10), 1105–1110. doi:10.1109/TCOM.1984.1095978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., & Frangopol, D. M. (2006). Probability-based bridge network performance evaluation. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 11(5), 633–641. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:5(633)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D. (2009). Probability-based network-level performence assessment of exiting bridges (master’s thesis). Hnnan University, Changsha, China
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China (2008). Unified Standard for Reliability Design of Engineering Structure. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Transport of China (MOT). (1999). Unified standard for reliability design of highway engineering structure (GB/T 50283-1999). Beijing: China Planning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Transport of China (MOT). (2011). Standards for technical condition evaluation of highway bridges (JTG/T H21-2011). Beijing: China Communications Press Co., Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Transport of China (MOT). (2014). Technical standard of highway engineering (JTJ 001-97). Beijing: China Communications Press Co., Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Transport of China (MOT). (2019a). Statistical bulletin on the development of transportation industry. Retrieved from http://www.chinahighway.com/article/63052.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Transport of China (MOT). (2019b). National statistical bulletin on toll highways. Retrieved from http://xxgk.mot.gov.cn/jigou/glj/201908/t20190829_3243792.html?agt=298.
   Google Scholar
• Moreu, F., Spencer, B. F., Foutch, D. A., & Scola, S. (2017). Consequence-based management of railroad bridge networks. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(2), 273–286. doi:10.1080/15732479.2016.1162817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, M., Pan, Z. Z., Liu, H., & He, Y. (2015). Vulnerability analysis of complementary transportation systems with applications to railway and airline systems in China. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 142(3), 248–257. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.013
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, M., Tian, H., Wang, Z., Hong, L., & Mao, Z. (2019). Critical infrastructure vulnerability to spatially localized failures with applications to Chinese railway system. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 39(1), 180–194. doi:10.1111/risa.12708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastor-Satorras, R., & Castellano, C. (2018). Eigenvector localization in real networks and its implications for epidemic spreading. Journal of Statistical Physics, 173(3-4), 1110–1114. doi:10.1007/s10955-018-1970-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J. (2018). Information-dependent seismic reliability assessment of bridge networks based on a correlation model. Engineering Structures, 176, 314–323. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saydam, D., Bocchini, P., & Frangopol, D. M. (2013). Time-dependent risk associated with deterioration of highway bridge networks. Engineering Structures, 54(3), 221–233. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.04.009
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Y., Lee, J., Jeong, H., Jeong, J., Lee, E., & Du, D. H. C. (2018). SAINT+: Self-adaptive interactive navigation tool + for emergency service delivery optimization. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19 (4), 1038–1016. doi:10.1109/TITS.2017.2710881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida, K., & Kato, T. (2017). A simplified network model for travel time reliability analysis in a road network. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2017, 1–17. doi:10.1155/2017/4941535
   Google Scholar
• Yang, D. Y., & Frangopol, D. M. (2019). Societal risk assessment of transportation networks under uncertainties due to climate change and population growth. Structural Safety, 78, 33–47. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C., Tu, Y., & Chen, X. (2009). Analysis method for topology vulnerability of transportation network. Paper presented at the International Conference on Transportation Engineering, Chengdu, China. doi:10.1061/41039(345)600
   Google Scholar
• Yao, B., Hu, P., Lu, X., Gao, J., & Zhang, M. (2014). Transit network design based on travel time reliability. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 43, 233–248. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2013.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, X., Zhai, M., He, Y., Zhang, J., & Ding, Y. (2008). Study on safety degree for existing concrete girderbridge members based on calculated reliability. Paper presented at the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Zanini, M. A., Faleschini, F., & Pellegrino, C. (2017). Probabilistic seismic risk forecasting of aging bridge networks. Engineering Structures, 136, 219–232. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Li, Y., Liu, G., & Wang, L. (2013). A node importance evaluation method for complex networks based on m-order neighbour importance contribution. International Journal of Applied Mathematics Statistics, 47(17), 213–221.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., & Wang, N. (2017). Bridge network maintenance prioritization under budget constraint. Structural Safety, 67, 96–104. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar