Welfare, corporatism, and criminal justice: comparing Durkheim and the new institutionalists

References

• Alexander, J.C. 2005. The inner development of Durkheim's sociological theory: From early writings to maturity. In The Cambridge companion to Durkheim, ed. J. C. Alexander, and P. Smith, 136–159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, V. 2012. Nordic exceptionalism revisited: Explaining the paradox of a Janus-faced penal regime. Theoretical Criminology 17, no. 1: 5–25. doi: 10.1177/1362480612468935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckett, K., and B. Western. 2001. Governing social marginality. Welfare, incarceration, and the transformation of state policy. In Mass imprisonment. Social causes and consequences, ed. D. Garland, 35–50. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Black, A. 1984. Guilds and civil society in European political thought from the twelfth century to the present. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Cavadino, M., and J. Dignan. 2002. The penal system. An introduction. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cavadino, M., and J. Dignan. 2006a. Penal policy and political economy. Criminology & Criminal Justice 6, no. 4: 435–456. doi: 10.1177/1748895806068581
   Google Scholar
• Cavadino, M., and J. Dignan. 2006b. Penal systems. A comparative approach. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cavadino, M., and J. Dignan. 2011. Penal comparisons: Puzzling relations. In International and comparative criminal justice and urban governance: Convergence and divergence in global, national and local settings, ed. A. Crawford, 193–213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crepaz, M.M.L., and R. Damron. 2009. Constructing tolerance. How the welfare state shapes attitudes about immigrants. Comparative Political Studies 42, no. 3: 437–463. doi: 10.1177/0010414008325576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Giorgi, A. 2006. Re-thinking the political economy of punishment. Perspectives on post-Fordism and penal politics. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Downes, D., and K. Hansen. 2006. Welfare and punishment in comparative perspective. In Perspectives on punishment. The contours of control, ed. S. Armstrong, and L. McAra, 133–154. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1915. The elementary forms of the religious life. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1933a. The division of labor in society. Glencoe: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1933b. Preface to the second edition. Some notes on occupational groups. In The division of labor in society, 1–31. Glencoe: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1938. The rules of sociological method. Glencoe: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1952. Suicide. A study in sociology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1957. Professional ethics and civic morals. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1973. Moral education. A study in the theory and application of the sociology of education. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1983. Two laws of penal evolution. In Durkheim and the law, ed. S. Lukes, and A. Scull, 102–132. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flora, P., and A.J. Heidenheimer. 1981. The historical core and changing boundaries of the welfare state. In The development of welfare states in Europe and America, ed. P. Flora, and A. J. Heidenheimer, 17–34. New Brunswick: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gane, M. 1984. Institutional socialism and the sociological critique of communism (introduction to Durkheim and Mauss). Economy and Society 13, no. 3: 304–330. doi: 10.1080/03085148400000011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland, D. 1990. Punishment and modern society. A study in social theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D. 2001. The culture of control. Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D. 2006. Concepts of culture in the sociology of punishment. Theoretical Criminology 10, no. 4: 419–447. doi: 10.1177/1362480606068873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland, D. 2013. Punishment and social solidarity. In The SAGE handbook of punishment and society, ed. J. Simon, and R. Sparks, 23–39. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1971. Durkheim's political sociology. The Sociological Review 19, no. 4: 477–519. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1971.tb00643.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A.W. 1962. Introduction. In Socialism, E. Durkheim, 7–31. New York: Collier Books.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, D.F. 1999. Punishment, division of labor, and social solidarity. In The criminology of criminal law, ed. W. S. Laufer, and F. Adler, 283–361. New Brunswick: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P.A., and D. Soskice. 2001. An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage, ed. P. A. Hall, and D. Soskice, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, M.J. 1994. Durkheim on occupational corporations: An exegesis and interpretation. Journal of the History of Ideas 55, no. 3: 461–481. doi: 10.2307/2709850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, J.E.S. 1960. Solidarist syndicalism: Durkheim and Duguit Part I. Sociological Review 8, no. 1: 17–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1960.tb02608.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, L. 2018. Durkheim on social justice: The argument from “organic solidarity”. American Political Science Review 112, no. 1: 112–124. doi: 10.1017/S000305541700048X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M. 2013. The public policy process. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, D., and R. Kleban. 2003. Political institutions, minorities, and punishment: A pooled cross-national analysis of imprisonment rates. Social Forces 82, no. 2: 725–755. doi: 10.1353/sof.2004.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joas, H. 1993. Durkheim's intellectual development. The problem of the emergence of new morality as a leitmotif in Durkheim's oeuvre. In Emile Durkheim. Sociologist and moralist, ed. S. P. Turner, 299–245. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karstedt, S. 2007. Explorations into the sociology of criminal justice and punishment: Leaving the modernist project behind. History of the Human Sciences 20, no. 2: 51–70. doi: 10.1177/0952695107076199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey, N. 2008. The prisoners’ dilemma. Political economy and punishment in contemporary democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, N. 2011. Why globalisation doesn't spell convergence: Models of institutional variation and the comparative political economy of punishment. In International and comparative criminal justice and urban governance: convergence and divergence in global, national and local settings, ed. A. Crawford, 214–250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, N. 2012. Political systems and criminal justice: The prisoners’ dilemma after the coalition. Current Legal Problems 65, no. 1: 203–239. doi: 10.1093/clp/cus002
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, N., D. Soskice, and D. Hope. 2018. Understanding the determinants of penal policy: Crime, culture, and comparative political economy. Annual Review of Criminology 1: 195–217. doi: 10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-091942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappi-Seppälä, T. 2008. Trust, welfare, and political culture: Explaining differences in national penal policies. Crime and Justice 37: 313–387. doi: 10.1086/525028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 2012. Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., and M. Roberts. 2013. Why institutions matter. The new institutionalism in political science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., and A. Scull. 1983. Introduction. In Durkheim and the law, ed. S. Lukes, and A. Scull, 1–32. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
   Google Scholar
• Mackert, J. 2004. Reorganization and stabilization. Social mechanisms in Émile Durkheim's Professional ethics and civic morals: A contribution to the explanation of social processes. Journal of Classical Sociology 4, no. 3: 311–336. doi: 10.1177/1468795X04046970
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F., and M. Dawson. 2014. Social solidarity, penal evolution and probation. The British Journal of Criminology 54, no. 5: 892–907. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azu042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G.H. 1918. The psychology of punitive justice. The American Journal of Sociology 23, no. 5: 577–602. doi: 10.1086/212795
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H. 1993. Durkheim's political sociology. In Emile Durkheim. Sociologist and moralist, ed. S. P. Turner, 95–110. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pashukanis, E. 1980. The general theory of law and Marxism. In Pashukanis: Selected writings on Marxism and law, ed. P. Beirne, and R. Sharlet, 40–131. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, J., and A. Eriksson. 2013. Contrasts in punishment. An explanation of Anglophone excess and Nordic exceptionalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, A. 2003. Conflict as a foundation for consensus: Contradictions of industrial capitalism in book III of Durkheim's Division of labor. Critical Sociology 29, no. 3: 295–335. doi: 10.1163/156916303322591095
   Google Scholar
• Rusche, G., and O. Kirchheimer. 1939. Punishment and social structure. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savelsberg, J.J. 1994. Knowledge, domination, and criminal punishment. American Journal of Sociology 99, no. 4: 911–943. doi: 10.1086/230367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapland, J. 2011. Restorative justice and states’ uneasy relationship with their publics. In International and comparative criminal justice and urban governance: Convergence and divergence in global, national and local settings, ed. A. Crawford, 439–460. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. 2013. Punishment and the political technologies of the body. In The SAGE handbook of punishment and society, ed. J. Simon, and R. Sparks, 60–89. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. 2008. Punishment and culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, J.R. 2013. The transformation of prison regimes in late capitalist societies. American Journal of Sociology 119, no. 3: 715–746. doi: 10.1086/675300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swank, D. 2002. Global capital, political institutions, and policy change in developed welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tiryakian, E.A. 1994. Revisiting sociology's first classic: The division of labor in society and its actuality. Sociological Forum 9, no. 1: 3–16. doi: 10.1007/BF01507701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiryakian, E.A., and J.H. Morgan. 2014. Solidarity, yesterday and today. In The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity. formulating a field of study, ed. V. Jeffries, 249–271. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Trägårdh, L. 1997. Statist individualism: On the culturality of the Nordic welfare state. In The cultural construction of Norden, ed. Ø Sørensen, and B. Stråth, 253–285. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trägårdh, L. 2017. On the gap between abstract and concrete tolerance. In Mechanisms of tolerance: An anthology, ed. E. Lundberg, 71–103. Stockholm: The Living History Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Waal, J., W. de Koster, and W. van Oorschot. 2013. Three worlds of welfare chauvinism? How welfare regimes affect support for distributing welfare to immigrants in Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 15, no. 2: 164–181. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2013.785147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, P.W. 1993. Durkheim's sociology of law. Morality and the cult of the individual. In Emile Durkheim. Sociologist and moralist, ed. S. P. Turner, 71–94. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2008. Urban outcasts. A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2009. Punishing the poor. The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, J.Q. 2003. Harsh justice. Criminal punishment and the widening divide between America and Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiarda, H.J. 1997. Corporatism and comparative politics. The other great “ism”. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W.R. 2015. Why restorative justice will not reduce incarceration. The British Journal of Criminology 55, no. 5: 883–900. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azu108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar