Bridge damage analysis under joint environmental and operational variability

References

• An, Y., Chatzi, E., Sim, S. H., Laflamme, S., Blachowski, B., & Ou, J. (2019). Recent progress and future trends on damage identification methods for bridge structures. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 26(10), e2416. doi:10.1002/stc.2416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azim, M. R., & Gül, M. (2019). Damage detection of steel girder railway bridges utilizing operational vibration response. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 26(11), e2447. doi:10.1002/stc.2447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisheh, H. B., & Amiri, G. G. (2023). Structural damage detection based on variational mode decomposition and kernel PCA-based support vector machine. Engineering Structures, 278, 115565. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, P. (2007). Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures-Part 1-2: General Rules-Structural Fire Design. London: European Committee for Standardisation.
   Google Scholar
• Cremona, C., & Santos, J. (2018). Structural health monitoring as a big-data problem. Structural Engineering International, 28(3), 243–254. doi:10.1080/10168664.2018.1461536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgadillo Rick, M., & Casas Joan, R. (2019). SHM of Bridges by Improved Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (ICEEMDAN) and Clustering. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, September 10–12, Stanford University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Delgadillo Rick, M., & Casas Joan, R. (2022). Bridge damage detection via improved completed ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise and machine learning algorithms. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 29(8), e2966. doi:10.1002/stc.2966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgadillo Rick, M., & Casas Joan, R. (2021). A combined kernel-PCA with clustering analysis for bridge damage detection under changing environmental conditions. In Life-Cycle Civil Engineering: Innovation, Theory and Practice. CRC Press. pp. 1362–1370.
   Google Scholar
• Delgadillo, R. M., Tenelema, F. J., & Casas, J. R. (2023). Marginal Hilbert spectrum and instantaneous phase difference as total damage indicators in bridges under operational traffic loads. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 19(6), 824–844. doi:10.1080/15732479.2021.1982994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgadillo, R. M. (2022). Development of a machine learning based methodology for bridge health monitoring [PhD Thesis]. UPC-BarcelonaTech, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Dragomiretskiy, K., & Zosso, D. (2014). Variational mode decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 62(3), 531–544. doi:10.1109/TSP.2013.2288675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entezami, A., Sarmadi, H., Behkamal, B., & Mariani, S. (2020). Big data analytics and structural health monitoring: A statistical pattern recognition-based approach. Sensors, 20(8), 2328. doi:10.3390/s20082328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahian, M., Khoshnoudian, F., & Meruane, V. (2018). Ensemble classification method for structural damage assessment under varying temperature. Structural Health Monitoring, 17(4), 747–762. doi:10.1177/1475921717717311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahian, M., Khoshnoudian, F., Talaei, S., Meruane, V., & Shadan, F. (2018). Experimental validation of a deep neural network—sparse representation classification ensemble method. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 27(15), e1504. doi:10.1002/tal.1504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, E., Radu, L., Westgate, R., Brownjohn, J., Cross, E., Worden, K., & Farrar, C. (2012). Applicability of a Markov-Chain Monte Carlo method for damage detection on data from the Z-24 and Tamar suspension bridges. In Proceedings of the 6th European Workshop-Structural Health Monitoring 2012, EWSHM 2012, pp. 747–754.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, N. E., Long, S. R., & Shen, Z. (1996). The mechanism for frequency downshift in nonlinear wave evolution. Advances in Applied Mechanics, 32, 59–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J. Z., Li, D. S., Li, H. N., Song, G. B., & Liang, Y. (2018). Damage identification of a large cable‐stayed bridge with novel cointegrated Kalman filter method under changing environments. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 25(5), e2152. doi:10.1002/stc.2152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I. (2002). Principal component analysis. 2nd. ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), 20150202. doi:10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunwar, A., Jha, R., Whelan, M., & Janoyan, K. (2013). Damage detection in an experimental bridge model using Hilbert–Huang transform of transient vibrations. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 20(1), 1–15. doi:10.1002/stc.466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Zhu, X., & Guo, J. (2022). Bridge modal identification based on successive variational mode decomposition using a moving test vehicle. Advances in Structural Engineering, 25(11), 2284–2300. doi:10.1177/13694332221092678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, A., Wang, L., Bornn, L., & Farrar, C. (2019). Robust structural health monitoring under environmental and operational uncertainty with switching state-space autoregressive models. Structural Health Monitoring, 18(2), 435–453. doi:10.1177/1475921718757721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves, A. C. (2020). Structural health monitoring of bridges: Data-based damage detection method using machine learning [Doctoral dissertation]. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi, A. A., Zhang, C., Masri, S. F., & Gholipour, G. (2022). Structural damage detection method based on the complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise: A model steel truss bridge case study. Structural Health Monitoring, 21(3), 887–912. doi:10.1177/14759217211013535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves, A. C., González, I., Karoumi, R., & Leander, J. (2021). The influence of frequency content on the performance of artificial neural network–based damage detection systems tested on numerical and experimental bridge data. Structural Health Monitoring, 20(3), 1331–1347. doi:10.1177/1475921720924320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooijevaar, T. H. (2014). Vibration based structural health monitoring of composite skin-stiffener structures [PhD Thesis]. University of Twente, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Pathirage, C. S. N., Li, J., Li, L., Hao, H., Liu, W., & Ni, P. (2018). Structural damage identification based on autoencoder neural networks and deep learning. Engineering Structures, 172, 13–28. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, B., Maeck, J., & De Roeck, G. (2001). Vibration-based damage detection in civil engineering: Excitation sources and temperature effects. Smart Materials and Structures, 10(3), 518–527. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. N., Seible, F., & Calvi, G. M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, A., Santos, R., Silva, M., Figueiredo, E., Sales, C., & Costa, J. C. (2017). A global expectation–maximization approach based on memetic algorithm for vibration-based structural damage detection. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 66(4), 661–670. doi:10.1109/TIM.2017.2663478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierra Pérez, J. (2014). Smart aeronautical structures: development and experimental validation of a structural health monitoring system for damage detection [Doctoral dissertation]. Aeronauticos.
   Google Scholar
• Skowroński, W., Włóka, A., & Chmiel, R. (2014). Modelling of strength processes of S235JR steel at increased temperature (Modelowanie procesów wytrzymałościowych stali S235JR w podwyższonej temperaturze). Structure & Environment, 6(3), 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Soo Lon Wah, W., Chen, Y. T., Roberts, G. W., & Elamin, A. (2018). Separating damage from environmental effects affecting civil structures for near real-time damage detection. Structural Health Monitoring, 17(4), 850–868. doi:10.1177/1475921717722060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsis, K., & Chatzi, E. (2019). A numerical benchmark for system identification under operational and environmental variability. In 8th International Operational Modal Analysis Conference (IOMAC 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Tenelema, F. J. (2020). Bridge Damage Identification under operational and environmental variability [Master’s Thesis]. UPC-BarcelonaTech, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Tenelema Muñoz, F. J., Delgadillo Ayala, R. M., & Casas Rius, J. R. (2021). Damage detection of bridges considering environmental variability using Hilbert-Huang Transform and Principal Component Analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure. Advanced Research and Real-World Applications. SHMII-10, Porto, Portugal, pp. 529–536.
   Google Scholar
• Witting, M., & Klein, M. (1996). Modal selection by means of effective modal masses and effective modal forces-An application example (launch vehicles). In ESA International Conference on Spacecraft Structures, Materials and Mechanical Testing, Noordwijk, Netherlands, pp. 715–722.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C., & Liu, Y. (2021). Detecting the damage of bridges under changing environmental conditions using the characteristics of the nonlinear narrow dimension of damage features. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 159, 107842. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, L., Zhu, J. H., & Yu, L. L. (2013). Structural damage detection in a truss bridge model using fuzzy clustering and measured FRF data reduced by principal component projection. Advances in Structural Engineering, 16(1), 207–217. doi:10.1260/1369-4332.16.1.207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang, J. G., Huang, H.-B., Sun, Z.-G., & Wang, D. S. (2023). Subdomain principal component analysis for damage detection of structures subjected to changing environments. Engineering Structures, 288, 116265. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y. C., Xiong, W., & Song, X. D. (2022). Structural performance assessment considering both observed and latent environmental and operational conditions: A Gaussian process and probability principal component analysis method. Structural Health Monitoring, 21(6), 2531–2546. 14759217211062099. doi:10.1177/14759217211062099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar