150
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Toward the abstractors: modes of care and lineages of becoming

ORCID Icon

References

  • Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Berlant, L. 2007. On the case. Critical Inquiry 33: 663–72. doi: 10.1086/521564
  • Brown, N. 2003. Hope against hype: Accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science Studies 16, no. 2: 3–21.
  • Callon, M., and J. Law. 1995. Agency and the hybrid collectif. The South Atlantic Quarterly 94: 481–507.
  • Collins, H.M. 1987. Certainty and the public understanding of science: science on television. Social Studies of Science 17: 689–713. doi: 10.1177/030631287017004005
  • Collins, H.M. 1988. Public experiments and displays of virtuosity. Social Studies of Science 18: 725–48. doi: 10.1177/030631288018004006
  • Connolly, W.E. 2011. A world of becoming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Debaise, D. 2017. Speculative empiricism: Revisiting Whitehead. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Debord, G. 1967/1994. The society of the spectacle. New York: Zone Books.
  • DeLanda, M. 2002. Intensive science and virtual philosophy. London: Continuum.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12, no. 2: 219–45. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
  • Fox Gotham, K., and D.A. Krier. 2008. From the culture industry to the society of the spectacle: Critical theory and the situationist international. In No social science without critical theory – current perspectives in social theory, Volume 25, ed. H. F. Dahms, 155–92. Bingley: Emerald Group.
  • Fraser, M. 2010. Facts, ethics and event. In Deleuzian intersections in science, technology and anthropology, ed. C. Bruun Jensen and K. Rödje, 57–82. New York: Berghahn Press.
  • Halewood, M., and M. Michael. 2008. Being a sociologist and becoming a Whiteheadian: Concrescing methodological tactics. Theory, Culture and Society 25, no. 4: 31–56.
  • Hansen, M. 2015. Feed-forward: On the future of twenty-first century media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Harvey, J. 2013. The story of black. London: Reaktion Books.
  • Heritage, J. 1984. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • MacKenzie, A. 2005. The problem of the attractor: A singular generality between science and social theory. Theory, Culture and Society 22, no. 5: 45–65. doi: 10.1177/0263276405057190
  • Michael, M. 1997. Inoculating gadgets against ridicule. Science as Culture 6, no. 2: 167–193.
  • Michael, M. 2012. “What are we busy doing?”: Engaging the idiot. Science, Technology and Human Values 37, no. 5: 528–554.
  • Michael, M. 2018. On “aesthetic publics”: The case of VANTAblack®. Science, Technology and Human Values 43, no. 6: 1098–1121.
  • Mol, A. 2008. The logic of care: health and the problem of patient choice. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2011. Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science 41, no. 1: 85–106. doi: 10.1177/0306312710380301
  • Rosengarten, M., and M. Savransky. 2018. A careful biomedicine? Generalization and abstraction in RCTs. Critical Public Health, doi:10.1080/09581596.2018.1431387.
  • Savransky, M. 2016. The adventure of relevance: An ethics of social Inquiry. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Shaviro, S. 2014. The universe of things. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
  • Stengers, I. 2010a. Cosmopolitics I. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Stengers, I. 2010b. The care of the possible: Isabelle Stengers interviewed by Erik Bordeleau. SCAPEGOAT: Architechture/Landscape/Political Economy 1: 12–7. 27.
  • Tight, M. 2010. The curious case of case study: A viewpoint. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 13, no. 4: 329–39. doi: 10.1080/13645570903187181
  • Whitehead, A.N. 1929. Process and reality. An essay in cosmology. (Gifford Lectures of 1927-8). New York: The Free Press.
  • Whitehead, A.N. 1967. Science and the modern world. New York: The Free Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.