Random field modelling of spatial variability in concrete – a review

References

• Aloisio, A., Pasca, D. P., Di Battista, L., Rosso, M. M., Cucuzza, R., Marano, G. C., & Alaggio, R. (2022). Indirect assessment of concrete resistance from FE model updating and Young’s modulus estimation of a multi-span PSC viaduct: Experimental tests and validation. Structures, 37, 686–697. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aloisio, A., Rosso, M. M., Fragiacomo, M., & Alaggio, R. (2023, March). Fragility estimate of railway bridges due to concrete fatigue. Structures, 49, 70–87). doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2023.01.123
   Google Scholar
• Betz, W., Papaioannou, I., & Straub, D. (2014). Numerical methods for the discretization of random fields by means of the Karhunen-Loève expansion. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 271, 109–129. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2013.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocchini, P., & Deodatis, G. (2008). Critical review and latest developments of a class of simulation algorithms for strongly non-Gaussian random fields. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 23(4), 393–407. doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botte, W., & Caspeele, R. (2021). Accounting for spatial variability in partial factor based design verifications. In IABSE Congress Ghent 2021 - Structural Engineering for Future Societal Needs (pp. 1805–1812). Ghent, Belgium. doi:10.2749/ghent.2021.1805
   Google Scholar
• CEN. (2005). EN 1992-1-1: Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Criel, P., Caspeele, R., & Taerwe, L. (2014). Bayesian updated correlation length of spatial concrete properties using limited data. Computers and Concrete, 13(5), 659–677. doi:10.12989/cac.2014.13.5.659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vasconcellos Real, M., Campos Filho, A., & Maestrini, S. R. (2003). Response variability in reinforced concrete structures with uncertain geometrical and material properties. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 226(3), 205–220. doi:10.1016/S0029-5493(03)00110-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deodatis, G. (1991). Weighted integral method. I: Stochastic stiffness matrix. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 117(8), 1851–1864. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:8(1851)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Der Kiureghian, A., & Ke, J. B. (1988). The stochastic finite element method in structural reliability. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 3(2), 83–91. doi:10.1016/0266-8920(88)90019-7
   Google Scholar
• DIANA FEA BV. (2017). Random fields for non-linear finite element analysis of reinforced concrete structures.
   Google Scholar
• Engelund, S., & Sørensen, J. D. (1998). A probabilistic model for chloride-ingress and initiation of corrosion in reinforced concrete structures. Structural Safety, 20(1), 69–89. doi:10.1016/S0167-4730(97)00022-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund, S. (1997). Probabilistic models and computational methods for chloride ingress in concrete. Aalborg: Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, G. A. (1994). A random field excursion model of salt-induced concrete delamination. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 99(4), 475–483. doi:10.6028/jres.099.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton, G. A. (1999). Random field modeling of CPT data. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125(6), 486–498. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:6(486)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• fib. (2006). Model code for service life design. Fib Bulletin 34 doi:10.35789/fib.BULL.0034
   Google Scholar
• Firouzi, A., & Rahai, A. (2013). Reliability assessment of concrete bridges subject to corrosion-induced cracks during life cycle using artificial neural networks. Computers and Concrete, 12(1), 91–107. doi:10.12989/cac.2013.12.1.091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., Der Kiureghian, A., & Mosalam, K. M. (2002). Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128(10), 1024–1038. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1024)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer, S., Papaioannou, I., Kunz, C., & Straub, D. (2020). Reliability assessment of large hydraulic structures with spatially distributed measurements. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 16(4), 599–612. doi:10.1080/15732479.2019.1652331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoriu, M. (1995). Applied non-gaussian processes: Examples, theory, simulation, linear random vibration, and MATLAB solutions(Book). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hajializadeh, D., OBrien, E. J., & Stewart, M. G. (2016). The sensitivity of bridge safety to spatial correlation of load and resistance. Structures, 5, 23–34. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2015.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajializadeh, D., Stewart, M. G., Enright, B., & OBrien, E. (2016). Spatial time-dependent reliability analysis of reinforced concrete slab bridges subject to realistic traffic loading. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12(9), 1137–1152. doi:10.1080/15732479.2015.1086385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldar, A., & Mahadevan, S. (2000). Reliability assessment using stochastic finite element analysis. Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Q., Gardoni, P., & Hurlebaus, S. (2009). Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns incorporating NDT data. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 135(12), 1384–1392. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:12(1384)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JCSS. (2001). Probabilistic model code. Retrieved from http://www.jcss.ethz.ch.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, A. R. (2001). Probabilistic assessment of deterioration and strength of concrete bridge beams and slabs. London: Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Kersner, Z., Novak, D., Teply, B., & Rusina, R. (1998). Modeling of deterioration of concrete structures by stochastic finite element method. In A. A. Balkema (Ed.), 7th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, ICOSSAR 97, Kyoto, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, S., Strauss, A., & Caspeele, R. (2017). Present and future probabilistic challenges for maintenance of reinforced concrete structures. In 14th International Probabilistic Workshop (pp. 521–537). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47886-9
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. H., & Mosalam, K. M. (2004). Probabilistic fiber element modeling of reinforced concrete structures. Computers & Structures, 82(27), 2285–2299. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C.-C., & Der Kiureghian, A. (1993). Optimal discretization of random fields. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 119(6), 1136–1154. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1993)119:6(1136)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., & Ye, X. (2018, February). Surface deterioration analysis for probabilistic durability design of RC structures in marine environment. Structural Safety, 75, 13–23. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2004). Effect of spatial variability on maintenance and repair decisions for concrete structures. Delft, Netherlands: Delft University.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, P. L., & Der Kiureghian, A. (1986). Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 1(2), 105–112. doi:10.1016/0266-8920(86)90033-0
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W. K., Belytschko, T., & Mani, A. (1986). Random field finite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 23(10), 1831–1845. doi:10.1002/nme.1620231004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malioka, V. (2009). Condition indicators for the assessment of local and spatial deterioration of concrete structures. Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich. doi:10.3929/ethz-a-010782581
   Google Scholar
• Malioka, V., Faber, M. H., Leemann, A., & Hoffmann, C. C. (2007). Durability performance acceptance criteria for concrete structures. In Life-Cycle Cost and Performance of Civil Infrastructure Systems - Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Life-Cycle Cost Analysis and Design of Civil Infrastructure Systems (pp. 249–257).
   Google Scholar
• Matthies, H. G., Brenner, C. E., Bucher, C. G., & Soares, C. G. (1997). Uncertainties in probabilistic numerical analysis of structures and solids-Stochastic finite elements. Structural Safety, 19(3), 283–336. doi:10.1016/S0167-4730(97)00013-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, A., & Kenshel, O. (2013). Experimental evaluation of the scale of fluctuation for spatial variability modeling of chloride-induced reinforced concrete corrosion. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18(1), 3–14. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedrosa, F., & Andrade, C. (2021). Spatial variability of concrete electrical resistivity and corrosion rate in laboratory conditions. Construction and Building Materials, 306, 124777. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J., Tang, H., Xiao, L., Cheng, X., & Zhang, J. (2021). Chloride diffusion and time to corrosion initiation of reinforced concrete structures. Magazine of Concrete Research, 73(15), 757–770. doi:10.1680/jmacr.19.00276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, R., Fischer, J., Bügler, M., Nowak, M., Thöns, S., Borrmann, A., & Straub, D. (2015). Assessing and updating the reliability of concrete bridges subjected to spatial deterioration–principles and software implementation. Structural Concrete, 16(3), 356–365. doi:10.1002/suco.201500014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M., & Deodatis, G. (1988). Response variability of stochastic finite element systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 114(3), 499–519. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1988)114:3(499)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivaranun, S., Akiyama, M., Masuda, K., Frangopol, D. M., & Maruyama, O. (2022). Random field-based reliability updating framework for existing RC structures incorporating the effect of spatial steel corrosion distribution. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 18(7), 967–982. doi:10.1080/15732479.2021.1995445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterrit, G., Chryssanthopoulos, M. K., & Shetty, N. K. (2001, March 21–23). Reliability based inspection planning for RC highway bridges. In International Conference Malta.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. G., & Mullard, J. A. (2007). Spatial time-dependent reliability analysis of corrosion damage and the timing of first repair for RC structures. Engineering Structures, 29(7), 1457–1464. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. G., & Suo, Q. (2009). Extent of spatially variable corrosion damage as an indicator of strength and time-dependent reliability of RC beams. Engineering Structures, 31(1), 198–207. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, D. (2011). Reliability updating with inspection and monitoring data in deteriorating reinforced concrete slabs. In Michael Faber, Jochen Kohler, Kazuyoshi Nishijima (Eds.), Application of statistics and probability in civil engineering (pp. 692–696). London: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Straub, D., & Faber, M. H. (2004). On the relation between inspection quantity and quality. Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 9(7), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Straub, D., & Faber, M. H. (2007). Temporal variability in corrosion modeling and reliability updating. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 129(4), 265–272. doi:10.1115/1.2355517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, D., Malioka, V., & Faber, M. H. (2009). A framework for the asset integrity management of large deteriorating concrete structures. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 5(3), 199–213. doi:10.1080/15732470601017369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudret, B., & Der Kiureghian, A. (2000). Stochastic finite element methods and reliability: A State-of-the-art report. Berkeley: University of California Berkeley. Retrieved from https://www1.ethz.ch/ibk/su/publications/Reports/SFE-report-Sudret.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sudret, B., Defaux, G., & Pendola, M. (2007). Stochastic evaluation of the damage length in RC beams submitted to corrosion of reinforcing steel. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 24(2), 165–178. doi:10.1080/10286600601159305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, J., & Chen, J. (2022, November). A hierarchy model for the uncertainty quantification of spatial variability in the constitutive parameters of concrete in structures. Structural Safety, 95, 102181. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, T. V., Bastidas-Arteaga, E., Schoefs, F., Bonnet, S., O’Connor, A. J., & Lanata, F. (2012, July). Structural reliability analysis of deteriorating RC bridges considering spatial variability. In Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management (pp. 698–705). doi:10.1201/b12352-94
   Google Scholar
• Uribe, F., Papaioannou, I., Betz, W., & Straub, D. (2020). Bayesian inference of random fields represented with the Karhunen–Loève expansion. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 358, 112632. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.112632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Have, R. (2015, November). Random fields for non-linear finite element analysis of reinforced concrete, p. 244. Retrieved from http://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:25780e9a-49c4-4085-9a65-af73119d97a7?collection=education.
   Google Scholar
• Vanmarcke, E. (1983). Random fields. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vereecken, E., Botte, W., Lombaert, G., & Caspeele, R. (2021a). A Bayesian inference approach for the updating of spatially distributed corrosion model parameters based on heterogeneous measurement data. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 18(1), 30–46. doi:10.1080/15732479.2020.1833046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vereecken, E., Botte, W., Lombaert, G., & Caspeele, R. (2021b). Influence of the correlation model on the failure probability of a reinforced concrete structure considering spatial variability. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 19(4), 510–524. doi:10.1080/15732479.2021.1953082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vořechovský, M. (2008). Simulation of simply cross correlated random fields by series expansion methods. Structural Safety, 30(4), 337–363. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu, K. A. T., & Stewart, M. G. (2005). Predicting the likelihood and extent of reinforced concrete corrosion-induced cracking. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(11), 1681–1689. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:11(1681)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, T., & Li, J. (2018). Assessing the spatial variability of the concrete by the rebound hammer test and compression test of drilled cores. Construction and Building Materials, 188, 820–832. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying, L., Vrouwenvelder, T., & Wijnants, G. H. (2003). Spatial variability of concrete degradation. In Life-Cycle Performance of Deteriorating Structures: Assessment, Design and Management; Third IABMAS Workshop on Life-Cycle Cost Analysis and Design of Civil Infrastructures Systems, pp. 49–58. Retrieved from papers2://publication/uuid/84A331C6-45C3-49E8-A030-CD9A196CD9CB
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., Li, Y., Wen, Q., & Deodatis, G. (2023). Stochastic field model for the residual radius along the length of naturally and artificially corroded rebars. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 19(10), 1366–1377. doi:10.1080/15732479.2022.2027471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar