Rethinking the ambiguities of abstraction in the Anthropocene

References

• Adorno, T., and M. Horkheimer. 1997. Dialectic of enlightenment. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Alt, S. 2019. Conclusion: Critique and the politics of affirmation in international relations. Global Society 33, no. 1: 137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 2005. The promise of politics. New York: Schocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bargues-Pedreny, P. 2019. From critique to affirmation in international relations. Global Society 33, no. 1: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2011. Modernity and its critics. In The Oxford handbook of political science, ed. R. E. Goodin, 1–13. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonneuil, C., and J.-B. Fressoz. 2016. The shock of the Anthropocene. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2017. Four theses on posthuman feminism. In Anthropocene feminism, ed. R Grusin, 21–48. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brassier, R. 2007. Nihil unbound: Enlightenment and extinction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, A., S. Fishel, A. Mitchell, S. Dalby, and D.J. Levine. 2016. Planet politics: A Manifesto from the end of IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 44, no. 3: 499–523. doi: 10.1177/0305829816636674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2009. The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry 35, no. 2: 197–222. doi: 10.1086/596640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., E. Cudworth, and S. Hobden. 2018. ‘Anthropocene, capitalocene and liberal cosmopolitan IR: A response to Burke et al.’s ‘planet politics’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 46, no. 2: 190–208. doi: 10.1177/0305829817715247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, N. 2010. Inhuman nature: Sociable life on a dynamic planet. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. 2014. Death of the posthuman: Essays on extinction, Vol. 1. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. 2017. We have always been post-Anthropocene: The Anthropocene counterfactual. In Anthropocene feminism, ed. R Grusin, 1–20. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P.J. 2002. Geology of mankind. Nature 415: 23. doi: 10.1038/415023a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P.J., and W. Steffen. 2003. How long have we been in the Anthropocene era? Climatic Change 61: 251–7. doi: 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000004708.74871.62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P.J., and E. Stoermer. 2000. The ‘anthropocene’. Global Change News 41: 17–8.
   Google Scholar
• De le Cadena, M., and M. Blaser. 2018. A world of many worlds. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 2014. A thousand plateaus. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, M. 2017. Security in the Anthropocene: Environment, ecology, escape. European Journal of International Relations 23, no. 2: 292–314. doi: 10.1177/1354066116639738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A. 2016. The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. 2011. Becoming undone: Darwinian reflections on life, politics, and art. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C., C. Bonneuil, and F. Gemenne, eds. 2015. The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis: Rethinking modernity in a new epoch. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14, no. 3: 575–99. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. 2010. Towards speculative realism: Essays and lectures. Winchester: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 2003. Future city. New Left Review 21: 65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffries, S. 2016. Grand hotel abyss: The lives of the Frankfurt School. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Kolozova, K. 2015. Toward a radical metaphysics of socialism. Brooklyn, NY: Punctum.
   Google Scholar
• Laruelle, F. 2017. Principles of non-philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004a. Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004b. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 30, no. 2: 225–48. doi: 10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2013. Facing Gaia, six lectures on the political theology of nature: Being the Gifford lectures on natural religion, Edinburgh, 18–28 February 2013 (draft version 1-3-13).
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2011. What’s wrong with a one-world world. heterogeneities.net, September 25.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. 2002. The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, D. 2012. Geography and abstraction: Towards an affirmative critique. Progress in Human Geography 36, no. 3: 715–34. doi: 10.1177/0309132512437074
   Google Scholar
• Meillassoux, Q. 2008. After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. 2017. Is IR going extinct? European Journal of International Relations 23, no. 1: 3–25. doi: 10.1177/1354066116632853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J.W. 2015. Capitalism in the web of life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. 2013. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. 2017. Humankind: Solidarity with nonhuman People. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, S., and B. Braun. 2017. Autonomia in the Anthropocene: New challenges to radical politics. South Atlantic Quarterly 116, no. 2: 223–35. doi: 10.1215/00382876-3829368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachter, H.M. 1974. The idea of progress in Marxism. Social Research 41, no. 1: 136–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povinelli, E. 2016a. Geontologies: A requiem to late liberalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Povinelli, E. 2016b. The world is flat and other super weird ideas. In Object-oriented feminism, ed. K Behar, 107–21. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rockstrom, J., W.L. Steffen, K. Noone, Å Persson, F. Stuart Chapin, E. Lambin, T.M. Lenton, et al. 2009. Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 14, no. 2: art.32. doi: 10.5751/ES-03180-140232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn-Rethel, A. 1978. Intellectual and manual labour: A critique of epistemology. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steigler, B. 2018. The neganthropocene. London: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2015. In catastrophic times: Resisting the coming barbarism. Paris: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A.L. 2015. The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, S. 2018. Inhabiting the Anthropocene back loop. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 6, no. 2: 77–94.
   Google Scholar
• Wark, M. 2015. Molecular red: Theory for the Anthropocene. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Weisman, A. 2008. The world without us. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A.N. 1967. Science and the modern world. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A.N. 1985. Process and reality. Cor. ed. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar