Between swarm, network, and multitude: Anonymous and the infrastructures of the common

References

• Agamben, G. 1993. The coming community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2004. The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Rev. ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant matter. A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. 2008. Affect, relationality and the “problem of personality”. Theory, Culture & Society 25, no. 1: 23–47. doi: 10.1177/0263276407085157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. 1946. Collective behavior. In New outlines of the principles of sociology, ed. A.M. Lee, 167–221. New York: Barnes and Noble. http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.b4095926;view=1up;seq=5.
   Google Scholar
• Borch, C. 2006. The exclusion of the crowd. The destiny of a sociological figure of the irrational. European Journal of Social Theory 9, no. 1: 83–102. doi: 10.1177/1368431006060464
   Google Scholar
• Borch, C. 2012. The politics of crowds: An alternative history of sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brigham, L.C. 2005. Networking the multitude. Electronic book review. 18 December 2005. http://www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/endconstruction/networked.
   Google Scholar
• Broeckmann, A. 2001. Towards an aesthetics of connective processes. http://www2.eur.nl/fw/cfk/InterAkta/InterAkta%203/PDF/interakta3.art.ab.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. 2012. Our weirdness is free. The logic of Anonymous – online army, agent of chaos, and seeker of justice. Triple Canopy 15, January. http://canopycanopycanopy.com/15/our_weirdness_is_free.
   Google Scholar
• Drury, J., and C. Stott. 2011. Contextualizing the crowd in contemporary social science. Contemporary Social Science 6, no. 3: 275–88. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2011.625626
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., and J.C. Thomas. 1999. Trust me, I'm accountable. Trust and accountability online. Summary of a panel discussion with experts. http://vsdesign.org/outreach/pdf/friedman99accountabilityonline.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, A.R. 2004. Protocol. How control exists after decentralization. Boston: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, A. 2008. Panic! Affect contagion, mimesis and suggestion in the social field. Cultural Studies Review 14, 130–45. doi: 10.5130/csr.v14i2.2076
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1997. Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2004. Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Herwig, J. 2012. ‘Post your Desktop!’ – 4chan als Sonderfall der Verhandlung von Nähe und Identität im Web. In Medialität der Nähe. Situationen – Praktiken – Diskurse, ed. P. Abend, T. Haupts, and C. Müller, 65–83. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, E. 2009. Schwärme – Kollektive ohne Zentrum. Einleitung. In Schwärme – Kollektive ohne Zentrum, ed. E. Horn and L.M. Gisi, 7–26. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Kelty, C. 2008. Two bits. The cultural significance of free software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2002. Gabriel Tarde and the end of the social. In The social in question: New bearings in history and the social sciences, ed. P. Joyce, 117–33. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Bon, G. [1895] 2002. The crowd: A study of the popular mind. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jannsen, J.-K. 2010. Anonymous verändert sich gerade dramatisch. Interview with developers of AnonNews.org. http://www.heise.de/ct/artikel/Anonymous-veraendert-sich-gerade-dramatisch-1154156.html.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the virtual. Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzarella, W. 2010. The myth of the multitude, or, Who's afraid of the crowd? Critical Inquiry 36, no. 4: 697–727. doi: 10.1086/655209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPhail, C. 1989. Blumer's theory of collective behavior: The development of a non-symbolic interaction explanation. Sociological Quarterly 30, no. 4: 401–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1989.tb01528.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nancy, J.-L. 1991. The inoperative community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parikka, J. 2007. Digital contagions. A media archaeology of computer viruses. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Parikka, J. 2008. Politics of swarms: Translations between entomology and biopolitics. Parallax 14, no. 3: 112–24. doi: 10.1080/13534640802159187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikka, J. 2010a. What is new materialism. Opening words from the event. http://jussiparikka.net/2010/06/23/what-is-new-materialism-opening-words-from-the-event/.
   Google Scholar
• Parikka, J. 2010b. Across scales, contagious movements. http://jussiparikka.net/2010/05/04/across-scales-contagious-movement/.
   Google Scholar
• Park, E.R. 1972. The crowd and the public and other essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pieper, M., B. Kuster, and V. Tsianos. 2011. ‘Making connections’. Skizze einer Net(h)nographischen Grenzregimeanalyse. In Generation Facebook, ed. T. Röhle and O. Leistert, 221–48. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Pieper, M., and C. Wiedemann. 2014. In den Ruinen der Repräsentation. Affekt, Agencement und das Okkurente. Zeitschrift für Geschlechterforschung und Visuelle Kultur 55: 66–78.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2003. Die Krise der Repräsentation und das reflexive Kontingenzbewusstsein. Zu den Konsequenzen der post-empiristischen Wissenschaftstheorien für die Identität der Sozialwissenschaften. In Die Ironie der Politik. Über die Konstruktion politischer Wirklichkeiten, ed. T. Bonacker, A. Reckwitz, A. Brodocz, T. Noetzel, 85–103. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, T. 2012. Virality: Contagion theory in the age of networks. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stage, C. 2013. The online crowd: A contradiction in terms? On the potentials of Gustave Le Bon's crowd psychology in an analysis of affective blogging. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 14, no. 2: 211–26. doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2013.773261
   Google Scholar
• Stäheli, U. 2011. Seducing the crowd: The leader in crowd psychology. New German Critique 38, 63–77. doi: 10.1215/0094033X-1340048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stäheli, U. 2012. Infrastrukturen des Kollektiven: alte Medien – neue Kollektive? ZMK, 2: 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Stalder, F. 2012. Enter the swarm: Anonymous and the global protest movements. http://felix.openflows.com/node/203.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. [1895] 2012. Monadology and sociology. Melbourne: re:press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. [1901] 1969. The public and the crowd. In Gabriel Tarde. On communication and social influence. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terranova, T. 2004. Network culture. Politics for the information age. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thacker, E. 2004a. Networks, swarms, multitudes. Part One. Ctheory. 18 May. http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=422.
   Google Scholar
• Thacker, E. 2004b. Networks, swarms, multitudes. Part Two. Ctheory. 18 May. http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=423.
   Google Scholar
• Tönnies, F. [1935] 1991. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchges.
   Google Scholar
• Tsianos, V., D. Papadopoulos, and N. Stephenson. 2008. Escape routes. Control and subversion in the twenty-first century. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R.H., and L.M. Killian. 1957. Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Vehlken, S. 2013. Zootechnologies: Swarming as a cultural technique. Theory, Culture & Society 30, no. 6: 110–31. doi: 10.1177/0263276413488959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedemann, C. (forthcoming). ‘Greetings from the Dark Site of the Internet’ – Anonymous und die Frage nach der Subversion in Zeiten der Informatisierung. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar