Utility analysis for SHM durations and service life extension of welds on steel bridge deck

References

• Alcover, I. F. (2014). Data-based models for assessment and life prediction of monitored civil infrastructure assets [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Surrey. Retrieved from http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/807811/.
   Google Scholar
• Balageas, D., Fritzen, C.-P., & Güemes, A. (2010). Structural health monitoring (Vol. 90). New Port Beach, CA, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bayane, I., Long, L., Thöns, S., & Brühwiler, E. (2019). Quantification of the conditional value of SHM data for the fatigue safety evaluation of a road viaduct [Paper presentation]. 13th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP13), Seoul, South Korea. https://doi.org/10.22725/ICASP13.275.
   Google Scholar
• Bernoulli, D. (1738). Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Comentarii Academiae Scientarum Imperialis Petropolitanae (Vol. V, 1730–1731, published 1738) (pp. 175–192). Gregg.
   Google Scholar
• del Grosso, A. (2013). Structural health monitoring: Research and practice. [Paper presentation] Second Conference on Smart Monitoring, Assessment and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures -SMAR, Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantidis, D., Sykora, M., & Sousa, H. (2019). Quantifying the value of structural health information (SHI) for decision support - Guide for practising engineers (COST Action TU1402). Retrieved from https://www.cost-tu1402.eu/action/deliverables/guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Eurocode. (2005). Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1–9: Fatigue. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, M. H. (2012). Bayesian decision analysis. In A.V. Gheorghe(Ed.), Statistics and probability theory: in pursuit of engineering decision support. (pp. 143–154). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, M. H., & Thöns, S. (2013). On the value of structural health monitoring. In The 22nd Annual Conference on European Safety and Reliability (ESREL 2013), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Farrar, C. R., & Worden, K. (2007). An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 365(1851), 303–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar, C. R., & Worden, K. (2012). Structural health monitoring: A machine learning perspective. John Wiley & Sons, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Farrar, C. R., Sohn, H., Hemez, F. M., Anderson, M. C., Bement, M. T., Cornwell, P. J., & Robertson, A. (2003). Damage prognosis: Current status and future needs. Report. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Farreras-Alcover, I., Andersen, J. E., & McFadyen, N. (2016). Assessing temporal requirements for SHM campaigns. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering, 169(2), 61–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1680/jfoen.15.00015
   Google Scholar
• Farreras-Alcover, I., Chryssanthopoulos, M. K., & Andersen, J. E. (2017). Data-based models for fatigue reliability of orthotropic steel bridge decks based on temperature, traffic and strain monitoring. International Journal of Fatigue, 95, 104–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finansministeriet. (2013). Ny og lavere samfunds¯konomisk diskonteringsrate, Faktaark 31. (Ministry of Finance, 2013, New and lower socio-economic discount rate, Fact sheet 31).
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, E. B., & Todd, M. D. (2010). A Bayesian approach to optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring with application to active sensing. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24(4), 891–903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jcss, J. (2001). Probabilistic model code. Joint Committee on Structural Safety. https://www.jcss-lc.org/jcss-probabilistic-model-code/
   Google Scholar
• Long, L., Döhler, M., & Thöns, S. (2020). Determination of structural and damage detection system influencing parameters on the value of information. Structural Health Monitoring. 1475921719900918. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719900918
   Google Scholar
• Long, L., Alcover, I. F., & Thöns, S. (2019). Quantification of the posterior utilities of SHM campaigns on an orthotropic steel bridge deck. In The Twelfth International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Long, L., Thöns, S., & Döhler, M. (2018). The effects of SHM system parameters on the value of damage detection information. In EWSHM-9th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Manchester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Mouter, N. (2015). Why do discount rates differ? Analyzing the differences between discounting policies for transport Cost-Benefit Analysis in five countries. Retrieved from http://www.mkba-informatie.nl/mkba-voorgevorderden/working-articles/mouter-why-do-discount-rates-differ-anayzlingdifferences-fi.
   Google Scholar
• Okasha, N. M., & Frangopol, D. M. (2012). Integration of structural health monitoring in a system performance based life-cycle bridge management framework. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8(11), 1–1016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.485726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orcesi, A. D., & Frangopol, D. M. (2011). Optimization of bridge maintenance strategies based on structural health monitoring information. Structural Safety, 33(1), 26–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2010.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzi, M., & Der Kiureghian, A. (2011). Assessing the value of information for long-term structural health monitoring. In Proceedings Volume 7984, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems 2011, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, 2011, San Diego, CA. doi:https://doi.org/10.1117/12.881918
   Google Scholar
• Pozzi, M., Zonta, D., Wang, W., & Chen, G. (2010). A framework for evaluating the impact of structural health monitoring on bridge management. In D. Frangopol (Ed.), Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management. IABMAS 2010, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, J., Thöns, S., & Faber, M. H. (2015). On the value of SHM in the context of service life integrity management. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H., & Schlaifer, R. (1961). Applied statistical decision theory. Wiley Classics Library.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, H., Wenzel, H., & Thöns, S. (2019). Quantifying the Value of Structural Health Information (SHI) for Decision Support - Guide for operators (COST Action TU1402). Retrieved from https://www.cost-tu1402.eu/action/deliverables/guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, H., Farrar, C. R., Hemez, F. M., Shunk, D. D., Stinemates, D. W., Nadler, B. R., & Czarnecki, J. J. (2003). A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001 (pp. 1–7). New Mexico: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Straub, D. (2014). Value of information analysis with structural reliability methods. Structural Safety, 49, 75–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sund & Baelt. (2014). The socio-economic importance of the Storebaelt link. Retrieved from http://publications.sundogbaelt.dk/Storeblt/the-socio-economic-importance-of-the-storebaelt-link/#/.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, M., Haynes, C., & Flynn, E. (2011). Bayesian experimental design approach to optimization in structural health monitoring. In Proceedings of World Congress on Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics.
   Google Scholar
• Thöns, S. (2019). Quantifying the Value of Structural Health Information (SHI) for decision support - guide for scientists (COST Action 1402). https://www.cost-tu1402.eu/action/deliverables/guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Vanik, M. W., Beck, J. L., & Au, S. (2000). Bayesian probabilistic approach to structural health monitoring. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126(7), 738–745. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:7(738)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O., Kuhn, W. H. (2007). Theory of games and economic behavior (Commemorative edition). Princeton University Press, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, H., Veit-Egerer, R., Widmann, M., & To, I. (2011). Risk based civil SHM and life cycle management. In F. Chang (Ed.), Structural Health Monitoring 2011 Condition-Based Maintenance and Intelligent Structures (pp. 717–724). Destech Pubns Inc,USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wirsching, P. (1995). Probabilistic fatigue analysis. In Probabilistic structural mechanics handbook (pp. 146–165). Springer, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Zhuang, J., Liang, Z., Lin, T., & De Guzman, F. (2007). Theory and practice in the choice of social discount rate for cost-benefit analysis: A survey. In ADB Economics Working Paper Series. Asian Development Bank (ADB). https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/109296.
   Google Scholar
• Zonta, D., Glisic, B., & Adriaenssens, S. (2014). Value of information: Impact of monitoring on decision‐making. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 21(7), 1043–1056. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar